Soon after its introduction in 1987, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has become a technique widely employed in diagnostic medical devices and forensic science with the intention of amplifying genetic information. PCR prescribes that each of its cycles must include a heating subprocess at 95 °C or more (denominated DNA denaturation and provided for allowing a claimed orderly separation of the two complementary nucleotides strands), which can produce significant damage to DNA, caused by high-speed collisions with surrounding molecules. Since such disruption should be prevented in order to reliably employ PCR, a study of the mechanics of such loss of structural integrity is herein presented, preceded by a review of the fundamental literature which has elucidated the effects of molecular agitation on DNA fragmentation. The main conclusion of this retrospective survey is that the body of examined theoretical and experimental evidence consistently and redundantly confirms scarce resilience and significant loss of structural integrity when DNA is heated at temperatures above 90 °C, even for 1 minute. Such conclusion contradicts the claimed paradigm of PCR fidelity and raises the concern that, at least for long sequences, if PCR can amplify some information, such amplified information may be unreliable for diagnostic or forensic applications, since it originates from sequences of nucleotides subjected to random fragmentation and reaggregation. Such a low-reliability scenario should be preventively considered in the various fields where DNA amplification methodologies are employed which provide for high-temperature heating under conditions equal to or similar to those prescribed by the PCR protocols reviewed in this study.

Diagnostic tests were heralded as crucial during the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic with most of the key methods using bioanalytical approaches that detected larger molecules (RNA, protein antigens or antibodies) rather than conventional clinical biochemical techniques. Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs), like the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), and other molecular methods, like sequencing (that often work in combination with NAATs), were essential to the diagnosis and management during COVID-19. This was exemplified both early in the pandemic but also later on, following the emergence of new genetic SARS-CoV-2 variants. The 100 day mission to respond to future pandemic threats highlights the need for effective diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines. Of the three, diagnostics represents the first opportunity to manage infectious diseases while also being the most poorly supported in terms of the infrastructure needed to demonstrate effectiveness. Where performance targets exist, they are not well served by consensus on how to demonstrate they are being met; this includes analytical factors such as limit of detection (LOD) false positive results as well as how to approach clinical evaluation. The selection of gold standards or use of epidemiological factors such as predictive value, reference ranges or clinical thresholds are seldom correctly considered. The attention placed on molecular diagnostic tests during COVID-19 illustrates important considerations and assumptions on the use of these methods for infectious disease diagnosis and beyond. In this manuscript, we discuss state-of-the-art approaches to diagnostic evaluation and explore how they may be better tailored to diagnostic techniques like NAATs to maximise the impact of these highly versatile bioanalytical tools, both generally and during future outbreaks.

Streptococcus agalactiae [group B Streptococcus (GBS)] poses a major threat as the primary cause of early-onset neonatal invasive disease, particularly when mothers are colonized rectovaginally. Although culture remains the gold standard for antepartum GBS screening, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) offers advantages in terms of sensitivity and turnaround time. The aim of this study was to validate the clinical utility of an automated qPCR laboratory-developed test (LDT) for antepartum GBS screening using the Panther Fusion Open Access system (Hologic, California, USA). The LDT targeted a conserved region of the GBS surface immunogenic protein gene, demonstrating no cross-reactivity and high coverage (99.82%-99.99%). The limit of detection (LoD) was 118 CFU/mL. Comparison with commercial qPCR assays (Panther Fusion GBS and VIASURE Streptococcus B Real-Time) revealed an overall agreement of 99.7%, with a robust Cohen\'s kappa coefficient of 0.992. Testing of 285 rectovaginal swabs from pregnant women and 15 external quality assessment samples demonstrated exceptional diagnostic performance of the LDT, achieving a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 100%, underscoring its accuracy. Prevalence and predictive values were also determined to reinforce test reliability. Our research highlights the limitations of culture-based screening and supports the suitability of our qPCR-based LDT for GBS detection in a clinical setting.IMPORTANCERectovaginal colonization by GBS is a major risk factor for early-onset invasive neonatal disease. The most effective approach to reducing the incidence of early-onset disease (EOD) has been described as universal screening, involving assessment of GBS colonization status in late pregnancy and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Despite its turnaround time and sensitivity limitations, culture remains the gold standard method for GBS screening. However, nucleic acid amplification-based tests, such as qPCR, have been utilized due to their speed and high sensitivity and specificity. This study validated the clinical usefulness of an automated qPCR-LDT for antepartum GBS screening through the Panther Fusion Open Access system (Hologic). Our study addresses the critical need for more robust, sensitive, and rapid strategies for GBS screening in pregnant women that could favorably impact the incidence of EOD.

Forecasting COVID-19 waves helps with public health planning and resource allocation. Cycle threshold (Ct) values obtained from positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) results offer limited value for individual patient management, but real-time analysis of temporal trends of aggregated Ct values may provide helpful information to predict the trajectories of COVID-19 waves in the community. Ct value trends on 59,609 SARS-CoV-2 NAAT-positive results from 574,403 tests using a single testing assay system, between September 2021 and January 2023, were examined to monitor the trend of the proportion of positive NAAT with lower Ct values (≤28) in relation to changing COVID-19 case numbers over time. We applied regression with autoregressive integrated moving average errors modelling approach to study the relation between Ct values and case counts. We also developed an insight product to monitor the temporal trends with Ct values obtained from SARS-CoV-2 NAAT-positive results. In this study, the proportion of lower Ct values preceded by a range of 7-32 days the rising population COVID-19 testing rate reflecting onset of a COVID-19 wave. Monitoring population Ct values may assist in predicting increased disease activity.

OBJECTIVE: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is the leading cause of invasive infections in newborns. The prevention of GBS neonatal disease relies on the administration of an intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to GBS-colonized women. In recent years, rapid intrapartum detection of GBS vaginal colonization using real-time nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) emerged as an alternative to antenatal culture screening methods.
METHODS: We compared the performances of two loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) tests, the Ampliflash® GBS and the PlusLife® GBS tests, to standard culture for GBS detection in vaginal specimens from pregnant women. The study was conducted from April to July 2023 in a French hospital of the Paris area.
RESULTS: A total of 303 samples were analyzed, including 85 culture-positive samples (28.1%). The Ampliflash® GBS test and the PlusLife® GBS tests gave a result for 100% and 96.3% tests, respectively. The performances of the tests were as follows: sensitivity 87.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 78.3-92.6) and 98.7% (95% CI 93.0-99.8), specificity 99.1% (95% CI 96.7-99.8), and 91.9% (95% CI 87.3-95.0), respectively. False negative results of the Ampliflash® GBS test correlated with low-density GBS cultures. Time-to-results correlated with GBS culture density only for the PlusLife® GBS test (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques provide excellent analytical performances with high sensitivity and specificity together with a short turnaround time and results available in 10 to 35 min. Their potential to further reduce the burden of GBS neonatal disease compared with antenatal culture screening needs to be assessed in future clinical studies.

We conducted a comparative evaluation of the FDA-cleared Simplexa GBS Direct and ARIES GBS molecular assays for the detection of Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus, GBS) in 386 prospectively collected, broth-enriched vaginal/rectal swab specimens. The sensitivity of each test was 96.2% and specificity was ≥98.7% when compared to a combined direct and enriched culture method using chromogenic culture medium. A total of four specimens were called positive by both molecular assays but negative by culture, likely representing specimens with a low burden of GBS in these specimens. Two specimens were reported positive by culture but negative by both molecular assays. One of these specimens demonstrated atypically colored colonies on chromogenic agar; the other yielded typically colored colonies only observed after broth enrichment. Our data demonstrate equivalent performance of Simplexa and ARIES molecular assays for the detection of GBS in clinical specimens.IMPORTANCEClinical laboratories often face decisions regarding which of the multiple available molecular platforms would best fit their needs based on cost, workflow, menu, and diagnostic performance. Therefore, objective clinical comparisons of similar molecular tests are valuable resources to aid these decisions. We provide a clinical comparison of two FDA-cleared tests to routine culture and to each other that can be used by clinical laboratories when determining which of the available molecular platforms would best fit their laboratory in terms of workflow, cost, and performance.

More than one million curable sexually transmitted infections occur every day. Trichomonas vaginalis is one of the main infections responsible for these epidemiological data; however, the diagnosis of this protozoan is still mainly based on microscopic and culture identification. The commercialization of immunological tests and the development of molecular techniques have improved the sensitivity of classical methods. Nevertheless, the fact that trichomoniasis is a neglected parasitic infection hinders the development of novel techniques and their implementation in routine diagnosis. This review article shows the different methods developed to identify T. vaginalis in population and the difficulties in diagnosing male and asymptomatic patients. The importance of including this parasite in routine gynecological screening, especially in pregnant women, and the importance of considering T. vaginalis as an indicator of high-risk sexual behavior are also discussed.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presents critical diagnostic challenges for managing the pandemic. We investigated the 30-month changes in COVID-19 testing modalities and functional testing sites from the early period of the pandemic to the most recent Omicron surge in 2022 in Kyoto City, Japan.
This is a retrospective-observational study using a local anonymized population database that included patients\' demographic and clinical information, testing methods and facilities from January 2020 to June 2022, a total of 30 months. We computed the distribution of symptomatic presentation, testing methods, and testing facilities among cases. Differences over time were tested using chi-square tests of independence.
During the study period, 133,115 confirmed COVID-19 cases were reported, of which 90.9% were symptomatic. Although nucleic acid amplification testing occupied 68.9% of all testing, the ratio of lateral flow devices (LFDs) rapidly increased in 2022. As the pandemic continued, the testing capability was shifted from COVID-19 designated facilities to general practitioners, who became the leading testing providers (57.3% of 99,945 tests in 2022).
There was a dynamic shift in testing modality during the first 30 months of the pandemic in Kyoto City. General practitioners increased their role substantially as the use of LFDs spread dramatically in 2022. By comprehending and documenting the evolution of testing methods and testing locations, it is anticipated that this will contribute to the establishment of an even more efficient testing infrastructure for the next pandemic.

Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are frequently used in Clostridioides difficile research and diagnostic testing, but the effect of freezing specimens on C. difficile NAAT performance is not well characterized. This study evaluated the concordance of NAAT results between fresh and frozen specimens (fecal and rectal swabs) and found it to be very good to excellent. The results indicate that frozen fecal and rectal swab specimens may be used for C. difficile NAAT testing in research when fresh specimens are not available.

The nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) such as Xpert MTB/RIF have transformed the TB diagnostic field by significantly increasing the case detection. However, newer improved diagnostic assays are still needed to meet the WHO targets to end TB. Present study is based on a novel approach of utilizing the in-vivo expressed specific mycobacterial transcriptomic biomarkers for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). Total 61 subjects were recruited including smear positive (smear+; n = 15), smear negative (smear-; n = 30) PTB patients and disease controls (n = 16). Transcripts of three mycobacterial genes Rv0986, Rv0971c and Rv3121 were analyzed using real time PCR (qRT-PCR) in sputum samples. qRT-PCR with Rv0986, Rv0971c and Rv3121 identified smear + PTB patients with 100 %, 78.6 % and 86.7 % sensitivity respectively. In smear- PTB patients, both Rv0986 and Rv0971c based qRT-PCR resulted in 63 %, sensitivity whereas Rv3121 identified these patients with ∼40 % sensitivity only. The sensitivity of the assay for smear-patients increased to 85 % when combinatorial analysis of qRT-PCR data for all the three genes was used. Thus, in-vivo expressed mycobacterial transcripts have promising potential as biomarkers for PTB diagnosis.