Topical photodynamic therapy is a widely approved therapy for actinic keratoses and low-risk nonmelanoma skin cancers with a rapidly growing range of emerging indications for other cutaneous diseases. This review summarizes the best-available evidence to provide a clinical update for dermatologists on the approved and emerging indications of photodynamic therapy. The body of evidence suggests that photodynamic therapy is superior or noninferior to other available treatment modalities for actinic keratoses, low-risk basal cell carcinomas, Bowen\'s disease, skin field cancerization, chemoprevention of keratinocyte carcinomas in organ transplant recipients, photoaging, acne vulgaris, and cutaneous infections including verrucae, onychomycosis, and cutaneous leishmaniasis. There is emerging evidence that photodynamic therapy plays a role in the management of actinic cheilitis, early-stage mycosis fungoides, extramammary Paget disease, lichen sclerosis, and folliculitis decalvans but there are no comparative studies with other active treatment modalities. Common barriers to topical photodynamic therapy include procedural pain, costs, and the time required for treatment delivery. There is significant heterogeneity in the photodynamic therapy protocols reported in the literature, including different photosensitizers, light sources, number of treatments, time between treatments, and use of procedural analgesia. Topical photodynamic therapy should be considered in the management of a spectrum of inflammatory, neoplastic, and infectious dermatoses. However, more comparative research is required to determine its role in the treatment algorithm for these dermatologic conditions and more methodological research is required to optimize photodynamic therapy protocols to improve the tolerability of the procedure for patients.

CONCLUSIONS: Evaluate a photodynamic therapy (PDT) protocol for low-risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC) treatment that requires less time spent at the hospital and is less painful.
METHODS: Eight BCCs were selected, debulked, and received 20 % methyl aminolevulinate cream. After 3 h, the first irradiation was performed at the hospital (20 min, 150 J/cm2). Then, the cream was re-applied, and a portable irradiation prototype was fixed to the skin around the lesion. After 1.5 h, the patients turned on the prototype for irradiation at home (for 2 h, totalizing 312 J/cm2). Disease-free survival rate and pain score during irradiations were evaluated.
RESULTS: The clearance at 30 days after PDT was 87.5 % by histological analysis. The mean follow-up was 21.5 months and the recurrence-free survival at 22 months was 75 %. The pain score was significantly lower at home.
CONCLUSIONS: A potentially less painful and more comfortable PDT treatment protocol with proven long-term efficiency is presented. A randomized clinical trial has been conducted to confirm these results.

CONCLUSIONS: Response rates evaluation of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for nodular basal cell carcinoma (BCC) treatment located on high-risk and low-risk areas of the face.
METHODS: Two groups of nodular BCC were selected, debulked, and received 20% methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) hydrochloride cream. After 3 h, the first irradiation was performed (20 min, 150 J/cm2). Then, the cream was re-applied, and a second irradiation was performed after 1.5 h (20 min, 150 J/cm2). Clearance at 30 days and recurrence-free survival rate were evaluated.
RESULTS: The clearance at 30 days after PDT was 89% for the low-risk area group and 87% for the high-risk group. The recurrence-free survival at 60 months was 82% and 85% for the high-risk and low-risk groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were observed between groups nor for clearance at 30 days, nor recurrence-free follow-up. These results make PDT possible option for nodular BCC less than 5 mm located in high-risk areas.

Methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) is a topical compound approved for use with photodynamic therapy (PDT) for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK) and field cancerization in certain countries. There exists a high burden of disease for patients with AK: repeated treatments are required, there is a known risk of progression to keratinocyte carcinoma, and cosmetic appearance is affected. Delivery of PDT using MAL is a flexible treatment strategy available in many forms; red light, daylight, or artificial daylight can be used for illumination, all of which result in high AK clearance rates and low recurrence. MAL-PDT protocols continue to evolve to further improve adherence and treatment outcomes. Here, we used PubMed to search MEDLINE to identify guidelines, consensus recommendations, and studies describing the use of MAL for the treatment of AK. The aim of this targeted review is to consider various MAL-PDT treatment strategies on the basis of published literature, with a focus on personalizing treatment for the heterogeneous AK population.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of available literature regarding the use of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and ALA derivative photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and provide recommendations on its use.
METHODS: A systematic review was performed of all published studies up to September 1, 2019 from nine databases, including PubMed, that evaluated PDT in the treatment of HS. For each study, quality of evidence and risk of bias was evaluated. Recommendations from the body of evidence were created based on Strength of Recommendation and Taxonomy (SORT) criteria.
RESULTS: Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria. The majority of studies had a high risk of bias. Blue light PDT with 20% ALA and red light PDT with 16% methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) demonstrated some benefit based on a small number of poor-quality studies with a high risk of bias (Grade C, level III evidence). The most promising results were for 1%-5% ALA with intralesional diode, with good to complete response in 78%-94% of anatomic sites treated (Grade B, level II evidence).
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of studies contained high levels of bias, with significant heterogeneity between studies. Conclusions are limited by small samples sizes, lack of randomized controlled trials, and differing protocols.
CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are needed to determine the clinical efficacy of 20% ALA with blue light and MAL with red light. Intralesional diode PDT shows the most promise and warrants further investigation in larger, randomized controlled trials.

Photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate (MAL-PDT) is an effective treatment of acne vulgaris, but is associated with side effects. We performed a prospective randomized split-face study aimed at optimizing MAL-PDT treatment. Patients (n = 33) were randomized to two or four treatments of PDT with MAL on one cheek and placebo vehicle on the other cheek, 1-2 weeks apart. A 1.5-h pre-treatment with the MAL cream was followed by illumination with red light (20 J/cm2). Assessments were performed before treatment and 4, 10, and 20 weeks after the last treatment. In comparison to baseline, the number of inflammatory lesions at 20 weeks on cheeks treated with MAL-PDT showed a relative decrease of 74% in the group with two treatments and 85% in the group with four treatments. This new treatment regimen for both MAL-PDT and red-light-only PDT, with shortened pre-treatment and reduced light dose, could be an effective modality.

BACKGROUND: Daylight photodynamic therapy (DL-PDT) has similar efficacy to conventional photodynamic therapy in treating actinic keratosis (AKs). Good clinical outcomes have been reported when associated with physical methods such as microneedles, but a comparison of different methods and histologic studies is lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical and histologic modifications induced by standard DL-PDT and compare with DL-PDT associated with physical methods in treating skin field cancerization of the face.
METHODS: Forty patients with photodamaged skin and at least one AK lesion on the face were randomly distributed into four groups, ten patients in each (I: Standard DL-PDT; II: DL-PDT + microneedles; III: DL-PDT + CO2 laser; IV: DL-PDT + microdermabrasion) and underwent two DL-PDT sessions with methyl aminolevulinate cream and 2-hour daylight exposure. Skin biopsies were performed on all patients before and 3 months after. All fragments were stained using the hematoxylin-eosin, orcein, and picrosirius.
RESULTS: All 40 patients completed the study. Group III had a higher AK-clearance after 1 (p = 0,002) and 3 (p = 0,034) months, but it was similar in every group at 6 months (p = 0,441). Group III and IV had better clinical global improvement on texture, pigmentation and fine lines. In the groups associated with physical methods, the improvement of the keratinocytes\' atypia and solar elastosis were remarkable. Only group III showed a significant reduction in solar elastosis (p = 0.034) and increased collagen type I (p = 0.028) after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: DL-PDT-associated with physical methods had better clinical and histologic results. AK-clearance were significantly higher after 1 and 3 months with pretreatment-CO2 laser. Photorejuvenation were more evident with pretreatment-CO2 laser and microdermabrasion. Pretreatment-CO2 laser showed a significant reduction in solar elastosis and increase of collagen type 1. These results pointed to the pretreatment with laser as a potentially better option for skin field cancerization of the face.

The high incidence of sunlight-induced human skin cancers reveals a need for more effective photosensitizing agents. In this study, we compared the efficacy of prophylactic photodynamic therapy (PDT) when methylene blue (MB), riboflavin (RF), or methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) were used as photosensitizers. All mice in four groups of female C3.Cg/TifBomTac hairless immunocompetent mice (N = 100) were irradiated with three standard erythema doses of solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation (UVR) thrice weekly. Three groups received 2 × 2 prophylactic PDT treatments (days 45 + 52 and 90 + 97). The PDT treatments consisted of topical administration of 16% MAL, 20% MB, or 20% RF, and subsequent illumination that matched the photosensitizers\' absorption spectra. Control mice received no PDT. We recorded when the first, second, and third skin tumors developed. The pattern of tumor development after MB-PDT or RF-PDT was similar to that observed in irradiated control mice (p > 0.05). However, the median times until the first, second, and third skin tumors developed in mice given MAL-PDT were significantly delayed, compared with control mice (256, 265, and 272 vs. 215, 222, and 230 days, respectively; p < 0.001). Only MAL-PDT was an effective prophylactic treatment against UVR-induced skin tumors in hairless mice.

Methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) is a photosensitizer topically used for photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) of skin pre-cancers and cancers. In this study, our goal is to expand the application of MAL to dual intraoperative PDD and PDT of peritoneal carcinomatosis. A new liposomal MAL formulation (lipMAL) designed for systemic or intraperitoneal administration was developed. LipMALs prepared by ammonium sulfate gradient technique achieved MAL payload up to 18% (w/w) with drug encapsulation efficiency in the range of 15.1-31.5%. All lipMALs demonstrated controlled MAL release behavior, and achieved strong fluorescence in cancer cells (SKOV3) but minimal fluorescence in non-cancer peritoneal cells (B14FAF28-G3). LipMALs led to significantly higher fluorescence levels than free MAL groups (P < 0.05), up to 6.8-fold of the free MAL fluorescence levels in SKOV3 cells. The PDD performance of lipMALs was also compared with free MAL in SKOV3/ B14FAF28-G3 co-cultures simulating ovarian cancer micrometastases on peritoneal surface. The lipMAL-treated cancer colonies glew more brightly than the free MAL treated colonies and were clearly distinguishable from the dim peritoneum background with unaided eyes. LipMAL also achieved significantly stronger anticancer PDT effects than free MAL both in terms of cell viability and colony-formation (P < 0.05) while demonstrating minimal dark toxicity. To conclude, a new promising aid for the surgeons to achieve more complete resection of tumors and PC micrometastases and clean up any residual cancer cells undetected was developed.