BACKGROUND: Opioid rotation can be indicated due to drug side effects, drug interactions or inadequate effect of treatment with opioids. For the determination of the oral morphine equivalence, a practice tool has been published with the long-term use of opioids in chronic nontumor-related pain (LONTS) guidelines. In contrast, several apps are available that have not yet been evaluated.
METHODS: Apps and web applications for opioid conversion were searched using Google Play Store®, iOS App Store® and the Google® search engine. German and English language apps with calculator functions were included. Using the apps, 16 test cases from clinical practice were calculated and the deviation from the recommendation of the LONTS guidelines was calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 17 apps were identified, 11 named the origin of the algorithm and 3 of them defined the literature sources. None of the apps and web applications had a quality seal, and none could solve all cases. Deviations of the resulting oral morphine equivalents of up to 179% from the guideline-compliant conversion were identified and 4 apps warned for overdosing.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the apps and web applications simplify conversion between opioids, there is high variance in conversion factors and sometimes a relevant deviation from evidence-based tables. Overall, there is a high risk of false opioid dosing.
UNASSIGNED: HINTERGRUND: Aufgrund von Arzneimittelnebenwirkungen, Medikamenteninteraktionen oder wegen inadäquater Wirkung bei der Behandlung mit Opioiden kann eine Opioidrotation indiziert sein. Zur Bestimmung der oralen Morphinäquivalenz ist mit der Leitlinie „Langzeitanwendung von Opioiden bei chronischen nicht-tumorbedingten Schmerzen (LONTS)“ ein Praxiswerkzeug veröffentlicht. Dem gegenüber stehen mehrere Apps, die bislang nicht bewertet wurden.
METHODS: Mittels Google Play Store®, iOS App Store® und der Suchmaschine Google® wurden Apps zur Opioidkonversion gesucht. Deutsch- und englischsprachige Apps mit Kalkulatorfunktion wurden eingeschlossen. Mit den Apps wurden 16 Testfälle aus der klinischen Praxis kalkuliert und die Abweichung von der Empfehlung der LONTS-Leitlinie berechnet.
UNASSIGNED: Insgesamt wurden 17 Apps identifiziert. Elf benannten die Herkunft des Algorithmus, 3 davon benannten Literaturquellen. Keine App wies ein Qualitätssiegel auf, zudem ließen sich mit keiner App sämtliche Fälle lösen. Es wurden Abweichungen der resultierenden oralen Morphinäquivalente um +179 % von der leitliniengerechten Umrechnung identifiziert. Vier Apps warnten vor Überdosierungen.
UNASSIGNED: Obwohl die Apps die Umrechnung zwischen Opioiden vereinfachen, besteht eine hohe Varianz der Umrechnungsfaktoren und teils eine große Abweichung von evidenzbasierten Tabellen. Insgesamt besteht ein hohes Risiko von Opioidfehldosierungen.

Patients with head and neck cancer represent a vulnerable population at particular risk of opioid dependence due to frequent histories of substance abuse, requirement of extensive surgery, and the synergistic toxicity of multimodal therapy. Regional anesthetic techniques have been used by other surgical disciplines to facilitate early recovery after surgery and decrease postoperative patient narcotic requirements. This pilot study investigates the efficacy of a preoperative regional analgesia using stellate ganglion block in lateralized head and neck cancer surgery. From our early results, stellate ganglion blockade may hold promise as an effective preoperative intervention for controlling early postoperative pain, lessening narcotic requirements, and improving quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: One of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery may be reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery. However, reliable comparisons of robot-assisted (RARP) vs. open radical prostatectomy (ORP) addressing perioperative pain regimen are scarce.
METHODS: We identified 420 consecutive treated patients who underwent RARP (n = 254) vs. ORP (n = 166) for clinically localized prostate cancer in 2017. After 1:1 propensity score matching for age, body mass index, D\'Amico risk classification and lymph node yield, intra- and postoperative pain medication doses, as well as pain perception expressed by the numeric rating scale were assessed in uni- and multivariable analyses.
RESULTS: Median age was 64.9 years. Operation time was significantly shorter in ORP patients (155 vs. 175 min in RARP, p < 0.001). Overall, a median of 12.5 vs. 12 g of metamizol was administered in RARP vs. ORP patients (p = 0.2). Additionally, a median of 146.7 vs. 133.9 mg of morphine equivalent was administered in RARP vs. ORP patients (p < 0.001). The mean maximum pain perceived on day 0 was 3.2 vs. 3.6 in RARP vs. ORP patients (p = 0.1). It decreased within the following days, and again, no differences between the two groups were observed. All results were confirmed in multivariable analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: When comparing RARP vs. ORP, a small increase in perioperative morphine administration at RARP may be expected. However, when assessing pain perception, no differences were observed between the two groups. Moreover, mean maximum pain perceived was very low, which may reassure patients, who are counselled for radical prostatectomy.

Opioid consumption in China has been very less and has varied widely since 1995. The representatively high level of consumption in Mainland China has never been reported. Our aim was to describe the consumption trends and prescription patterns of opioids in Nanjing, a highly developed city of Mainland China, and compare the results with selected worldwide regions.
Application data of opioids in 2011-2016 were extracted from the Jiangsu Medicine Information Institute. Six opioids were included. Consumption was expressed in terms of defined daily doses (DDDs), morphine equivalents (MEs) and expenditure. The correlation between consumption of opioids and gross domestic product (GDP), Human Development Index (HDI) and cancer incidence was analysed by Pearson\'s correlation test.
DDDs, expenditure and MEs of opioids were, respectively, 256.04, $599.24 and 13.07 g in 2011, and increased to 361.27, $1041.79 and 18.09 g in 2016. DDDs in Nanjing were 2.80-fold that in Mainland China, 1.42-fold that in East and South-East Asia, but only equivalent to 8.89% of the worldwide average level. From 2011 to 2016, the consumption had a linear correlation with GDP, HDI and cancer incidence (p<0.05). However, DDDs varied greatly in countries with similar GDP or HDI. Within 45 Asian countries, the GDP only contributed to 10.47% of change in DDDs, while the HDI contributed to 20.32%. Consumption of non-intravenous opioids or strong opioids always comprised majority of the total consumption. The opioids prescribed predominantly were fentanyl, oxycodone and morphine. Fentanyl and oxycodone account for most of the increase in consumption.
Opioid consumption has increased >40% from 2011 to 2016, with consumption of fentanyl and oxycodone accounting for most of that increase. The consumption in Nanjing was higher than the average Chinese level, but lower than the global average. An increase in pain control services might be needed, but this need should be highly regulated.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be associated with significant pain which can negatively impact outcomes. Multiple strategies have been employed to reduce pain. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of 3 different pain management modalities after TKA that included (1) our standardized knee injection cocktail and oral acetaminophen, (2) liposomal bupivacaine periarticular injection and oral acetaminophen, and (3) our standardized knee injection cocktail and intravenous (IV) acetaminophen.
A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted with 3 perioperative pain management regimes: oral acetaminophen and our standardized knee injection cocktail (standard group), oral acetaminophen and liposomal bupivacaine periarticular injection (LB group), and IV acetaminophen and our standardized knee injection cocktail (IVA group). Primary outcome measures included visual analog scale, total morphine equivalents, and the opioid-related symptoms distress scale at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.
There were no significant differences on visual analog scale/opioid-related symptoms distress scale scores 24 hours after surgery. The LB group required significantly more narcotics (total morphine equivalents) than the standard (P = .025) and IVA groups (P = .032). No significant differences were observed on any of the outcomes measured at 48 hours after surgery.
Our data suggest that there is no added benefit in the routine use of IV acetaminophen or liposomal bupivacaine after TKA.