Middle ear (ME)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这是由日本耳科学学会和日本大黄喉学会制定的2015年指南的更新,该指南定义了儿童(12岁以下)的渗出性中耳炎(OME),并描述了发病率。诊断,和检查方法。在考虑日本目前使用的疗法并基于现有证据的基础上,对获得指南委员会共识的推荐疗法进行了更新。
    方法:关于儿童OME的治疗,我们开发了临床问题(CQs)并检索了每个主题的文档,包括定义,疾病状态,诊断方法,和医疗。在以前的指南中,没有使用检索表达式来指定文献检索的时间段.相反,JOS2015指南增加了对2014年3月至2019年5月出版物的文献检索.对于CQ的发布,我们根据收集的证据制定了建议,并为其指定了优势.
    结果:儿童的OME被分为一组缺乏患慢性或顽固性疾病的风险,另一组风险较高(例如,患有唐氏综合症的儿童,腭裂),以及临床管理的建议,包括后续行动,提供。还提供了有关单侧OME儿童和难治性病例并发粘连性中耳炎的管理信息。
    结论:在儿童OME的临床管理中,日本临床实践指南不仅建议管理OME本身的并发症,如中耳积液和鼓膜病理变化,以及与感染性或炎性疾病相关的周围器官的病理变化。
    This is an update of the 2015 Guidelines developed by the Japan Otological Society and Oto-Rhino-Laryngeal Society of Japan defining otitis media with effusion (OME) in children (younger than 12 years old) and describing the disease rate, diagnosis, and method of examination. Recommended therapies that received consensus from the guideline committee were updated in consideration of current therapies used in Japan and based on available evidence.
    METHODS: Regarding the treatment of OME in children, we developed Clinical Questions (CQs) and retrieved documents on each theme, including the definition, disease state, method of diagnosis, and medical treatment. In the previous guidelines, no retrieval expression was used to designate a period of time for literature retrieval. Conversely, a literature search of publications from March 2014 to May 2019 has been added to the JOS 2015 Guidelines. For publication of the CQs, we developed and assigned strengths to recommendations based on the collected evidence.
    RESULTS: OME in children was classified into one group lacking the risk of developing chronic or intractable disease and another group at higher risk (e.g., children with Down syndrome, cleft palate), and recommendations for clinical management, including follow-up, is provided. Information regarding management of children with unilateral OME and intractable cases complicated by adhesive otitis media is also provided.
    CONCLUSIONS: In clinical management of OME in children, the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines recommends management not only of complications of OME itself, such as effusion in the middle ear and pathologic changes in the tympanic membrane, but also pathologic changes in surrounding organs associated with infectious or inflammatory diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们调查了外耳道(EAC)和中耳(ME)局部晚期鳞状细胞癌(SCC)的预处理炎症反应标志物的预后意义和治疗结果。在2003年7月至2019年7月之间,有21例EAC的SCC(n=18)或ME(n=3)患者接受了有或没有手术或全身治疗的放疗(单纯放疗[n=2],放疗+全身治疗[n=6],放疗+手术[n=7],放疗+手术+全身治疗[n=6])进行回顾性检查。中位辐射剂量为66.0(范围,50.4-70.0)Gy,每日分数为1.8-2.0Gy。中位随访期为25个月(范围,6-137)。2年总生存期(OS),无进展生存期(PFS),局部控制率(LC)为61%,48%,55%,分别。操作系统,PFS,根据患者的不同,LC没有显著差异-(年龄,sex),肿瘤-(匹兹堡舞台,预处理神经学发现),和治疗相关(手术或全身治疗,辐射剂量,预防性颈部照射)因素。相反,操作系统存在显著差异,PFS,治疗前C反应蛋白与白蛋白比值高和低的患者之间的LC(分别为p=0.002、0.003和0.004)。治疗前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率高和低的患者之间的OS也存在显着差异(NLR;p=0.037)。其他炎症反应标志物,包括血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)和白蛋白与球蛋白比率(AGR),没有影响操作系统,PFS,或LC。我们的研究结果表明,治疗前C反应蛋白与白蛋白的比值和NLRs对EAC和ME局部晚期SCC患者的治疗结果有显著影响。
    We investigated the prognostic significance and treatment outcomes of pretreatment inflammatory response markers for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the external auditory canal (EAC) and middle ear (ME). Between July 2003 and July 2019, 21 patients with SCC of the EAC (n = 18) or ME (n = 3) who received radiotherapy with or without surgery or systemic therapy (radiotherapy alone [n = 2], radiotherapy + systemic therapy [n = 6], radiotherapy + surgery [n = 7], radiotherapy + surgery + systemic therapy [n = 6]) were retrospectively examined. The median radiation dose was 66.0 (range, 50.4-70.0) Gy, with daily fractions of 1.8-2.0 Gy. The median follow-up period was 25 months (range, 6-137). The two-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and locoregional control (LC) rates were 61%, 48%, and 55%, respectively. OS, PFS, and LC did not differ significantly according to patient- (age, sex), tumor- (Pittsburgh stage, pretreatment neurological findings), and treatment-related (surgery or systemic therapy, radiation dose, prophylactic neck irradiation) factors. Conversely, there were significant differences in OS, PFS, and LC between patients with high and low pretreatment C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratios (p = 0.002, 0.003, and 0.004, respectively). OS also differed significantly between patients with high and low pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR; p = 0.037). Other inflammatory response markers, including platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR), did not influence OS, PFS, or LC. Our findings suggest that pretreatment C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and NLRs have a significant impact on treatment outcomes in patients with locally advanced SCC of the EAC and ME.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号