Microbiological Techniques

微生物技术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在履行其法定职责时,美国食品和药物管理局通常参考美国药典(USP)中详述的标准测试方法。微生物测试方法(包含在一般章节中)在章节<51>至<80>中列出,其中作为测试方法引用的细节被认为是可执行的。USP<61>“非无菌产品的微生物学检查:微生物计数测试”是一个全球统一的章节,已成功用于从非无菌成品药品中回收的微生物计数。USP<61>的内容并不总是科学原则,也不是所有的药物微生物学家都强调理解。因此,对USP<61>的误解和误用可能导致微生物质量的分析和评估有缺陷或错误。在这篇文章中,澄清是为了帮助药物微生物学家在USP<61>的适当和预期的用途,包括提供并不总是众所周知或理解的细节。
    In the execution of its legislated responsibilities, the United States Food and Drug Administration commonly refers to standard test methods detailed in the United States Pharmacopeia (USP). Microbiological test methods (contained in general chapters) are listed in chapters <51> to <80> with details regarded as enforceable where referenced as a test method. USP <61> \"Microbiological Examination of Nonsterile Products: Microbial Enumeration Tests\" is a globally harmonized chapter that has been successfully employed for the enumeration of microorganisms recoverable from nonsterile finished drug products. The content of USP <61> is not always scientifically principled nor emphatically understood by all pharmaceutical microbiologists. Consequently, misunderstanding and misapplication of USP <61> may result in analyses and assessments of microbiological quality that are flawed or erroneous. In this article, clarification is provided to assist the pharmaceutical microbiologist in the appropriate and intended use of USP <61>, including provision of details not always commonly known or understood.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    解决与植入物相关的感染的微生物学诊断中存在的问题,以及当前关于超声流体培养(SFC)的精确性的真正力量的争论,这篇综述的目的是描述方法,分析和比较目前在该主题研究中获得的结果。此外,本研究还讨论并提出了进行超声处理的最佳参数。对解决这一研究课题的文献(2019-2023)中的最新研究进行了搜索。因此,在分析的研究中采用了不同的超声处理方案,正如预期的那样,因此,与传统培养方法(假体周围组织培养-PTC)相关的技术的敏感性和特异性的结果之间存在显著差异.SFC和PTC确定了凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CoNS)和金黄色葡萄球菌为主要致病因子,SFC对于鉴定难以检测的低毒力病原体很重要。与化学生物膜置换方法相比,EDTA和DTT,SFC还产生了可变结果。在这种情况下,这篇综述概述了该主题的最新情况和提高超声处理性能的理论支持,特别是在敏感性和特异性方面,通过从各个方面对最佳参数进行评分,包括样本收集,储存条件,种植方法,微生物鉴定技术(表型和分子)和集落形成单位(CFU)计数的截止点。这项研究证明了该技术标准化的必要性,并为超声处理方案提供了理论基础,该方案旨在实现与植入物和假体装置相关的感染的可靠微生物学诊断的最高水平的灵敏度和特异性。如人工关节感染(PJIs)。然而,实际应用和额外的补充研究仍然需要。
    Addressing the existing problem in the microbiological diagnosis of infections associated with implants and the current debate about the real power of precision of sonicated fluid culture (SFC), the objective of this review is to describe the methodology and analyze and compare the results obtained in current studies on the subject. Furthermore, the present study also discusses and suggests the best parameters for performing sonication. A search was carried out for recent studies in the literature (2019-2023) that addressed this research topic. As a result, different sonication protocols were adopted in the studies analyzed, as expected, and consequently, there was significant variability between the results obtained regarding the sensitivity and specificity of the technique in relation to the traditional culture method (periprosthetic tissue culture - PTC). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) and Staphylococcus aureus were identified as the main etiological agents by SFC and PTC, with SFC being important for the identification of pathogens of low virulence that are difficult to detect. Compared to chemical biofilm displacement methods, EDTA and DTT, SFC also produced variable results. In this context, this review provided an overview of the most current scenarios on the topic and theoretical support to improve sonication performance, especially with regard to sensitivity and specificity, by scoring the best parameters from various aspects, including sample collection, storage conditions, cultivation methods, microorganism identification techniques (both phenotypic and molecular) and the cutoff point for colony forming unit (CFU) counts. This study demonstrated the need for standardization of the technique and provided a theoretical basis for a sonication protocol that aims to achieve the highest levels of sensitivity and specificity for the reliable microbiological diagnosis of infections associated with implants and prosthetic devices, such as prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). However, practical application and additional complementary studies are still needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Kodamaeaohmeri是一种罕见的,以前从环境来源中分离出的公认病原体。通常受该酵母影响的患者包括具有若干相关风险因素的免疫受损以及免疫活性患者。
    方法:我们报告了3例使用BactT/ALERT从血液中分离出K.ohmeri的病例。通过MALDI-TOFMS(Vitek-MS,BioMérieux,Marcy-l\'Etoile,法国)除了显色介质上的颜色特征。由于多种合并症,患者的免疫反应减弱。
    结果:K.ohmeri可以被误认为是热带假丝酵母,白色念珠菌,通过常规方法可以正确,及时地识别或通过MALDI-TOFMS。目前未定义K.ohmeri的抗真菌易感性断点。在所有三例病例的治疗方案中都加入了棘球红素。
    结论:使用常规方法很难鉴定K.ohmeri,应仔细观察不寻常的酵母,特别是在长时间的孵育。
    BACKGROUND: Kodamaea ohmeri is a rare, recognized pathogen that has previously been isolated from environmental sources. The patients commonly affected by this yeast include immunocompromised as well as immunocompetent patients having several associated risk factors.
    METHODS: We report three cases in which K. ohmeri was isolated from blood using Bact T/ALERT. Identification was carried out by MALDI-TOF MS (Vitek-MS, BioMérieux, Marcy-l\'Etoile, France) in addition to color characteristics on chromogenic media. The patients had diminished immune response on account of a multitude of comorbidities.
    RESULTS: K. ohmeri can be misidentified as Candida tropicalis, Candida albicans, or Candida hemolounii by conventional methods; correct and timely identification can be achieved by MALDI-TOF MS. Antifungal susceptibility breakpoints for K. ohmeri are currently not defined. An Echinocandin was added to the treatment regimen of all three of the cases.
    CONCLUSIONS: Identification of K. ohmeri using conventional methods is difficult and unusual yeasts should be carefully observed, especially upon prolonged incubation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    我们评估了一种新的快速表型抗微生物药敏试验(ASTar;Q-lineaAB)对革兰氏阴性杆菌的性能,直接从阳性血培养瓶。通过常规参考方法获得的MIC值(Microscan,BeckmanCoulter)与测试方法(ASTar)提供的比较。ASTar的总体基本协议为98%,类别协议为96.1%。主要错误和非常主要错误的总体比率为2.5%和3.3%,分别。ASTAR可以代表一种快速的,简单,和可靠的方法,以加快有关从阳性血培养瓶中获得革兰氏阴性病原体的抗菌敏感性信息。
    We evaluated the performance of a new rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility test (ASTar; Q-linea AB) on Gram-negative bacilli, directly from positive blood cultures bottles. MIC values obtained by the routine reference method (Microscan, Beckman Coulter) were compared to the ones provided by the tested method (ASTar). ASTar demonstrated an overall essential agreement of 98% and a category agreement of 96.1%. The overall rate of major errors and very major errors was 2.5% and 3.3%, respectively. ASTar can represent a rapid, simple, and reliable method to speed up information about antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative pathogens from positive blood culture bottles.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:早期,快速,准确的病原体诊断可以帮助临床医生选择有针对性的治疗方案,从而改善预后并降低重症肺炎的死亡率。与传统的微生物测试相比,宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)具有更高的灵敏度和更广泛的病原体谱。然而,基于mNGS的抗菌治疗程序对重症肺炎患者临床结局和成本效益的影响尚未评估.
    方法:这是一个区域,多中心,打开,prospective,随机对照试验,以评估mNGS和传统测试方法的组合是否可以在中等成本效益的情况下降低28天呼叫原因死亡率。将从中国四家大型三级医院招募192名重症肺炎患者。将在所有患者中获得支气管肺泡灌洗液,并以1:1的比例随机分配到研究组(mNGS结合传统微生物测试)或对照组(仅传统微生物测试)。根据分析结果选择个体化抗菌治疗和策略。主要结果是28天全因死亡率。次要结局是ICU和住院时间(LOS),无呼吸机天数和无ICU天数,MNGS与传统微生物测试之间的一致性,MNGS和传统微生物检测的检出率,外出时间,从小组分配到开始治疗的时间,血管加压药支持的持续时间,抗感染方案的类型和持续时间,耐药细菌或真菌的来源,ICU费用。
    结论:mNGS的临床益处是潜在显著的,但也应考虑其局限性。
    背景:ChineseClinicalTrialRegistry.org,ChiCTR2300076853。2023年10月22日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Early, rapid, and accurate pathogen diagnosis can help clinicians select targeted treatment options, thus improving prognosis and reducing mortality rates of severe pneumonia. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has a higher sensitivity and broader pathogen spectrum than traditional microbiological tests. However, the effects of mNGS-based antimicrobial treatment procedures on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness in patients with severe pneumonia have not been evaluated.
    METHODS: This is a regional, multi-center, open, prospective, randomized controlled trial to evaluate that whether the combination of mNGS and traditional testing methods could decrease 28-day call-cause mortality with moderate cost-effectiveness. A total of 192 patients with severe pneumonia will be recruited from four large tertiary hospitals in China. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid will be obtained in all patients and randomly assigned to the study group (mNGS combined with traditional microbiological tests) or the control group (traditional microbiological tests only) in a 1:1 ratio. Individualized antimicrobial treatment and strategy will be selected according to the analysis results. The primary outcome is 28-day all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes are ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), ventilator-free days and ICU-free days, consistency between mNGS and traditional microbiological tests, detective rate of mNGS and traditional microbiological tests, turn-out time, time from group allocation to start of treatment, duration of vasopressor support, types and duration of anti-infective regimens, source of drug-resistant bacteria or fungi, and ICU cost.
    CONCLUSIONS: The clinical benefits of mNGS are potentially significant, but its limitations should also be considered.
    BACKGROUND: ChineseClinicalTrialRegistry.org, ChiCTR2300076853. Registered on 22 October 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    文献中报道的患者就绪柔性内窥镜的污染率从0.4%到49%不等。不幸的是,这些结果的比较和解释几乎是不可能的,因为包括采样和培养方法在内的几个因素,污染的目标水平或指示微生物的定义在不同的研究中差异很大。这项研究的目的是通过提取功效比较来比较六种十二指肠镜采样和培养方法的功效,同时确定提供最佳微生物回收的关键参数。使用ISO11737-1:2018中描述的重复回收方法评估每种方法的十二指肠镜样品提取功效。获得的结果表明,平均总生物负载提取效率从澳大利亚方法的1%到法国方法的39%不等。最低的内窥镜样本提取效率与没有任何中和剂有关,摩擦,或张力活性剂,并且仅将收集的一小部分采样溶液接种到培养基上。取样和培养方法的功效也根据内窥镜中存在的微生物的性质而变化。以及取样和培养之间的时间。这项研究支持对柔性内窥镜的统一和标准化采样和培养方法的需求。
    BACKGROUND: Contamination rates reported in the literature for patient-ready flexible endoscopes vary from 0.4% to 49%. Unfortunately, the comparison and interpretation of these results is almost impossible since several factors including sampling and culturing methods, target levels for contamination, or definition of indicator micro-organisms vary widely from one study to the other.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of six duodenoscope sampling and culturing methods by means of extraction efficacy comparison, while at the same time identifying key parameters that provide optimal microbial recovery.
    METHODS: The duodenoscope sample extraction efficacy of each method was assessed using the repetitive recovery method described in ISO 11737-1: 2018.
    RESULTS: Mean overall bioburden extraction efficacy varied from 1% for the Australian method to 39% for the French one. The lowest endoscope sample extraction efficacy was associated with the absence of any neutralizer, friction, or tensioactive agent, and when only a small portion of the sampling solution collected was inoculated on to culture media. The efficacy of the sampling and culturing methods also varied according to the nature of micro-organisms present in the endoscope, and the time between sampling and culturing.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the need for a harmonized and standardized sampling and culturing method for flexible endoscopes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    微塑料(MPs)构成了重大的全球威胁,需要一种环境友好的分解模式。微生物介导的微塑料(MPs)的生物降解和生物劣化以其成本效益而广为人知。以及清除国会议员的环保技术。各种研究也报道了MP对各种杀生物微生物的抗性。MPs的生物降解性和/或微生物敏感性的杀生物抗性程度可以通过污损来确定,结构变形,侵蚀,增塑剂降解程度,代谢,和/或MPs的增溶。微塑料的降解涉及细菌等微生物,霉菌,酵母,藻类,和相关的酶。分析和微生物技术监测微塑料生物降解,但是没有微生物可以消除微塑料。国会议员可能对水生和人类生命构成环境风险。微塑料生物降解涉及碎裂,同化,和矿化,受非生物和生物因素的影响。环境因素和预处理剂可以自然降解大型聚合物或诱导生物碎片,这可能会影响他们的效率。清楚了解MPs污染和微生物降解过程对于减轻其影响至关重要。该研究旨在鉴定有助于微塑料(MPs)生物降解的变质微生物物种。这些知识对于设计新颖的生物降解和生物降解制剂至关重要,实验室规模和工业规模,展示国会议员的杀戮行动,可能预测无MP的水生和大气环境。研究报告强调了全球合作的迫切需要,研究进展,以及公众参与,通过政策建议和改进废物管理做法来减少微塑料污染。
    Micro- plastics (MPs) pose significant global threats, requiring an environment-friendly mode of decomposition. Microbial-mediated biodegradation and biodeterioration of micro-plastics (MPs) have been widely known for their cost-effectiveness, and environment-friendly techniques for removing MPs. MPs resistance to various biocidal microbes has also been reported by various studies. The biocidal resistance degree of biodegradability and/or microbiological susceptibility of MPs can be determined by defacement, structural deformation, erosion, degree of plasticizer degradation, metabolization, and/or solubilization of MPs. The degradation of microplastics involves microbial organisms like bacteria, mold, yeast, algae, and associated enzymes. Analytical and microbiological techniques monitor microplastic biodegradation, but no microbial organism can eliminate microplastics. MPs can pose environmental risks to aquatic and human life. Micro-plastic biodegradation involves fragmentation, assimilation, and mineralization, influenced by abiotic and biotic factors. Environmental factors and pre-treatment agents can naturally degrade large polymers or induce bio-fragmentation, which may impact their efficiency. A clear understanding of MPs pollution and the microbial degradation process is crucial for mitigating its effects. The study aimed to identify deteriogenic microorganism species that contribute to the biodegradation of micro-plastics (MPs). This knowledge is crucial for designing novel biodeterioration and biodegradation formulations, both lab-scale and industrial, that exhibit MPs-cidal actions, potentially predicting MPs-free aquatic and atmospheric environments. The study emphasizes the urgent need for global cooperation, research advancements, and public involvement to reduce micro-plastic contamination through policy proposals and improved waste management practices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究了临床实验室中微生物的MALDI-TOFMS鉴定,将钢目标与MBT生物目标进行比较。通过使用MBT生物目标,酵母鉴定的得分值增加,而革兰氏阴性菌的评分值下降。切换到MBT生物目标不会对高置信度识别的总体频率产生负面影响。
    MALDI-TOF MS identifications of microorganisms in a clinical laboratory were investigated, comparing steel targets with MBT Biotargets. By using MBT Biotargets, the score values of yeast identifications increased, whereas the score values of Gram-negative bacteria decreased. Switching to MBT Biotargets did not negatively impact overall frequencies of high confidence identifications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    摘要植入物相关感染(IAIs)对患者构成严重威胁,并可能导致严重的发病率和死亡率。这些感染可能很难诊断,在某种程度上,在装置表面形成生物膜,因为即使发现了微生物,其临床意义可能尚不清楚.尽管实验室测试最近取得了进展,IAIs仍然是诊断挑战。从治疗的角度来看,许多IAIs目前需要移除装置和延长抗菌治疗疗程以实现治愈。因此,做出准确的诊断,定义感染的存在和涉及的微生物,是最重要的。用于IAI诊断的标准微生物培养物的敏感性因IAI的类型而异,分析的标本,和使用的培养技术。尽管已经描述了IAI特定的基于培养物的诊断,文化负面IAIs的挑战仍然存在。鉴于此,分子测定,包括核酸扩增测试和基于下一代测序的检测,已被使用。在这次审查中,概述了这些具有挑战性的感染,以及从微生物学角度进行诊断的方法。
    SUMMARYImplant-associated infections (IAIs) pose serious threats to patients and can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. These infections may be difficult to diagnose due, in part, to biofilm formation on device surfaces, and because even when microbes are found, their clinical significance may be unclear. Despite recent advances in laboratory testing, IAIs remain a diagnostic challenge. From a therapeutic standpoint, many IAIs currently require device removal and prolonged courses of antimicrobial therapy to effect a cure. Therefore, making an accurate diagnosis, defining both the presence of infection and the involved microorganisms, is paramount. The sensitivity of standard microbial culture for IAI diagnosis varies depending on the type of IAI, the specimen analyzed, and the culture technique(s) used. Although IAI-specific culture-based diagnostics have been described, the challenge of culture-negative IAIs remains. Given this, molecular assays, including both nucleic acid amplification tests and next-generation sequencing-based assays, have been used. In this review, an overview of these challenging infections is presented, as well as an approach to their diagnosis from a microbiologic perspective.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号