Metastatic stage

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在转移性尿道癌中,时间趋势,住院姑息治疗(IPC)的使用模式未知。
    方法:依托全国住院患者样本(2006-2019年),转移性尿道肿瘤患者根据IPC使用情况进行分层.拟合了用于预测IPC使用的估计年度百分比变化(EAPC)分析和多变量逻辑回归模型(LRM)。
    结果:在1,106例转移性尿道癌患者中,199(18%)接受IPC。随着时间的推移,整个队列中IPC的使用从5.8%增加到28.0%(EAPC9.8%;P<0.001),从<12.5到35.1%(EAPC+11.2%;P<0.001),女性和男性分别为<12.5%至24.7%(EAPC9.4%;P=0.01)。最低的IPC率记录在中西部(13.5%)与南方最高(22.5%)。IPC患者更常见的是女性(44vs.37%),更频繁地表现出骨转移(45vs.34%)。在多变量LRM中,女性(多变量比值比[OR]1.46,95%置信区间[CI]1.05-2.02;P=0.02),和骨转移(OR1.46,95CI1.02-2.10;P=0.04)独立预测较高的IPC率。相反,在中西部地区住院(OR0.53,95CI0.31-0.91;P=0.02),在东北地区(OR0.48,95CI0.28-0.82;P=0.01),IPC使用率低于西部地区的住院率。
    结论:IPC在转移性尿道癌中的使用从5.8%的边缘率增加到高达28%。理想情况下,根据性别的差异,转移部位,和区域应该得到解决,以提高IPC的使用率。
    BACKGROUND: In metastatic urethral cancer, temporal trends, and patterns of inpatient palliative care (IPC) use are unknown.
    METHODS: Relying on the National Inpatient Sample (2006-2019), metastatic urethral cancer patients were stratified according to IPC use. Estimated annual percentage changes (EAPC) analyses and multivariable logistic regression models (LRM) for the prediction of IPC use were fitted.
    RESULTS: Of 1,106 metastatic urethral cancer patients, 199 (18%) received IPC. IPC use increased from 5.8 to 28.0% over time in the overall cohort (EAPC +9.8%; P < 0.001), from <12.5 to 35.1% (EAPC +11.2%; P < 0.001), and from <12.5 to 24.7% (EAPC +9.4%; P = 0.01) in respectively females and males. Lowest IPC rates were recorded in the Midwest (13.5%) vs. highest in the South (22.5%). IPC patients were more frequently female (44 vs. 37%), and more frequently exhibited bone metastases (45 vs. 34%). In multivariable LRM, female sex (multivariable odds ratio [OR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-2.02; P = 0.02), and bone metastases (OR 1.46, 95%CI 1.02-2.10; P = 0.04) independently predicted higher IPC rates. Conversely, hospitalization in the Midwest (OR 0.53, 95%CI 0.31-0.91; P = 0.02), and in the Northeast (OR 0.48, 95%CI 0.28-0.82; P = 0.01) were both associated with lower IPC use than hospitalization in the West.
    CONCLUSIONS: IPC use in metastatic urethral cancer increased from a marginal rate of 5.8% to as high as 28%. Ideally, differences according to sex, metastatic site, and region should be addressed to improve IPC use rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    背景:使用免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)改善了转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的预后。不幸的是,在某些情况下,癌细胞会产生抗性机制。在有限数量的病变进展的情况下(少进展),建议在继续ICI治疗的同时进行放疗的局部治疗.
    方法:将37例转移性NSCLC患者在第二行或后续行接受纳武单抗(抗PD-1)治疗,并接受局灶性放疗以少进展继续使用纳武单抗治疗的对照组与87例患者的对照组进行比较。
    结果:经过37个月的中位随访[18;62],放疗组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为15.04个月,对照组为5.04个月,差异有统计学意义(P=0.048)。在弱进展组中,局灶性放疗后的中位PFS为7.5个月。在单变量分析中,肺转移的存在与PFS增加有关,与脑转移的存在相反,与放疗组PFS降低相关。两组均未达到中位总生存期,两个队列之间没有显着差异。
    结论:在次要或后续治疗中,在治疗转移性NSCLC时,联合使用局灶性放疗和继续使用纳武单抗治疗相结合,似乎增加了PFS。
    BACKGROUND: The prognosis of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been improved by the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Unfortunately, in some cases, cancer cells will develop resistance mechanisms. In case of progression in a limited number of lesions (oligoprogression), focal treatment with radiotherapy is proposed while continuing the ICI therapy.
    METHODS: A cohort of 37 patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with nivolumab (anti-PD-1) in second or subsequent line and who received focal radiotherapy for oligoprogression with continuation of nivolumab was compared with a control cohort of 87 patients no oligoprogressor treated par immunotherapy.
    RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 37 months [18; 62], the median progression free survival (PFS) in the radiotherapy-treated cohort was 15.04 versus 5.04 months in the control cohort, with a statistically significant difference (P=0.048). The median PFS following focal radiotherapy in the oligoprogressor group was 7.5 months. In univariate analysis, the presence of lung metastasis was associated with increased PFS, in contrast to the presence of brain metastases, which were associated with decreased PFS in the radiotherapy group. The median overall survival was not reached in both groups, with no significant difference between the two cohorts.
    CONCLUSIONS: The combination of focal radiotherapy in case of oligoprogression and continued treatment with nivolumab in the treatment of metastatic NSCLC in the second or subsequent line of treatment seems to be with an increase in PFS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于21基因复发评分(RS)在初发转移性乳腺癌(dnMBC)患者中的实用性和有效性的数据有限。本研究旨在探讨dnMBC中基于21基因RS的实践模式以及相关的生存结果。
    监视,流行病学,和最终结果Oncotype数据库查询了激素受体阳性和Her2阴性dnMBC的女性。
    总共确认了153名患者,分别包括62.7%和37.3%的RS<26和≥26的患者。与RS<26的患者相比,RS≥26的患者更有可能接受化疗(61.4%vs.28.1%,p<0.001)。RS≥26的患者乳腺癌特异性生存率(BCSS)较差(2年BCSS:84.3%vs.89.5,p=0.067)和总生存率(OS)与RS<26(2年OS:76.9%vs.87.4%,p=0.018)。多变量Cox比例风险模型显示,与RS<26的患者相比,RS≥26的患者的BCSS(风险比[HR]2.251,95%置信区间[CI]1.056-4.799,p=0.036)和OS(HR2.151,95CI1.123-4.120,p=0.021)明显较差。
    21基因RS测定是dnMBC患者的重要预后因素。
    UNASSIGNED: Limited data exist regarding the utility and validity of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) in patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC). This study aimed to investigate the practice patterns as well as associated survival outcomes based on 21-gene RS in dnMBC.
    UNASSIGNED: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Oncotype database was queried for women with hormone receptor-positive and Her2-negative dnMBC.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 153 patients were identified, including 62.7% and 37.3% of patients who had RS < 26 and ≥ 26, respectively. Patients with RS ≥ 26 were more likely to receive chemotherapy compared to those with RS < 26 (61.4% vs. 28.1%, p < 0.001). Patients with RS ≥ 26 had an inferior breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (2-year BCSS: 84.3% vs. 89.5, p = 0.067) and overall survival (OS) compared to those with RS < 26 (2-year OS: 76.9% vs. 87.4%, p = 0.018). The multivariate Cox proportional hazard models showed that those with RS ≥ 26 had a significantly inferior BCSS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.251, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.056-4.799, p = 0.036) and OS (HR 2.151, 95%CI 1.123-4.120, p = 0.021) compared to those with RS < 26.
    UNASSIGNED: The 21-gene RS assay is an important prognostic factor in patients with dnMBC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Practice Guideline
    目的:根据临床情况确定腺样囊性癌(ACC)的全身药物治疗的适应证。
    方法:法国罕见头颈部肿瘤网络(REFCOR)组成了一个指导小组,对Medline上发表的文献进行了叙述性综述,并提出了建议。然后由评级小组评估对建议的遵守程度,根据正式共识方法。
    结果:ACCs是罕见的肿瘤,目前没有足够的证据表明化疗处于局部阶段。在转移阶段,通常进展缓慢。在寡转移ACC的情况下,应该讨论局部治疗。多转移性ACC最常见的惰性性质可以通过主动监测进行管理。建议进行分子筛选,针对靶向治疗可能获得的异常。
    结论:ACCs是罕见的肿瘤,目前尚无有效的药物治疗方法。因此,建议将患者纳入临床试验。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the therapeutic indications for systemic medical treatment in the management of adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) according to the clinical situation.
    METHODS: The French Network of Rare Head and Neck Tumors (REFCOR) formed a steering group, which drafted a narrative review of the literature published on Medline and proposed recommendations. The level of adherence to the recommendations was then assessed by a rating group, according to the formal consensus method.
    RESULTS: ACCs are rare tumors and there is currently insufficient evidence to indicate chemotherapy at the localized stage. At the metastatic stage, progression is often slow. In case of oligometastatic ACC, local treatment should be discussed. The most often indolent nature of polymetastatic ACC can allow management by active surveillance. Molecular screening is recommended, for abnormalities potentially accessible to targeted therapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: ACCs are rare tumors for which there are currently few effective medical treatments. It is therefore recommended to include patients in clinical trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:肺癌是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因,在过去的二十年里,它的发病率有所增加。第一阶段的标准护理,第二阶段,选择IIIA期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的病例是手术切除;在某些情况下,患者可在手术切除后接受系统辅助治疗.出现远处转移的肺癌患者属于IV期:在这种情况下,一些精心挑选的患者可能会从多模态方法的手术中获益.
    未经评估:我们进行了全面的,非系统回顾最新文献,以确定目前手术在肺癌治疗中的作用。
    UNASSIGNED:文献综述揭示了手术在早期肺癌中的关键作用和在局部晚期肺癌中的补充作用;在非常选定的病例中,手术可以考虑在寡转移疾病。
    UNASSIGNED:肺癌的外科治疗在疾病的早期阶段仍然起着关键作用,在当地高级阶段,与药物治疗和放射治疗相结合,它可能有助于提高总生存率。最近,在精心选择的寡转移患者中,人们提倡手术的有效作用,并取得了令人鼓舞的初步结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and its incidence has increased over the past two decades. The standard care for stage I, stage II, and selected cases of stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is surgical resection; in some cases, patients may be offered adjuvant systemic therapy after surgical resection. Patients with lung cancer presenting with distant metastases belong to stage IV: in this setting, some carefully selected patients may benefit from surgery within a multimodality approach.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a comprehensive, non-systematic review of the latest literature to define the present role of surgery in lung cancer treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: The literature review disclosed a pivotal role of surgery in early stage lung cancer and a complimentary role in locally advanced lung cancer; in very selected cases, surgery might be considered in oligometastatic disease.
    UNASSIGNED: Surgical treatment of lung cancer still plays a pivotal role in early stages of the disease while, in locally advanced stages, it may contribute to improve overall survival in combination with medical treatments and radiotherapy. More recently, an effective role of surgery has been advocated in carefully selected oligometastatic patients with encouraging initial results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignant tumors and highly heterogeneous diseases. More recently, RNA expression profiles have been used as prognostic cancer markers. In this regard, the expression of small non-coding RNAs like tRNA-derived fragments (tRFs) in tumor tissue has potential diagnostic values in metastatic cancer.
    METHODS: Sixty postoperative CRC tissue samples, consisting of 30 cancers and 30 adjacent normal tissues, were collected from cancer patients. We evaluated MINTbase database to select tRNA-derived fragments. The expression levels of miR-1280, miR1308, tRNA-ValAAC/CAC, and tRNA-AspGTC were measured by TaqMan quantitative reverse transcription PCR technology. Also, we have evaluated the correlation between the levels of tRFs gene expression and clinicopathological of CRC disease.
    RESULTS: The three tRFs derived from tRF/miR-1280, tRNA-ValAAC/CAC, and tRNA-AspGTC downregulated in tumor tissues (all, p < 0.0001). These tRFs have lower expression in stage IV in comparison with stage III. The tRFs derived from tRNA-ValAAC (p = 0.005) and tRNA-AspGTC (p = 0.034) showed the decreased expression in CRC patients with distant metastasis.
    CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that low expression of tRF/miR-1280, tRNA-ValAAC/CAC, and tRNA-AspGTC was significantly associated with metastatic stage and more aggressive tumor behavior of CRC disease. Our finding promising the potential of using tRFs as biomarkers for cancer diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    主要目的是确定我们医院收治的癌症患者的死亡率,他们的临床和人口统计学特征,调查癌症患者感染COVID-19的风险,并确定影响死于COVID-19的癌症患者死亡率的因素。自3月11日起,我院共收治2401例确诊为COVID-19的患者,2020年5月31日,2020年。根据计划的纳入/排除标准,总共112名癌症患者中有92名被纳入本研究。临床,人口统计学,并研究了实验室特征和提供的治疗方法,并分析了它们对死亡率的影响。在我们的研究中,患者的中位年龄为67岁,55.4%为男性。超过一半(56.5%)的患者有转移。COVID-19患者的死亡率为6.2%,而癌症患者的死亡率为23.9%。与无转移患者相比,有转移患者的死亡率在统计学上显着较高(34.0%vs.10.3%P=0.008)。仍吸烟患者的死亡率在统计学上显着高于不吸烟者(37.5%vs.12.5%P=0.033)。高平均C反应蛋白(CRP)患者的死亡率,铁蛋白,乳酸脱氢酶(LDH),和D-二聚体水平在统计学上显著高于那些没有,平均白蛋白和血红蛋白水平较低的患者死亡率明显高于无白蛋白和血红蛋白水平较低的患者(分别为P<0.001,P=0.006,P=0.041,P<0.001,P<0.001,P=0.028)。与COVID-19同时发生转移是预测预后的统计学显著因素。此外,高CRP,铁蛋白,LDH,和D-二聚体,低白蛋白和低血红蛋白与死亡率增加有关。与预后相关的可能因素的预测和预后作用尚不清楚,需要多中心前瞻性研究来证实这些结果。
    The main objective is to define the mortality of patients with cancer admitted to our hospital, their clinical and demographic characteristics, investigate the risk of COVID-19 for patients with cancer, and determine factors that affect the mortality rates of patients with cancer dying of COVID-19. A total of 2401 patients were admitted to our hospital with the diagnosis of COVID-19 from March 11th, 2020, to May 31st, 2020. Ninety-two out of a total of 112 cancer patients were included in this study based on the planned inclusion/exclusion criteria. The clinical, demographic, and laboratory features and treatments provided were studied, and their effect on mortality rates was analyzed. In our study the median age of the patients was 67 years, and 55.4% were male. More than half (56.5%) of our patients had metastasis. The mortality rate was 6.2% in the overall population with COVID-19, whereas it was 23.9% in patients with cancer. The mortality rate in patients with metastasis was statistically significantly higher compared with those without metastasis (34.0% vs. 10.3% P = 0.008). The mortality rate in patients still smoking was statistically significantly higher than in non-smokers (37.5% vs. 12.5% P = 0.033). The mortality rates of patients with high average C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and D-dimer levels were statistically significantly higher than in those without, and the mortality rates of patients with lower average albumin and hemoglobin levels were statistically significantly higher than those without (P < 0.001, P = 0.006, P = 0.041, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.028, respectively). Having metastases concurrent with COVID-19 was a statistically significant factor predictive of prognosis. Also, high CRP, ferritin, LDH, and D-dimer, and low albumin and hemoglobin were related to increased mortality rates. The predictive and prognostic role of possible factors related to prognosis is still unknown and further large, multicenter prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the COVID-19 infection rate and determine the factors that affect hospitalization and prognosis in patients receiving systemic chemotherapy (CT), immunotherapy (IT) and molecular-targeted therapies at our hospital within three months after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic.
    METHODS: The patients who received systemic treatment at chemotherapy unit with diagnosis of cancer between 11 March 2020 and 11 June 2020 were included. The clinical and demographic characteristics of patients, the systemic treatments that they received (CT, IT, targeted therapies), and the stage of disease were determined. For the parameters that affect the hospitalization of COVID-19 infected patients were also determined.
    RESULTS: Among 1149 patients with cancer, 84 of them were infected with COVID-19, and the median age of infected patients was 61.0 (IQR: 21-84) and 60.7% of them were male. As a subtype of cancers lung cancer was more frequent in the patients who infected with COVID compared with non-infected ones and the difference was statistically significant when the underlying malignities were compared (32.1% vs 19.0%, p = 0.031). The hospitalization rate and receiving COVID-19 treatment were more frequent in metastatic patients who were receiving palliative therapy, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.01, p = 0.03). In our study, infection rate was similar among patients treated with CT, IT and CT plus targeted therapy; however, fewer COVID-19 infections were seen at patients who received only targeted therapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 infection is more frequent in cancer patients and tends to be more severe in metastatic cancer patients receiving anticancer treatment, and the continuation of palliative cancer treatments in these patients may cause increased cancer and infection-related morbidity and mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    乳房外佩吉特病(EMPD)是一种经常误诊的罕见疾病,其原因仍然未知。通过皮肤活检证实诊断。EMPD的主要治疗是手术。复发在头两年是常见的,并且如果疾病是局部的并且没有潜在的相关癌症,则预后良好。侵袭性和转移性EMPD患者并不常见,且预后不良。即使对第一个化疗线有良好的反应。多种化疗方案,不同程度的成功,已经尝试过,但护理标准尚未建立。中枢神经系统似乎是一个常见的转移部位,其生存率优于内脏转移。我们报告了一例转移性EMPD,解决了与这种罕见疾病的治疗相关的困难。没有现行的指导方针。
    Extramammary Paget Disease (EMPD) is an often-misdiagnosed rare disorder, whose cause remains unknown. Diagnosis is confirmed by skin biopsy. Primary treatment for EMPD is surgery. Recurrence is common in the first two years and prognosis is good if the disease is localized and there is no underlying associated cancer. Patients with invasive and metastatic EMPD are uncommon and exhibit a poor prognosis, even when there is good response to a first chemotherapy line. Multiple chemotherapeutic regimens, with varying levels of success, have been attempted, but standard of care is not established. The central nervous system seems to be a common metastatic site with better survival than visceral metastasis.We report a case of metastatic EMPD that addresses the difficulties associated with the treatment of this rare disease, that has no current guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Bronchial carcinoids are uncommon pulmonary neoplasms and represent 1 to 2 % of all lung tumors. In early stage of disease, the mainstay and only curative treatment is surgery. Bronchial carcinoids are generally regarded as low-grade carcinomas and metastatic dissemination is unusual. The management of the metastatic stage is not currently standardized due to a lack of relevant studies. As bronchial carcinoids and in particular their metastatic forms are rare, we apply treatment strategies that have been evaluated in gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. However, bronchial carcinoids have their own characteristic. A specific therapeutic feature of these metastatic tumors is that they require a dual approach: both anti-secretory for the carcinoid syndrome, and anti-tumoral.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号