Multifactorial diseases

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(PPI)网络的背景下,分析复杂疾病表型的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据是有价值的,因为相关的病理生理学是由相互作用的多蛋白途径的功能引起的。分析可能包括设计和管理表型特异性GWAS元数据库,其中包含与PPI和其他生物学数据集相关的基因型和eQTL数据。以及为基于PPI网络的数据集成开发系统的工作流程,以实现蛋白质和途径优先排序。这里,我们对血压(BP)调节进行了这项分析。
    方法:在MicrosoftSQLServerBP-GWAS元数据库中实现的关系方案实现了组合存储:GWAS数据和从GWAS目录和文献中挖掘的属性,Ensembl定义的SNP转录本关联,和GTExeQTL数据。从PICKLEPPImeta数据库重建了BP蛋白相互作用组,扩展GWAS推导的网络,将所有GWAS蛋白连接到一个组件中的最短路径。最短路径中间体被认为是BP相关的。对于蛋白质优先排序,我们将一个新的基于GWAS的综合评分方案与两个基于网络的标准结合起来:一个标准考虑了蛋白质在通过最短路径(RbSP)相互作用的重建组中的作用,另一个新的标准是促进GWAS优先蛋白质的共同邻居.按满足的标准的数量对优先的蛋白质进行排序。
    结果:元数据库包括与1167个BP相关蛋白编码基因相关的6687个变异体。GWAS推导的PPI网络包括1065种蛋白质,672形成一个连接的组件。RbSP相互作用组包含1443个额外的,网络推导的蛋白质,表明基本上所有的BP-GWAS蛋白最多是第二邻居。通过基于GWAS或基于网络的标准中的任一个,从最显著的BP的联合中导出优先的BP-蛋白质组。它包括335种蛋白质,从BPPPI网络扩展中推导出~2/3,至少有两个标准确定了126个优先级。ESR1是唯一满足所有三个标准的蛋白质,排在前十名的是INSR,PTN11,CDK6,CSK,NOS3,SH2B3,ATP2B1,FES和FINC,满足两个RbSP相互作用组的途径分析揭示了许多生物过程,实际上在功能上支持与BP相关的功能,扩展了我们对BP监管的理解。
    结论:实施的工作流程可用于其他多因素疾病。
    BACKGROUND: It is valuable to analyze the genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data for a complex disease phenotype in the context of the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network, as the related pathophysiology results from the function of interacting polyprotein pathways. The analysis may include the design and curation of a phenotype-specific GWAS meta-database incorporating genotypic and eQTL data linking to PPI and other biological datasets, and the development of systematic workflows for PPI network-based data integration toward protein and pathway prioritization. Here, we pursued this analysis for blood pressure (BP) regulation.
    METHODS: The relational scheme of the implemented in Microsoft SQL Server BP-GWAS meta-database enabled the combined storage of: GWAS data and attributes mined from GWAS Catalog and the literature, Ensembl-defined SNP-transcript associations, and GTEx eQTL data. The BP-protein interactome was reconstructed from the PICKLE PPI meta-database, extending the GWAS-deduced network with the shortest paths connecting all GWAS-proteins into one component. The shortest-path intermediates were considered as BP-related. For protein prioritization, we combined a new integrated GWAS-based scoring scheme with two network-based criteria: one considering the protein role in the reconstructed by shortest-path (RbSP) interactome and one novel promoting the common neighbors of GWAS-prioritized proteins. Prioritized proteins were ranked by the number of satisfied criteria.
    RESULTS: The meta-database includes 6687 variants linked with 1167 BP-associated protein-coding genes. The GWAS-deduced PPI network includes 1065 proteins, with 672 forming a connected component. The RbSP interactome contains 1443 additional, network-deduced proteins and indicated that essentially all BP-GWAS proteins are at most second neighbors. The prioritized BP-protein set was derived from the union of the most BP-significant by any of the GWAS-based or the network-based criteria. It included 335 proteins, with ~ 2/3 deduced from the BP PPI network extension and 126 prioritized by at least two criteria. ESR1 was the only protein satisfying all three criteria, followed in the top-10 by INSR, PTN11, CDK6, CSK, NOS3, SH2B3, ATP2B1, FES and FINC, satisfying two. Pathway analysis of the RbSP interactome revealed numerous bioprocesses, which are indeed functionally supported as BP-associated, extending our understanding about BP regulation.
    CONCLUSIONS: The implemented workflow could be used for other multifactorial diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    近几十年来在遗传学和基因组学方面都取得了巨大的进步,以及信息技术(IT)。人类基因组的序列现在是已知的,虽然我们的知识还很不完整,在理解基因组如何工作方面取得了很大进展。随着存储容量的发展,人工智能,和学习算法,我们现在能够在很短的时间内学习和解释复杂的系统,如人类基因组。也许了解人类基因组的最重要目标是更好地了解疾病:它们是如何发展的;如何预防或减缓其过程;以及在疾病发展之后,如何治愈或缓解症状。绝大多数疾病都有遗传背景,即,基因,序列变异,基因-基因相互作用或多或少地在大多数疾病中发挥作用。因此,第一步是发现哪些基因,或基因组变异,在特定患者中引起或促成特定疾病的发展。鉴于一个人的基因组在他们的一生中几乎保持不变(除了一两个例外,比如癌症,这是由体细胞突变引起的),对每个人出生时的基因组进行测序可能被认为是有利的。在本文中,我们开始展示对每个人出生时的整个基因组进行测序的可能好处,同时也讨论了反对它的主要论点。
    Recent decades have brought enormous progress in both genetics and genomics, as well as in information technology (IT). The sequence of the human genome is now known, and although our knowledge is far from complete, great progress has been made in understanding how the genome works. With the developments in storage capacity, artificial intelligence, and learning algorithms, we are now able to learn and interpret complex systems such as the human genome in a very short time. Perhaps the most important goal of learning about the human genome is to understand diseases better: how they develop; how their processes can be prevented or slowed down; and after diseases have developed, how they can be cured or their symptoms alleviated. The vast majority of diseases have a genetic background, i.e., genes, sequence variations, and gene-gene interactions play a role in most diseases to a greater or lesser extent. Accordingly, the first step is to discover which genes, or genomic variants, cause or contribute to the development of a particular disease in a given patient. Given that an individual\'s genome remains virtually unchanged throughout their life (with one or two exceptions, such as in the case of cancer, which is caused by somatic mutations), it might be considered advantageous to sequence the genome of every person at birth. In this paper, we set out to show the possible benefits of sequencing the entire genome of every human being at birth, while also discussing the main arguments against it.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    设计和发现用于双靶标抑制剂的化合物对于合成新的,更安全,比单一靶点药物更有效的药物,特别是治疗多因素疾病,如癌症。多个靶标的同时调节可能代表了优化患者依从性和耐受性的替代合成方法。由于一些靶标的调节,将基于靶标的耐药性的风险降至最低。为此,我们首次设想了双配体σR/HDACi的设计和合成,以评估作为解决这一复杂疾病的创新候选人的可能性.在为几种肿瘤细胞系筛选的所有合成化合物中,化合物6(Kiσ1R=38±3.7;Kiσ2R=2917±769,HDACsIC50=0.59µM)是最有希望的抗增殖剂,对HCT116细胞系的IC50为0.9µM,对正常细胞无明显毒性。分子对接的研究,这证实了对σ1R的亲和力和泛HDACs抑制行为,支持两个目标之间可能的平衡亲和力和活性。
    Designing and discovering compounds for dual-target inhibitors is challenging to synthesize new, safer, and more efficient drugs than single-target drugs, especially to treat multifactorial diseases such as cancer. The simultaneous regulation of multiple targets might represent an alternative synthetic approach to optimize patient compliance and tolerance, minimizing the risk of target-based drug resistance due to the modulation of a few targets. To this end, we conceived for the first time the design and synthesis of dual-ligands σR/HDACi to evaluate possible employment as innovative candidates to address this complex disease. Among all synthesized compounds screened for several tumoral cell lines, compound 6 (Kiσ1R = 38 ± 3.7; Kiσ2R = 2917 ± 769 and HDACs IC50 = 0.59 µM) is the most promising candidate as an antiproliferative agent with an IC50 of 0.9 µM on the HCT116 cell line and no significant toxicity to normal cells. Studies of molecular docking, which confirmed the affinity over σ1R and a pan-HDACs inhibitory behavior, support a possible balanced affinity and activity between both targets.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在上位性分析中,单核苷酸多态性-基因之间的单核苷酸多态性相互作用(SSIs)可能,除了其他环境因素,影响多因素疾病的风险。为了识别案例和对照之间的SSI(即二元特征),由于潜在的疾病模型偏好和疾病复杂性,模型质量的得分受到不同目标函数(即测量)的影响。我们之前的研究提出了一种基于多目标方法的多因子降维(MOMDR),结果表明,两个目标函数可以增强具有弱边际效应的SSI识别。然而,使用MOMDR进行SSI识别仍然是一个挑战,因为尚未研究目标函数的最佳度量组合。本研究将MOMDR扩展到多目标版本(即多目标MDR,MaODR)通过基于双向列联表整合各种疾病概率措施,以改善病例和对照之间SSI的识别。我们引入了一种目标函数选择方法,以确定MaODR中10种著名措施中的最佳措施组合。总的来说,使用6种具有边际效应的疾病模型和40种没有边际效应的疾病模型来评估一般算法,即基于多因子降维的降维,MOMDR和MaODR。我们的结果表明,基于MaODR的三目标函数模型,正确的分类率,通过应用目标函数选择方法,似然比和归一化互信息(MaODR-CLN)的检测成功率(准确性)比MOMDR高6.47%,检测成功率比MDR高17.23%。在惠康信托案件控制联盟中,MaODR-CLN成功鉴定了与冠状动脉疾病相关的显著SSI(P<0.001)。我们进行了系统分析,以在10个目标函数中确定MaODR中的最佳度量组合。我们的组合检测到基于SSIs的二元性状具有弱的边际效应,从而减少了得分模型中的虚假变量。MOAI可在https://站点免费获得。google.com/view/maodr/home.
    In epistasis analysis, single-nucleotide polymorphism-single-nucleotide polymorphism interactions (SSIs) among genes may, alongside other environmental factors, influence the risk of multifactorial diseases. To identify SSI between cases and controls (i.e. binary traits), the score for model quality is affected by different objective functions (i.e. measurements) because of potential disease model preferences and disease complexities. Our previous study proposed a multiobjective approach-based multifactor dimensionality reduction (MOMDR), with the results indicating that two objective functions could enhance SSI identification with weak marginal effects. However, SSI identification using MOMDR remains a challenge because the optimal measure combination of objective functions has yet to be investigated. This study extended MOMDR to the many-objective version (i.e. many-objective MDR, MaODR) by integrating various disease probability measures based on a two-way contingency table to improve the identification of SSI between cases and controls. We introduced an objective function selection approach to determine the optimal measure combination in MaODR among 10 well-known measures. In total, 6 disease models with and 40 disease models without marginal effects were used to evaluate the general algorithms, namely those based on multifactor dimensionality reduction, MOMDR and MaODR. Our results revealed that the MaODR-based three objective function model, correct classification rate, likelihood ratio and normalized mutual information (MaODR-CLN) exhibited the higher 6.47% detection success rates (Accuracy) than MOMDR and higher 17.23% detection success rates than MDR through the application of an objective function selection approach. In a Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, MaODR-CLN successfully identified the significant SSIs (P < 0.001) associated with coronary artery disease. We performed a systematic analysis to identify the optimal measure combination in MaODR among 10 objective functions. Our combination detected SSIs-based binary traits with weak marginal effects and thus reduced spurious variables in the score model. MOAI is freely available at https://sites.google.com/view/maodr/home.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    未经批准:牙周炎影响全球多达10亿人,并已被证明与几种全身性炎症有关。这项研究调查了两种多因素疾病之间的特定关系:炎症性肠病(IBD)和牙周炎。要深入探究这个问题,我们单独调查IBD患者是否有更高的机会发展牙周炎,同样,牙周炎患者是否有更高的机会发展IBD。
    UNASSIGNED:在三个数据库中进行了系统搜索:MEDLINE,Cochrane试验,和Embase,2021年10月26日该协议已在PROSPERO注册。包括从任一方向调查IBD与牙周炎之间关联的所有合格研究。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表用于评估偏倚风险。作为主要结果,我们调查了IBD和牙周炎的患病率,并计算了比值比(OR)。我们的次要结果包括比较IBD患者与无IBD患者的临床牙周结果。
    未经评估:系统搜索产生了1,715条记录,其中14个符合定性合成条件,8个符合定量合成条件。根据主要结果的结果,IBD诊断与牙周炎的几率明显升高相关:OR=2.65(CI:2.09-3.36,I2=0(CI:0-0.75))。对于子组分析,我们分别调查了克罗恩病(CD)患者的几率:OR=2.22(CI:1.49~3.31,I2=0.05(CI:0~0.76))和溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者的几率:OR=3.52(CI:2.56~4.83,I2=0(CI:0~0.75));所有病例的几率均显著较高.两项研究调查了牙周炎患者是否更容易患IBD,两者都发现牙周炎与后续UC的风险显着相关,但不是随后的CD。然而,需要更多的研究来证明这种关联。
    UNASSIGNED:我们的分析证实,IBD患者患牙周炎的几率更高,并且是牙科领域的高风险人群。牙医和胃肠病学家都应该意识到这种关系,并且应该比健康人群更多地强调预防的重要性。
    UNASSIGNED:[https://www.crd.约克。AC.英国/普华永道/],标识符[CRD42021286161]。
    UNASSIGNED: Periodontitis affects up to one billion people worldwide, and has been proven to be associated with several systemic inflammatory conditions. This study investigates the specific relationship between two multifactorial diseases: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and periodontitis. To thoroughly explore this issue, we investigated separately whether IBD patients have a higher chance of developing periodontitis, and equally, whether patients with periodontitis have a higher chance of developing IBD.
    UNASSIGNED: The systematic search was performed in three databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane Trials, and Embase, up to 26 October 2021. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO. All eligible studies investigating the association between IBD and periodontitis from either direction were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias. As a primary outcome, we investigated the prevalence of IBD and periodontitis, and calculated the odds ratio (OR). Our secondary outcomes involved comparing the clinical periodontal outcomes of IBD patients to those of IBD-free patients.
    UNASSIGNED: The systematic search resulted in 1,715 records, 14 of which were eligible for qualitative synthesis and 8 for quantitative synthesis. On the basis of the results of the primary outcome, IBD diagnosis was associated with significantly higher odds of periodontitis: OR = 2.65 (CI: 2.09-3.36, I 2 = 0 (CI: 0-0.75)). For subgroup analysis, we investigated separately the odds in Crohn\'s disease (CD) patients: OR = 2.22 (CI: 1.49-3.31, I 2 = 0.05 (CI: 0-0.76)) and in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients: OR = 3.52 (CI: 2.56 to 4.83, I 2 = 0 (CI: 0-0.75)); the odds were significantly higher in all cases. Two studies investigated whether patients with periodontitis were more susceptible to IBD, and both found that periodontitis was significantly associated with the risk of subsequent UC, but not with subsequent CD. However, more studies are needed to prove an association.
    UNASSIGNED: Our analysis confirmed that IBD patients have a higher chance of developing periodontitis, and are a higher risk population in dentistry. Both dentists and gastroenterologists should be aware of this relationship and should emphasize the importance of prevention even more than in the healthy population.
    UNASSIGNED: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42021286161].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多因素疾病表现出复杂的病理生理学,其中有几个因素导致其发病机理和发展。此类疾病的实例是神经退行性疾病(例如G.老年痴呆症,帕金森氏症)和心血管疾病(例如。g.动脉粥样硬化,代谢综合征,糖尿病II)。传统的单靶点药物治疗方法已得到证实,在许多情况下,对于多因素疾病如糖尿病II的治疗不令人满意。目前已经确立的多靶点药物战略正在不断获得人们的兴趣和动力,作为一种更有效的方法。能够同时调节多个与疾病相关的靶标的药物分子的开发已经在各个领域有几个成功的例子,因此,启发了多靶点抗糖尿病药物的设计;这篇综述通过介绍几个成功的药效团组合的例子,在(多靶点)药物中调节两个或多个参与糖尿病II的分子靶点,强调了这种方法用于改善抗糖尿病药物的设计方面和功效。导致一个优越的抗高血糖的特点。
    Multifactorial diseases exhibit a complex pathophysiology with several factors contributing to their pathogenesis and development. Examples of such disorders are neurodegenerative (e. g. Alzheimer\'s, Parkinson\'s) and cardiovascular diseases (e. g. atherosclerosis, metabolic syndrome, diabetes II). Traditional therapeutic approaches with single-target drugs have been proven, in many cases, unsatisfactory for the treatment of multifactorial diseases such as diabetes II. The well-established by now strategy of multitarget drugs is constantly gaining interest and momentum, as a more effective approach. The development of pharmacomolecules able to simultaneously modulate multiple relevant-to-the-disease targets has already several successful examples in various fields and has, as such, inspired the design of multitarget antidiabetic agents; this review highlights the design aspect and efficacy of this approach for improved antidiabetics by presenting several examples of successful pharmacophore combinations in (multitarget) agents that modulate two or more molecular targets involved in diabetes II, resulting in a superior antihyperglycemic profile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多靶点抗阿尔茨海默药是非常深入研究的焦点。通过对1990-2020年期间出版物的全面文献计量分析,我们确定了可能指导未来方向的趋势和潜在差距。我们发现:(i)到2011年出版物数量激增,到2020年继续上升;(ii)与基于融合或合并药效团或特权结构的设计方法相比,连接药效团策略更受欢迎;(iii)大量的体内研究,主要采用东莨菪碱诱导的健忘症小鼠模型,已经表演了,特别是2017年以来;(Iv)中国,意大利和西班牙是这一主题出版物总数最多的国家,而葡萄牙,西班牙和意大利是科学界对此主题产生最大兴趣的国家;(v)乙酰胆碱酯酶,β-淀粉样蛋白聚集,氧化应激,丁酰胆碱酯酶,和生物金属螯合及其二元组合是最常见的追求,而基于其他关键目标的组合,例如tau聚合,糖原合成酶激酶-3β,NMDA受体,而其他70多个目标只被少量考虑。这些结果可能使我们能够发现基于创新靶标组合的新设计机会,以扩大和多样化多靶标候选药物的库,并增加找到这种破坏性疾病的有效疗法的可能性。
    Multitarget anti-Alzheimer agents are the focus of very intensive research. Through a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the publications in the period 1990-2020, we have identified trends and potential gaps that might guide future directions. We found that: (i) the number of publications boomed by 2011 and continued ascending in 2020; (ii) the linked-pharmacophore strategy was preferred over design approaches based on fusing or merging pharmacophores or privileged structures; (iii) a significant number of in vivo studies, mainly using the scopolamine-induced amnesia mouse model, have been performed, especially since 2017; (iv) China, Italy and Spain are the countries with the largest total number of publications on this topic, whereas Portugal, Spain and Italy are the countries in whose scientific communities this topic has generated greatest interest; (v) acetylcholinesterase, β-amyloid aggregation, oxidative stress, butyrylcholinesterase, and biometal chelation and the binary combinations thereof have been the most commonly pursued, while combinations based on other key targets, such as tau aggregation, glycogen synthase kinase-3β, NMDA receptors, and more than 70 other targets have been only marginally considered. These results might allow us to spot new design opportunities based on innovative target combinations to expand and diversify the repertoire of multitarget drug candidates and increase the likelihood of finding effective therapies for this devastating disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前对具有复杂病理机制的多因素疾病的发现证实,与单靶标药物相比,多靶标药物是更有效的治疗方法。然而,设计多目标配体,必须考虑到许多因素和挑战。
    从这个角度来看,总结了多靶点药物治疗神经退行性疾病等复杂疾病的概念,精神分裂症,糖尿病,和癌症。我们讨论了多功能配体的靶标选择方面以及计算机模拟方法在其设计和优化中的应用。此外,我们强调了其他挑战,例如平衡对不同靶标的亲和力和所获得化合物的药物相似性。最后,我们介绍了设计用于治疗常见复杂疾病的多靶标配体的成功案例。
    尽管多靶配体的设计带来了许多挑战,这些努力是值得的。适当的目标选择,活动平衡,和配体药物相似度属于作用于多个靶标的配体设计中的关键方面。应该强调的是,在计算机方法中,特别是反向对接,药效团建模,机器学习方法和来自网络药理学的方法是设计多靶点药物的有价值的工具。
    Current findings on multifactorial diseases with a complex pathomechanism confirm that multi-target drugs are more efficient ways in treating them as opposed to single-target drugs. However, to design multi-target ligands, a number of factors and challenges must be taken into account.
    In this perspective, we summarize the concept of application of multi-target drugs for the treatment of complex diseases such as neurodegenerative diseases, schizophrenia, diabetes, and cancer. We discuss the aspects of target selection for multifunctional ligands and the application of in silico methods in their design and optimization. Furthermore, we highlight other challenges such as balancing affinities to different targets and drug-likeness of obtained compounds. Finally, we present success stories in the design of multi-target ligands for the treatment of common complex diseases.
    Despite numerous challenges resulting from the design of multi-target ligands, these efforts are worth making. Appropriate target selection, activity balancing, and ligand drug-likeness belong to key aspects in the design of ligands acting on multiple targets. It should be emphasized that in silico methods, in particular inverse docking, pharmacophore modeling, machine learning methods and approaches derived from network pharmacology are valuable tools for the design of multi-target drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    食管闭锁伴或不伴气管食管瘘(EA/TEF)是最常见的先天性上消化道畸形。这项研究代表了第一个全基因组关联研究(GWAS),以确定EA/TEF的风险位点。我们使用了欧洲病例对照样品,包括764例EA/TEF患者和5,778例对照,并在三个基因座观察到全基因组的显着关联。在CTNNA3基因内的10q21染色体上(p=2.11×10-8;比值比[OR]=3.94;95%置信区间[CI],3.10-5.00),在染色体16q24上靠近FOX基因簇(p=2.25×10-10;OR=1.47;95%CI,1.38-1.55)和染色体17q12上靠近基因HNF1B(p=3.35×10-16;OR=1.75;95%CI,1.64-1.87)。接下来,我们在四个选定的胚胎时间点对大鼠胚胎进行了食道/气管转录组分析。根据这些数据和已经公布的数据,所有3个GWAS基因座的相关基因都是EA/TEF发育的有希望的候选基因.我们还分析了单标记水平之外的遗传EA/TEF架构,这揭示了估计的基于单核苷酸多态性(SNP)的遗传力约为37%±14%的标准偏差。此外,我们检查了EA/TEF的多基因性,发现EA/TEF的多基因性比其他复杂遗传疾病少。总之,我们的研究结果有助于更好地理解ET/TEF的潜在遗传结构,同时鉴定3个风险位点和候选基因.
    Esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) is the most common congenital malformation of the upper digestive tract. This study represents the first genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify risk loci for EA/TEF. We used a European case-control sample comprising 764 EA/TEF patients and 5,778 controls and observed genome-wide significant associations at three loci. On chromosome 10q21 within the gene CTNNA3 (p = 2.11 × 10-8; odds ratio [OR] = 3.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.10-5.00), on chromosome 16q24 next to the FOX gene cluster (p = 2.25 × 10-10; OR = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.38-1.55) and on chromosome 17q12 next to the gene HNF1B (p = 3.35 × 10-16; OR = 1.75; 95% CI, 1.64-1.87). We next carried out an esophageal/tracheal transcriptome profiling in rat embryos at four selected embryonic time points. Based on these data and on already published data, the implicated genes at all three GWAS loci are promising candidates for EA/TEF development. We also analyzed the genetic EA/TEF architecture beyond the single marker level, which revealed an estimated single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based heritability of around 37% ± 14% standard deviation. In addition, we examined the polygenicity of EA/TEF and found that EA/TEF is less polygenic than other complex genetic diseases. In conclusion, the results of our study contribute to a better understanding on the underlying genetic architecture of ET/TEF with the identification of three risk loci and candidate genes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号