Pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) are rare pancreatic malignant tumors, and comprehensive gene analyses are scarce. In this study, six NECs and six MiNENs were collected, immunohistochemistry for synaptophysin, chromogranin A, INSM1, Ki-67, and Rb was conducted, and KRAS mutational status was examined. Among these cases, comprehensive gene expression analysis of oncogene pathways using nCounter® were performed with six NECs and four MiNENs, and those data were compared with that of three pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs), with that of three normal pancreatic ducts, and with each other. By dividing NEC and MiNEN cases into KRAS-mutated group and KRAS-wild group, the difference of clinicopathological data and gene expression profiling data were examined between the two groups. Compared to the data of normal pancreatic epithelium, all 13 cancer-related pathways were upregulated in PDAC, MiNEN, and NEC group with more upregulation in this order. Compared to the data of PDAC, genes of DNA Damage repair pathway was most upregulated both in NECs and MiNENs. Regarding the difference between KRAS-mutated and KRAS-wild groups, several genes were differentially expressed between the two, where MMP7 was the upregulated gene with highest p-value and NKD1 was the downregulated gene with highest p-value in KRAS-mutated group. From the extent of upregulation of 13 pathways, MiNEN was considered more progressed stage than PDAC, and NEC was considered more progressed than MiNEN. From the comparison of KRAS-mutated and KRAS-wild NECs and MiNENs, several differentially expressed genes were identified in this study.

OBJECTIVE: Intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct (IPNB) are histologically and clinically classified as type 1 and 2. This study aimed to identify the differences between these two types.
METHODS: Based on multiple gene expression analysis (MGEA) using type 1, type 2, and pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (n=4, 6, and 5, respectively), immunohistochemistry of DNMT1 and methylation-specific PCR for p16, APC, BRCA1, hMLH1, TIMP3, and SOX17 were performed on type 1 and 2 IPNBs (n=14, each).
RESULTS: The DNMT1 protein was highly expressed (p<0.001) in 28.6% of type 1 cases and all type 2 cases. The DNA methylation ratio for the six genes in total as well as for SOX17 was lower in type 1 than in type 2 (p<0.05 each).
CONCLUSIONS: Type 2 IPNB showed increased DNMT1 protein expression and increased DNA methylation frequency of the examined tumor suppressor genes compared to type 1. DNMT1 IHC may be helpful in discriminating between these two types.