Minimally invasive hysterectomy

微创子宫切除术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨子宫切除术患者中种族与子宫切除术途径之间的关系,以治疗无子宫肌瘤疾病和排除恶性肿瘤的异常子宫出血。
    方法:一项横断面队列研究,利用医疗保健成本和利用项目全国住院患者样本和全国门诊手术数据库,比较腹部和微创子宫切除术的途径。
    方法:参与2019年医疗保健成本和利用项目的医院和医院附属门诊外科中心患者:75,838例因异常子宫出血而接受子宫切除术的患者,不包括子宫肌瘤和恶性肿瘤。
    方法:测量和主要结果:在没有子宫肌瘤和恶性肿瘤的异常子宫出血的75,838例子宫切除术中,10.1%在腹部进行,89.9%微创进行。在调整了混杂因素后,与白人患者相比,黑人患者接受腹部子宫切除术的可能性高38%(OR1.38,CI1.12-1.70p=0.002)。因此,黑人种族与开放性手术独立相关。
    结论:尽管排除了子宫肌瘤作为腹部行子宫切除术的危险因素,黑人仍然是腹部与微创子宫切除术的独立预测因子,与白人患者相比,黑人患者接受腹部子宫切除术的比例更高。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between race and route of hysterectomy among patients undergoing hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding in the absence of uterine fibroid disease and excluding malignancy.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional cohort study utilizing the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample and National Ambulatory Surgical databases to compare abdominal to minimally invasive route of hysterectomy.
    METHODS: Hospitals and hospital-affiliated ambulatory surgical centers participating in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project in 2019 PATIENTS: 75,838 patients who had undergone hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding excluding uterine fibroids and malignancy.
    METHODS: n/a MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 75,838 hysterectomies performed for abnormal uterine bleeding in the absence of uterine fibroids and malignancy, 10.1% were performed abdominally and 89.9% minimally invasively. After adjusting for confounders, Black patients were 38% more likely to undergo abdominal hysterectomy compared to White patients (OR 1.38, CI 1.12-1.70 p=0.002). Black race thus is independently associated with open surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite excluding uterine fibroids as a risk factor for an abdominal route of hysterectomy, Black race remained an independent predictor for abdominal versus minimally invasive hysterectomy and Black patients were found to undergo a disproportionately higher rate of abdominal hysterectomy compared to White patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:虽然微创子宫切除术具有优势,腹式子宫切除术仍然是主要的手术方法。创建标准化数据集和建立子宫切除术登记系统为减少体积和选择良性子宫切除术方法的早期干预提供了机会。本研究旨在开发一个用于设计良性子宫切除术配准系统的数据集。
    方法:在2020年4月至9月之间,进行了一项定性研究,以创建一个数据集,用于招募子宫切除术的候选患者。在这个阶段,研究小组进行了信息需求评估,相关数据元素标识,注册表软件开发,和现场测试;随后,设计了一个基于Web的应用程序。2023年6月,使用从大不里士Al-Zahra医院收治的患者的医疗记录中提取的数据对注册软件进行了评估,伊朗。
    结果:在两个月内,40例良性子宫切除术患者均成功登记。子宫切除术患者登记的最终数据集包括11个主要组,27个子类,总共91个数据元素。定义了强制性数据和基本报告。此外,基于Web的注册系统,根据数据集和各种场景进行设计和评估。
    结论:创建子宫切除术登记系统是识别和登记子宫切除术候选患者的第一步。此系统捕获有关程序技术的信息,和相关的并发症。在伊朗,该注册可以作为评估所提供护理质量和临床措施分布的宝贵资源.
    OBJECTIVE: Although minimally invasive hysterectomy offers advantages, abdominal hysterectomy remains the predominant surgical method. Creating a standardized dataset and establishing a hysterectomy registry system present opportunities for early interventions in reducing volume and selecting benign hysterectomy methods. This research aims to develop a dataset for designing benign hysterectomy registration system.
    METHODS: Between April and September 2020, a qualitative study was carried out to create a data set for enrolling patients who were candidate for hysterectomy. At this stage, the research team conducted an information needs assessment, relevant data element identification, registry software development, and field testing; Subsequently, a web-based application was designed. In June 2023the registry software was evaluated using data extracted from medical records of patients admitted at Al-Zahra Hospital in Tabriz, Iran.
    RESULTS: During two months, 40 patients with benign hysterectomy were successfully registered. The final dataset for the hysterectomy patient registry comprise 11 main groups, 27 subclasses, and a total of 91 Data elements. Mandatory data and essential reports were defined. Furthermore, a web-based registry system designed and evaluated based on data set and various scenarios.
    CONCLUSIONS: Creating a hysterectomy registration system is the initial stride toward identifying and registering hysterectomy candidate patients. this system capture information about the procedure techniques, and associated complications. In Iran, this registry can serve as a valuable resource for assessing the quality of care delivered and the distribution of clinical measures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:根据手术方法(腹部,阴道,或腹腔镜),并确定粘连性肠梗阻的危险因素。
    方法:基于国家注册的队列。
    方法:1984-2013年期间的丹麦医院。
    方法:为良性适应症行子宫切除术的丹麦妇女(N=125,568)。
    方法:将腹部子宫切除术与阴道子宫切除术进行比较,腹腔镜子宫切除术,和微创(阴道和腹腔镜)子宫切除术。
    结果:使用Cox比例风险回归比较根据手术方法的肠梗阻发生率。包括的协变量是时间段,年龄,伴随行动,之前的腹部手术或疾病,和社会经济因素。在2004-2013年期间的子分析(n=35,712名妇女)中,来自丹麦子宫切除术数据库的详细信息使患者相关,手术相关,和并发症相关协变量。肠梗阻的总发生率为17.4/1000子宫切除术(2196例)。肠梗阻的10年累积发病率在手术途径之间有所不同(腹部,1.7%;腹腔镜,1.4%;和阴道,0.9%)。在多个调整后的分析中,与经阴道(HR1.64[95%CI1.39-1.93])和微创(经阴道或腹腔镜)子宫切除术(HR1.54[1.33-1.79])相比,经腹子宫切除术后发生肠梗阻的风险更高.子宫切除术时肠梗阻的其他预先存在的危险因素是年龄增加,低教育,低收入,吸烟,高ASA合并症评分,不孕史,腹部感染,和先前的腹部手术(剖宫产除外),腹部器官的穿透性病变,或手术粘连松解术。子宫切除术时的围手术期危险因素包括同时切除卵巢,粘连松解术,输血,重新接纳,以及围手术期并发症的总体存在。
    结论:腹式子宫切除术与微创(腹腔镜或阴式)子宫切除术相比,肠梗阻风险高54%。
    OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of bowel obstruction (BO) after hysterectomy for benign indications depending on the surgical method (abdominal, vaginal, or laparoscopic) and identify risk factors for adhesive BO.
    METHODS: A national registry-based cohort.
    METHODS: Danish hospitals during the period 1984-2013.
    METHODS: Danish women who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications (N = 125 568).
    METHODS: Abdominal hysterectomies were compared with vaginal hysterectomies, laparoscopic hysterectomies, and minimally invasive (vaginal and laparoscopic) hysterectomies.
    RESULTS: The incidence of BO according to the surgical method was compared using Cox proportional hazard regression. The covariates included were the time period, age, concomitant operations, previous abdominal surgery or disease, and socioeconomic factors. In a subanalysis (n = 35 712 women) of the period 2004-2013, detailed information from the Danish Hysterectomy Database enabled the inclusion of patient-, surgery-, and complication-related covariates. The overall crude incidence of BO was 17.4 of 1000 hysterectomies (2196 incident cases). The 10-year cumulative incidence of BO differed among the surgical routes (abdominal, 1.7%; laparoscopic, 1.4%; and vaginal, 0.9%). In multiple-adjusted analyses, the risk of BO was higher after abdominal hysterectomy than after vaginal (hazard ratio 1.64 [95% confidence interval, 1.39-1.93]) and minimally invasive (vaginal or laparoscopic) hysterectomy (hazard ratio 1.54 [1.33-1.79]). Additional pre-existing risk factors for BO at the time of hysterectomy were increased age, low education, low income, smoking, high American Society of Anesthesiologists comorbidity score, history of infertility, abdominal infection, and previous abdominal surgery (apart from cesarean section), penetrating lesions in abdominal organs, or operative adhesiolysis. Perioperative risk factors at the time of hysterectomy included concomitant removal of the ovaries, adhesiolysis, blood transfusion, readmission, and overall presence of perioperative complications.
    CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal hysterectomy is associated with a 54% higher risk of BO than minimally invasive (laparoscopic or vaginal) hysterectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:微创手术治疗妇科恶性肿瘤与疼痛减轻有关,并发症少,早些时候返回活动,更低的成本,缩短住院时间。患者通常在手术当天出院,但由于麻醉后监护病房(PACU)的停留时间延长,偶尔会过夜。这项研究的目的是确定延长PACU住院时间(LOS)的危险因素。
    方法:这是对2019年至2022年接受微创子宫切除术治疗妇科癌症且住院时间<24小时的患者的单机构回顾性研究。主要结果是PACULOS。人口统计,术前诊断,并记录手术特点。在Box-Cox变换之后,线性回归用于确定PACULOS的重要预测因子。
    结果:对于确定的661名患者,中位PACULOS为5.04h(范围2.16-23.76h)。在单变量分析中,更长的PACULOS与年龄增加相关(ρ=0.106,p=0.006),非合作状态[平均差(MD)=0.019,p=0.099],酒精使用量增加(MD=0.018,p=0.102),Charlson合并症指数(CCI)评分增加(ρ=0.065,p=0.097),ASA等级≥3级(MD=0.033,p=0.002)。使用多元线性回归,年龄增加(R2=0.0011,p=0.043),非合作状态(R2=0.0389,p<0.001),ASA≥3级(R2=0.0250,p=0.023)与PACULOS增加相关。
    结论:确定有长期PACULOS风险的患者,包括年龄较大的病人,非合作伙伴,并且ASA等级≥3级,可以进行干预以改善患者体验,更好地利用医院资源,减少PACU过度拥挤,并限制术后入院和并发症。非合作状态与PACULOS之间的关系是本研究中确定的最新颖的关系。
    Minimally invasive surgery for treatment of gynecologic malignancies is associated with decreased pain, fewer complications, earlier return to activity, lower cost, and shorter hospital stays. Patients are often discharged the day of surgery, but occasionally stay overnight due to prolonged post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stays. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for prolonged PACU length of stay (LOS).
    This is a single institution retrospective review of patients who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy for gynecologic cancer from 2019 to 2022 and had a hospital stay <24-h. The primary outcome was PACU LOS. Demographics, pre-operative diagnoses, and surgical characteristics were recorded. After Box-Cox transformation, linear regression was used to determine significant predictors of PACU LOS.
    For the 661 patients identified, median PACU LOS was 5.04 h (range 2.16-23.76 h). On univariate analysis, longer PACU LOS was associated with increased age (ρ = 0.106, p = 0.006), non-partnered status [mean difference (MD) = 0.019, p = 0.099], increased alcohol use (MD = 0.018, p = 0.102), increased Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score (ρ = 0.065, p = 0.097), and ASA class ≥3 (MD = 0.033, p = 0.002). Using multivariate linear regression, increased age (R2 = 0.0011, p = 0.043), non-partnered status (R2 = 0.0389, p < 0.001), and ASA class ≥3 (R2 = 0.0250, p = 0.023) were associated with increased PACU LOS.
    Identifying patients at risk for prolonged PACU LOS, including patients who are older, non-partnered, and have an ASA class ≥3, may allow for interventions to improve patient experience, better utilize hospital resources, decrease PACU overcrowding, and limit postoperative admissions and complications. The relationship between non-partnered status and PACU LOS is the most novel relationship identified in this study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:妇科门诊手术可能提供包括降低成本在内的优势,在不影响患者安全和满意度的情况下,为患者提供便利和优化病床。随着2000年以来医疗费用的持续上升,门诊手术可能是提高财政资源利用率的一项行动,也是在2019年冠状病毒疾病大流行等危机期间继续治疗患者的解决方案。
    目的:本系统综述了门诊子宫切除术治疗良性适应症的文献。
    方法:使用PubMed和GoogleScholar搜索引擎,对2018年至2022年期间关于良性适应症的门诊妇科手术的医学文献进行了重点系统评价。然后,我们将选择范围缩小到涉及子宫切除术的文章。成功的当日出院(SDD)定义为患者在手术当天返回家中而没有过夜。
    结果:这篇综述包括了15篇关于微创手术的文章。大多数研究(n=11)在美国进行。门诊手术的平均成功率为60%,平均再入院率为3%。SDD失败的主要原因是患者的选择,排尿失败,疼痛管理的需要,恶心或呕吐,或者两者兼而有之,以及手术时机的延迟。与住院护理相比,SDD与更多的并发症和再入院无关。SDD的三个主要属性预测因子是年轻,手术时机早,总手术时间短。患者对SDD的满意度绝对较高,相对于住院满意度。
    结论:针对良性适应症的微创门诊子宫切除术是可行且安全的,但存在明显的失败风险。提高门诊管理的成功率,必须精心选择患者,并且必须提前计划手术路径。增强恢复方案的实施可能有助于促进门诊子宫切除术以获得良性适应症。
    BACKGROUND: Outpatient surgery in gynaecology may offer advantages including cost reduction, patient convenience and hospital bed optimisation without compromising patient safety and satisfaction. With the continual rise in health costs since 2000, outpatient surgery could be a line of action to improve financial resource utilisation and a solution for continuing to treat patients during crises such as the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
    OBJECTIVE: This systematic review provides an overview of the literature on minimally invasive outpatient hysterectomy for benign indications.
    METHODS: A focused systematic review of the medical literature between 2018 and 2022 on outpatient gynaecological surgery for a benign indication was conducted using the PubMed and Google Scholar search engines. We then narrowed our selection to articles that referred to hysterectomy. Successful same-day discharge (SDD) was defined as the patient\'s return home on the day of the procedure without an overnight stay.
    RESULTS: Fifteen articles that focused on minimally invasive surgery were included in this review. Most of the studies (n = 11) were conducted in the United States. Outpatient surgery had a mean success rate of 60 % and a mean readmission rate of 3 %. The main reasons for SDD failure were patient choice, failed voiding, the need for pain management, nausea or vomiting, or both and the late timing of surgery. SDD was not associated with more complications and readmissions compared with inpatient care. The three main attribute predictors of SDD were young age, early timing of surgery and short total operative time. Patient satisfaction with SDD was high in absolute terms and relative to satisfaction with hospitalisation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive outpatient hysterectomy for a benign indication is feasible and safe but is associated with a notable risk of failure. To increase the success rate of outpatient management, patients must be well selected and surgery pathways must be planned in advance. The implementation of enhanced recovery protocols may help promote outpatient hysterectomy for a benign indication.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估术前双侧超声引导下腰方神经阻滞(QLB)对微创子宫切除术后恢复质量的影响,在强化手术后恢复(ERAS)设置中。
    方法:随机化,控制,双盲试验(加拿大工作组一级)地点:大学附属三级医疗中心患者:所有接受选择性机器人或腹腔镜子宫切除术的妇女.患有慢性疼痛的女性,慢性抗凝,排除体重指数(BMI)>50kg/m2。
    方法:患者以1:1的比例随机分配,以下两个手臂之一,并根据机器人与腹腔镜方法进行分层。1.QLB:QLB(布比卡因)+假局部套管针浸润(生理盐水)。2.局部浸润:假QLB(生理盐水)+局部浸润(布比卡因)测量和主要结果:主要结果定义为基于验证问卷(QOR-40)的恢复质量评分,术后24小时完成。次要结果包括:动态疼痛评分,累积的阿片类药物消耗长达24小时,术后恶心呕吐,手术并发症,住院时间,麻醉后监护病房(PACU)首次止痛药的时间和不良事件。76名女性被纳入研究。两组的人口统计学特征相似。中位年龄为44(IQR39-50)岁,47%的参与者是非裔美国人,平均BMI为32.8(SD8.1)kg/m2。QLB的平均QOR-40评分为179.1(+/-10.3SD),局部麻醉组的平均QOR-40评分为175.6(+/-9.7SD)(p=0.072)。所有次要结果在组间具有可比性。
    结论:与局部麻醉端口部位浸润相比,择期机器人或腹腔镜子宫切除术后QLBs并没有显著改善恢复质量。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of preoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum nerve block (QLB) on quality of recovery after minimally invasive hysterectomy, in an enhanced recovery after surgery setting.
    METHODS: Randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial (Canadian Task Force level I).
    METHODS: University-affiliated tertiary medical center.
    METHODS: All women undergoing an elective robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy. Women with chronic pain, chronic anticoagulation, and body mass index >50 kg/m2 were excluded.
    METHODS: Patients were randomized with a 1:1 allocation, to one of the following 2 arms, and stratified based on robotic versus laparoscopic approach. 1. QLB: QLB (bupivacaine) + sham local trocar sites infiltration (normal saline) 2. Local infiltration: sham QLB (normal saline) + local infiltration (bupivacaine) MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was defined as the quality of recovery score based on the validated questionnaire Quality of Recovery, completed 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included dynamic pain scores, accumulated opioid consumption up to 24 hours, postoperative nausea and vomiting, surgical complications, length of hospital stay, time to first pain medication administration in the postanesthesia care unit, and adverse events. A total of 76 women were included in the study. Demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Median age was 44 years (interquartile range 39-50), 47% of the participants were African American, and mean body mass index was 32.8 kg/m2 (standard deviation [SD] 8.1). The mean Quality of Recovery score was 179.1 (SD ± 10.3) in the QLB and 175.6 (SD ± 9.7) for the local anesthesia group (p = .072). All secondary outcomes were comparable between groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: QLBs do not significantly improve quality of recovery after elective robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with local anesthetic port site infiltration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    将经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)引入妇科外科医生的工具箱中有可能扭转经阴道子宫切除术下降的趋势。
    这篇综述讨论了应用于子宫切除术的vNOTES技术的细微差别;描述了vNOTES子宫切除术,一步一步(包括可能希望将vNOTES子宫切除术纳入其手术库的外科医生的低复杂性和高复杂性病例的提示和技巧);并检查该领域的证据和研究趋势。
    文本中的描述,数字,tables,和视频都有助于让读者清楚地了解vNOTES,其优势,局限性,和研究潜力。
    vNOTES子宫切除术是一种独特的混合阴道,腹腔镜,和腹腔镜单部位手术(LESS)技术,并不是一个新的程序,而是另一种用于微创妇科手术的工具。(JGYNECOLSURG40:78)。
    UNASSIGNED: The introduction of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) to the toolbox of gynecologic surgeons has the potential to reverse the trend of vaginal hysterectomy declines.
    UNASSIGNED: This review discusses nuances of the vNOTES technique applied to hysterectomy; describes vNOTES hysterectomy, step-by-step (including tips and tricks for low- and high-complexity cases for surgeons who may want to incorporate vNOTES hysterectomy into their surgical repertoires); and examines evidence and research trends in this field.
    UNASSIGNED: The descriptions in the text, figures, tables, and videos all contribute to giving readers a clear understanding of vNOTES, its advantages, limitations, and research potentials.
    UNASSIGNED: vNOTES hysterectomy is a unique blend of vaginal, laparoscopic, and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) techniques and is not a new procedure, but rather another tool to use in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. (J GYNECOL SURG 40:78).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在LACC试验发表后,早期宫颈癌的标准手术方式是开腹根治性子宫切除术.关于LACC试验后观察到的开腹子宫切除术的改变是否由于微创方法的使用减少而导致术后并发症发生率增加,只有有限的数据可用。
    目的:本研究的目的是分析是否与LACC试验的发表相关,以及与浸润性宫颈癌手术治疗相关的30天并发症的增加。
    方法:我们使用美国外科医生学会国家外科质量改善计划的数据,将LACC前(2016年1月至2017年12月)与LACC后(2019年1月至2020年12月)进行比较。评估了两个时期中每种手术方法(开腹或微创)子宫切除术对浸润性宫颈癌的发生率。随后,我们比较了30天的主要并发症,轻微并发症,计划外的医院再入院,以及LACC试验发表前后的术中/术后输血率。
    结果:总计,本研究纳入了3024例接受开腹或微创子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的患者。其中,1515(50.1%)在前LACC期处理,1509(49.9%)在后LACC期处理。从LACC前后,微创入路的发生率从75.6%(1145/1515)显着下降到41.1%(620/1509),而开腹手术的发生率从前到后LACC期间的24.4%(370/1515)增加到58.9%(889/1509)(p<0.001)。在LACC前(85/1515,5.6%)和LACC后(74/1509,4.9%)之间,总体30天主要并发症保持稳定[校正比值比0.85(95%CI,0.61-1.17)]。LACC前期(103/1515,6.8%)与LACC后期(120/1509,8.0%)的总体30天轻微并发症相似[调整后比值比为1.17(95%CI,0.89-1.55)]。在LACC前(每30人天7.9%)和LACC后(每30人天6.3%)期间,计划外的住院再入院率保持稳定[调整后的HR0.78(95%CI,0.58-1.04)]。从LACC前(58/1515,3.8%)到LACC后(101/1509,6.7%),术中/术后输血率显着增加[校正OR1.79(95%CI1.27-2.53)]。
    结论:在LACC试验发表后,我们观察到浸润性宫颈癌的手术方式发生了重大转变,减少了微创和增加了开腹途径。手术方式的改变与30天主要或次要并发症发生率的增加无关。计划外的医院再入院,虽然它与输血率的增加有关。
    After the publication of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial, the standard surgical approach for early-stage cervical cancer is open radical hysterectomy. Only limited data were available regarding whether the change to open abdominal hysterectomy observed after the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial led to an increase in postoperative complication rates as a consequence of the decrease in the use of the minimally invasive approach.
    This study aimed to analyze whether there was a correlation between the publication of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial and an increase in the 30-day complications associated with surgical treatment of invasive cervical cancer.
    Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were used to compare the results in the pre-Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer period (January 2016 to December 2017) vs the results in the post-Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer period (January 2019 to December 2020). The rates of each surgical approach (open abdominal or minimally invasive) hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer during the 2 periods were assessed. Subsequently, 30-day major complication, minor complication, unplanned hospital readmission, and intra- or postoperative transfusion rates before and after the publication of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial were compared.
    Overall, 3024 patients undergoing either open abdominal hysterectomy or minimally invasive hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer were included in the study. Of the patients, 1515 (50.1%) were treated in the pre-Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer period, and 1509 (49.9%) were treated in the post-Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer period. The rate of minimally invasive approaches decreased significantly from 75.6% (1145/1515) in the pre-Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer period to 41.1% (620/1509) in the post-Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer period, whereas the rate of open abdominal approach increased from 24.4% (370/1515) in the pre-Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer period to 58.9% (889/1509) in the post-Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer period (P<.001). The overall 30-day major complications remained stable between the pre-Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer period (85/1515 [5.6%]) and the post-Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer period (74/1509 [4.9%]) (adjusted odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-1.17). The overall 30-day minor complications were similar in the pre-Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer period (103/1515 [6.8%]) vs the post-Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer period (120/1509 [8.0%]) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.55). The unplanned hospital readmission rate remained stable during the pre-Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer period (7.9% per 30 person-days) and during the post-Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer period (6.3% per 30 person-days) (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.04)]. The intra- and postoperative transfusion rates increased significantly from 3.8% (58/1515) in the pre-Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer period to 6.7% (101/1509) in the post-Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer period (adjusted odds ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-2.53).
    This study observed a significant shift in the surgical approach for invasive cervical cancer after the publication of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial, with a reduction in the minimally invasive abdominal approach and an increase in the open abdominal approach. The change in surgical approach was not associated with an increase in the rate of 30-day major or minor complications and unplanned hospital readmission, although it was associated with an increase in the transfusion rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用美国外科医生学会国家外科质量改善计划数据库(NSQIP)描述腹腔镜子宫切除术后并发症风险增加的子宫重量阈值:设计:使用2016年至2021年美国外科医生学会国家外科质量改善计划数据库进行横断面分析。
    方法:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库。
    方法:为良性适应症行微创子宫切除术的患者(N=64,289)。
    方法:无测量结果和主要结果:以克数输入子宫重量,并从患者图表中提取30天并发症。在分析样本中,中位子宫重量为135g(IQR:90,215),6%的患者(n=4,085)出现并发症.在双变量分析中,子宫重量在预测并发症方面表现很差(AUROC=0.53,95%置信区间[CI]:0.53,0.54)。在多变量分析中,163克的子宫重量临界值与较高的并发症几率相关(比值比[OR]:1.11;95%CI:1.03,1.19;p=0.003),但该阈值对预测并发症的敏感性仅为43%,特异性为62%.
    结论:单独的子宫重量在预测微创子宫切除术围手术期并发症风险方面的作用可忽略不计。
    To describe the uterine weight threshold for increasing risk of complications after a laparoscopic hysterectomy using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.
    Cross-sectional analysis using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP database from 2016 to 2021.
    American College of Surgeons NSQIP database.
    Patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications (N = 64 289).
    None.
    Uterine weight was entered in grams and 30-day complications were abstracted from patient charts. In the analytic sample, median uterine weight was 135 grams (interquartile range, 90-215) and 6% of patients (n = 4085) experienced complications. Uterine weight performed very poorly in predicting complications on bivariate analysis (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.54). On multivariable analysis, a uterine weight cutoff of 163 grams was associated with higher odds of complications (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.19; p = .003), but this threshold achieved only a 43% sensitivity and 62% specificity for predicting complications.
    Uterine weight alone possessed negligible utility for predicting the risk of perioperative complications in minimally invasive hysterectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号