Mitochondrial diabetes

线粒体糖尿病
  • 文章类型: Editorial
    单基因糖尿病,占全球糖尿病病例的1%-2%,源于具有独特遗传模式的单基因缺陷。尽管有超过50种遗传性疾病,单基因糖尿病的准确诊断和管理仍然不足,强调临床医生意识不足。疾病谱包括年轻人的成熟型糖尿病(MODY),以影响胰岛素分泌的独特基因突变为特征,和新生儿糖尿病(NDM)-一组婴儿严重的高血糖疾病。线粒体糖尿病,自身免疫性单基因糖尿病,遗传性胰岛素抵抗和脂肪营养不良综合征进一步使单基因糖尿病的格局多样化。对于MODY的疑似病例,建议采用基于表型和生化因素的量身定制的方法来鉴定遗传筛查的候选者。NDM诊断需要对6个月以下的婴儿进行立即的分子遗传检测。识别这些遗传缺陷为精准医学提供了独特的机会。正在进行的旨在开发具有成本效益的基因检测方法和基于基因的治疗的研究可以促进适当的识别和优化临床结果。新基因的鉴定和研究为深入了解胰腺细胞生物学和常见糖尿病的致病机制提供了宝贵的机会。发表在最近一期的《世界糖尿病杂志》上的临床评论试图填补我们对这种神秘疾病的知识空白。
    Monogenic diabetes, constituting 1%-2% of global diabetes cases, arises from single gene defects with distinctive inheritance patterns. Despite over 50 ass-ociated genetic disorders, accurate diagnoses and management of monogenic diabetes remain inadequate, underscoring insufficient clinician awareness. The disease spectrum encompasses maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), characterized by distinct genetic mutations affecting insulin secretion, and neonatal diabetes mellitus (NDM) - a heterogeneous group of severe hyperglycemic disorders in infants. Mitochondrial diabetes, autoimmune monogenic diabetes, genetic insulin resistance and lipodystrophy syndromes further diversify the monogenic diabetes landscape. A tailored approach based on phenotypic and biochemical factors to identify candidates for genetic screening is recommended for suspected cases of MODY. NDM diagnosis warrants immediate molecular genetic testing for infants under six months. Identifying these genetic defects presents a unique opportunity for precision medicine. Ongoing research aimed to develop cost-effective genetic testing methods and gene-based therapy can facilitate appropriate identification and optimize clinical outcomes. Identification and study of new genes offer a valuable opportunity to gain deeper insights into pancreatic cell biology and the pathogenic mechanisms underlying common forms of diabetes. The clinical review published in the recent issue of World Journal of Diabetes is such an attempt to fill-in our knowledge gap about this enigmatic disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    单基因糖尿病,包括线粒体糖尿病,占所有糖尿病的1%至3%。尽管人们对了解糖尿病患者骨骼脆性的机制越来越感兴趣,骨骼研究主要集中在1型和2型糖尿病。对线粒体糖尿病患者的骨骼健康知之甚少。在这项单中心研究中,我们介绍了线粒体糖尿病患者的临床特征和骨质疏松症的临床诊断。在10名线粒体糖尿病患者中,4例(40%)临床诊断为骨质疏松。骨质疏松症患者年龄较大,体重指数较低,糖尿病持续时间较长,降低空腹C肽,与没有骨质疏松症的患者相比,存在多种合并症。除了我们的案例,我们还系统回顾了有关线粒体糖尿病患者骨骼健康的文献,并概述了影响骨骼健康的潜在因素以及未来改善线粒体疾病患者护理的临床和研究方向。©2023作者。JBMRPlus由WileyPeriodicalsLLC代表美国骨骼和矿物研究学会出版。
    Monogenic diabetes, including mitochondrial diabetes, constitutes 1% to 3% of all diabetes. Although there is an increased interest in understanding the mechanisms of bone fragility in people with diabetes, skeletal research is mostly focused on type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Little is known on skeletal health among people with mitochondrial diabetes. In this single-center study, we presented clinical characteristics of individuals with mitochondrial diabetes and clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis. Of 10 patients with mitochondrial diabetes, 4 (40%) had a clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis. Patients with osteoporosis were older, had lower body mass index, longer diabetes duration, lower fasting C-peptide, and presence of multiple comorbidities compared with patients without osteoporosis. In addition to our cases, we also systematically reviewed literature on skeletal health in people with mitochondrial diabetes and provided an overview of potential factors affecting skeletal health and future clinical and research directions to improve the care of people with mitochondrial disease. © 2023 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    母亲遗传性糖尿病和耳聋(MIDD)综合征是指由mtDNA致病变异引起的罕见诊断疾病。它于1992年首次被确认,到目前为止,由于错误分类为1型或2型糖尿病而被认为未被诊断。MIDD反映了多系统代谢综合征,通常导致需要胰岛素的糖尿病和感觉神经性耳聋,但也可能导致广泛的其他表现。病理学的范围在个体之间是不同的,可能是因为与mtDNA相关的不同程度的异质体。异位症也会造成诊断困难,在某些情况下,诊断MIDD需要高度怀疑。这里,我们回顾了一位患有不典型临床糖尿病的MIDD患者,另外记录了他的血统书.据我们所知,这是第一个与MIDD报道的塞浦路斯。
    Maternally inherited diabetes and deafness (MIDD) syndrome refers to a rarely diagnosed disorder caused by pathogenic variants in mtDNA. It was first identified in 1992 and, to date, is considered underdiagnosed because of misclassification to type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. MIDD reflects a multisystem metabolic syndrome commonly resulting in insulin-requiring diabetes and sensorineural deafness but can also lead to a broad range of other manifestations. The spectrum of pathology differs among individuals, likely because of varied degrees of heteroplasmy associated with mtDNA. Heteroplasmy also creates diagnostic difficulties, with a high index of suspicion required to diagnose MIDD in some cases. Here, we review a patient with MIDD who presented with an atypical clinical diabetes picture, additionally documenting his pedigree. To our knowledge, this is the first Cypriot reported with MIDD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在描述澳大利亚转诊队列中单基因糖尿病的患病率,与年轻的埃克塞特成熟发病型糖尿病(MODY)概率计算器(EMPC)评分和下一代测序相关,并更新相关测试。
    方法:全州5年回顾性队列研究,纳入单基因糖尿病基因检测的个体。
    结果:在排除进行家族性变异级联测试(21)或拒绝参与研究(1)的个体后,最后一组由40名先证者组成.结合更新的测试,最终的遗传结果是11/40(27.5%)的阳性(可能是致病性/致病性变异),8/40(20%)参与者不确定(显著性不确定变异),21/40(52.5%)参与者为阴性。在GCK中发现了因果变异,HNF1A,MT-TL1和HNF4A。意义不确定的变体包括新的多外显子GCK复制。在EMPC得分≥25%的参与者中,37%的患者发现了致病变异.9/10的糖尿病受试亲属和0/6的无糖尿病史受试亲属的级联测试呈阳性。
    结论:当代基因检测在临床疑似单基因糖尿病患者及其亲属中产生了高产量的阳性结果。强调基因检测对这种情况的价值。在这种多种族人口统计学中,≥25%的EMPC评分截止值正确地产生≥25%的阳性预测值。这是第一个描述澳大利亚诊所环境中EMPC分数的澳大利亚研究,尽管有偏见的转诊队列。较大的研究可能有助于表征种族子集之间的EMPC表现,注意单基因糖尿病相对于2型糖尿病的预期概率存在差异。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the prevalence of monogenic diabetes in an Australian referral cohort, in relation to Exeter maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) probability calculator (EMPC) scores and next-generation sequencing with updated testing where relevant.
    METHODS: State-wide 5-year retrospective cohort study of individuals referred for monogenic diabetes genetic testing.
    RESULTS: After excluding individuals who had cascade testing for a familial variant (21) or declined research involvement (1), the final cohort comprised 40 probands. Incorporating updated testing, the final genetic result was positive (likely pathogenic/pathogenic variant) in 11/40 (27.5%), uncertain (variant of uncertain significance) in 8/40 (20%) and negative in 21/40 (52.5%) participants. Causative variants were found in GCK, HNF1A, MT-TL1 and HNF4A. Variants of uncertain significance included a novel multi-exonic GCK duplication. Amongst participants with EMPC scores ≥ 25%, a causative variant was identified in 37%. Cascade testing was positive in 9/10 tested relatives with diabetes and 0/6 tested relatives with no history of diabetes.
    CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary genetic testing produces a high yield of positive results in individuals with clinically suspected monogenic diabetes and their relatives with diabetes, highlighting the value of genetic testing for this condition. An EMPC score cutoff of ≥ 25% correctly yielded a positive predictive value of ≥ 25% in this multiethnic demographic. This is the first Australian study to describe EMPC scores in the Australian clinic setting, albeit a biased referral cohort. Larger studies may help characterise EMPC performance between ethnic subsets, noting differences in the expected probability of monogenic diabetes relative to type 2 diabetes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Preprint
    β细胞单基因型糖尿病是糖尿病治疗领域,对精准医学方法的支持最为强烈。我们系统回顾了GCK相关高血糖的治疗方法,HNF1A-糖尿病,HNF4A-糖尿病,HNF1B-糖尿病,线粒体糖尿病(MD)由于m.3243A>G变异,6q24-短暂性新生儿糖尿病(TND)和SLC19A2-糖尿病(硫胺素响应性巨幼细胞性贫血,TRMA)。
    使用来自PubMed的数据源进行系统审查,进行MEDLINE和Embase,回答不同亚型的特定治疗问题。在遗传证实的单基因糖尿病的个体中,针对血糖结果提取个体和组水平的数据。
    147项研究符合纳入标准,仅有6项实验研究(4项针对HNF1A-糖尿病的随机试验),其余为单例报告或队列研究。大多数研究被认为具有中度或严重的偏倚风险。对于GCK相关的高血糖,6项研究(35例)显示,停止降糖治疗后HbA1c无恶化.一项随机试验(每组18例)表明,磺脲类药物(SU)在HNF1A糖尿病中比在2型糖尿病中更有效,队列和案例研究支持SU降低HbA1c的有效性。两项交叉试验(n=15和n=16)表明,可以使用glinides和GLP-1受体激动剂代替SU。HNF4A-糖尿病的证据仅限于三项研究(16人),显示SU治疗降低HbA1c。在HNF1B-糖尿病中的13项研究(n=301)和在MD中的10项研究具有m.3243A>G变体(n=250)表明,尽管某些患者可以用口服药物治疗,但大多数患者接受胰岛素治疗。在HNF1B糖尿病中,从胰岛素转移到口服降血糖药(OHA)的尝试在大多数情况下都是不成功的。在6q24-TND中,没有足够的研究支持OHA在缓解前接近诊断,但在复发后更多地支持其使用。在SLC19A2糖尿病中,有一些证据表明,硫胺素治疗改善了血糖控制并降低了胰岛素需求,而不到一半的人实现了胰岛素独立性。
    指导单基因糖尿病治疗的证据有限,大多数研究是非随机且规模小的。综合数据确实支持:与GCK相关的高血糖症不需要治疗;SU被用作HNF1A-糖尿病的一线治疗;SU可以在HNF4A-糖尿病中尝试;HNF1B-糖尿病和m.3243A>G变体的MD中经常需要胰岛素;SU可以在6q24-TND复发中尝试;硫胺素可以改善SLC19A2-糖尿病的血糖控制。进一步的证据,特别是随机比较研究,需要检查所有单基因亚型的血糖反应的最佳治疗方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Beta-cell monogenic forms of diabetes are the area of diabetes care with the strongest support for precision medicine. We reviewed treatment of hyperglycemia in GCK-related hyperglycemia, HNF1A-HNF4A- and HNF1B-diabetes, Mitochondrial diabetes (MD) due to m.3243A>G variant, 6q24-transient neonatal diabetes (TND) and SLC19A2-diabetes.
    UNASSIGNED: Systematic reviews with data from PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase were performed for the different subtypes. Individual and group level data was extracted for glycemic outcomes in individuals with genetically confirmed monogenic diabetes.
    UNASSIGNED: 147 studies met inclusion criteria with only six experimental studies and the rest being single case reports or cohort studies. Most studies had moderate or serious risk of bias.For GCK-related hyperglycemia, six studies (N=35) showed no deterioration in HbA1c on discontinuing glucose lowering therapy. A randomized trial (n=18 per group) showed that sulfonylureas (SU) were more effective in HNF1A-diabetes than in type 2 diabetes, and cohort and case studies supported SU effectiveness in lowering HbA1c. Two crossover trials (n=15 and n=16) suggested glinides and GLP-1 receptor agonists might be used in place of SU. Evidence for HNF4A-diabetes was limited. While some patients with HNF1B-diabetes (n=301) and MD (n=250) were treated with oral agents, most were on insulin. There was some support for the use of oral agents after relapse in 6q24-TND, and for thiamine improving glycemic control and reducing insulin requirement in SLC19A2-diabetes (less than half achieved insulin-independency).
    UNASSIGNED: There is limited evidence to guide the treatment in monogenic diabetes with most studies being non-randomized and small. The data supports: no treatment in GCK-related hyperglycemia; SU for HNF1A-diabetes. Further evidence is needed to examine the optimum treatment in monogenic subtypes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    线粒体糖尿病(MD)通常被归类为β细胞的遗传缺陷。主要病理生理学是由于线粒体ATP产生受损而导致的胰腺β细胞中的胰岛素分泌衰竭。然而,一些报道提到胰岛素抵抗(IR)的存在是MD的临床特征。由于线粒体功能障碍是引起IR的重要因素之一,我们需要关注IR作为MD的另一种病理生理学。在本期特刊中,本文首先简要概述了胰岛素信号和IR的分子机制。第二,我们从MITOMAP数据库中概述了目前确认的致病性线粒体DNA(mtDNA)突变.导致糖尿病的变异主要是线粒体基因组的转移RNA(tRNA)中的点突变。第三,我们关注这些导致最近描述的“tRNA病态”的变异,并回顾了糖尿病患者的临床特征。最后,我们讨论了mtDNA突变引起的MD的病理生理学,并探讨了IR发生的可能机制。这篇综述对参与糖尿病和线粒体疾病诊断和治疗的所有临床医生都是有益的。
    Mitochondrial diabetes (MD) is generally classified as a genetic defect of β-cells. The main pathophysiology is insulin secretion failure in pancreatic β-cells due to impaired mitochondrial ATP production. However, several reports have mentioned the presence of insulin resistance (IR) as a clinical feature of MD. As mitochondrial dysfunction is one of the important factors causing IR, we need to focus on IR as another pathophysiology of MD. In this special issue, we first briefly summarized the insulin signaling and molecular mechanisms of IR. Second, we overviewed currently confirmed pathogenic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations from the MITOMAP database. The variants causing diabetes were mostly point mutations in the transfer RNA (tRNA) of the mitochondrial genome. Third, we focused on these variants leading to the recently described \"tRNA modopathies\" and reviewed the clinical features of patients with diabetes. Finally, we discussed the pathophysiology of MD caused by mtDNA mutations and explored the possible mechanism underlying the development of IR. This review should be beneficial to all clinicians involved in diagnostics and therapeutics related to diabetes and mitochondrial diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇综述旨在提供有关遗传性疾病引起的糖尿病病因的最新信息,并与听力或视力受损同时发生,并进行比较。潜在的机制,包括新的治疗方法,将是详细的。
    Wolfram综合征,Kearns-Sayre综合征,硫胺素反应性巨幼细胞性贫血,母系遗传性糖尿病和耳聋是以糖尿病为特征的遗传性疾病,听力受损,和视觉。它们的继承方式不同,介绍时的年龄,以及其他器官的受累;它们经常被误诊为1型或2型糖尿病。当胰腺自身抗体阴性时,应该提高对遗传性糖尿病综合征的怀疑,涉及其他器官,家族史包括糖尿病。正确诊断各种综合征对于定制最先进的治疗方法很重要,预防疾病进展,并提供适当的遗传咨询。
    This review aims to provide an update on the etiologies of diabetes that are due to genetic disorders and that co-occur with impaired hearing or vision and to compare them. The potential mechanisms, including novel treatments, will be detailed.
    Wolfram syndrome, Kearns-Sayre syndrome, thiamine-responsive megaloblastic anemia, and maternally inherited diabetes and deafness are genetic disorders characterized by diabetes, impaired hearing, and vision. They differ in mode of inheritance, age at presentation, and the involvement of other organs; they are often misdiagnosed as type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Suspicion of a genetic diabetes syndrome should be raised when pancreatic autoantibodies are negative, other organs are involved, and family history includes diabetes. Correct diagnosis of the various syndromes is important for tailoring the most advanced treatment, preventing disease progression, and enabling proper genetic counseling.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:Friedreich共济失调(FRDA)是一种进行性神经肌肉疾病,通常由两个共济失调蛋白基因等位基因中的GAA三联体重复扩增引起。FRDA可并发糖尿病(DM)。这项研究的目的是描述患病率,的危险因素,以及FRDA相关DM的管理实践。
    方法:FACOMS,一个潜在的,多站点自然历史研究,包括1,104个人。提取的数据包括DM和其他合并症的存在,基因诊断,和疾病严重程度的标志物。我们在一个FACOMS站点对FRDA相关DM患者的子集进行了详细的病历审查和调查。费城儿童医院。
    结果:8.7%的个体报告了FRDA相关的DM。年龄,严重疾病,FRDA心脏并发症与DM风险呈正相关。FRDA相关的DM总体控制良好,正如HbA1c所反映的那样,尽管确实发生了糖尿病酮症酸中毒。胰岛素是治疗的主要手段(总体占64-74%);在成人中,二甲双胍的使用很常见,较新的降糖药很少使用.
    结论:临床因素确定FRDA相关DM风险增加的个体。未来的研究应该测试FRDA相关DM筛查和管理的策略,特别是新型降糖疗法在预防或延缓FRDA相关心脏病方面的潜在作用。
    OBJECTIVE: Friedreich\'s Ataxia (FRDA) is a progressive neuromuscular disorder typically caused by GAA triplet repeat expansions in both frataxin gene alleles. FRDA can be complicated by diabetes mellitus (DM). The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of, risk factors for, and management practices of FRDA-related DM.
    METHODS: FACOMS, a prospective, multi-site natural history study, includes 1,104 individuals. Extracted data included the presence of DM and other co-morbidities, genetic diagnosis, and markers of disease severity. We performed detailed medical record review and a survey for the subset of individuals with FRDA-related DM followed at one FACOMS site, Children\'s Hospital of Philadelphia.
    RESULTS: FRDA-related DM was reported by 8.7% of individuals. Age, severe disease, and FRDA cardiac complications were positively associated with DM risk. FRDA-related DM was generally well-controlled, as reflected by HbA1c, though diabetic ketoacidosis did occur. Insulin is the mainstay of treatment (64-74% overall); in adults, metformin use was common and newer glucose-lowering agents were used rarely.
    CONCLUSIONS: Clinical factors identify individuals at increased risk for FRDA-related DM. Future studies should test strategies for FRDA-related DM screening and management, in particular the potential role for novel glucose-lowering therapies in preventing or delaying FRDA-related cardiac disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究的目的是分析线粒体糖尿病(MD)患者空腹血浆C肽的临床特征和长期变化规律。为MD的诊断和治疗提供指导。
    我们通过病历检索系统检索了2005年1月至2021年7月在北京协和医院长期随访的MD患者,并对其临床资料进行了回顾性分析。生化参数,空腹血浆C肽,糖化血红蛋白和治疗方案。非参数受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线用于评估与运动测试相关的血浆乳酸水平与MD之间的关系。
    共纳入12例MD患者,具有早期发病的临床特征,正常或低体重,听力损失,母性继承,胰岛相关自身抗体阴性.此外,与1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者相比,MD患者在运动后立即表现出更高的平均血浆乳酸水平(8.39±2.75vs.3.53±1.47mmol/L,p=0.003)和运动后延迟恢复时间(6.02±2.65vs.2.17±1.27mmol/L,p=0.011)。确定的最佳临界点是5.5和3.4mmol/L的血浆乳酸水平运动后立即和30分钟后,分别。空腹血浆C肽水平随着疾病进展呈负指数函数下降(Y=1.343*e-0.07776X,R2=0.4154)。MD患者的治疗方案多种多样,没有二甲双胍使用者,胰岛素剂量与体重之间的相关性较弱。
    运动时血浆乳酸水平升高或运动后恢复延迟有助于诊断MD。MD患者空腹血浆C肽在病程中的变化表明早期迅速下降,其次是逐渐放缓的下降速度。
    The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and the pattern of long-term changes of fasting plasma C-peptide in patients with mitochondrial diabetes (MD), and to provide guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of MD.
    We retrieved MD patients with long-term follow-up at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2005 to July 2021 through the medical record retrieval system and retrospectively analyzed their clinical data, biochemical parameters, fasting plasma C-peptide, glycosylated hemoglobin and treatment regimens. Non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the relationship between exercise test-related plasma lactate levels and suffering from MD.
    A total of 12 MD patients were included, with clinical characteristics of early-onset, normal or low body weight, hearing loss, maternal inheritance, and negative islet-related autoantibodies. In addition, patients with MD exhibited significantly higher mean plasma lactate levels immediately after exercise compared to patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) (8.39 ± 2.75 vs. 3.53 ± 1.47 mmol/L, p=0.003) and delayed recovery time after exercise (6.02 ± 2.65 vs. 2.17 ± 1.27 mmol/L, p=0.011). The optimal cut-off points identified were 5.5 and 3.4 mmol/L for plasma lactate levels immediately after and 30 minutes after exercise, respectively. The fasting plasma C-peptide levels decreased as a negative exponential function with disease progression (Y= 1.343*e-0.07776X, R2 = 0.4154). Treatment regimens in MD patients were varied, with no metformin users and a weak correlation between insulin dosage and body weight.
    The increased level of plasma lactate during exercise or its delayed recovery after exercise would contribute to the diagnosis of MD. Changes of fasting plasma C-peptide in MD patients over the course of the disease indicated a rapid decline in the early stages, followed by a gradual slowing rate of decline.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    m.3243A>G相关疾病具有包括糖尿病在内的多系统表现。不确定二甲双胍是否会引发这种疾病的神经系统表现。本研究旨在回顾由我们实验室遗传证实的m.3243A>G相关糖尿病的诊断和管理,并评估使用二甲双胍引发神经系统表现的风险。
    回顾了2009年至2020年间检测到的m.3243A>G的病例。包括糖尿病患者。线粒体脑肌病病例,糖尿病发病前乳酸性酸中毒和卒中样发作(MELAS)被排除.计算二甲双胍使用与新出现的神经系统表现之间的关联的几率。
    确定了16名患者。使用二甲双胍的几率为3.50[0.37-33.0;p=0.3287]。详细描述了一个在二甲双胍使用与神经系统表现之间具有明确因果关系的说明性病例。
    m.3243A>G相关糖尿病未被诊断。危险信号包括积极的家族史,身材矮小,低体重和听力损失经常被忽视。早期诊断允许定期进行系统评估。在精准医学和新疗法的时代,谨慎的做法是避免使用二甲双胍,因为它可能在这种情况下引发神经系统表现。辅酶Q10,DPP-IV抑制剂,可以考虑SGLT2抑制剂和GLP-1受体激动剂。
    m.3243A>G-related disease has multi-systemic manifestations including diabetes mellitus. It is uncertain whether metformin would trigger neurological manifestations of this disease. This study aims to review the diagnosis and management of m.3243A>G-related diabetes genetically confirmed by our laboratory and to evaluate the risk of metformin use triggering neurological manifestations.
    Cases with m.3243A>G detected between 2009 and 2020 were reviewed. Cases with diabetes mellitus were included. Cases with mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes (MELAS) before diabetes onset were excluded. Odds ratio was calculated for association between metformin use and newly developed neurological manifestations.
    Sixteen patients were identified. Odds ratio for metformin use was 3.50 [0.37-33.0; p = 0.3287]. One illustrative case with clear causal relationship between metformin use and neurological manifestations was described in detail.
    m.3243A>G-related diabetes mellitus is underdiagnosed. Red flags including positive family history, short stature, low body weight and hearing loss are often overlooked. Early diagnosis allows regular systemic assessment. In the era of precision medicine and novel therapies, it is prudent to avoid metformin as it could trigger neurological manifestations in this condition. Coenzyme Q10, DPP-IV inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists may be considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号