Early motor skills may be important early markers of neurodevelopmental conditions or predictors of their later onset. To explore this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of infant motor skill assessments in those who go on to gain a clinical diagnosis of autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), schizophrenia, language conditions, tic disorders, or developmental coordination disorder (DCD). In total, 65 articles met inclusion criteria. Three three-level meta-analyses were run. Meta-analysis of milestone achievement in N=21354 individuals revealed gross motor milestones were significantly delayed compared to controls (g= 0.53, p< 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed autism (g= 0.63) and DCD (g= 0.53) had the highest magnitude delays. Specific delays were revealed for holding the head up (g= 0.21), sitting (g= 0.28), standing (g= 0.35), crawling (g=0.19), and walking (g= 0.71). Meta-analyses of standardised motor skill measurements in N=1976 individuals revealed reduced performance compared to controls in autism and language conditions (g= -0.54, p< 0.001). Together, these findings demonstrate delayed milestone attainment and motor impairments in early childhood in neurodevelopmental conditions.

OBJECTIVE: In transitioning to competency-based surgical training, the need to clearly define competency is paramount. The purpose of this study is to define the well-prepared foundational resident using the ACGME General Surgery Milestones as our conceptual framework.
METHODS: Participants reflected on their expectations of a well-prepared resident at the end of PGY1, then assigned milestone levels reflecting this level of competence for General Surgery Milestones 1.0 and 2.0. Subcompetency scores were averaged among residents and faculty. The level of the well-prepared foundational resident was determined based on the highest level within one standard deviation of faculty, resident, and total group averages.
METHODS: This took place during a dedicated education retreat at a single, large academic general surgery residency program.
METHODS: Key faculty stakeholders and a representative sample of residents (PGY 1-5) within our institution participated.
RESULTS: Eight faculty and five residents completed Milestones 1.0 and 2.0 scoring. Mean scores between faculty and residents were compared. For 1.0, mean scores for Practice-Based Learning and Improvement 3 (PBLI 3) and Interpersonal Communication Skills 3 (ICS 3) were discernably lower for residents than for faculty (PBLI 3 1.3 (0.3) v 0.9 (0.2), p = 0.01; ICS3 1.6 (0.6) v 1.1 (1), p = 0.01). Scores of 2.0 were comparable across all subcompetency domains. With this broad agreement, Milestone-based competency standards were determined. Descriptive narratives of the KSAs were created for each subcompetency, combining the determined Milestones 1.0 and 2.0 levels.
CONCLUSIONS: We were able to clearly define the competent foundational resident using the ACGME Milestones as a conceptual framework. These Milestone levels reflect the culture and expectations in our department, providing a foundation upon which to build a program of assessment. This methodology can be readily replicated in other programs to reflect specific expectations of the program within the larger ACGME frameworks of competency.

Pediatric pulmonology fellowship training programs are required by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education to report Pediatric Subspecialty Milestones biannually to track fellow progress. However, several issues, such as lack of subspecialty-specific context and ambiguous language, have raised concerns about their validity and applicability to use for fellow assessment and curriculum development. In this Perspective, we briefly share the process of the Pediatric Pulmonology Milestones 2.0 Work Group in creating new specialty-specific Milestones and tailoring information on the Harmonized Milestones to pediatric pulmonologists, with the goal of improving the Milestones\' utility for stakeholders, including pulmonology fellows, faculty, program directors, and accrediting bodies. In addition, we created a supplemental guide to better link the Milestones to pulmonary-specific scenarios to create a shared mental model between stakeholders and remove a potential detriment to validity. Through the process, a number of guiding principles were clarified, including: 1) every Milestone should be able to be assessed independently, without overlap with other Milestones; 2) there should be clear developmental progression from one Milestone to the next; 3) Milestones should be based on the unique skills expected of pediatric pulmonologists; and 4) health equity should be a core component to highlight as a top priority to all stakeholders. In this Perspective, we describe these principles that guided formulation of the Pediatric Pulmonary Milestones to help familiarize the pediatric pulmonary community with the new Milestones. In addition, we share lessons learned and challenges in our process to inform other specialties that may soon participate in this process.

OBJECTIVE: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) introduced General Surgery Milestones 1.0 in 2014 and Milestones 2.0 in 2020 as steps toward competency-based training. Analysis will inform residency programs on curriculum development, assessment, feedback, and faculty development. This study describes the distributions and trends for Milestones 1.0 and 2.0 ratings and proportion of residents not achieving the level 4.0 graduation target.
METHODS: A deidentified dataset of milestone ratings for all ACGME-accredited General Surgery residency programs in the United States was used. Medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) were reported for milestone ratings at each PGY level. Percentages of PGY-5s receiving final year ratings of less than 4.0 were calculated. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare 1.0 and 2.0 median ratings. Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni post-hoc tests were used to compare median ratings across time periods and PGY levels. Chi-squared tests were used to compare the proportion of level 4.0 nonachievement under both systems.
RESULTS: Milestones 1.0 data consisted of 13,866 residents and Milestones 2.0 data consisted of 7,633 residents. For 1.0 and 2.0, all competency domain median ratings were higher for subsequent years of training. Milestones 2.0 had significantly higher median ratings at all PGY levels for all competency domains except Medical Knowledge. Percentages of PGY-5 residents not achieving the graduation target in Milestones 1.0 ranged from 27% to 42% and in 2.0 from 5% to 13%. For Milestones 1.0, all subcompetencies showed an increased number of residents achieving the graduation target from 2014 to 2019.
CONCLUSIONS: This study of General Surgery Milestones 1.0 and 2.0 data uncovered significant increases in average ratings and significantly fewer residents not achieving the graduation target under the 2.0 system. We hypothesize that these findings may be related more to rating bias given the change in rating scales, rather than a true increase in resident ability.

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires residency programs to complete competency-based assessments of medical trainees based on nationally established Milestones. Previous research demonstrates a strong correlation between CCC and resident scores on the Milestones in surgery, but little is known if this is true between specialties. In this study, we investigated a variety of specialties and sought to determine what factors affect self-assessment of milestones. In addition, a post-hoc analysis was completed on the COVID-19 pandemic effects on self-evaluation.
METHODS: This is an IRB approved observational study on prospectively collected self-evaluation milestone data that is used within each ACGME program\'s Clinical Competency Committees. Medical trainees within the San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium were approached for possible participation in this study with permission from program directors.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between self-assessments and CCC-assessments based on self-identified gender or residency type (surgical versus nonsurgical) for any milestone domain. Within the postgraduate year (PGY) groups, the PGY5 and PGY6 tended to rate themselves higher than CCC. Chiefs (Internal Medicine PGY2/3, and General Surgery PGY5/6) tended to be more accurate in scoring themselves than the interns (PGY1) within the milestone of Interpersonal Skills and Communication (chiefs 0.5 vs. interns 0.62, p = 0.03). On post hoc analysis of self-rating, during the first wave of the COVID 19 pandemic, Post-Covid residents were more likely to underrate themselves in Systems-Based Practice compared to the Pre-Covid cohort (-0.49 vs 0.10; p = 0.007) and more likely to rate themselves higher in Professionalism (-0.54 vs. -0.10, p = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: Unique to this study and our institution, there was no gender difference found in self vs CCC evaluations. With the change in learning environment from COVID, there was also a change in ability for some learners to self-assess accurately. As medical educators, we should understand the importance of both encouraging learners to practice self-assessment as well as give feedback to trainees on their progress. We also need to educate our faculty on the use of milestones for assessment to create a true gold standard in the CCC.

UNASSIGNED: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires emergency medicine (EM) residency training programs to monitor residents\' progress using standardized milestones. The first assessment of PGY 1 resident milestones occurs midway through the first year and could miss initial deficiencies. Early assessment of PGY 1 EM resident milestones has potential to identify at-risk residents prior to standard midyear evaluations. We developed an orientation syllabus for PGY 1 residents followed by a milestone assessment. Assessment scores helped predict future milestone scores and American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) In-Training Examination (ITE) scores for PGY 1 residents.
UNASSIGNED: From 2013 to 2020, we developed and implemented Milestone Evaluation Day (MED), a simulation-based day and written exam assessing PGY 1 EM residents during their first month on the 23 ACGME 1.0 milestones. MED stations included a history and physical with verbal presentation, patient simulation, vascular access, wound management, and airway management. MED, Clinical Competency Committee-generated (CCC-generated) milestone, and ABEM ITE scores were averaged and compared utilizing Pearson\'s correlation coefficient.
UNASSIGNED: Of 112 PGY 1 EM residents, 110 (98%) were analyzed over an 8-year period. We observed a moderate positive correlation of MED and CCC-generated milestone scores (r = .34, p < .001). There was a nonstatistically significant weak positive correlation of MED and ABEM ITE scores (r = .13, p = .17).
UNASSIGNED: An early assessment of EM milestones in the PGY 1 year can assist in the prediction of CCC-generated milestone scores for PGY 1 residents.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition poses a significant global health challenge, affecting various age groups, with infants under 6 months being particularly vulnerable. Vitamin B12, an essential micronutrient critical for neurological development, has been identified as a key player in the overall health of both mothers and infants.
OBJECTIVE: To find the correlation between serum vitamin B12 levels in infants, 1-6 months of age with severe malnutrition and maternal levels at tertiary care hospitals in western Rajasthan.
METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted in the UNICEF Regional Center of Excellence-supported Nutrition Rehabilitation Center in Rajasthan, India, through simple random sampling. One hundred ten infants with their mothers were enrolled after consent and approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee.
RESULTS: Severe malnutrition predominantly affected infants aged 1-2 months, with 77% born small for gestational age and 66.4% belonging to the multiple birth order group. Serum vitamin B12 levels showed a significant positive correlation between mothers and infants (p < 0.001), while exclusive breastfeeding correlated positively with age-appropriate milestones (p = 0.033).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings emphasize the importance of targeted interventions addressing maternal and infant nutrition, with a focus on ensuring adequate vitamin B12 levels.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. In this Personal View article we discuss the limitations of the summative medical student data currently received by residencies pre-match (such as transcripts, the Dean\'s Letter and letters of recommendation) to adequately communicate a student\'s strengths, weaknesses, and learning needs as they begin internship. We briefly summarize the evolution of medical student and resident performance evaluation, and discuss the role that educational handoffs may play in the future as students transition to internship. We then consider emerging questions about the feasibility and mechanics of educational handoffs and discuss possible steps forward.

BACKGROUND: The Enneagram is an ancient personality typing system developed to improve self-knowledge. Broken down into nine personality types, each is driven by a core motivating factor. Other personality assessments have been used to study the personality profile of surgeons. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the variability in Enneagram type among a single institution\'s general surgery residents.
METHODS: All categorical general surgery residents at a single institution completed an online Enneagram assessment as part of a wellness initiative. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education milestone levels for professionalism (PRO) and interpersonal and communication skills were collected for each resident\'s intern year. Milestone levels were compared between the nine Enneagram types.
RESULTS: All nine Enneagram types were represented among surveyed residents. The most frequent Enneagram type was type 3 (20.69%). There was no significant difference between PRO (P = 0.322) and interpersonal and communication skills (P = 0.645) scores among residents distributed by Enneagram type.
CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of core Enneagram type, general surgery residents in this study all achieved appropriate Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education milestone levels for entry level of training. The Enneagram can provide self-awareness and understanding of resident differences but does not impact initial assessment of competency in PRO and interpersonal communication skills.

UNASSIGNED: Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) is now mandated by many graduate and undergraduate accreditation standards. Evaluating CBME is essential for quantifying its impact, finding supporting evidence for the efforts invested in accreditation processes, and determining future steps. The Ambulatory Healthcare Services (AHS) family medicine residency program has been accredited by the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education-International (ACGME-I) since 2013. This study aims to report the Abu Dhabi program\'s experience in implementing CBME and accreditation.
UNASSIGNED: Compare the two residents\' cohorts\' performance pre-and post-ACGME-I accreditation.Study the bi-annually reported milestones as a graduating residents\' performance prognostic tool.
UNASSIGNED: All residents in the program from 2008 to 2019 were included. They are called Cohort one-the intake from 2008 to 2012, before the ACGME accreditation, and Cohort two-the intake from 2013 to 2019, after the ACGME accreditation, with the milestones used. The mandatory annual in-training exam was used as an indication of the change in competency between the two cohorts. Among Cohort two ACGME-I, the biannual milestones data were studied to find the correlation between residents\' early and graduating milestones.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 112 residents were included: 36 in Cohort one and 76 in Cohort two. In Cohort one, before the ACGME accreditation, no significant associations were identified between residents\' graduation in-training exam and their early performance indicators, while in Cohort two, there were significant correlations between almost all performance metrics. Early milestones are correlated with the graduation in-training exam score. Linear regression confirmed this relationship after controlling the residents\' undergraduate Grade Point Average (GPA). Competency development continues to improve even after residents complete training at Post Graduate Year, PGY4, as residents\' achievement in PGY5 continues to improve.
UNASSIGNED: Improved achievement of residents after the introduction of the ACGME-I accreditation is evident. Additionally, the correlation between the graduation in-training exam and graduation milestones, with earlier milestones, suggests a possible use of early milestones in predicting outcomes.