Minimal residual disease (MRD)

微小残留病 (MRD)
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们分析了140例患者,中位年龄为51岁;21%的患者WBC≥100×109/L,52%有NPM1共突变。直到2018年,101名患者接受了化疗;此后,39人接受了3+7+midostaurin。总体CR率为64%,NPM1突变患者更高(73%)。单因素分析显示,NPM1突变(p=0.032)和WBC<100×109/L(p=0.013)对应答有正向影响。具有FLT3i给药的趋势(p=0.052)。多因素分析证实WBC计数是独立的预后因素(p=0.017)。在CR1中,41/90例患者接受了同种异体和18例自体移植。EFS中位数为1.1vs.自体移植和同种异体移植患者1.6年,分别(p=0.9)。自体移植的一年非复发死亡率为0.00%,同种异体移植的一年非复发死亡率为28%(p=0.007);自体移植的1年和3年CIR较高(39%vs.15%和57%vs.21%,p=0.004)。FLT3i组未达到中位生存期。总的来说,69例患者接受干细胞移植(18例自体,51同种异体)。8名患者恢复了移植后的FLT3i,全部存活的中位数为65个月。同种异体移植在FLT3突变的AML中至关重要,但下一个挑战将是确定哪些患者可以从CR1移植中获益,哪些患者可以加强移植后治疗.
    We analyzed 140 patients with a median age of 51 years; 21% had WBC ≥ 100 × 109/L, and 52% had an NPM1 co-mutation. Until 2018, 101 patients received chemotherapy; thereafter, 39 received 3+7+midostaurin. The overall CR rate was 64%, higher in NPM1 mutant patients (73%). Univariate analysis showed that NPM1 mutation (p = 0.032) and WBC < 100 × 109/L (p = 0.013) positively influenced the response, with a trend for FLT3i administration (p = 0.052). Multivariate analysis confirmed WBC count as an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.017). In CR1, 41/90 patients underwent allogeneic and 18 autologous transplantation. The median EFS was 1.1 vs. 1.6 years in autografted and allografted patients, respectively (p = 0.9). The one-year non-relapse mortality was 0.00% for autologous and 28% for allogeneic transplants (p = 0.007); CIR at 1 and 3 years was higher in autologous transplants (39% vs. 15% and 57% vs. 21%, p = 0.004). The median survival was not reached in the FLT3i group. Overall, 69 patients received stem cell transplantation (18 autologous, 51 allogeneic). Post-transplant FLT3i was resumed in eight patients, all alive after a median of 65 months. Allogeneic transplantation is crucial in FLT3-mutated AML, but the next challenge will be to identify which patients can benefit from transplants in CR1 and in which to intensify post-transplant therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺癌是全球第二常见的癌症,也是癌症相关死亡的主要原因。非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)占所有肺癌的85%。在过去的四十年里,NSCLC患者的5年生存率仅为16%,尽管化疗有所改善,靶向治疗,和免疫疗法。血液中循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)可用于识别微小残留病(MRD),基于ctDNA的MRD已被证明在预后评估中具有重要意义,复发监测,复发风险评估,疗效监测,和NSCLC的治疗干预决策。MRD的水平可以通过监测ctDNA来获得,为更精确和个性化的治疗提供指导,其科学可行性可以极大地改变肺癌治疗模式。在这次审查中,我们对NSCLC中的MRD研究进行了全面综述,并重点介绍了基于ctDNA的MRD在当前临床实践中在NSCLC不同分期中的应用.
    Lung cancer is the second most common cancer worldwide and the leading cause of cancer-related fatalities, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for 85% of all lung cancers. Over the past forty years, patients with NSCLC have had a 5-year survival rate of only 16%, despite improvements in chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in blood can be used to identify minimal residual disease (MRD), and ctDNA-based MRD has been shown to be of significance in prognostic assessment, recurrence monitoring, risk of recurrence assessment, efficacy monitoring, and therapeutic intervention decisions in NSCLC. The level of MRD can be obtained by monitoring ctDNA to provide guidance for more precise and personalized treatment, the scientific feasibility of which could dramatically modify lung cancer treatment paradigm. In this review, we present a comprehensive review of MRD studies in NSCLC and focus on the application of ctDNA-based MRD in different stages of NSCLC in current clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    核磷蛋白1(NPM1)突变状态的定量评估对于评估NPM1突变的急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的可测量残留病(MRD)不可或缺。在一项回顾性研究中,通过新型自动RT-qPCR定量NPM1测定(XpertNPM1突变测定)和NPM1mutA测试了用于AML疾病负担的常规临床诊断评估的剩余外周血(PB)标本(n=40),mutB&DMutaQuant试剂盒。基于戴明回归分析,XpertNPM1突变分析的定量结果与NPM1mutA之间存在高度相关性(斜率=0.92;截距=0.12;皮尔逊r=0.982),mutB&DMutaQuant试剂盒。因此,Xpert测试定量结果与比较方法高度相关,前者具有作为监测具有已知NPM1突变的AML患者的有用替代方法的潜力。
    Quantitative assessment of nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) mutation status is integral to evaluating measurable residual disease (MRD) in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. In a retrospective study, leftover peripheral blood (PB) specimens (n = 40) which were collected for routine clinical diagnostic evaluations of AML disease burden were tested by both a novel automated RT-qPCR quantitative NPM1 assay (Xpert NPM1 mutation assay) and the NPM1 mutA, mutB&D MutaQuant kit. Based on a Deming regression analysis, there was a high correlation (slope = 0.92; intercept = 0.12; Pearson\'s r = 0.982) between the quantitative results of the Xpert NPM1 mutation assay and the NPM1 mutA, mutB&D MutaQuant kit. The Xpert test quantitative results are thus highly correlated with the comparator method and the former has potential as a useful alternative for the monitoring of AML patients with a known NPM1 mutation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法改善了复发和难治性(R/R)大B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤(LBCL)的历史不良结局。然而,近60%的患者在接受CAR-T细胞治疗后要么无反应,要么复发.目前,PET/CT扫描用于评估反应。无细胞循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)由肿瘤细胞释放到外周血中,可以进行测量以进行微小残留病(MRD)评估。
    方法:在本回顾性研究中,IRB批准的试点研究,收集来自10名R/RNHL患者的CART细胞输注后第0、14、28、56、90、180和365天的外周血样本的存档淋巴瘤组织和ctDNA,用于克隆可变多样性连接(VDJ)重排的下一代测序(NGS)(自适应生物技术[西雅图,WA]).在第90天和第365天通过PET/CT评估反应,并根据Lugano2014标准进行分级。主要终点是确定检测ctDNA以监测抗CD19CART细胞治疗后疾病反应的可行性。次要终点是比较从ctDNA到PET/CT成像的MRD评估的敏感性/特异性。
    结果:10名患者中有9名具有可跟踪序列[中位年龄69(范围:56-76);55.6%男性;中位LDH224],包括在这项研究中。在中位数2次先前治疗后,每个人都接受了tisagenlecleucel(tisa-cel)CART细胞治疗(范围:2-4)。7/9例患者有R/R弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL),2/9转化为滤泡性淋巴瘤。中位随访时间为12.7个月(范围:1.5-30个月),4名患者还活着。到第90天,3名患者(33.3%)达到放射学完全缓解(CR),而6名患者(66.6%)患有进行性疾病(PD)。第14天或第28天的可检测MRD在1年之前的任何时间对放射学进展具有83%的灵敏度和100%的特异性。对于PD患者,第0、14和28天的中位数(四分位距)MRD为17.31(1.01,96.84),9.12(0.30,18.8),和23.77(8.01,137.53)拷贝每毫升(毫升),分别。对于在第28天检测到MRD的患者,mOS和mPFS分别为6.7和1.3个月,分别。
    结论:监测MRD是一种敏感而特异的方法,可以检测对tisa-cel的不良反应。需要更频繁地使用不同产品评估MRD的其他研究。
    BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has improved the historically poor outcomes for relapsed and refractory (R/R) large B-cell non-Hodgkin\'s lymphoma (LBCL). However, nearly 60% of patients will either fail to respond or relapse after CAR T-cell therapy. Currently, PET/CT scans are used to assess response. Cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is released by tumor cells into the peripheral blood and can be measured for minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment.
    METHODS: In this retrospective, IRB approved pilot study, archived lymphoma tissue and ctDNA from peripheral blood samples on day 0, 14, 28, 56, 90, 180, and 365 after CAR T-cell infusion from 10 patients with R/R NHL were collected for next-generation sequencing (NGS) of clonal variable-diversity-joining (VDJ) rearrangements (Adaptive biotechnologies [Seattle, WA]). Response was assessed by PET/CT on days 90 and 365 and graded according to the Lugano 2014 criteria. The primary endpoint was to determine the feasibility of detecting ctDNA to monitor disease response after anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. The secondary endpoint was to compare the sensitivity/specificity of MRD assessment from ctDNA to PET/CT imaging.
    RESULTS: Nine out of 10 patients with a trackable sequence [median age 69 (range: 56-76); 55.6% male; median LDH 224], were included in this study. Each received tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) CAR T-cell therapy after median 2 prior treatments (range: 2-4). 7/9 patients had R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and 2/9 had transformed follicular lymphoma. At a median follow up of 12.7 months (range: 1.5-30 months), 4 patients were alive. By day 90, 3 patients (33.3%) achieved a radiographic complete response (CR) whilst 6 patients (66.6%) had progressive disease (PD). Detectable MRD on day 14 or day 28 had 83% sensitivity and 100% specificity for radiographic progression at any time before 1 year. For patients with PD, the median (interquartile range) MRD at day 0, 14, and 28 were 17.31 (1.01, 96.84), 9.12 (0.30, 18.8), and 23.77 (8.01, 137.53) copies per milliliter (mL), respectively. For patients with detectable MRD at day 28, mOS and mPFS were 6.7 and 1.3 months, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring MRD was a sensitive and specific method to detect poor response to tisa-cel. Additional studies evaluating MRD more frequently and with different products are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前骨肉瘤复发的监测模式显示出有限的敏感性和特异性。尽管循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)已被确定为许多实体瘤中微小残留病(MRD)的生物标志物,对于骨肉瘤的纵向MRD检测,尚未彻底探索灵敏的ctDNA检测技术。
    自2019年8月至2023年6月,对中山大学附属第一医院诊断为骨肉瘤的59例患者进行了评估。通过肿瘤组织的全外显子组测序(WES)开发肿瘤信息MRD组。在治疗期间收集纵向血液样品并进行基于多重PCR的下一代测序(NGS)。卡普兰-迈耶曲线和对数秩检验用于比较结果,并进行Cox回归分析以确定预后因素.
    对83例患者的WES分析显示出实质性的突变异质性,非复发突变基因占58.1%。85.5%(71/83)的患者成功获得了肿瘤信息MRD组。在59名成功定制MRD面板和可用血液样本的患者中,13例患者术后ctDNA检测呈阳性。与ctDNA阳性的患者相比,术后ctDNA阴性的患者具有更好的无事件生存率(EFS)。手术后1-6个月,辅助化疗后,术后6个月以上(p<0.05)。在单变量和多变量Cox回归分析中,ctDNA结果是EFS的显著预测因子(p<0.05)。ctDNA检测先于5例阳性显像,平均提前期为92.6天。三十九名病人仍然无病,在随访期间,ctDNA结果始终为阴性或转为阴性。
    我们的研究强调了肿瘤信息深度测序ctDNA在骨肉瘤MRD监测中的适用性,根据我们的知识,表示迄今为止最大的队列。ctDNA检测是一个重要的预后因素,与标准成像相比,能够早期识别肿瘤复发和进展,从而为指导骨肉瘤患者管理提供有价值的见解。
    国家自然科学基金资助(编号:82072964,82072965,82203798,82203026),广东省自然科学基金(编号:2023A1515012659,2023A1515010302),和广东省基础与应用基础研究基金区域组合项目(编号:2020A1515110010)。
    UNASSIGNED: Current surveillance modalities of osteosarcoma relapse exhibit limited sensitivity and specificity. Although circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been established as a biomarker of minimal residual disease (MRD) in many solid tumors, a sensitive ctDNA detection technique has not been thoroughly explored for longitudinal MRD detection in osteosarcoma.
    UNASSIGNED: From August 2019 to June 2023, 59 patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were evaluated in this study. Tumor-informed MRD panels were developed through whole exome sequencing (WES) of tumor tissues. Longitudinal blood samples were collected during treatment and subjected to multiplex PCR-based next-generation sequencing (NGS). Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-rank tests were used to compare outcomes, and Cox regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors.
    UNASSIGNED: WES analysis of 83 patients revealed substantial mutational heterogeneity, with non-recurrent mutated genes accounting for 58.1%. Tumor-informed MRD panels were successfully obtained for 85.5% of patients (71/83). Among 59 patients with successful MRD panel customization and available blood samples, 13 patients exhibited positive ctDNA detection after surgery. Patients with negative post-operative ctDNA had better event-free survival (EFS) compared to those with positive ctDNA, at 1-6 months after surgery, after adjuvant chemotherapy, and more than 6 months after surgery (p < 0.05). In both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, ctDNA results emerged as a significant predictor of EFS (p < 0.05). ctDNA detection preceded positive imaging in 5 patients, with an average lead time of 92.6 days. Thirty-nine patients remained disease-free, with ctDNA results consistently negative or turning negative during follow-up.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study underscores the applicability of tumor-informed deep sequencing of ctDNA in osteosarcoma MRD surveillance and, to our knowledge, represents the largest cohort to date. ctDNA detection is a significant prognostic factor, enabling the early identification of tumor relapse and progression compared to standard imaging, thus offering valuable insights in guiding osteosarcoma patient management.
    UNASSIGNED: The Grants of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82072964, 82072965, 82203798, 82203026), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong (No. 2023A1515012659, 2023A1515010302), and the Regional Combination Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong (No. 2020A1515110010).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)作为微小残留病(MRD)替代品的研究一直是各种临床试验的重点,研究结果强调了其作为检测复发的敏感标志物的有效性。2018年,美国临床肿瘤学会和美国病理学家学院的联合审查承认,目前缺乏指导ctDNA临床决策的证据。然而,有许多正在进行的研究探索ctDNA的未来应用及其在特定患者人群的临床决策中的作用。
    该病例涉及一名患有Lynch综合征的患者,该患者发展为同步左侧结直肠癌(CRC)。每个原发性恶性肿瘤都表现出不同的突变谱,为用于定量ctDNA水平的个性化肿瘤信息测定引入复杂性。最初的ctDNA水平是阴性的,直到测定被校准到横结肠原发性肿瘤。不幸的是,监测成像显示影像学复发与ctDNA阳性一致.开始用抗PD-1抑制剂派姆单抗治疗,导致ctDNA在仅仅四个循环后的清除。截至目前,没有放射学或生物学证据表明疾病复发。
    本案例研究揭示了ctDNA作为MRD替代的不断发展的景观和当前的局限性。我们描述了一名同步CRC患者,其影像学复发且MRD检测阴性。当前的肿瘤知情检测在检测单个肿瘤的能力方面受到限制,自然会错过同步和异时恶性肿瘤。针对多种肿瘤定制或利用肿瘤不可知方法的测定应该是该患者群体中临床决策的一部分。
    UNASSIGNED: The investigation of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a substitute for minimal residual disease (MRD) has been a central focus in various clinical trials, with findings highlighting its effectiveness as a sensitive marker for detecting recurrence. In 2018, a joint review by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists acknowledged a lack of current evidence guiding clinical decisions regarding ctDNA. Nevertheless, there are a multitude of ongoing studies exploring the future applications of ctDNA and its role in clinical decision making for select patient populations.
    UNASSIGNED: The case presented involves a patient with Lynch syndrome who developed synchronous left-sided colorectal cancers (CRC). Each primary malignancy exhibited a distinct mutational profile, introducing complexity to the personalized tumor-informed assays used for quantifying ctDNA levels. Initial ctDNA levels were negative until the assay was calibrated to the transverse colon primary tumor. Unfortunately, surveillance imaging showed radiographic recurrence coinciding with positive ctDNA findings. Treatment with the anti-PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab was initiated, resulting in the clearance of ctDNA after just four cycles. As of now, there is no radiographic or biologic evidence indicating disease recurrence.
    UNASSIGNED: This case study sheds light on the evolving landscape and current limitations of ctDNA as a surrogate for MRD. We describe a patient with synchronous CRC who had radiographic recurrence and a negative MRD assay. Current tumor-informed assays are limited in their capacity to detect a single tumor, and by nature can miss both synchronous and metachronous malignancies. Assays tailored to multiple tumors or utilizing tumor agnostic methods should be a part of clinical decision making in this patient population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多发性骨髓瘤(MM)表示以浆细胞异常增殖为特征的癌性生长。越来越多的证据表明,解决MM的复杂性在于体内存在微小残留病(MRD)。MRD评估对于MM患者的风险评估变得越来越重要。同样,血清游离蛋白轻链水平及其比值在评估疾病负担和MM%变化中起着至关重要的作用.在本文中,我们回顾和探讨MRD和血清游离轻链比值在MM治疗中的应用,深入研究它们各自的特点,优势,缺点,以及它们的相互关系。
    Multiple myeloma (MM) denotes a cancerous growth characterized by abnormal proliferation of plasma cells. Growing evidence suggests that the complexity in addressing MM lies in the presence of minimal residual disease (MRD) within the body. MRD assessment is becoming increasingly important for risk assessment in patients with MM. Similarly, the levels of serum free protein light chain and their ratio play a crucial role in assessing the disease burden and changes in MM. In this paper, we review and explore the utilization of MRD and serum free light chain ratio in the treatment of MM, delving into their respective characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and their interrelation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    T淋巴细胞白血病/淋巴瘤(T-ALL/LBL)是一种罕见且高度侵袭性的淋巴母细胞肿瘤。我们评估了195例仅接受ALL型化疗的T-ALL/LBL青少年和成人患者(化疗,n=72)或与自体造血干细胞移植(auto-HSCT,n=23)或异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT,n=100),从2006年1月至2020年9月在三个中国医疗中心。167例(85.6%)患者达到总体缓解(ORR),其中138例完全缓解(CR)患者(70.8%)和29例部分缓解(PR)患者(14.8%)。直到2023年10月1日,allo-HSCT和auto-HSCT之间的5年总生存率(5-OS)和5年无进展生存率(5-PFS)没有差异(5-OS57.9%vs.36.7%,P=0.139,5年PFS为49.4%28.6%,P=0.078)对于达到CR的患者,对于达到PR的患者,与单独化疗的接受者相比,allo-HSCT接受者的5-OS较高(5-OS23.8%与0,P=0.042)。对于接受allo-HSCT的患者,与MRD阳性患者相比,微小残留病(MRD)阴性人群显示出更好的5-OS生存率(67.8%vs.19.6%,p=0.000)。早期T细胞前体(ETP)之间没有显着差异,有或没有表达一种或多种骨髓相关或干细胞相关(M/S)标志物的NON-ETP患者(M/S+的NON-ETP,无M/S+的非ETP)在5-OS的allo-HSCT群体中。(62.9%与54.5%vs.48.4%,P>0.05)。Notch突变在非复发/难治性疾病患者中比复发/难治性疾病患者更常见(χ²=4.293,P=0.038)。总之,Allo-HSCT可能是一种有效的巩固治疗,不仅适用于CR患者,而且对于那些实现公关的人。通过在同种异体移植之前获得MRD阴性,可以显着改善预后。
    T lymphoblastic leukemia /lymphoma (T-ALL/LBL) is a rare and highly aggressive neoplasm of lymphoblasts. We evaluated 195 T-ALL/LBL adolescent and adult patients who received ALL-type chemotherapy alone (chemo,n = 72) or in combination with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(auto-HSCT,n = 23) or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(allo-HSCT,n = 100) from January 2006 to September 2020 in three Chinese medical centers. 167 (85.6%) patients achieved overall response (ORR) with 138 complete response (CR) patients (70.8%) and 29 partial response (PR) patients (14.8%). Until October 1, 2023, no difference was found in 5-year overall survival (5-OS) and 5-year progression free survival(5-PFS) between allo-HSCT and auto-HSCT (5-OS 57.9% vs. 36.7%, P = 0.139, 5-year PFS 49.4% vs. 28.6%, P = 0.078) for patients who achieved CR, for patients who achieved PR, allo-HSCT recipients had higher 5-OS compared with chemo alone recipients (5-OS 23.8% vs. 0, P = 0.042). For patients undergoing allo-HSCT, minimal residual disease (MRD) negative population showed better 5-OS survival compared with MRD positive patients (67.8% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.000). There were no significant differences between early T-cell precursor (ETP), NON-ETP patients with or without expression of one or more myeloid-associated or stem cell-associated (M/S+) markers (NON-ETP with M/S+, NON-ETP without M/S+) groups in allo-HSCT population for 5-OS. (62.9% vs. 54.5% vs.48.4%, P > 0.05). Notch mutations were more common in patients with non-relapsed/refractory disease than relapsed/refractory disease (χ² =4.293, P = 0.038). In conclusion, Allo-HSCT could be an effective consolidation therapy not just for patients with CR, but also for those who achieved PR. The prognosis is significantly improved by obtaining MRD negative prior to allogeneic transplantation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    目的:在过去的二十年中,可切除的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗一直依赖于手术和辅助化疗,但现在通过免疫疗法和靶向药物的引入发生了根本性的变化。进行此审查是为了总结最近的发展并强调未来的方向。
    方法:根据PubMed和过去3年主要肿瘤学大会的内容,对早期非小细胞肺癌治疗的随机2/3期试验进行了文献检索。
    采用3-4个周期的新辅助化学免疫疗法和1年的辅助程序性细胞死亡(配体)1[PD-(L)1]阻断的围手术期策略结合了纯佐剂的功效[对II期和III期肿瘤均有效,无事件生存风险比(HR)约为0.70]和纯新辅助策略(仅对EFSHR约为0.50的III期有效),显示整个PD-L1肿瘤表达水平的益处,并显著提高总体生存率,正如NADIM-2和Keynote-671研究最近显示的那样。一旦批准,基于两个主要优势,它们可能会主导可切除NCSLC的管理格局:第一,与纯辅助治疗相比,像IMpower010和Keynote-091试验一样,它们允许评估手术标本的反应,并允许相应地调整术后管理;第二,与Checkmate-816的单纯新辅助治疗相比,其术后成分似乎可额外改善未能达到病理完全缓解(pCR)的患者的预后.在不久的将来,进一步的改善可能包括非pCR患者的强化术后治疗,例如,加上化疗,抗体-药物缀合物,或下一代免疫治疗;更广泛地使用循环肿瘤DNA测定来改善微小残留病的监测;以及常规可用的其他酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)对抗经典EGFR突变以外的致癌驱动因素,就像alectinib辅助治疗ALK融合肿瘤一样,根据最近ALINA试验的成功,预计很快就会获得批准,和辅助selpercatinib治疗RET融合肿瘤,如果正在进行的LIBRETTO-432试验也是阳性的。TKI和新辅助化学免疫疗法在常规环境中的可用性使得分子肿瘤谱分析对于已经在初始诊断时可能可切除的肿瘤是必要的。
    结论:围手术期免疫治疗正在成为可切除NSCLC的主要治疗模式,虽然越来越多地使用靶向药物进行可行的改变,但需要对早期肿瘤进行前期分子谱分析以进行患者选择。
    OBJECTIVE: The management of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has relied on surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for the past two decades, but is now radically changing through the introduction of immunotherapy and targeted drugs. This review was conducted to summarize recent developments and highlight future directions.
    METHODS: A literature search for randomized phase 2/3 trials on the treatment of early-stage NSCLC was performed based on PubMed and the content on major oncology congresses during the last 3 years.
    UNASSIGNED: Perioperative strategies with 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and 1 year of adjuvant programmed cell death (ligand) 1 [PD-(L)1] blockade combine the efficacy of purely adjuvant [effective for both stage II and stage III tumors with event-free survival hazard ratios (HR) of approximately 0.70] and the purely neoadjuvant strategies (effective only for stage III with a lower EFS HR of approximately 0.50), show benefit across the entire spectrum of PD-L1 tumor expression levels, and significantly improve overall survival, as the NADIM-2 and Keynote-671 studies recently showed. Once approved, they will probably dominate the landscape of management for resectable NCSLC based on two main advantages: first, compared to purely adjuvant treatments, like those of the IMpower010 and Keynote-091 trials, they allow for evaluation of response in the surgical specimen and permit adjustment of the postoperative management accordingly; second, compared to the purely neoadjuvant treatment of Checkmate-816, their postoperative component appears to additionally improve the outcome of patients failing to achieve a pathologic complete remission (pCR). Further improvements in the near future will likely include intensified postoperative therapy for non-pCR patients, e.g., with addition of chemotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates, or next-generation immunotherapeutics; broader use of circulating tumor DNA assays for improved monitoring of minimal residual disease; as well as routine availability of further tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) against oncogenic drivers beyond classic EGFR mutations, like adjuvant alectinib for tumors with ALK fusions, whose approval is expected soon based on the recent success of the ALINA trial, and adjuvant selpercatinib for tumors with RET fusions, if the ongoing LIBRETTO-432 trial is also positive. The availability of both TKI and neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in the routine setting renders molecular tumor profiling imperative for potentially resectable tumors already at initial diagnosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative immunotherapy is becoming the dominant treatment paradigm for resectable NSCLC, while increasing use of targeted drugs for actionable alterations necessitates upfront molecular profiling of early tumors for patient selection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号