Metaphyseal–diaphyseal junction

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:几种方法已用于治疗小儿桡骨远端骨折,如弹性稳定髓内钉(ESIN),克氏针(K线),和盘子,但是关于最佳方法还没有达成共识。这项研究的目的是比较ESIN和K线技术在小儿桡骨远端干phy端-骨干连接(MDJ)骨折中的应用。
    方法:对2018年8月至2022年1月在山东大学附属儿童医院接受治疗的患者资料进行回顾性分析。将儿童分为ESIN组和K线组。通过Gartland和Werley评分系统测量临床结果。使用统计学方法分析两组之间的变量。
    结果:该研究包括26名患者,其中11人接受了K线治疗,15人接受了ESIN治疗。在最后的后续行动中,所有骨折均愈合。在年龄方面没有差异,性别,骨折位置,或手腕功能评分。然而,ESIN在手术时间上优于K线,荧光照射,估计失血量(EBL)。
    结论:K-wire和ESIN均是治疗小儿桡骨远端MDJ骨折的有效方法。使用ESIN技术代表较少的EBL,透视暴露,和操作时间与K线相比。对于桡骨远端MDJ骨折患者,我们建议通过ESIN而不是K线进行骨合成。
    方法:III,病例对照研究。
    BACKGROUND: Several methods have been used for the treatment of pediatric distal radius fractures, such as the elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN), Kirschner wire (K-wire), and plate, but there has been no consensus about the optimum method. The purpose of this study was to compare ESIN and K-wire techniques used in metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction (MDJ) fractures of the pediatric distal radius.
    METHODS: The data of patients who were treated at a children\'s hospital affiliated with Shandong University between August 2018 and January 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. The children were divided into the ESIN and K-wire groups. Clinical outcomes were measured by the Gartland and Werley scoring system. Variables were analyzed using a statistical approach between the two groups.
    RESULTS: The study included 26 patients, of whom 11 were treated with K-wire and 15 with ESIN. At the final follow-up, all of the fractures were healed. There were no differences in terms of age, sex, fracture location, or wrist function score. However, the ESIN was superior to K-wire in operative time, fluoroscopic exposure, and estimated blood loss (EBL).
    CONCLUSIONS: K-wire and ESIN are both effective methods in the treatment of MDJ fractures of the pediatric distal radius. The use of the ESIN technique represents less EBL, fluoroscopy exposure, and operation time compared with K-wire. We recommend osteosynthesis by ESIN rather than K-wires in patients with MDJ fractures of the distal radius.
    METHODS: III, a case-control study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    UNASSIGNED:尽管教科书中的描述很少,并且指出干phy端-骨干端交界性(MDJ)骨折的治疗很困难,它的治疗方法和注意事项几乎没有详细的描述。
    未经证实:我们遇到了两名患者,9岁和1岁和11个月大的日本男孩,肱骨远端MDJ骨折,这在儿童中非常罕见。与肱骨远端髁上骨折不同,骨折是螺旋骨折,这使得经皮钉扎非常困难。使用带有两个皮肤切口的双侧方法进行切开复位。两名患者均完全康复,在进行日常生活或运动活动时没有任何问题。
    未经评估:对于年龄足以接受锁定板的患者,我们建议使用锁定板固定。在没有交叉钉扎的情况下,应考虑逆行髓内钉。肱骨远端MDJ骨折应作为肱骨远端骨折治疗,不是肱骨髁上骨折的亚型。
    UNASSIGNED: Although there are few descriptions in textbooks and it is stated that the treatment of metaphyseal-diaphyseal junctional (MDJ) fracture is difficult, there is almost no detailed description on its treatment methods and precautions.
    UNASSIGNED: We encountered two patients, 9-year-old and 1-year and 11-month-old Japanese boys, with MDJ fractures of the distal humerus, which are very rare in children. Unlike supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus, the fractures were spiral fractures, which made percutaneous pinning very difficult. Open reduction was performed using a bilateral approach with two skin incisions. Both patients recovered completely and had no problems carrying out activities of daily living or playing sports.
    UNASSIGNED: For patients that are old enough to receive a locking plate, we recommend fixation using a locking plate. In cases of unilateral pinning without cross-pinning, retrograde intramedullary nailing should be considered. MDJ fractures of the distal humerus should be treated as distal humeral shaft fractures, not as subtypes of supracondylar fractures of the humerus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号