Molecular methods

分子方法
  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    正坦病毒感染的实验室诊断主要基于血清学。然而,为了确诊的血清学诊断,评估后续血清样本是必不可少的,这是耗时的,并导致延迟。实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)测试,如果是积极的,提供即时和明确的诊断,并准确识别病原体,其中血清学的辨别性质是次优的。我们重新评估了2014年7月至2016年4月在Twente和Achterhoek的荷兰地区的疑似正坦病毒临床病例的血清中是否存在Puumala正坦病毒(PUUV),图拉正坦病毒(TULV),和首尔正州病毒(SEOV)RNA。PUUVRNA检测到的血清总数(n=85)的11%,在50%的抗PUUV/TULVIgM阳性血清中(n=16),并且在1.4%的血清中抗PUUV/TULVIgM阴性或不确定(n=69)。没有发现存在TULV或SEOV病毒RNA的证据。基于这些发现,我们提出了两种算法来实现实时RT-PCR检测在常规的正畸病毒诊断,这可以最佳地为临床医生提供早期确诊的诊断,并可以防止可能的进一步侵入性测试和治疗。
    目的:将实时逆转录聚合酶链反应试验添加到常规的正坦病毒诊断中可能比单独使用标准血清学试验更好地帮助临床决策。临床医生和临床微生物学家对这一优势的认识可能最终导致过度住院和不必要的侵入性诊断程序的减少。
    Laboratory diagnosis of orthohantavirus infection is primarily based on serology. However, for a confirmed serological diagnosis, evaluation of a follow-up serum sample is essential, which is time consuming and causes delay. Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests, if positive, provide an immediate and definitive diagnosis, and accurately identify the causative agent, where the discriminative nature of serology is suboptimal. We re-evaluated sera from orthohantavirus-suspected clinical cases in the Dutch regions of Twente and Achterhoek from July 2014 to April 2016 for the presence of Puumala orthohantavirus (PUUV), Tula orthohantavirus (TULV), and Seoul orthohantavirus (SEOV) RNA. PUUV RNA was detected in 11% of the total number (n = 85) of sera tested, in 50% of sera positive for anti-PUUV/TULV IgM (n = 16), and in 1.4% of sera negative or indeterminate for anti-PUUV/TULV IgM (n = 69). No evidence was found for the presence of TULV or SEOV viral RNA. Based on these findings, we propose two algorithms to implement real-time RT-PCR testing in routine orthohantavirus diagnostics, which optimally provide clinicians with early confirmed diagnoses and could prevent possible further invasive testing and treatment.
    OBJECTIVE: The addition of a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test to routine orthohantavirus diagnostics may better aid clinical decision making than the use of standard serology tests alone. Awareness by clinicians and clinical microbiologists of this advantage may ultimately lead to a reduction in over-hospitalization and unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    引言抗菌素耐药性(AMR)已成为一种威胁,在全球细菌物种中传播。AMR现在被认为是导致治疗失败的无声大流行。因此,有必要建立有效的监测机制,以了解从人体临床标本中分离出的细菌种类.本研究采用下一代测序(NGS)或全基因组测序(WGS)来鉴定抗性和毒力基因,序列类型,和血清型。方法本研究包括18例多药耐药(MDR)肺炎克雷伯菌(K。肺炎)从患有不同感染的患者中获得的分离株,这些患者参加了Prathima医学科学研究所,Karimnagar,印度。所有分离物均已鉴定,和抗菌药物敏感性曲线通过常规微生物技术确定,并通过自动化系统确认。使用NGS或WGS对所有分离株进行了研究,以鉴定编码抗性的基因,如超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBLs),金属-β-内酰胺酶,和毒力基因。进行多位点序列分型(MLST)以鉴定序列类型,进行了Kleborate分析以确认该物种,AMR的基因,和毒力,并评估分离株携带的荚膜多糖(KL)和细胞壁/脂多糖(O)血清型。结果患者平均年龄为46.11±20.35岁。在包括的患者中,男性12例(66.66%),女性6例(33.33%)。观察到高百分比(>50%)的具有编码AMR的基因的高毒力肺炎克雷伯氏菌(hvKp)菌株和具有携带blaNDM和抗性基因的潜力的质粒。在分离物中,16(88.88%)揭示了多种抗生素抗性基因的存在,证据表明至少有一种基因编码β-内酰胺酶抗性。blaSHV(17/18;94.44%)和blaCTX-M-15(16/18;88.88%)AMR基因的患病率较高。鉴定的其他AMR基因包括blaTEM(83.33%;15/18)和blaOXA(14/18;77.77%)。两个(11.11%)菌株各自显示blaNDM-1和blaNDM-5基因的存在。鉴定的毒力基因包括gapA,infb,mdh,PGI,phoE,rpoB,tonB,还有ybt.最常见的肺炎克雷伯菌血清型是KL51:O1v2(3/18,16.66%),KL17:O1v1(3/18,16.66%),和KL64:O2v1(3/18,16.66%)。KL64(4/18;22.22%)是分离株中最常见的荚膜血清型。最常见的基于MLST的序列类型(ST)包括ST-147(5/18,27.77%),其次是ST-231(3/18,16.66%)和ST-101(2/18,11.11%)。结论肺炎克雷伯菌分离株的分子分析显示存在多种AMR,质粒,和毒力基因。此外,MLST注意到了许多全球ST。结果注意到hvKp菌株的高流行率。使用NGS/WGS进行细菌菌株的分子表征对于了解细菌菌株的流行病学以及它们可能携带的抗生素抗性和毒力基因很重要。从这项研究中获得的数据可用于设计谨慎的抗生素处方方法并改善患者管理实践。
    Introduction Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a menace, spreading among bacterial species globally. AMR is now recognized as a silent pandemic responsible for treatment failures. Therefore, an effective surveillance mechanism is warranted to understand the bacterial species isolated from human clinical specimens. The present study employed next-generation sequencing (NGS) or whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to identify the resistance and virulence genes, sequence type, and serotypes. Methods This study included 18 multidrug-resistant (MDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) isolates obtained from patients suffering from different infections attending the Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences, Karimnagar, India. All isolates were identified, and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles were determined through conventional microbiological techniques and confirmed by automated systems. All the isolates were investigated using NGS or WGS to identify the genes coding for resistance, such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), metallo-beta-lactamases, and virulence genes. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was conducted to identify the sequence types, and Kleborate analysis was performed to confirm the species, genes for AMR, and virulence and evaluate the capsular polysaccharide (KL) and cell wall/lipopolysaccharide (O) serotypes carried by the isolates. Results The mean age of the patients was 46.11±20.35 years. Among the patients included, 12 (66.66%) were males and 6 (33.33%) were females. A high percentage (>50%) of hypervirulent K. pneumoniae (hvKp) strains that had genes coding for AMR and plasmids having the potential to carry blaNDM and resistance genes were observed. Among the isolates, 16 (88.88%) revealed the presence of multiple antibiotic-resistant genes with evidence of at least one gene coding for beta-lactamase resistance. There was a high prevalence of blaSHV (17/18; 94.44%) and blaCTX-M-15 (16/18; 88.88%) AMR genes. Other AMR genes identified included blaTEM (83.33%; 15/18) and blaOXA (14/18; 77.77%). Two (11.11%) strains each showed the presence of blaNDM-1 and blaNDM-5 genes. The virulence genes identified included gapA, infB, mdh, pgi, phoE, rpoB, tonB, and ybt. The most frequent K. pneumoniae serotypes found were KL51:O1v2 (3/18, 16.66%), KL17:O1v1 (3/18, 16.66%), and KL64:O2v1 (3/18, 16.66%). KL64 (4/18; 22.22%) was the most common capsular serotype identified among the isolates. The most frequent MLST-based sequence type (ST) identified included ST-147 (5/18, 27.77%), followed by ST-231 (3/18, 16.66%) and ST-101 (2/18, 11.11%). Conclusions The molecular analysis of K. pneumoniae isolates revealed multiple AMR, plasmid, and virulence genes. Additionally, many global STs were noticed by MLST. The results noted a high prevalence of hvKp strains. Molecular characterization of bacterial strains using NGS/WGS is important to understand the epidemiology of bacterial strains and the antibiotic resistance and virulence genes they are potentially carrying. The data obtained from this study may be utilized to devise careful antibiotic-prescribing approaches and improve patient management practices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:淋病奈瑟菌是引起性传播感染的最重要的致病生物之一。淋病的临床表现模仿其他性传播感染的症状,因此,正确的诊断在患者管理中至关重要。当前的研究旨在比较不同的内部分子方法:即,常规PCR,实时PCR,和用于检测淋病奈瑟菌的LAMP测定法。方法:从145例尿道和阴道分泌物患者中收集163例样本。收集的样品在GC琼脂基础上进行处理以进行培养,和三种不同的分子诊断测试(常规PCR,实时PCR,和LAMP测定)对所有样品同时进行。结果:21份拭子样本中有17份(80.9%)淋病奈瑟菌培养阳性。以文化为黄金标准的方法,常规和实时PCR的灵敏度为94.1%,而LAMP检测的灵敏度为88.2%。所有三种方法具有100%的特异性。除了拭子样本,通过不同的分子方法评估尿液样品产生了良好的一致性,常规PCR和实时PCR的kappa值为0.85,显示出完美的一致性。而LAMP测定被发现具有实质性的一致性。结论:LAMP测定法与其他分子方法检测淋病奈瑟菌的诊断准确性相当,可在资源有限的环境中用作即时测试。
    Background: Neisseria gonorrhoeae is one of the most important causative organisms in causing sexually transmitted infections. The clinical presentation of gonorrhoea mimics the symptoms of other sexually transmitted infections, and a proper diagnosis of the same is therefore crucial in patient management. The current study intended to compare different in-house molecular methods: that is, conventional PCR, real-time PCR, and LAMP assay for detection of N. gonorrhoeae. Methods: A total of 163 samples were collected from 145 patients who presented with urethral and vaginal discharge. Collected samples were processed for culture on GC agar base, and three different molecular diagnostic tests (conventional PCR, real-time PCR, and LAMP assay) were performed simultaneously on all the samples. Results: Culture of N. gonorrhoeae was positive in 17 out of 21 (80.9%) swab samples. With culture as the gold standard method, conventional and real-time PCR had a sensitivity of 94.1%, whereas the sensitivity of the LAMP assay was found to be 88.2%. All three methods had a specificity of 100%. In addition to swab samples, evaluation of urine samples by different molecular methods yielded a good concordance with a kappa value of 0.85 by conventional PCR and real-time PCR showing a perfect level of agreement, while the LAMP assay was found to have a substantial level of agreement. Conclusion: LAMP assay had a comparable diagnostic accuracy to other molecular methods for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae and can be used as a point-of-care test in resource-limited settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耳念珠菌是一种多药耐药的机会性真菌病原体,能够引起严重的感染和医疗保健相关的爆发。筛查金黄色葡萄球菌的定植已成为常规,并在许多医院和医疗机构中被推荐作为感染控制和预防策略。随后,由于目前没有FDA批准的测试,临床微生物学实验室已开始负责开发使用轴向和腹股沟筛查拭子检测C.auris的方案。在美国病理学家学院认可的大型学术医疗中心设置中,我们实施了实验室开发的核酸扩增测试,用于检测C.aurisDNA。我们的测试验证评估了DiaSorinC.auris引物组的性能,该引物组用于LIAISONMDX热循环仪和SimplexaUniversalDisc.该方法灵敏度高、特异性强,检测限为1-2CFU/反应,没有观察到与其他念珠菌的交叉反应。,细菌皮肤共生生物或常见的病毒。当与基于培养的检测方法并行运行时,PCR检测具有100%的敏感性和特异性。分析是精确的,在运行内和运行之间的重复之间具有低变异性。最后,预分析因素,包括拭子存放时间,温度,和运输媒体,进行了评估,发现在可变浓度下对C.auris的检测没有显着影响。一起来看,这项研究扩展了C.auris核酸检测的可用选项,并表征了在高容量和低量实验室环境中实施的预分析因素。
    目的:本研究概述了在美国病理学家认可的临床实验室中,用于检测耳念珠菌的分子筛查工具的验证和实施。这种分子实验室开发的测试既高度敏感又特异,与传统的基于标准护理文化的工作相比,显着节省了卫生系统的成本,并大大减少了周转时间。这种方法和工作流程对支持临床微生物学诊断和帮助医院住院患者具有重要意义。和感染预防控制筛查。
    Candida auris is a multidrug-resistant opportunistic fungal pathogen capable of causing serious infections and healthcare-associated outbreaks. Screening for colonization with C. auris has become routine and is recommended in many hospitals and healthcare facilities as an infection control and prevention strategy. Subsequently, and since there are currently no FDA-approved tests for this purpose, clinical microbiology laboratories have become responsible for developing protocols to detect C. auris using axial and inguinal screening swabs. In a College of American Pathologists-accredited large academic healthcare center setting, we implemented a laboratory-developed nucleic-acid amplification test for the detection of C. auris DNA. Our test validation evaluated the performance of the DiaSorin C. auris primer set used in a real-time qualitative PCR assay on the LIAISON MDX thermocycler with the Simplexa Universal Disc. The assay was highly sensitive and specific, with a limit of detection of 1-2 CFU/reaction, with no observed cross-reactivity with other Candida spp., bacterial skin commensal organisms or commonly encountered viruses. When run in parallel with a culture-based detection method, the PCR assay was 100% sensitive and specific. The assay was precise, with low variability between replicates within and between runs. Lastly, pre-analytical factors, including swab storage time, temperature, and transport media, were assessed and found to have no significant effect on the detection of C. auris at variable concentrations. Taken together, this study expands the available options for nucleic acid detection of C. auris and characterizes pre-analytical factors for implementation in both high- and low-volume laboratory settings.
    OBJECTIVE: This study overviews the validation and implementation of a molecular screening tool for the detection of Candida auris in a College of American Pathologist-accredited clinical laboratory. This molecular laboratory-developed test is both highly sensitive and specific and has significant health-system cost-savings associated with significantly reduced turn-around-time compared to traditional standard-of-care culture-based work up. This method and workflow is of interest to support clinical microbiology diagnostics and to help aid in hospital inpatient, and infection prevention control screening.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的检测依赖于通过毒素抗原检测或PCR方法检测患者的粪便。尽管PCR和抗原方法显著缩短了结果产生时间,粪便收集的延迟会大大增加周转时间。使用直肠拭子检测艰难梭菌可以大大减少诊断CDI的时间。我们开发了一种用于检测艰难梭菌的新的快速PCR测定法,并在粪便和直肠拭子标本上评估了该PCR测定法。我们共招募了623例疑似艰难梭菌感染的患者。从每位患者收集粪便样品和直肠拭子,并通过我们的PCR测定法进行测试。还通过细胞毒性中和测定(CCNA)测试粪便样品作为参考。PCR检测在60例粪便标本和61例直肠拭子中检测到艰难梭菌,64例患者的粪便样本通过CCNA检测为艰难梭菌阳性。PCR检测检测到另外35和36个粪便和直肠拭子标本艰难梭菌阳性,分别,粪便和直肠拭子的敏感性为93.8%和95.3%,特异性为93.7%和93.6%,阳性预测值为63.2%和62.9%,阴性预测值为99.2%和99.4%。在粪便或直肠拭子上使用PCR检测艰难梭菌产生可靠和相似的结果。在直肠拭子上使用PCR测试可以减少CDI检测的周转时间,从而改善CDI管理和控制艰难梭菌传播。
    目的:艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是医疗保健相关性腹泻的主要原因,导致高发病率,死亡率,和经济负担。在临床实验室,目前对从腹泻患者收集的粪便样品进行CDI测试。然而,收集粪便样本所需的时间会延迟CDI的诊断.可以通过使用直肠拭子代替粪便样品来克服样品收集的障碍。我们的研究表明,通过我们实验室在粪便和直肠拭子标本上开发的新PCR检测方法,可以快速可靠地鉴定CDI。在直肠拭子上使用PCR测试可以减少检测CDI的时间并改善这种感染的管理。它还应该为感染控制从业者提供有用的替代方案,以更好地控制艰难梭菌的传播。
    The detection of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) relies on testing the stool of patients by toxin antigen detection or PCR methods. Although PCR and antigenic methods have significantly reduced the time to results, delays in stool collection can significantly add to the turnaround time. The use of rectal swabs to detect C. difficile could considerably reduce the time to diagnosis of CDI. We developed a new rapid PCR assay for the detection of C. difficile and evaluated this PCR assay on both stool and rectal swab specimens. We recruited a total of 623 patients suspected of C. difficile infection. Stool samples and rectal swabs were collected from each patient and tested by our PCR assay. Stool samples were also tested by the cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA) as a reference. The PCR assay detected C. difficile in 60 stool specimens and 61 rectal swabs for the 64 patients whose stool samples were positive for C. difficile by CCNA. The PCR assay detected an additional 35 and 36 stool and rectal swab specimens positive for C. difficile, respectively, for sensitivity with stools and rectal swabs of 93.8% and 95.3%, specificity of 93.7% and 93.6%, positive predictive values of 63.2% and 62.9%, and negative predictive values of 99.2% and 99.4%. Detection of C. difficile using PCR on stools or rectal swabs yielded reliable and similar results. The use of PCR tests on rectal swabs could reduce turnaround time for CDI detection, thus improving CDI management and control of C. difficile transmission.
    OBJECTIVE: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea, resulting in high morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. In clinical laboratories, CDI testing is currently performed on stool samples collected from patients with diarrhea. However, the diagnosis of CDI can be delayed by the time required to collect stool samples. Barriers to sample collection could be overcome by using a rectal swab instead of a stool sample. Our study showed that CDI can be identified rapidly and reliably by a new PCR assay developed in our laboratory on both stool and rectal swab specimens. The use of PCR tests on rectal swabs could reduce the time for the detection of CDI and improve the management of this infection. It should also provide a useful alternative for infection-control practitioners to better control the spread of C. difficile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    分子方法已成为微生物鉴定的微生物研究的组成部分。本文献综述着重于分子方法在医疗机构中检查空气传播的细菌和真菌中的应用。2024年1月,在受人尊敬的数据库中进行了全面的电子搜索,包括PubMed,WebofScience,还有Scopus,采用精心选择的关键词,如((细菌)或(病毒)或(真菌))和(气溶胶)和((医院)或(医疗保健)或(牙科诊所))和((分子)或(PCR)或(NGS)或(RNA)或(DNA)或(宏基因组)或(微阵列)),遵循PRISMA协议。该评论特别针对致病菌浓度升高的医疗保健环境。初步确定共487篇,但只有13人符合纳入标准并被纳入审查.该研究表明,评估气溶胶质量的流行分子方法包括利用PCR方法,结合16SrRNA(细菌)或18SrRNA(真菌)扩增技术。值得注意的是,五种不同的分子技术,特别是PFGE,DGGE,SBT,LAMP,和DNA杂交方法,在五项不同的研究中实施。与传统的细菌和真菌培养物相比,这些分子测试表现出卓越的能力,提供精确的应变识别。此外,分子方法允许检测与抗生素抗性相关的基因序列。总之,与经典的微生物培养相比,分子检测具有显著的优势,提供更全面的信息。
    Molecular methods have become integral to microbiological research for microbial identification. This literature review focuses on the application of molecular methods in examining airborne bacteria and fungi in healthcare facilities. In January 2024, a comprehensive electronic search was carried out in esteemed databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, employing carefully selected keywords such as ((bacteria) OR (virus) OR (fungi)) AND (aerosol) AND ((hospital) OR (healthcare) OR (dental office)) AND ((molecular) OR (PCR) OR (NGS) OR (RNA) OR (DNA) OR (metagenomic) OR (microarray)), following the PRISMA protocol. The review specifically targets healthcare environments with elevated concentrations of pathogenic bacteria. A total of 487 articles were initially identified, but only 13 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The study disclosed that the prevalent molecular methodology for appraising aerosol quality encompassed the utilization of the PCR method, incorporating either 16S rRNA (bacteria) or 18S rRNA (fungi) amplification techniques. Notably, five diverse molecular techniques, specifically PFGE, DGGE, SBT, LAMP, and DNA hybridization methods, were implemented in five distinct studies. These molecular tests exhibited superior capabilities compared to traditional bacterial and fungal cultures, providing precise strain identification. Additionally, the molecular methods allowed the detection of gene sequences associated with antibiotic resistance. In conclusion, molecular testing offers significant advantages over classical microbiological culture, providing more comprehensive information.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    海洋细菌在共生中起着至关重要的作用,生物地球化学循环,并产生用于制药的新型生物活性化合物和酶,生物燃料和生物技术产业。目前,对海洋细菌功能及其产品的调查主要基于表型观察,-omic型方法和异源基因表达。为了提高我们对海洋细菌的理解,并充分发挥其在工业应用中的潜力,至关重要的是,我们必须拥有适当的工具和资源来就地对它们进行基因操纵。然而,目前主要为大肠杆菌等模式生物设计的遗传工具,产生低转化效率或在海洋细菌中没有转移能力。为了改善海洋细菌的遗传操作应用,我们需要改进的转化方法,如结合和电穿孔,除了识别更多的海洋广域宿主质粒。在这次审查中,我们旨在概述已报道的海洋细菌转化方法,并讨论在提高效率的背景下每种方法的注意事项。此外,我们进一步讨论了海洋质粒和未来的研究领域,包括CRISPR工具及其在海洋细菌中的潜在应用。
    Marine bacteria play vital roles in symbiosis, biogeochemical cycles and produce novel bioactive compounds and enzymes of interest for the pharmaceutical, biofuel and biotechnology industries. At present, investigations into marine bacterial functions and their products are primarily based on phenotypic observations, -omic type approaches and heterologous gene expression. To advance our understanding of marine bacteria and harness their full potential for industry application, it is critical that we have the appropriate tools and resources to genetically manipulate them in situ. However, current genetic tools that are largely designed for model organisms such as E. coli, produce low transformation efficiencies or have no transfer ability in marine bacteria. To improve genetic manipulation applications for marine bacteria, we need to improve transformation methods such as conjugation and electroporation in addition to identifying more marine broad host range plasmids. In this review, we aim to outline the reported methods of transformation for marine bacteria and discuss the considerations for each approach in the context of improving efficiency. In addition, we further discuss marine plasmids and future research areas including CRISPR tools and their potential applications for marine bacteria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    牛病毒性腹泻病毒(BVDV)是牛病毒性腹泻(BVD)的病原体,这给全球养牛业带来了巨大的经济损失。幸运的是,已经建立了各种可用于BVDV的诊断方法。它们包括病因方法,如病毒分离(VI);血清学方法,如酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),免疫荧光分析(IFA),和免疫组织化学(IHC);分子方法,例如逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR),实时PCR,数字液滴PCR(ddPCR),环介导等温扩增(LAMP),重组酶聚合酶扩增(RPA),和CRISPR-Cas系统;和生物传感器。本文综述了目前BVDV的诊断方法,讨论它们的优点和缺点,并提出了BVDV诊断的未来观点,旨在为BVD疾病的有效诊断和控制提供有价值的指导。
    Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) is the causative agent of bovine viral diarrhea (BVD), which results in significant economic losses in the global cattle industry. Fortunately, various diagnostic methods available for BVDV have been established. They include etiological methods, such as virus isolation (VI); serological methods, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunofluorescence assay (IFA), and immunohistochemistry (IHC); molecular methods, such as reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), real-time PCR, digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), and CRISPR-Cas system; and biosensors. This review summarizes the current diagnostic methods for BVDV, discussing their advantages and disadvantages, and proposes future perspectives for the diagnosis of BVDV, with the intention of providing valuable guidance for effective diagnosis and control of BVD disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    通过核酸扩增试验(NAAT)检测细菌RNA,如逆转录PCR(RT-PCR)和逆转录环介导等温扩增(RT-LAMP),与基于DNA的方法相比,它具有明显的优势。然而,这样的测定也提出了挑战,在确定阳性和内部控制材料,可以可靠地监测成功的所有阶段的测试(细菌裂解,核酸回收,逆转录,扩增,和信号检测):由于它们无法区分细菌RNA转录本的扩增和编码它们的DNA模板,使用完整的生物体作为对照可以告知细胞裂解,但不能成功检测RNA。我们开发了一种基于RNA的细菌NAAT的控制策略,可以使用自剪接细菌内含子从DNA模板中轻松区分RNA,这些核酸最终编码不同的序列。基于这个原理,我们设计了两个编码合成转基因的载体,一种在革兰氏阴性菌大肠杆菌中具有活性,一种在大肠杆菌和革兰氏阳性菌金黄色葡萄球菌中均起作用。我们随后设计了RT-LAMP测定,其靶向来自转基因生物的RNA和DNA或专门靶向RNA,并证明了使用纯化的核酸扩增的特异性。使用热裂解标本的多重荧光RT-LAMP,我们展示了在临床诊断测试过程中部署此类转基因生物作为内部对照以确定样品完整性和测定性能的实用性。我们的方法对基于RNA的细菌NAAT具有广泛的实用性,特别是即时测定和其他应用,其中核酸被非特异性释放用于测试。
    Detection of bacterial RNA by nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), such as reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), offers distinct advantages over DNA-based methods. However, such assays also present challenges in ascertaining positive and internal control material that can reliably monitor success over all phases of testing (bacterial lysis, nucleic acid recovery, reverse transcription, amplification, and signal detection): since they are unable to distinguish between amplification of bacterial RNA transcripts and the DNA templates that encode them, using intact organisms as controls can inform cell lysis but not successful detection of RNA. We developed a control strategy for RNA-based bacterial NAATs that allows ready discrimination of RNA from DNA templates using self-splicing bacterial introns, such that those nucleic acids ultimately encode different sequences. We engineered two vectors encoding synthetic transgenes based on this principle, one that is active in the Gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli and one that functions in both E. coli and the Gram-positive organism Staphylococcus aureus. We subsequently designed RT-LAMP assays that either target RNA and DNA from transgenic organisms or target RNA exclusively and demonstrated the specificity of amplification using purified nucleic acids. Using multiplex fluorescent RT-LAMP of heat-lysed specimens, we showed the practicality of deploying such transgenic organisms as an internal control to ascertain sample integrity and assay performance during clinical diagnostic testing. Our approach has broad utility for RNA-based bacterial NAATs, especially point-of-care assays and other applications where nucleic acids are nonspecifically liberated for testing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号