Midwest

中西部
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    农业生产者的心理健康状况比普通人群差;然而,最近的研究没有考虑压力源和心理健康状况的性别差异。一项调查被邮寄给伊利诺伊州的随机样本农民,以筛查焦虑和抑郁症状,并确定压力和社会支持的来源。男性比女性经历了更多与环境和经济条件有关的压力,而女性的地理隔离压力往往比男性略高。总的来说,满足抑郁或焦虑标准的比例在性别上没有显着差异;但是,结果高于在一般人群中观察到的结果。在那些对地理隔离有更高压力的农民中,女性农民出现抑郁症状的几率是男性农民的四倍(OR4.46(0.91,21.8);p=0.06).其他研究应检查社会支持与心理健康之间的关系。应考虑按性别减少压力的干预措施。
    Agricultural producers have worse mental health than the general population; however, recent research has not considered differences in stressors and mental health conditions by gender. A survey was mailed to a random sample of farmers in Illinois to screen for symptoms of anxiety and depression and identify sources of stress and social support. Men experienced more stress related to environmental and economic conditions than women, while women tended to have slightly higher levels of geographic isolation stress than men. Overall, there were no significant differences by gender in the proportion meeting the criteria for depression or anxiety; however, the results are higher than what is observed in the general population. Among those farmers who experience higher levels of stress about geographic isolation, the odds for women farmers to experience depressive symptoms are four times more than men farmers (OR 4.46 (0.91, 21.8); p = 0.06). Additional research should examine the relationship between social support and mental health. Interventions to reduce stress by gender should be considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19大流行对种族和少数民族的影响不成比例。医学生也受到特别的影响,因为他们应对由于医学培训延迟和精神健康状况高发而增加的压力源。这项研究调查了圣路易斯大学医学院(SLUSOM)医学中代表性不足(URM)学生的心理健康差异。2021年2月,向SLUSOM的一年级和二年级医学生分发了一项匿名在线调查。调查查询了人口统计信息,生活方式因素,以及与大流行有关的和体制上的关切。通过广泛性焦虑症-7(GAD-7)和患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)评估心理健康。使用SPSS进行统计测试,版本2787名学生的便利样本对调查做出了回应。被归类为URM的学生在大流行期间更有可能患重度抑郁症的风险。被归类为URM的学生对缺乏经济支持的担忧更大。对缺乏财政支持的担忧,心理健康支持,医学培训质量下降可显着预测PHQ-9得分。我们的发现揭示了几个关键因素,这些因素可能会加剧大流行期间URM学生之间的心理健康差异。为URM提供足够的财务和学术资源可能会改善未来类似不良事件的心理健康结果。
    The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately affected racial and ethnic minorities. Medical students were also particularly impacted as they coped with increased stressors due to delayed medical training and a high prevalence of mental health conditions. This study investigates mental health disparities of underrepresented in medicine (URM) students at the Saint Louis University School of Medicine (SLUSOM). An anonymous online survey was distributed to first- and second-year medical students at SLUSOM in February 2021. The survey queried demographic information, lifestyle factors, and pandemic-related and institutional concerns. Mental health was assessed via the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Statistical tests were run with SPSS, version 27. A convenience sample of 87 students responded to the survey. Students who were categorized as URM were significantly more likely to be at risk of major depressive disorder during the pandemic. Concern about a lack of financial support was significantly greater among students categorized as URM. Concerns regarding a lack of financial support, mental health support, and decreased quality of medical training significantly predicted PHQ-9 scores. Our findings revealed several key factors that may exacerbate mental health disparities among URM students during the pandemic. Providing adequate financial and academic resources for URMs may improve mental health outcomes for similar adverse events in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景COVID-19是由2019年发现的冠状病毒SARS-CoV-2引起的呼吸道疾病。由于该疾病的大量死亡,其对世界的影响仍在继续研究。由于COVID-19大流行仍在继续,检查COVID-19与合并症和由此导致的死亡率的关系是必要的。这项研究的重点是COVID-19感染和高脂血症(总胆固醇大于或等于200mg/dL)共病的人群健康结果,包括与年龄和性别的潜在关联。方法作为回顾性分析研究,根据国际疾病分类,根据COVID-19和/或高脂血症将患者分为三个群体,第十版(ICD-10)代码在2020年4月1日至2021年12月31日在密苏里州西南部FreemanHealthSystem(FHS)的电子病历系统中报告。使用Wald方法和带置信区间(CI)的两个样本比例汇总假设进行比较。对人群进行细分并分析年龄和性别差异。结果COVID-19合并高脂血症患者的死亡率高于COVID-19合并高脂血症患者和无COVID-19合并高脂血症患者;COVID-19合并高脂血症患者的死亡率高于无COVID-19合并高脂血症患者。这些群体之间的所有比较均具有统计学显著性(p值<0.05)。虽然年龄的增加与所有组的死亡率增加有关,性别在这方面没有预测性。结论我们的研究通过显示合并症高脂血症如何导致死亡率增加,为影响中西部农村人群COVID-19结局的变量提供了见解。
    Background COVID-19 is a respiratory disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, a coronavirus discovered in 2019. Its impact on the world continues to be studied due to the significant death toll of the disease. As the COVID-19 pandemic remains ongoing, examining the association of COVID-19 with comorbidities and resulting mortality is necessary. This study focuses on population health outcomes with COVID-19 infection and hyperlipidemia (total cholesterol greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL) as a comorbidity, including potential associations with age and sex. Methods As a retrospective analytical study, patients were divided into three populations based on COVID-19 and/or hyperlipidemia based on the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition (ICD-10) codes reported in the electronic medical record system at Freeman Health System (FHS) in Southwest Missouri from April 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021. Wald\'s methods and two sample proportion summary hypotheses with confidence intervals (CIs) were used for comparison. The populations were subdivided and analyzed for age and sex differences. Results Patients with both COVID-19 and hyperlipidemia had a higher mortality rate than patients with COVID-19 and without hyperlipidemia and patients with hyperlipidemia and without COVID-19; patients with COVID-19 and without hyperlipidemia had a higher mortality rate than patients with hyperlipidemia and without COVID-19. All comparisons across these populations were statistically significant (p-value < 0.05). While increased age was associated with increased mortality in all groups, sex was not predictive in this regard. Conclusion Our study provides insights into variables affecting COVID-19 outcomes in a rural Midwestern population by showing how the comorbidity hyperlipidemia contributes to increased mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景严重急性呼吸道综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染产生2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19),主要表现为呼吸道症状,包括咳嗽,呼吸急促,等。呼吸衰竭的表现与COVID-19感染相似,COVID-19感染可导致呼吸衰竭。因此,研究呼吸衰竭很重要,COVID-19,以及两者之间的相互作用,以期改善患者的预后。在这项研究中,我们比较了COVID-19、呼吸衰竭患者的死亡率,或者两者兼而有之。我们研究人群的死亡率根据患者年龄进一步审查。材料和方法通过FreemanHealthSystem的电子病历系统收集呼吸衰竭和COVID-19数据,一张410床,乡村医院,在Neosho和Joplin,密苏里州,从2020年4月到2021年12月。患者群体包括所有入院诊断为COVID-19或呼吸衰竭的患者,根据国际疾病分类的定义,第十次修订(ICD-10)。有或没有COVID-19,有或没有呼吸衰竭的患者,并纳入患有COVID-19的呼吸衰竭患者。结果与无呼吸衰竭的COVID-19患者(P2)相比,合并呼吸衰竭的COVID-19患者(P1)的死亡率显着增加(17.28%)。将COVID-19合并呼吸衰竭(P1)的患者与无COVID-19(P3)的呼吸衰竭患者进行比较时,差异无统计学意义(p值=0.4921)。相比之下,当根据年龄划分时,我们发现,与65岁及以上无COVID-19的呼吸衰竭患者相比,65岁及以上的COVID-19合并呼吸衰竭患者的死亡率显著增加(P5).在其他比较中没有显著的死亡率增加。结论在比较弗里曼卫生系统内的患者人群时,COVID-19合并呼吸衰竭的患者与无COVID-19合并呼吸衰竭的患者死亡率相似,而仅有COVID-19的患者死亡率明显降低,相对而言。与同时患有呼吸衰竭和COVID-19的患者相比,仅患有呼吸衰竭的患者的死亡率更高,这表明呼吸衰竭的存在可能在炎症反应中起着更大的作用,从而降低了患者在这种情况下的生存机会。此外,年龄被证明是一个显著的危险因素,因为与同时患有COVID-19和呼吸衰竭的患者相比,年龄在65岁及以上的患者死亡率更高.导致老年患者免疫反应的减少可能是最大的促成因素,同时该人群中患者合并疾病的可能性增加,进一步降低了生存的机会。未来的研究可以研究65岁及以上患有COVID-19和呼吸衰竭的死亡风险较高的患者的替代治疗计划。
    Background Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) produces the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), primarily presenting with respiratory symptoms, including cough, shortness of breath, etc. Respiratory failure can present similarly to a COVID-19 infection, and COVID-19 infection can cause respiratory failure. Thus, it is important to study respiratory failure, COVID-19, and the interaction between the two in hopes of improving patient outcomes. In this study, we compared mortality rates in patients admitted with COVID-19, respiratory failure, or both. Mortality rates in our study populations were further scrutinized based on patient age. Materials and methods Respiratory failure and COVID-19 data were collected via the electronic medical records system at Freeman Health System, a 410-bed, rural hospital, in Neosho and Joplin, Missouri, from April 2020 through December 2021. The patient population included all patients admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of COVID-19 or respiratory failure, as defined by the International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10). Patients with or without COVID-19, with or without respiratory failure, and patients with respiratory failure with COVID-19 were included. Results There was a significant increase in mortality (17.28%) in patients with COVID-19 and respiratory failure (P1) compared to patients with COVID-19 who did not have respiratory failure (P2). No significance was found when comparing patients with COVID-19 and respiratory failure (P1) and patients with respiratory failure without COVID-19 (P3) (p value=0.4921). In contrast, when divided based on age, we found a significant increase in mortality in patients 65 and older with COVID-19 and respiratory failure compared to patients 65 and older with respiratory failure who did not have COVID-19 (P5). There were no significant mortality increases in other comparisons. Conclusion When comparing patient populations within the Freeman Health System, patients with COVID-19 and respiratory failure had similar mortality rates as those with respiratory failure without COVID-19, while patients with only COVID-19 had a markedly reduced mortality rate, relatively. The higher mortality rates in patients with only respiratory failure when compared to patients with both respiratory failure and COVID-19 indicate that the presence of respiratory failure likely plays a bigger role in the inflammatory response that reduces one\'s chance of survival in this setting. Furthermore, age was shown to be a significant risk factor as patients aged 65 and older showed a greater mortality rate when patients had both COVID-19 and respiratory failure compared to patients with both conditions below the age of 65. The decrease in immune response that results in older patients is likely the largest contributing factor along with the increased likelihood of patients in this population also having more comorbidities, further decreasing the chance of survival. Future studies can investigate alternate treatment plans for patients aged 65 and older who are at higher risk of mortality with COVID-19 and respiratory failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:虽然在美国被认定为初级农民的女性有所增加,没有特别针对女农民压力和生活质量的前因进行研究。本研究着手构建女性农民压力量表(WFSI),测试它的维度,并通过查看其与生活满意度量表(SWLS)衡量的主观幸福感的关系来评估其与标准相关的有效性。然后,我们检查了社会人口统计学和农场水平的相关性,以评估它们与压力的关系。
    方法:我们利用了来自592名爱荷华州女性农民的随机样本的回答,这些人对包括WFSI在内的mailout调查做出了回应。我们进行了探索性因子分析,以确定WFSI的阶乘结构,并使用线性回归来评估社会人口统计学和农场水平特征与每个因素的关系。
    结果:分析揭示了反映女性农民压力不同方面的5个独特因素:时间压力和工作量,环境关注,来自政府和市场的外部压力源,人际关系,和农村设施。除农村便利设施外,所有因素均具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach'salpha>0.80),并使用SWLS措施的外部标准进行了验证。年轻的年龄,结婚了,从事非农工作,农场规模越小,大多数领域的压力水平越高。
    结论:WFSI是一种有前途的工具,显示出较高的内部一致性,并通过生活满意度得到验证。我们的研究还发现了与不同压力领域相关的某些社会人口统计学和农场特征,这可以为未来的研究和基于社区的干预提供信息。
    OBJECTIVE: While women identifying as primary farmers have increased in the United States, there has not been research focused on the antecedents of stress and quality of life among women farmers in particular. This study set out to construct a Women Farmer Stress Inventory (WFSI), test its dimensionality, and assess its criterion-related validity by looking at its relationship with subjective wellbeing as measured by the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). We then examined sociodemographic and farm-level correlates to assess their relationship with stress.
    METHODS: We utilized responses from a random sample of 592 Iowan women farmers who responded to a mailout survey that included the WFSI. We conducted exploratory factor analysis to identify the factorial structure of the WFSI, and used linear regression to evaluate how sociodemographic and farm-level characteristics were related to each factor.
    RESULTS: The analysis revealed 5 unique factors that reflected different aspects of women farmer stress: time pressures and workload, environmental concern, external stressors from governments and market, interpersonal relationships, and rural amenities. All factors except rural amenities had high levels of internal consistency (Cronbach\'s alpha >0.80) and were validated using the external criteria of SWLS measures. Young age, being married, and engagement in off-farm work, and smaller farm size were associated with greater levels of stress across most domains.
    CONCLUSIONS: The WFSI is a promising tool that shows high internal consistency and is validated with life satisfaction. Our study also finds certain sociodemographic and farm characteristics associated with different stress domains, which could inform both future research and community-based interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:高容量中心的直肠癌治疗与指南一致治疗和改善预后的可能性更高相关。直肠癌患者是否在高容量医院转诊治疗可能取决于诊断提供者的专业。我们旨在确定诊断提供者专业与治疗提供者专业之间的关联以及爱荷华州直肠癌患者治疗机构的特征。
    方法:使用爱荷华州癌症登记处确定的直肠癌患者完成了关于他们治疗经验和决策过程的邮寄调查。提供者类型由提供者专业定义,以及提供者是否将患者转介到其他地方进行手术。使用多变量调整的逻辑回归模型来检查由也进行后续手术的普通外科医生诊断的预测因素。
    结果:在接触的417名患者中,381(76%)完成了调查;我们的最终分析样本量为267。一半的受访者是由胃肠病学家诊断的,他把他们转诊到别处;30%的受访者是由普通外科医生诊断的,他把他们转诊到别处,20%是由进行手术的普通外科医生诊断的。年龄≥65岁的受访者,没有受过大学教育,每年收入<50,000美元的人更有可能被进行手术的普通外科医生诊断。在多变量调整模型中,由同一普通外科医生诊断和治疗的受访者更有可能在年度结直肠癌手术量较低的医院接受手术,并且对他们的护理满意度较低。
    结论:在爱荷华州的直肠癌患者中,由同一提供者诊断和治疗的受访者在大批量医疗机构接受治疗的可能性较小.这项研究告知了提供者转诊在直肠癌护理集中化中的重要性。
    OBJECTIVE: Rectal cancer treatment at high-volume centers is associated with higher likelihood of guideline-concordant care and improved outcomes. Whether rectal cancer patients are referred for treatment at high-volume hospitals may depend on diagnosing provider specialty. We aimed to determine associations of diagnosing provider specialty with treating provider specialty and characteristics of the treating facility for rectal cancer patients in Iowa.
    METHODS: Rectal cancer patients identified using the Iowa Cancer Registry completed a mailed survey on their treatment experience and decision-making process. Provider type was defined by provider specialty and whether the provider referred patients elsewhere for surgery. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models were used to examine predictors of being diagnosed by a general surgeon who also performed the subsequent surgery.
    RESULTS: Of 417 patients contacted, 381 (76%) completed the survey; our final analytical sample size was 267. Half of respondents were diagnosed by a gastroenterologist who referred them elsewhere; 30% were diagnosed by a general surgeon who referred them elsewhere, and 20% were diagnosed by a general surgeon who performed the surgery. Respondents who were ≥ 65 years old, had less than a college education, and who made < $50,000 per year were more likely to be diagnosed by a general surgeon who performed surgery. In multivariable-adjusted models, respondents diagnosed and treated by the same general surgeon were more likely to have surgery at hospitals with low annual colorectal cancer surgery volume and less likely to be satisfied with their care.
    CONCLUSIONS: Among rectal cancer patients in Iowa, respondents who were diagnosed and treated by the same provider were less likely to get treatment at a high-volume facility. This study informs the importance of provider referral in centralization of rectal cancer care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    作为遗传改良和年龄隔离的一部分,猪在部位之间的运输经常发生。然而,如果管理不当,缺乏运输生物安全可能会带来灾难性的影响,因为疾病的传播迫在眉睫。然而,缺乏对中西部猪系统内车辆运动趋势的全面研究。在这项研究中,我们的目的是描述和表征一个代表现代养猪生产的大型中西部猪系统内的车辆运动模式,以了解运动趋势和生物安全合规性的代理,并确定可能导致传染病传播风险较高的潜在危险行为.地理定位跟踪设备每5分钟记录一次生产系统中卡车和拖车子集的车辆移动,每次跟踪进入2019年1月至2020年12月之间的地标,在COVID-19大流行之前和期间。我们描述了该公司控制的12辆车的6,213条运输记录。总的来说,研究期间包括114个预定义的地标,代表5类农场和卡车清洗设施。结果显示,卡车完成了大部分(76.4%,2,111/2,762)记录的运动。传入运动的季节性分布在不同年份相似(P>0.05),虽然2019年冬季和夏季季节显示,播种农场的到来运动比其他任何季节都要高,Year,或生产类型(P<0.05)。超过一半的内移记录发生在母猪养殖场的三合会内,断奶上市阶段,和卡车清洗设施。总的来说,2020年在每个地标上花费的时间比2019年增加了9.08%,没有季节性亮点,但在卡车清洗设施上花费的时间明显高于任何其他类型的地标。网络分析显示,在网络中具有可识别集群的农场之间具有高度连通性。此外,与2019年相比,我们观察到2020年的连通性下降,大多数网络参数值都表明了这一点。需要进一步的网络分析,以了解其对疾病传播和控制的影响。然而,本研究报告的运动趋势的描述和量化提供了可能成为针对传染病监测和控制的基础的发现。
    Transport of pigs between sites occurs frequently as part of genetic improvement and age segregation. However, a lack of transport biosecurity could have catastrophic implications if not managed properly as disease spread would be imminent. However, there is a lack of a comprehensive study of vehicle movement trends within swine systems in the Midwest. In this study, we aimed to describe and characterize vehicle movement patterns within one large Midwest swine system representative of modern pig production to understand movement trends and proxies for biosecurity compliance and identify potential risky behaviors that may result in a higher risk for infectious disease spread. Geolocation tracking devices recorded vehicle movements of a subset of trucks and trailers from a production system every 5 min and every time tracks entered a landmark between January 2019 and December 2020, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We described 6,213 transport records from 12 vehicles controlled by the company. In total, 114 predefined landmarks were included during the study period, representing 5 categories of farms and truck wash facilities. The results showed that trucks completed the majority (76.4%, 2,111/2,762) of the recorded movements. The seasonal distribution of incoming movements was similar across years (P > 0.05), while the 2019 winter and summer seasons showed higher incoming movements to sow farms than any other season, year, or production type (P < 0.05). More than half of the in-movements recorded occurred within the triad of sow farms, wean-to-market stage, and truck wash facilities. Overall, time spent at each landmark was 9.08% higher in 2020 than in 2019, without seasonal highlights, but with a notably higher time spent at truck wash facilities than any other type of landmark. Network analyses showed high connectivity among farms with identifiable clusters in the network. Furthermore, we observed a decrease in connectivity in 2020 compared with 2019, as indicated by the majority of network parameter values. Further network analysis will be needed to understand its impact on disease spread and control. However, the description and quantification of movement trends reported in this study provide findings that might be the basis for targeting infectious disease surveillance and control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:研究已将先前存在的肾脏疾病(KD)与2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)感染导致的较高死亡率联系起来。在中西部农村,在KD盛行的地方,COVID-19对包括许多接受医疗保险或医疗补助的患者在内的人群的影响显著。
    方法:进行了一项回顾性队列研究,评估急性肾损伤(AKI)患者,慢性肾病(CKD)和终末期肾病(ESRD),有和没有COVID-19。国际疾病分类第10次修订代码由医生提交到FreemanHealthSystem的电子病历中,并于2020年4月至2021年1月收集。对数据进行分析和比较,以确定不同阶段KD和COVID-19患者的死亡率是否高于单纯KD患者的死亡率,不包括性别和年龄等变量。
    结果:COVID-19和任何程度的KD患者死亡率的95%置信区间(CI),包括AKI和CKD,在30.21%和37.63%之间。这一指标显著高于COVID-19感染的95%CI(6.70%-9.96%,p<0.0001)或单独KD(10.89%-13.01%,p<0.0001)。在患有COVID-19和KD的人群中,死亡率最高的是AKI患者(38.13%和49.02%).我们的样本中没有足够的统计支持来断言COVID-19增加了ESRD患者的死亡率。
    结论:根据我们的结果,与单纯KD患者相比,KD和COVID-19患者的死亡风险更高.有必要对影响KD患者COVID-19预后的个体合并症进行进一步研究。
    BACKGROUND: Studies have linked pre-existing kidney disease (KD) to higher rates of mortality due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. In the rural Midwest, where KD is prevalent, the impact of COVID-19 has been significant in a population that includes many patients on Medicare or Medicaid.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed assessing patients with acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end stage renal disease (ESRD), with and without COVID-19. International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes were submitted by physicians into Freeman Health System\'s Electronic Medical Records and gathered from April 2020 to January 2021. The data were analyzed and compared to determine whether the mortality rate in patients with varying stages of KD and COVID-19 was higher than the mortality rate in patients with KD alone, excluding variables such as sex and age.
    RESULTS: The 95% confidence interval (CI) of the mortality rate of patients with COVID-19 and any degree of KD, encompassing both AKI and CKD, was between 30.21% and 37.63%. This metric was significantly higher than the 95% CI of COVID-19 infection (6.70%-9.96%, p<0.0001) or KD alone (10.89%-13.01%, p<0.0001). Within those with COVID-19 and KD, the highest rate of mortality was in patients with AKI (38.13% and 49.02%). There was not sufficient statistical support in our sample to assert that COVID-19 increased mortality in ESRD patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, patients with KD and COVID-19 are at higher risk for mortality when compared to patients with KD alone. Further studies are warranted into individual comorbidities affecting KD patient outcomes with COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:乳腺癌筛查和预防的金标准是定期乳房X线照相术;因此,了解遵守该标准的影响因素对于限制癌症相关成本至关重要.我们评估了各种研究不足的社会人口统计学因素对坚持接受定期乳房X光检查的影响。
    方法:从多个提供商提供的保险索赔数据库中,利用了来自Nw=6,336名年龄在45至54岁之间的堪萨斯州女性的Nc=14,553次乳房X线照相术相关索赔。通过依从性比连续量化对常规乳房X线照相术的依从性,用于捕获至少接受一次乳房X光检查的合格年数,以及断然。种族之间的关系,种族,rurality,保险(公共/私人),筛选设施类型,通过Kruskal-Wallis单向ANOVA单独评估与最近的筛查设施的距离,同时具有连续和明确定义的依从性,卡方检验,多元线性回归模型,和多元逻辑回归,视情况而定。这些单个模型的结果被用来为构建一个基本的,多方面预测模型。
    结果:模型结果表明,在中年女性堪萨斯州中,种族和民族的所有因素至少对符合筛查指南有一定影响。在乡村性变量中观察到最强的信号,无论它是如何定义的,它都证明了与合规性的显著关系。
    结论:与常规乳房X线照相术依从性相关的因素,例如乡村和到最近设施的距离,在制定干预策略以确保女性患者坚持规定的筛查方案时,可能是重要的考虑因素。
    OBJECTIVE: The gold standard for breast cancer screening and prevention is regular mammography; thus, understanding what impacts adherence to this standard is essential in limiting cancer-associated costs. We assessed the impact of various understudied sociodemographic factors of interest on adherence to the receipt of regular mammograms.
    METHODS: A total Nc = 14,553 mammography-related claims from Nw = 6,336 female Kansas aged between 45 and 54 were utilized from insurance claim databases furnished by multiple providers. Adherence to regular mammography was quantified continuously via a compliance ratio, used to capture the number of eligible years in which at least one mammogram was received, as well as categorically. The relationship between race, ethnicity, rurality, insurance (public/private), screening facility type, and distance to nearest screening facility with both continuous and categorically defined compliance were individually assessed via Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVAs, chi-squared tests, multiple linear regression models, and multiple logistic regression, as appropriate. Findings from these individual models were used to inform the construction of a basic, multifaceted prediction model.
    RESULTS: Model results demonstrated that all factors race and ethnicity had at least some bearing on compliance with screening guidelines among mid-life female Kansans. The strongest signal was observed in the rurality variable, which demonstrated a significant relationship with compliance regardless of how it was defined.
    CONCLUSIONS: Understudied factors that are associated with regular mammography adherence, such as rurality and distance to nearest facility, may serve as important considerations when developing intervention strategies for ensuring that female patients stick to prescribed screening regimens.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号