Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2

错配修复核酸内切酶 PMS2
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    缺陷(d)DNA错配修复(MMR)是预测实体瘤中对PD-1阻断免疫疗法的更好响应的生物标志物。dMMR可由MMR基因突变或蛋白质失活引起,可以通过测序和免疫组织化学检测,分别。探讨dMMR在弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)中的作用,MMR基因突变和MSH6,MSH2,MLH1和PMS2蛋白的表达通过靶向下一代测序和免疫组织化学在接受标准化学免疫疗法治疗的大量DLBCL患者中进行评估。并与通过荧光多重免疫组织化学和基因表达谱定量的肿瘤免疫微环境特征相关。结果表明,遗传dMMR在DLBCL中很少发生,并且与癌症基因突变增加和良好的免疫微环境显着相关,但不影响预后。表型dMMR也很少见,MMR蛋白在DLBCL中普遍表达。然而,瘤内异质性存在,并且具有表型dMMR的DLBCL细胞增加与T细胞和PD-1T细胞显着增加相关,T细胞和PAX5+细胞之间的平均最近邻距离更高,上调的免疫基因签名,LE4和LE7生态型及其潜在的Ecotyper定义的细胞状态,提示增加的T细胞仅靶向dMMR的肿瘤细胞亚群的可能性。仅在MYCDLBCL患者中,MSH6/PMS2高表达对预后有显著影响.这项研究显示了遗传/表型dMMR在DLBCL中的免疫学和预后作用,并提出了一个问题,即DLBCL浸润性PD-1+T细胞是否仅靶向肿瘤亚克隆,与PD-1阻断免疫疗法在DLBCL中的疗效相关。
    Deficient (d) DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is a biomarker predictive of better response to PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in solid tumors. dMMR can be caused by mutations in MMR genes or by protein inactivation, which can be detected by sequencing and immunohistochemistry, respectively. To investigate the role of dMMR in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), MMR gene mutations and expression of MSH6, MSH2, MLH1, and PMS2 proteins were evaluated by targeted next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry in a large cohort of DLBCL patients treated with standard chemoimmunotherapy, and correlated with the tumor immune microenvironment characteristics quantified by fluorescent multiplex immunohistochemistry and gene-expression profiling. The results showed that genetic dMMR was infrequent in DLBCL and was significantly associated with increased cancer gene mutations and favorable immune microenvironment, but not prognostic impact. Phenotypic dMMR was also infrequent, and MMR proteins were commonly expressed in DLBCL. However, intratumor heterogeneity existed, and increased DLBCL cells with phenotypic dMMR correlated with significantly increased T cells and PD-1+ T cells, higher average nearest neighbor distance between T cells and PAX5+ cells, upregulated immune gene signatures, LE4 and LE7 ecotypes and their underlying Ecotyper-defined cell states, suggesting the possibility that increased T cells targeted only tumor cell subsets with dMMR. Only in patients with MYC¯ DLBCL, high MSH6/PMS2 expression showed significant adverse prognostic effects. This study shows the immunologic and prognostic effects of genetic/phenotypic dMMR in DLBCL, and raises a question on whether DLBCL-infiltrating PD-1+ T cells target only tumor subclones, relevant for the efficacy of PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in DLBCL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    MLH1在DNA错配修复和基因组维持中起关键作用。MLH1缺乏促进癌症的发展和进展,但MLH1调控的潜在机制仍然是神秘的。在这项研究中,我们证明MLH1蛋白被泛素-蛋白酶体系统降解,并已鉴定出参与MLH1周转的重要顺式元件和反式因子。我们发现包含氨基酸516-650的区域对于MLH1降解至关重要。错配修复蛋白PMS2可以保护MLH1免于降解,因为它结合到MLH1段关键以实现其周转。此外,我们已经鉴定了E3泛素连接酶UBR4和去泛素酶USP5,它们相反地调节MLH1的稳定性.在一致性中,UBR4或USP5缺乏影响细胞对核苷酸类似物6-TG的反应,支持他们在调节错配修复方面的作用。我们的研究揭示了MLH1蛋白水解的调控机制的重要见解,DNA错配修复相关疾病的关键。
    MLH1 plays a critical role in DNA mismatch repair and genome maintenance. MLH1 deficiency promotes cancer development and progression, but the mechanism underlying MLH1 regulation remains enigmatic. In this study, we demonstrated that MLH1 protein is degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system and have identified vital cis-elements and trans-factors involved in MLH1 turnover. We found that the region encompassing the amino acids 516 to 650 is crucial for MLH1 degradation. The mismatch repair protein PMS2 may shield MLH1 from degradation as it binds to the MLH1 segment key to its turnover. Furthermore, we have identified the E3 ubiquitin ligase UBR4 and the deubiquitylase USP5, which oppositely modulate MLH1 stability. In consistence, UBR4 or USP5 deficiency affects the cellular response to nucleotide analog 6-TG, supporting their roles in regulating mismatch repair. Our study has revealed important insights into the regulatory mechanisms underlying MLH1 proteolysis, critical to DNA mismatch repair related diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尽管早期发现的宫颈癌与良好的生存率相关,晚期疾病的预后较差,治疗方案稀少.错配修复缺陷(MMR-D)已成为几种癌症类型的预后和对免疫检查点抑制剂反应的预测因子。但其在宫颈癌中的价值尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定MMR-D在宫颈癌中的患病率,并评估MMR蛋白表达的预后价值。
    方法:在前瞻性收集的宫颈癌队列(n=508)中,通过免疫组织化学染色研究了MMR蛋白MLH-1,PMS-2,MSH-2和MSH-6的表达,并获得相应的临床病理和随访数据。切片被评分为缺失或完整表达以定义MMR-D,通过染色指数,根据染色强度和面积,评估预后潜力。RNA和全外显子组测序数据可用于72和75名患者,并用于基因集富集和突变分析。分别。
    结果:有5例(1%)肿瘤缺乏MMR,其中三个是神经内分泌组织学。MMR状态不能预测生存(HR1.93,p=0.17)。MSH-2低(n=48)与低生存率相关(HR1.94,p=0.02),也在调整肿瘤分期时,肿瘤类型,和患者年龄(HR2.06,p=0.013)。MSH-2低肿瘤具有较高的肿瘤突变负荷(p=0.003)和双链断裂修复基因RAD50中(移码)突变的频率较高(p<0.01)。
    结论:MMR-D在宫颈癌中罕见,然而,低MSH-2表达是生存不良的独立预测因素。
    OBJECTIVE: Although early-detected cervical cancer is associated with good survival, the prognosis for late-stage disease is poor and treatment options are sparse. Mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D) has surfaced as a predictor of prognosis and response to immune checkpoint inhibitor(s) in several cancer types, but its value in cervical cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to define the prevalence of MMR-D in cervical cancer and assess the prognostic value of MMR protein expression.
    METHODS: Expression of the MMR proteins MLH-1, PMS-2, MSH-2, and MSH-6 was investigated by immunohistochemical staining in a prospectively collected cervical cancer cohort (n=508) with corresponding clinicopathological and follow-up data. Sections were scored as either loss or intact expression to define MMR-D, and by a staining index, based on staining intensity and area, evaluating the prognostic potential. RNA and whole exome sequencing data were available for 72 and 75 of the patients and were used for gene set enrichment and mutational analyses, respectively.
    RESULTS: Five (1%) tumors were MMR-deficient, three of which were of neuroendocrine histology. MMR status did not predict survival (HR 1.93, p=0.17). MSH-2 low (n=48) was associated with poor survival (HR 1.94, p=0.02), also when adjusting for tumor stage, tumor type, and patient age (HR 2.06, p=0.013). MSH-2 low tumors had higher tumor mutational burden (p=0.003) and higher frequency of (frameshift) mutations in the double-strand break repair gene RAD50 (p<0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: MMR-D is rare in cervical cancer, yet low MSH-2 expression is an independent predictor of poor survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    PMS2是Lynch综合征常规基因检测中包含的错配修复基因之一,结直肠,卵巢,和子宫内膜癌。在临床外显子组和基因组测序的背景下,PMS2也包括在美国医学遗传学和基因组学学院(ACMG)的二级发现基因列表中。然而,通过基于短读取的下一代测序(NGS)技术对PMS2进行测序由于假基因PMS2CL的存在而变得复杂,并且通常由远程聚合酶链反应(LR-PCR)或基于长读取的下一代测序等基于远程的方法进行补充。这增加了复杂性和成本。这里,我们描述了一种生物信息学同源性分诊工作流程,该流程可以消除对绝大多数接受外显子组测序的患者进行基于PMS2的长读取测试的需要,从而简化PMS2测试并降低相关成本。
    PMS2 is one of the DNA-mismatch repair genes included in routine genetic testing for Lynch syndrome and colorectal, ovarian, and endometrial cancers. PMS2 is also included in the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics\' List of Secondary Findings Genes in the context of clinical exome and genome sequencing. However, sequencing of PMS2 by short-read-based next-generation sequencing technologies is complicated by the presence of the pseudogene PMS2CL, and is often supplemented by long-range-based approaches, such as long-range PCR or long-read-based next-generation sequencing, which increases the complexity and cost. This article describes a bioinformatics homology triage workflow that can eliminate the need for long-read-based testing for PMS2 in the vast majority of patients undergoing exome sequencing, thus simplifying PMS2 testing and reducing the associated cost.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:乳腺癌,特别是三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC),造成了巨大的全球卫生负担。在引入免疫治疗之前,化疗是TNBC患者的主要治疗方法。研究表明,在TNBC中,错配修复蛋白(MMRP)缺乏症的患病率(0.2%至18.6%),最近的研究强调了免疫疗法治疗MMRP缺陷型转移性乳腺癌的潜力。本研究旨在使用免疫组织化学方法鉴定TNBC患者中的MMRP缺乏。
    方法:采用回顾性队列研究设计,纳入2015年至2021年在侯赛因国王癌症中心接受治疗的TNBC患者。进行免疫组织化学以评估MMRP表达。
    结果:在152名患者中,14(9.2%)表现出缺乏MMR(dMMR)。在13例患者中观察到PMS2表达的缺失,其中5例显示MLH1表达丧失。在一名患者中观察到MSH6和MSH2表达的缺失。中位随访时间为44(3-102)个月。尽管存活率较高(80.8%,5年)的DMMR患者比熟练的MMR患者(62.3%),两组的总生存期无显著差异.
    结论:大约9%的TNBC患者表现出dMMR。dMMR可用于预测结果和确定可能受益于免疫治疗的TNBC患者。
    BACKGROUND: Breast cancer, particularly triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), poses a significant global health burden. Chemotherapy was the mainstay treatment for TNBC patients until immunotherapy was introduced. Studies indicate a noteworthy prevalence (0.2% to 18.6%) of mismatch repair protein (MMRP) deficiency in TNBC, with recent research highlighting the potential of immunotherapy for MMRP-deficient metastatic breast cancer. This study aims to identify MMRP deficiency in TNBC patients using immunohistochemistry.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study design was used and included TNBC patients treated between 2015 and 2021 at King Hussein Cancer Center. Immunohistochemistry was conducted to assess MMRP expression.
    RESULTS: Among 152 patients, 14 (9.2%) exhibited deficient MMR (dMMR). Loss of PMS2 expression was observed in 13 patients, 5 of whom showed loss of MLH1 expression. Loss of MSH6 and MSH2 expression was observed in one patient. The median follow-up duration was 44 (3-102) months. Despite the higher survival rate (80.8%, 5 years) of dMMR patients than of proficient MMR patients (62.3%), overall survival did not significantly differ between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 9% of TNBC patients exhibit dMMR. dMMR could be used to predict outcomes and identify patients with TNBC who may benefit from immunotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:传统上,错配修复(MMR)状态由一组四种抗体(MLH1、PMS2、MSH2、MSH6)确定。如果所有的蛋白质都被保留,病例为MMR熟练(pMMR),而一种或多种蛋白质的丢失指示MMR缺陷(dMMR)。这种方法受到了两种抗体方法的挑战,使用PMS2和MSH6作为第一次筛查。他们的保留被认为足以宣布案件pMMR。在这项研究中,我们旨在验证双抗体方法的有效性。
    结果:我们在2016年至2023年诊断的结直肠癌(CRC)和子宫内膜癌(EC)中进行了一项全国性研究,其中包括47,657名患者,以评估双抗体方法。在0.17%和0.4%的CRC和EC病例中,分别,双抗体方法会错过dMMR病例。亚组分析指出两组年轻患者(50岁以下)的漏诊率略有增加,并确定了特殊亚型(印戒细胞癌,髓样癌,CRC中的粘液性癌和EC中的透明细胞癌)的漏诊率增加。对于这些特定的子组,低阈值应用于进一步测试。如果染色模式不明确或不均匀,应使用四种抗体。
    结论:一般来说,双抗体MMR检测策略的应用不会导致dMMR鉴定的严重失败,并节省成本.
    OBJECTIVE: Traditionally, mismatch repair (MMR) status is determined by a panel of four antibodies (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6). If all proteins are retained, cases are MMR proficient (pMMR), while loss of one or more proteins is indicative of MMR deficiency (dMMR). This approach has been challenged in favour of a two-antibody approach, using PMS2 and MSH6 as a first screening. Their retainment is deemed sufficient to declare cases pMMR. In this study we aim to verify the validity of the two-antibody approach.
    RESULTS: We performed a nationwide study in colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC) diagnosed between 2016 and 2023, including 47,657 patients to evaluate the two-antibody approach. In 0.17% and 0.4% of cases of CRC and EC, respectively, dMMR cases would be missed with the two-antibody approach. Subgroup analyses pointed towards slightly increased miss rates in younger patients (under the age of 50 years) in both groups and identified special subtypes (signet ring cell carcinoma, medullary carcinoma, and mucinous carcinoma in CRC and clear cell carcinoma in EC) with increased miss rates. For these specific subgroups, a low threshold should be used for further testing. In case of ambiguous or heterogeneous staining patterns, four antibodies should be used.
    CONCLUSIONS: In general, the application of a two-antibody MMR testing strategy does not lead to considerable failure of dMMR identification and saves costs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    MMR缺陷型癌症综合征的分子诊断受到PMS2基因测序困难的阻碍,主要是由于PMS2CL假基因。下一代测序(NGS)短读段无法通过标准管道明确映射,影响变体调用准确性。我们旨在为PMS2突变分析提供完善的生物信息学管道,并探索未选择的遗传性癌症(HC)队列中的PMS2种系致病变异患病率。使用两个队列优化PMS2突变分析:192个未选择的HC患者用于评估旁系同源序列变体的等位基因比率,和13份富含PMS2(可能)致病变异的样品,先前通过长范围gDNAPCR扩增(LR-PCR)筛选。迫使读数与PMS2参考序列比对;除了对应于外显子11的那些,其中仅考虑那些交叉的基因特异性不变位置。之后,在40例患者的队列中验证了精制管道的准确性,并用于筛查5619例HC患者.与我们的常规诊断管道相比,PMS2_vaR管道在验证队列中显示技术敏感性增加(0.853至0.956),鉴定所有以前通过LR-PCR发现的PMS2致病变体。15个HC队列样本携带致病性PMS2变体(15/5619,0.285%),是普通人群中估计患病率的两倍。改进的开源方法提高了PMS2突变分析的准确性,允许将其纳入常规NGS管道,从而简化PMS2筛查。
    The molecular diagnosis of mismatch repair-deficient cancer syndromes is hampered by difficulties in sequencing the PMS2 gene, mainly owing to the PMS2CL pseudogene. Next-generation sequencing short reads cannot be mapped unambiguously by standard pipelines, compromising variant calling accuracy. This study aimed to provide a refined bioinformatic pipeline for PMS2 mutational analysis and explore PMS2 germline pathogenic variant prevalence in an unselected hereditary cancer (HC) cohort. PMS2 mutational analysis was optimized using two cohorts: 192 unselected HC patients for assessing the allelic ratio of paralogous sequence variants, and 13 samples enriched with PMS2 (likely) pathogenic variants screened previously by long-range genomic DNA PCR amplification. Reads were forced to align with the PMS2 reference sequence, except those corresponding to exon 11, where only those intersecting gene-specific invariant positions were considered. Afterward, the refined pipeline\'s accuracy was validated in a cohort of 40 patients and used to screen 5619 HC patients. Compared with our routine diagnostic pipeline, the PMS2_vaR pipeline showed increased technical sensitivity (0.853 to 0.956, respectively) in the validation cohort, identifying all previously PMS2 pathogenic variants found by long-range genomic DNA PCR amplification. Fifteen HC cohort samples carried a pathogenic PMS2 variant (15 of 5619; 0.285%), doubling the estimated prevalence in the general population. The refined open-source approach improved PMS2 mutational analysis accuracy, allowing its inclusion in the routine next-generation sequencing pipeline streamlining PMS2 screening.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    林奇综合征(LS)是最常见的遗传性癌症综合征。PMS2中的杂合功能丧失变体与LS连接。虽然这些变异并不直接导致癌症,由于DNA错配修复功能障碍,PMS2功能降低导致体细胞变异体积累和癌症风险随时间增加.影响PMS2表达的其他类型的遗传变异也可能导致癌症风险是合理的。Kozak序列是高等真核生物中高度保守的翻译起始基序,被定义为翻译起始密码子上游的九个碱基对,通过翻译序列的前四个碱基(5'-[GTT]GCATCCATGG-3';人PMS2NM_000535.7)。虽然在ClinVar中已经报道了PMS2中的Kozak序列变体在疑似遗传性癌症患者中,翻译起始位点上游的所有变体目前被分类为显著性未定的变体(VUS).我们假设显著破坏PMS2的Kozak序列的变体会降低PMS2蛋白表达,随着时间的推移,导致癌症风险增加。使用双荧光素酶报告质粒和定点诱变,我们在PMS2Kozak序列中产生了野生型人PMS2和ClinVarVUS。除了c.1A>C变体,已知是致病的,我们将另外6个变异体称为ACMG/AMP致病支持(PP)变异体,并将10个变异体归类为良性支持(BP).总之,我们提出了一种为人类PMS2Kozak序列变体分类而开发的方法,该方法可有助于患者中鉴定的VUS的重新分类.
    Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary cancer syndrome. Heterozygous loss-of-function variants in PMS2 are linked to LS. While these variants are not directly cancer causing, reduced PMS2 function results in the accumulation of somatic variants and increased cancer risk over time due to DNA mismatch repair dysfunction. It is reasonable that other types of genetic variation that impact the expression of PMS2 may also contribute to cancer risk. The Kozak sequence is a highly conserved translation initiation motif among higher eukaryotes and is defined as the nine base pairs upstream of the translation start codon through the first four bases of the translated sequence (5\'-[GTT]GCATCCATGG-3\'; human PMS2: NM_000535.7). While Kozak sequence variants in PMS2 have been reported in ClinVar in patients with suspected hereditary cancer, all variants upstream of the translation start site are currently classified as variants of undetermined significance (VUSs). We hypothesized that variants significantly disrupting the Kozak sequence of PMS2 would decrease PMS2 protein expression, contributing to increased cancer risk over time. Using a dual-luciferase reporter plasmid and site-directed mutagenesis, we generated the wild-type human PMS2 and the ClinVar VUSs within the PMS2 Kozak sequence. Besides the c.1A>C variant, which is already known to be pathogenic, we implicate six additional variants as American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) pathogenic supporting (PP) variants and classify ten as benign supporting (BP). In summary, we present a method developed for the classification of human PMS2 Kozak sequence variants that can contribute to the re-classification of VUSs identified in patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在不同种族的以色列人群中描述了BRCA1/BRCA2中几种复发的致病变异(PVs)和其他癌症易感基因。自2019年以来,对以色列所有乳腺癌(BC)患者的这些复发性PV的测试均无选择地报销。目的是评估诊断年龄≥50岁的非Ashkenazi犹太人(AJ)患者中这些PV的基因分型率。
    方法:回顾了2017年6月至2023年12月在舍巴医学中心肿瘤研究所接受肿瘤遗传学咨询的所有BC患者的临床和基因分型数据。
    结果:在2706例BC患者中(诊断时的平均年龄,54年;范围,20-92岁)咨询,515例非AJ(所有四个祖父母)血统的患者,诊断≥50岁的患者进行基因分型,55与三阴性BC(TNBC)和460与非TNBC。在12.7%(7/55)的TNBC患者和0.65%(3/460)的非TNBC患者中检测到BRCA1/BRCA2中的复发PV之一。一名非TNBC患者患有PMS2PV。在2.5%的基因分型TNBC和3.7%的非TNBC患者中发现了低外显率变异,包括CHEK2c.499G>A(n=3),APCc.3920T>A(n=4),杂合MUTYHc.1187G>A(n=5)。在首过基因分型后,146名患者进行了多基因小组检测,没有人携带BRCA1/BRCA2PV,只有5/127的非TNBC(3.9%)在CHEK2中携带PV(n=2,c.846+1G>C和c.592+3A>T),ATMc.103C>T(n=2),NBNc.966C>G(n=1)。
    结论:在诊断年龄≥50岁的非AJ非TNBC病例中观察到的PV检出率较低,主要是临床上微不足道的变异,质疑在这一部分患者中未选择的基因分型的合理性。
    OBJECTIVE: Several recurring pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1/BRCA2 and additional cancer susceptibility genes are described in the ethnically diverse Israeli population. Since 2019, testing for these recurring PVs is reimbursed unselectively for all patients with breast cancer (BC) in Israel. The aim was to evaluate the yield of genotyping for these PVs in non-Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) patients with BC diagnosed ≥age 50 years.
    METHODS: Clinical and genotyping data of all patients with BC undergoing oncogenetic counseling at the Oncology Institute at Sheba Medical Center from June 2017 to December 2023 were reviewed.
    RESULTS: Of 2706 patients with BC (mean age at diagnosis, 54 years; range, 20-92 years) counseled, 515 patients of non-AJ (all four grandparents) descent, diagnosed ≥age 50 years of age were genotyped, 55 with triple-negative BC (TNBC) and 460 with non-TNBC. One of the recurring PVs in BRCA1/BRCA2 were detected in 12.7% (7/55) of TNBC patients and 0.65% (3/460) of non-TNBC. One patient with non-TNBC had PMS2 PV. Low-penetrance variants were found in 2.5% of genotyped TNBC and in 3.7% of patients with non-TNBC, including CHEK2 c.499G>A (n = 3), APC c.3920T > A (n = 4), and heterozygous MUTYH c.1187G>A (n = 5). Following first-pass genotyping, 146 patients performed multigene panel testing, none carried a BRCA1/BRCA2 PV, and only 5/127 non-TNBC (3.9%) harbored PVs in CHEK2 (n = 2, c.846+1G>C and c.592+3A>T), ATM c.103C>T (n = 2), and NBN c.966C>G (n = 1).
    CONCLUSIONS: The observed low rates of PV detection in non-AJ non-TNBC cases ≥age 50 years at diagnosis, mostly for clinically insignificant variants, questions the justification of unselected genotyping in this subset of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:虽然先前的研究表明结直肠癌(CRC)中不同错配修复(MMR)状态的远处转移潜能存在差异,他们的发现仍然没有定论,特别是考虑到不同种族背景的潜在差异。此外,基因调控网络和导致MMR状态间转移潜能差异的潜在机制尚未阐明.
    方法:我们从中国西南部收集了2058个连续的原发性CRC样本,并使用免疫组织化学评估了MMR蛋白(MLH1,MSH2,MSH6和PMS2)的表达。为了探索不同MMR状态和复发之间的不一致,我们进行了荟萃分析.为了更深入地研究,我们采用加权基因共表达网络分析(WGCNA),ClueGo,还有iRegulon,精确定位与CRC转移和复发相关的基因表达网络和关键调控分子。最后,应用单变量和多变量Cox回归分析来确定核心调节分子对转移的影响.
    结果:在样本中,8.2%显示MMR不足(dMMR),MLH1和PSM2的损失分别为40.8%和63.9%,分别。发现了一个独特的24.3%的PMS2孤立损失,没有并发转移,与既定文献不同的结果。此外,与熟练MMR(pMMR)相比,我们的荟萃分析进一步巩固了dMMRCRC样本中降低的复发可能性.确定了两个与远处转移和复发相关的基因表达网络,大多数与转移相关的基因位于8号和18号染色体上。在转移相关网络中发现了IRF1正反馈回路,IRF1被确定为多个数据集的无复发和无远处转移生存的预测标志物。
    结论:地理和种族因素可能影响MMR蛋白丢失的特殊性。我们的发现还强调了新的基因表达网络和CRC转移中的关键调控分子。增强我们对驱动远处转移的机制的理解。
    BACKGROUND: While previous studies have indicated variability in distant metastatic potential among different mismatch repair (MMR) states in colorectal cancer (CRC), their findings remain inconclusive, especially considering potential differences across various ethnic backgrounds. Furthermore, the gene regulatory networks and the underlying mechanisms responsible for these variances in metastatic potential across MMR states have yet to be elucidated.
    METHODS: We collected 2058 consecutive primary CRC samples from the South West of China and assessed the expression of MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) using immunohistochemistry. To explore the inconsistencies between different MMR statuses and recurrence, we performed a meta-analysis. To delve deeper, we employed Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA), ClueGo, and iRegulon, pinpointing gene expression networks and key regulatory molecules linked to metastasis and recurrence in CRC. Lastly, both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were applied to determine the impact of core regulatory molecules on metastasis.
    RESULTS: Of the samples, 8.2% displayed deficient MMR (dMMR), with losses of MLH1 and PSM2 observed in 40.8% and 63.9%, respectively. A unique 24.3% isolated loss of PMS2 without concurrent metastasis was identified, a result that diverges from established literature. Additionally, our meta-analysis further solidifies the reduced recurrence likelihood in dMMR CRC samples compared to proficient MMR (pMMR). Two gene expression networks tied to distant metastasis and recurrence were identified, with a majority of metastasis-related genes located on chromosomes 8 and 18. An IRF1 positive feedback loop was discerned in the metastasis-related network, and IRF1 was identified as a predictive marker for both recurrence-free and distant metastasis-free survival across multiple datasets.
    CONCLUSIONS: Geographical and ethnic factors might influence peculiarities in MMR protein loss. Our findings also highlight new gene expression networks and crucial regulatory molecules in CRC metastasis, enhancing our comprehension of the mechanisms driving distant metastasis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号