Mesonephric adenocarcinomas (MAs) and mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas (MLAs) are rare, aggressive neoplasms that arise in the gynecologic tract and show overlapping morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features. While MAs occur in the cervix and are thought to arise from mesonephric remnants, MLAs occur in the endometrium and ovary and are believed to originate from transdifferentiation of Müllerian lesions. Both MAs and MLAs show a variety of architectural patterns, exhibit frequent expression of GATA3 by immunohistochemistry, and harbor KRAS mutations. In a recent article published in The Journal of Pathology, Kommoss and colleagues used DNA methylation profiling to extend these similarities and showed that MLAs and MAs cluster together based on their epigenetic signatures and are epigenetically distinct from other Müllerian adenocarcinomas. They also showed that MLAs and MAs harbor a high number of global copy number alterations. This study provides evidence that MLAs more closely resemble MAs than Müllerian carcinomas on an epigenetic level. As a result, the authors argue that MLA should be renamed \'mesonephric-type adenocarcinoma.\' Further research is needed to establish the relationship between these two entities, their etiology, and pathogenesis. © 2024 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

暂无摘要。

Adenocarcinoma, HPV-independent, mesonephric type (hereafter referred to as \"mesonephric carcinoma\") arising from the cervix is rare, its treatment has not been established, and its sensitivity to chemotherapy has not been fully investigated. Here we report on a 30-year-old female patient who presented at our hospital with a chief complaint of abnormal genital bleeding. We suspected cervical cancer. Based on examination, biopsy, and imaging, she was diagnosed with stage IIA2 adenocarcinoma of the cervix and was scheduled for surgery. Because she had a SARS-COV-2 infection, she was given two courses of paclitaxel-carboplatin (TC) therapy, based on the then-current surgical risk assessment after SARS-COV-2 infection, with a waiting period of at least 8 weeks. The patient was deemed to have a partial response and was treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin, after which she was deemed to have a partial response and underwent total hysterectomy. A diagnosis of stage IIA2 mesonephric carcinoma, ypT1b2N0M0, was made after histopathologic examination of an excised specimen. The patient was treated with 4 additional courses of TC therapy after surgery, and has had no recurrence in 13 months. We report a first case of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TC regimen in a patient with mesonephric carcinoma of the cervix.

暂无摘要。

Extrauterine mesonephric-like carcinoma (ExUMLC) shares histologic, immunohistochemical (IHC), and molecular (MOL) features with endometrial mesonephric-like carcinoma (EnMLC). Its rarity and histologic overlap with Mullerian carcinomas contribute to underrecognition of ExUMLC. Aggressive behavior of EnMLC is well-documented; behavior of ExUMLC is yet to be characterized. This study presents the clinicopathologic, IHC, and MOL features of 33 ExUMLC identified over a 20-year time period (2002-2022) and compares the behavior of this cohort to more common upper gynecologic Mullerian carcinomas (low-grade endometrioid, LGEC; clear cell, CCC; high-grade serous, HGSC) and EnMLC diagnosed over the same time period. ExUMLC patients ranged from 37 to 74 years old (median=59 y); 13 presented with advanced stage (FIGO III/IV) disease. Most ExUMLC had the characteristic mixture of architectural patterns and cytologic features, as previously described. Two ExUMLC had sarcomatous differentiation, 1 with heterologous rhabdomyosarcoma. Twenty-one ExUMLC (63%) had associated endometriosis, and 7 (21%) arose in a borderline tumor. In 14 (42%) cases, ExUMLC was part of a mixed carcinoma representing >50% of the tumor in 12. Twenty-six cases (79%) were incorrectly classified as follows: LGEC or HGEC (12); adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified (3); HGSC (3); LGSC (2); mixed carcinoma (1); carcinosarcoma, Mullerian type (2); seromucinous carcinoma (1); transitional pattern of HGSC (1); and female adnexal tumor of probable Wolffian origin (1). Three patients had occult synchronous endometrial LGEC. IHC facilitated diagnosis in all cases with an expression of GATA-3 and/or TTF-1 in conjunction with decreased hormone receptor expression in most tumors. MOL testing (n=20) identified a variety of mutations, most frequently: KRAS (15); TP53 (4); SPOP (4); and PIK3CA (4). ExUMLC and CCC were more likely to be associated with endometriosis ( P <0.0001). ExUMLC and HGSC had more recurrences compared with CCC and LGEC ( P <0.0001). Histologic subtype was associated with longer disease-free survival for LGEC and CCC versus HGSC and ExUMLC ( P <0.001). ExUMLC trended towards a similar poor overall survival as HGSC compared with LGEC and CCC, and EnMLC trended to shorter survival compared with ExUMLC. Neither finding reached significance. No differences were seen between EnMLC and ExUMLC with respect to presenting stage or recurrence. Staging, histotype, and endometriosis were associated with disease-free survival, but on multivariate analysis, only stage remained as an independent predictor of outcome. The tendency of ExUMLC to present at an advanced stage and have distant recurrence points to more aggressive behavior compared with LGEC with which it is most frequently confused, underscoring the importance of an accurate diagnosis.

暂无摘要。

Given the association of mesonephric adenocarcinoma (MA) of the uterine cervix with florid mesonephric hyperplasia, one would expect MAs to rarely arise in other anatomical locations that harbor mesonephric remnants. In contrast, mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) is thought to arise from Müllerian origin without an association with mesonephric remnants. The current case series characterizes 4 cases of MA arising in the urinary bladder (1 woman and 3 men), 1 case of MA in the perirenal region (woman), and 1 case of MLA in the ureter (woman). All cases displayed morphologic features similar to MA of the uterine cervix and MLA of the ovary and endometrium, characterized by predominant tubular and focal glandular/ductal architecture. Mesonephric remnants in the bladder wall were closely associated with adjacent MA in cases 1 and 4. MLA in case 6 was associated with mesonephric-like proliferations and endometriosis. All cases (6/6) were diffusely positive for Pax8, and all displayed a luminal pattern of CD10 staining, except case 4 for which CD10 immunostain was not available for review. Gata3 was either focally positive (cases 1, 2, and 6), negative (case 3), or diffusely positive (case 5). TTF-1 was diffusely expressed in cases 1 and 3 and negative in cases 2, 5, and 6. Although a KRAS G12C somatic mutation was detected in case 6, hotspot mutations in KRAS, NRAS, and PIK3CA were not present in other tested cases. Our study demonstrates that MAs and MLAs of the urinary tract share similar histopathogenesis, morphology, and immunophenotype to their counterparts in the female genital tract. We propose that, in the urinary tract, MA might be classified as a distinctive tumor that arises from mesonephric remnants or presumed Wolffian origin if they are not related to Müllerian-type precursors. The tumor displaying similar morphology and immunoprofile to MA but associated with Müllerian-type precursors should be classified as MLA.

OBJECTIVE: Are reported in the cervix in the female genital tract, has been reported in very few studies in the literature. In this report, we aimed to present a case with mesonephric carcinoma, which was detected in the ovary and is very rarely seen.
METHODS: In a case since the frozen section results of the left adnexal mass were reported as malignant.
CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian mesonephric carcinoma is very rare and exhibits very different morphological patterns. Therefore, immunohistochemical and morphological findings should be evaluated together. If the pathological picture does not fit the common carcinomas of ovarian origin and this entity must be brought to mind, because, if these tumors with different molecular developmental pathways are diagnosed correctly, treatment schemes will change and targeted therapies will be developed too.
BACKGROUND: Mesonephric carcinoma, Mesonephric like carcinoma, Ovarian carcinoma.
La rara localizzazione ovarica del carcinoma mesonefrico, che solitamente è riportato nella cervice del tratto genitale femminile, è stata riportata in pochissimi studi in letteratura. In questo rapporto, abbiamo mirato a presentare un caso con carcinoma mesonefrico, che è stato rilevato nell’ovaio ed è dunque di raro riscontro. CASO CLINICO: in una paziente di 58 anni, è stata rilevata una massa nella loggia annessiale sinistra ed i risultati dell’esame istologico estemporaneo della massa annessiale sinistra sono stati indicativi di formazione maligna. CONCLUSIONE: Il carcinoma ovarico mesonefrico è molto raro e presenta aspetti morfologici molto diversi. Pertanto, i risultati immunoistochimici e morfologici dovrebbero essere valutati insieme. Se il quadro patologico non rientra nei comuni carcinomi di origine ovarica anche l’eventualità di questa entità va ricordata, perché, dato che questi tumori hanno percorsi di sviluppo molecolare diversi se vengono diagnosticati correttamente, gli schemi di trattamento cambieranno e verranno sviluppate anche terapie mirate.

UNASSIGNED: Mesonephric adenocarcinoma (MNAC) is a very rare tumor that originates from mesonephric duct remnants of the female genital tract. Only a few cases were reported in the literature, and most of them occurred in the cervix, extremely rare in the uterine body and ovary. MNAC was rarely reported to arise in the uterine corpus, but never was reported in the ovary. Mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas are recently suggested to describe these neoplasms arising from the uterine corpus and ovary. Due to the rareness of the disease, little is known regarding clinical characteristics, pathological diagnosis, prognosis, and optimal management strategy of MNAC in the female reproductive system. We report a series of MNACs arising from the vagina, cervix, uterine corpus, ovary, and fallopian tube, to summarize the clinical characteristics, pathological diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.We retrospectively analyzed all MNACs in the female genital tract derived from our institute from January 2010 till January 2020. Patients\' clinical details and follow-up were obtained from hospital records and scans were obtained from picture archiving and communication system.A total of 11 patients were included. The median age of onset of symptoms was 52 years. All patients underwent total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and lymph node dissections were performed in 7/11 (63.6%) patients. Two/eleven (18.2%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery and 7/11 (63.6%) received adjuvant chemotherapy after primary surgery. Of the 11 patients, only 1 patient received adjuvant radiation therapy. One patient died at the end point of this study, 9 patients (81.8%) survived and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. The mean follow-up duration was 33.5 months.Although there is no consensus for the optimal treatment of this rare disease, radical surgery is considered to be the initial choice for localized lesion. Given the high malignancy, the majority of MNAC or mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy received 4 to 8 cycles of carboplatin/paclitaxel as a first-line treatment after primary surgery with a median progression-free survival of 12 months. Treatment for recurrent disease in these patients included gemcitabine, carboplatin, and paclitaxel. Radiation was very limited in the treatment of the disease.

BACKGROUND:  Malignant mesonephric tumors are uncommon in the female genital tract, and they are usually located where embryonic remnants of Wolffian ducts are detected, such as the uterine cervix. The information about these tumors, their treatment protocol, and prognosis are scarce.
METHODS:  A 60-year-old woman with postmenopausal vaginal bleeding was initially diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma. After suspicion co-testing, the patient underwent a loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and was eventually diagnosed with mesonephric adenocarcinoma. She was subjected to a radical hysterectomy, which revealed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IB1 stage, and adjuvant radiotherapy. The follow-up showed no evidence of recurrence after 60 months.
CONCLUSIONS:  We present the case of a woman with cervical mesonephric adenocarcinoma. When compared with the literature, this case had the longest clinical follow-up without evidence of recurrence, which reinforces the concept that these tumors are associated with a favorable prognosis if managed according to the guidelines defined for the treatment of patients with cervical adenocarcinomas. Though a rare entity, it should be kept in mind as a differential diagnosis for other cervical cancers.