UNASSIGNED: To explore the effectiveness of prostate biopsy density in predicting prostate cancer under cognitive and systematic biopsy mode in multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI).
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of 204 patients who were suspected of having prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels less than 50 ng mL-1 and underwent cognitive and systematic biopsy through the perineal approach in our hospital from 2022 to 2023. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the odds ratios of prostate biopsy density and relevant clinical indicators. Logistic regression analysis was performed to establish a predictive model combining indicators with predictive value. The predictive value of each indicator and the new model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC).
UNASSIGNED: The detection rate of prostate cancer in the study population was 32.35%. Multivariate analysis showed that age, PSAD, PI-RADS 2.1 score, and prostate biopsy density were independent predictors of prostate cancer. The ROC curve analysis revealed an AUC of 0.707 (95% CI 0.625-0.790) for biopsy density, with a cutoff value of approximately 0.22 needle mL-1. The best predictive model consisted of age, PSAD, PI-RADS 2.1 score, and biopsy density, with an AUC of 0.857.
UNASSIGNED: Biopsy density is associated with the detection of prostate cancer, with a critical value of 0.22 needle mL-1. Combining biopsy density with other clinical indicators can significantly improve the ability to predict prostate cancer and avoid unnecessary prostate biopsy cores.

In the study of the deep learning classification of medical images, deep learning models are applied to analyze images, aiming to achieve the goals of assisting diagnosis and preoperative assessment. Currently, most research classifies and predicts normal and cancer cells by inputting single-parameter images into trained models. However, for ovarian cancer (OC), identifying its different subtypes is crucial for predicting disease prognosis. In particular, the need to distinguish high-grade serous carcinoma from clear cell carcinoma preoperatively through non-invasive means has not been fully addressed. This study proposes a deep learning (DL) method based on the fusion of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) data, aimed at improving the accuracy of preoperative ovarian cancer subtype classification. By constructing a new deep learning network architecture that integrates various sequence features, this architecture achieves the high-precision prediction of the typing of high-grade serous carcinoma and clear cell carcinoma, achieving an AUC of 91.62% and an AP of 95.13% in the classification of ovarian cancer subtypes.

OBJECTIVE: Accurate identification of primary breast cancer and axillary positive-node response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is important for determining appropriate surgery strategies. We aimed to develop combining models based on breast multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinicopathologic characteristics for predicting therapeutic response of primary tumor and axillary positive-node prior to treatment.
METHODS: A total of 268 breast cancer patients who completed NAC and underwent surgery were enrolled. Radiomics features and clinicopathologic characteristics were analyzed through the analysis of variance and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm. Finally, 24 and 28 optimal features were selected to construct machine learning models based on 6 algorithms for predicting each clinical outcome, respectively. The diagnostic performances of models were evaluated in the testing set by the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.
RESULTS: Of the 268 patients, 94 (35.1 %) achieved breast cancer pathological complete response (bpCR) and of the 240 patients with clinical positive-node, 120 (50.0 %) achieved axillary lymph node pathological complete response (apCR). The multi-layer perception (MLP) algorithm yielded the best diagnostic performances in predicting apCR with an AUC of 0.825 (95 % CI, 0.764-0.886) and an accuracy of 77.1 %. And MLP also outperformed other models in predicting bpCR with an AUC of 0.852 (95 % CI, 0.798-0.906) and an accuracy of 81.3 %.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study established non-invasive combining models to predict the therapeutic response of primary breast cancer and axillary positive-node prior to NAC, which may help to modify preoperative treatment and determine post-NAC surgery strategy.

We sought to quantify the additive value of systematic biopsy (SB) using in-bore magnetic resonance (MR)-guided prostate biopsy (IBMRGpB) by retrospectively reviewing the records of 189 patients who underwent IBMRGpB for suspected prostate cancer or as part of the surveillance protocol for previously diagnosed prostate cancer. The endpoints included clinically significant and non-clinically significant cancer diagnosis. SB detected clinically significant disease in 67 (35.5%) patients. Five (2.65%) patients whose targeted biopsies indicated benign or non-clinically significant disease had clinically significant disease based on SB. SB from the lobe contralateral to the lesion detected clinically significant disease in 15 (12%) patients. The size of the prostate was larger and the percentage of lesions located in the peripheral zone of the prostate was higher in patients with SB-detected clinically significant disease. The location of the main lesion in the peripheral zone of the prostate was a predictor for clinically significant disease in the multivariate analysis (OR = 8.26, p = 0.04), a finding supported by a subgroup analysis of biopsy-naïve patients (OR = 10.52, p = 0.034). The addition of SB during IBMRGpB increased the diagnosis of clinically significant as well as non-clinically significant prostate cancer. The location of the main lesion in the peripheral zone emerged as a positive predictive factor for clinically significant disease based on SB. These findings may enhance patient-tailored management.

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) is introduced and established as a noninvasive alternative for prostate cancer (PCa) detection and characterization.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a mutually communicated deep learning segmentation and classification network (MC-DSCN) based on mp-MRI for prostate segmentation and PCa diagnosis.
METHODS: The proposed MC-DSCN can transfer mutual information between segmentation and classification components and facilitate each other in a bootstrapping way. For classification task, the MC-DSCN can transfer the masks produced by the coarse segmentation component to the classification component to exclude irrelevant regions and facilitate classification. For segmentation task, this model can transfer the high-quality localization information learned by the classification component to the fine segmentation component to mitigate the impact of inaccurate localization on segmentation results. Consecutive MRI exams of patients were retrospectively collected from two medical centers (referred to as center A and B). Two experienced radiologists segmented the prostate regions, and the ground truth of the classification refers to the prostate biopsy results. MC-DSCN was designed, trained, and validated using different combinations of distinct MRI sequences as input (e.g., T2-weighted and apparent diffusion coefficient) and the effect of different architectures on the network\'s performance was tested and discussed. Data from center A were used for training, validation, and internal testing, while another center\'s data were used for external testing. The statistical analysis is performed to evaluate the performance of the MC-DSCN. The DeLong test and paired t-test were used to assess the performance of classification and segmentation, respectively.
RESULTS: In total, 134 patients were included. The proposed MC-DSCN outperforms the networks that were designed solely for segmentation or classification. Regarding the segmentation task, the classification localization information helped to improve the IOU in center A: from 84.5% to 87.8% (p < 0.01) and in center B: from 83.8% to 87.1% (p < 0.01), while the area under curve (AUC) of PCa classification was improved in center A: from 0.946 to 0.991 (p < 0.02) and in center B: from 0.926 to 0.955 (p < 0.01) as a result of the additional information provided by the prostate segmentation.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed architecture could effectively transfer mutual information between segmentation and classification components and facilitate each other in a bootstrapping way, thus outperforming the networks designed to perform only one task.

BACKGROUND: Targeted dose-escalation and reduction of dose to adjacent organs at risk have been the main goal of radiotherapy in the last decade. Prostate cancer benefited the most from this process. In recent years, the development of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) radically changed clinical practice, also thanks to the availability of modern imaging techniques. The aim of this paper is to explore the relationship between diagnostic imaging and prostate cancer radiotherapy techniques.
METHODS: Aiming to provide an overview of the integration between modern imaging and radiotherapy techniques, we performed a non-systematic search of papers exploring the predictive value of imaging before treatment, the role of radiomics in predicting treatment outcomes, implementation of novel imaging in RT planning and influence of imaging integration on use of RT in current clinical practice. Three independent authors (GF, IM and ID) performed an independent review focusing on these issues. Key references were derived from a PubMed query. Hand searching and clinicaltrials.gov were also used, and grey literature was searched for further papers of interest. The final choice of papers included was discussed between all co-authors.
RESULTS: This paper contains a narrative report and a critical discussion of the role of new modern techniques in predicting outcomes before treatment, in radiotherapy planning and in the integration with systemic therapy in the management of prostate cancer. Also, the role of radiomics in a tailored treatment approach is explored.
CONCLUSIONS: Integration between diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy is of great importance for the modern treatment of prostate cancer. Future clinical trials should be aimed at exploring the real clinical benefit of complex workflows in clinical practice.

UNASSIGNED: Use of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scoring system allowed more precise detection of prostate cancer (PCa). Our study aimed at evaluating the diagnostic performance of mp-MRI in detection of PCa.
UNASSIGNED: Eighty-six patients suspected to have prostate cancer were enrolled. All patients underwent mp-MRI followed by systematic and targeted trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsies. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of mp-MRI were evaluated.
UNASSIGNED: Forty-six patients (53.5%) had prostate cancer on targeted and systematic TRUS biopsies. On mp-MRI, 96.6% of lesions with PI-RADS < 3 revealed to be benign by TRUS biopsy, 73.3% of lesions with PI-RADS 4 showed ISUP grades ≥1, whereas all PI-RADS 5 lesions showed high ISUP grades ≥ 3. For PI-RADS 3 lesions, 62.5% of them revealed to be benign and 37.5% showed ISUP grades ≥1 by TRUS biopsy. PI-RADS scores ˃3 had 69.57% sensitivity and 85% specificity for detection of PCa. On adding the equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions, PI-RADS scores ≥3 had higher sensitivity (97.83%), but at the cost of lower specificity (32.5%).
UNASSIGNED: Mp-MRI using PI-RADS V2 scoring system categories ≤3 and >3 could help in detection of PCa. PI-RADS 3 lesions are equivocal. Including PI-RADS lesions ≥3 demonstrated higher sensitivity, but at the cost of lower specificity for mp-MRI in diagnosis for Pca.
UNASSIGNED: CDR: cancer detection rates; DRE: digital rectal examination; ISUP: international society of urological pathology; mp-MRI: multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging; NPV: negative predictive value; PCa: prosatate cancer; PI-RADS: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System; PPV: Positive predictive value; PSA: prostate specific antigen; TRUS: transrectal ultrasound.

Identification of muscle-invasive status (MIS) of bladder cancer (BCa) is critical for treatment decisions. The Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) has been widely used in preoperatively predicting MIS using tri-parametric MR imaging including T2-weighted (T2W), diffusion-weighted (DW), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) sequences. While the diagnostic values of radiomics features from bi-parametric MRI such as T2W + DW to identification of MIS have been reported, whether the tri-parametric MRI could provide additional diagnostic value to the radiomics prediction task, and how to integrate DCE features into the radiomics model, which is the objectives of this study, remain unknown.
Patients with postoperatively confirmed BCa lesions (150 in non-muscle-invasive BCa and 56 in muscle-invasive BCa groups) were retrospectively included. Their T2W, DW with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and DCE sequences were acquired using a 3.0T MR system. Regions of interest were manually depicted and VI-RADS scores were assessed by three radiologists. Three predictive models were developed by the radiomics features extracted from sequence combinations of T2W + DW (Model one), T2W + DCE (Model two), and T2W + DW + DCE (Model three), respectively, using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The performance of each model was quantitatively assessed on both the training (n = 165) and testing (n = 41) cohorts. Then a 10 times five-fold cross validation was conducted to assess the overall performance.
Three models achieved area under the curve of 0.888, 0.869, and 0.901 in the cross validation, respectively. The tri-parametric model performed significantly superior than the two bi-parametric models and VI-RADS. The analysis of feature coefficients derived from least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm showed features from the tri-parametric MRI are effective in MIS discrimination.
The tri-parametric MRI provides additional value to the radiomics-based identification of MIS.

OBJECTIVE: Tumour size measurement is pivotal for staging and stratifying patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). However, computed tomography (CT) frequently underestimates tumour size due to insufficient depiction of the tumour rim. CT-derived fractal dimension (FD) maps might help to visualise perfusion chaos, thus allowing more realistic size measurement.
METHODS: In 46 patients with histology-proven PDA, we compared tumour size measurements in routine multiphasic CT scans, CT-derived FD maps, multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and, where available, gross pathology of resected specimens. Gross pathology was available as reference for diameter measurement in a discovery cohort of 10 patients. The remaining 36 patients constituted a separate validation cohort with mpMRI as reference for diameter and volume.
RESULTS: Median RECIST diameter of all included tumours was 40 mm (range: 18-82 mm). In the discovery cohort, we found significant (p = 0.03) underestimation of tumour diameter on CT compared with gross pathology (Δdiameter3D = -5.7 mm), while realistic diameter measurements were obtained from FD maps (Δdiameter3D = 0.6 mm) and mpMRI (Δdiameter3D = -0.9 mm), with excellent correlation between the two (R2 = 0.88). In the validation cohort, CT also systematically underestimated tumour size in comparison to mpMRI (Δdiameter3D = -10.6 mm, Δvolume = -10.2 mL), especially in larger tumours. In contrast, FD map measurements agreed excellently with mpMRI (Δdiameter3D = +1.5 mm, Δvolume = -0.6 mL). Quantitative perfusion chaos was significantly (p = 0.001) higher in the tumour rim (FDrim = 4.43) compared to the core (FDcore = 4.37) and remote pancreas (FDpancreas = 4.28).
CONCLUSIONS: In PDA, fractal analysis visualises perfusion chaos in the tumour rim and improves size measurement on CT in comparison to gross pathology and mpMRI, thus compensating for size underestimation from routine CT.
CONCLUSIONS: • CT-based measurement of tumour size in pancreatic adenocarcinoma systematically underestimates both tumour diameter (Δdiameter = -10.6 mm) and volume (Δvolume = -10.2 mL), especially in larger tumours. • Fractal analysis provides maps of the fractal dimension (FD), which enable a more reliable and size-independent measurement using gross pathology or multi-parametric MRI as reference standards. • FD quantifies perfusion chaos-the underlying pathophysiological principle-and can separate the more chaotic tumour rim from the tumour core and adjacent non-tumourous pancreas tissue.

Preoperative identification of rectal cancer lymph node status is crucial for patient prognosis and treatment decisions. Rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an essential role in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer, but its ability to predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) is insufficient. This study explored the value of histogram features of primary lesions on multi-parametric MRI for predicting LNM of stage T3 rectal carcinoma.
We retrospectively analyzed 175 patients with stage T3 rectal cancer who underwent preoperative MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) before surgery. 62 patients were included in the LNM group, and 113 patients were included in the non-LNM group. Texture features were calculated from histograms derived from T2 weighted imaging (T2WI), DWI, ADC, and T2 maps. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to screen independent predictors of LNM from clinical features, imaging features, and histogram features. Predictive performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Finally, a nomogram was established for predicting the risk of LNM.
The clinical, imaging and histogram features were analyzed by stepwise logistic regression. Preoperative carbohydrate antigen 199 level (p = 0.009), MRN stage (p < 0.001), T2WIKurtosis (p = 0.010), DWIMode (p = 0.038), DWICV (p = 0.038), and T2-mapP5 (p = 0.007) were independent predictors of LNM. These factors were combined to form the best predictive model. The model reached an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.860, with a sensitivity of 72.8% and a specificity of 85.5%.
The histogram features on multi-parametric MRI of the primary tumor in rectal cancer were related to LN status, which is helpful for improving the ability to predict LNM of stage T3 rectal cancer.