目的:本研究旨在测试中国孕妇盆底肌肉训练的可行性和可接受性,并促进女性对盆底肌肉训练计划的坚持。
背景:尿失禁是全球女性普遍存在的健康问题,尤其是孕妇。建议将有监督的盆底肌肉训练作为尿失禁的一线保守治疗。然而,盆底肌肉训练的实施和效果受到人力资源不足和依从性低的限制。基于团体的干预措施可以通过促进同伴支持来提高人们对干预措施的依从性。然而,在有限数量的产妇研究中对其进行了调查。
方法:可行性测试随机对照试验,伴随着混合方法过程评估。
方法:本研究由医学研究理事会复杂干预措施框架和行为改变轮指南指导制定干预措施。三个阶段,本研究采用混合方法设计。这项研究报告了基于小组的盆底肌肉训练计划的可行性。干预后进行了半结构化审查,以探讨该方案的可接受性。
结果:该研究包括48名孕妇,招募率为52.17%。对培训方案的依从率为66.67%。干预得到了积极的评价,特别是促进参与者坚持的支持,但未来的试验需要对该方案进行额外的修改。
结论:以小组为基础的盆底肌肉训练计划提供了一种在中国有限的卫生专业人员进行盆底肌肉训练的可能方法。该研究显示了有关干预措施的可接受性和可行性的有希望的结果,孕妇和助产士都很清楚。
结论:以小组为基础的盆底肌肉训练可能有可能降低医疗保健专业人员不足的孕妇的尿失禁患病率。
结论:本研究评估了在中国孕妇中实施基于群体的盆底肌肉训练的可行性。孕妇和助产士都可以接受以小组为基础的盆底肌肉训练,但整合在线和面对面的会议需要考虑。这项研究的发现为中国孕妇提供基于群体的盆底肌肉训练提供了证据。
■该研究遵循了CONSORT指南(表S1)和TIDier检查表(表S2)。
■在制定干预措施期间,已邀请患者和公众作为利益相关者。他们与医疗保健专业人员合作,共同设计了基于小组的盆底肌肉训练计划。
背景:该试验在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT05242809)上注册,标题为“中国南京市产前妇女基于群体的PFMT计划的开发和可行性测试”。
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to test the feasibility and acceptability of a group-based pelvic floor muscle training for pregnant women in China and facilitate women\'s adherence to the pelvic floor muscle training programme.
BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence is a prevalent health problem in women worldwide, especially in pregnant women. Supervised pelvic floor muscle training is recommended as the first-line conservative treatment for urinary incontinence. However, the implementation and effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training are limited by insufficient human resources and low adherence. Group-based interventions may improve people\'s adherence to interventions by facilitating peer support. However, it has been investigated in a limited number of maternity studies.
METHODS: Feasibility testing randomized controlled trial, accompanied by a mixed methods process evaluation.
METHODS: This study was guided by the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions and the Behaviour Change Wheel guide to developing interventions. A three-phase, mixed-methods design was used in this study. This study reported the feasibility of the group-based pelvic floor muscle training programme. Semi-structured reviews were conducted following the intervention to explore the acceptability of the programme.
RESULTS: The study included 48 pregnant women with a recruitment rate of 52.17%. The adherence rate to the training programme was 66.67%. The intervention was positively valued, in particular the support promoting participants\' adherence, but additional changes need to be made to the programme for a future trial.
CONCLUSIONS: Group-based pelvic floor muscle training programme provides a possible way of delivering pelvic floor muscle training with limited health professionals in China. The study showed promising results concerning the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention, which were well perceived by both pregnant women and the midwife.
CONCLUSIONS: Group-based pelvic floor muscle training may have the potential of reducing the prevalence of urinary incontinence in pregnant women with insufficient healthcare professionals.
CONCLUSIONS: This study assessed the feasibility of delivering group-based pelvic floor muscle training in pregnant women in China. The group-based pelvic floor muscle training is acceptable to both pregnant women and the midwife, but integrating online and face-to-face sessions need to be considered. The findings of this study provided evidence for delivering group-based pelvic floor muscle training to pregnant women in China.
UNASSIGNED: The study has adhered to CONSORT guidelines (Table S1) and TIDier checklist (Table S2).
UNASSIGNED: The patient and public have been invited as stakeholders during the development of the intervention. They worked with healthcare professionals to co-design the group-based pelvic floor muscle training programme.
BACKGROUND: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05242809) under the title \'Development and Feasibility Testing of a Group-based PFMT Programme for Antenatal Women in Nanjing City in China\'.