Abdominal hernia surgeries are commonly performed with many different approaches, and mesh utilization has become a cornerstone in hernia repair, ensuring durable outcomes with minimal recurrence risk. However, managing contaminated hernia repairs presents unique challenges due to the heightened risks of mesh infection. Recent advancements in lightweight macroporous polypropylene meshes offer promising solutions. Studies have highlighted the superiority of macroporous polypropylene meshes compared to primary suture repair and other mesh types in terms of reduced surgical site infection rates and lower hernia recurrence rates. Moreover, utilizing macroporous polypropylene mesh in the retrorectus plane is associated with a favorable salvage rate, underscoring its efficacy in contaminated hernia repairs. At the same time, contrary evidence suggests higher postoperative complications with mesh use in settings of clean-contaminated or contaminated fields. Most significant complications are increased infection rates and similar recurrence rates compared to mesh-free repairs. New synthetic mesh that is being marketed as having better outcomes than other types of mesh and potentially primary repair need to be carefully assessed as biologic mesh once used to also be touted as the mesh to use in such fields, but more research is showing higher complication rates. The risk of infection and consequent morbidity might outweigh the benefit of less recurrence risk with mesh use. Further research, including prospective studies with long-term follow-up, is warranted to elucidate optimal hernia repair strategies in contaminated fields and inform evidence-based practice guidelines.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: We present a case of post-inguinal hernia repair delayed mesh infection that was initially misdiagnosed as appendiceal cancer.
METHODS: The patient was an 82-year-old man who underwent right inguinal hernia repair with a plug mesh 7 years before he presented with a lump in the right inguinal region. No skin infection signs were evident; blood tests revealed no inflammation or abnormal tumor markers. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a tumorous lesion in the right lower abdomen, raising the suspicion of appendiceal cancer with lymph node and lung metastases. Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed extrinsic cecal wall compression. During laparoscopic ileocecal resection with lymph node dissection, a pus-filled abscess exposed the mesh in the inguinal region; hence, a diagnosis of a mesh infection was made. There were no macroscopic cancer signs in the appendix or cecum. Partial cecal resection involving the infected mesh was performed. Pathological tests did not reveal cancer, confirming the delayed mesh infection diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: This case presents the diagnostic challenges posed by post-inguinal hernia repair delayed mesh infections, emphasizing the lack of typical clinical and imaging indications and the potential for misdiagnosis as appendiceal cancer. It also highlights the importance of early recognition and appropriate management of these infections.
CONCLUSIONS: This case emphasizes the complexity of diagnosing post-inguinal hernia repair delayed mesh infections. These infections may mimic other conditions such as appendiceal cancer, stressing the need for vigilance and careful evaluation. Early recognition and proper management are essential to avoid unnecessary extensive surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Synthetic mesh material is of great importance for surgical incisional hernia repair. The physical and biochemical characteristics of the mesh influence mechanical stability and the foreign body tissue reaction. The influence on bacterial infections, however, remains ill-defined. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of a modified mesh structure with variation in filament linking on the occurrence of bacterial infection that is indicated by the occurrence of CD68+, CD4+, and CD8+ cells in two different materials.
METHODS: A total of 56 male Sprague Dawley rats received a surgical mesh implant in a subcutaneous abdominal position. The mesh of two different polymers (polypropylene (PP) and polyvinylidenfluoride (PVDF)) and two different structures (standard structure and bold structure with higher filament linking) were compared. During the implantation, the meshes were infected with Staphylococcus (S.) aureus. After 7 and 21 days, meshes were explanted, and the early and late tissue responses to infection were histologically evaluated.
RESULTS: Overall, the inflammatory tissue response was higher at 7 days when compared to 21 days. At 7 days, PP meshes of the standard structure (PP-S) showed the strongest inflammatory tissue response in comparison to all the other groups. At 21 days, no statistically significant difference between different meshes was detected. CD8+ cytotoxic T cells showed a significant difference at 21 days but not at 7 days. PP meshes of both structures showed a higher infiltration of CD8+ T cells than PVDF meshes. CD4+ T helper cells differed at 7 days but not at 21 days, and PVDF meshes in a bold structure showed the highest CD4+ T cell count. The number of CD68+ macrophages was also significantly higher in PP meshes in a standard structure when compared to PVDF meshes at 21 days.
CONCLUSIONS: The inflammatory tissue response to S. aureus infection appears to be highest during the early period after mesh implantation. PP meshes showed a higher inflammatory response than PVDF meshes. The mesh material appears to be more important for the risk of infection than the variation in filament linking.

A 50-year-old woman presented with chief complaints of fever and cough. She had a poorly controlled left lung abscess and a history of congenital left diaphragmatic hernia treated 9 years prior with composite mesh. Computed tomography showed suspected fistula formation between the left lower lung lobe and stomach, and the tract was visualized in a contrast study from an upper gastrointestinal endoscope. We suspected a gastrobronchial fistula associated with mesh infection and performed en bloc resection of the mesh and inflamed organ tissue, comprising resection of the left lower lung lobe and left diaphragm, partial gastrectomy, and splenectomy. The diaphragm was reconstructed using the latissimus dorsi and rectus abdominis muscles. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing this treatment strategy for gastrobronchial fistula associated with mesh infection. The patient\'s postoperative course was favourable.

Inguinal hernias are the most common type of hernias, and most are repaired surgically with mesh placement to prevent future reoccurrence. Mesh infection and hernia recurrence are some of the rare complications of mesh placement, and chronic mesh infections increase the risk of squamous cell carcinoma at the site. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the setting of a mesh infection presents in a similar manner to a Marjolin ulcer and is treated with the removal of the tumor and degraded infected mesh. However, in this case, the patient presented atypically with an absence of mesh involvement. This report aims to explore the etiology of SCC due to mesh infections as well as describe the perplexing case of inguinal SCC in the absence of mesh involvement.

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is the gold-standard treatment for localized prostate cancer in the USA. However, performing RARP along with a concomitant hernia repair with mesh is debatable because of the lack of well-designed studies on this subject. Some argue that this procedure may result in mesh infections and increased complications due to possible contact of mesh and urine. This study reports our experience with simultaneous hernia repair with mesh placement in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. We compared 244 patients (from August 2008 to August 2021) who underwent RARP with concomitant hernia repair (inguinal, umbilical, and ventral) and mesh placement with 244 patients from 6275 RARPs operated on the same period without hernia repair. We performed a propensity score matching analysis using preoperative covariates and compared the perioperative outcomes, and complications in 90 days after surgery. Median follow-up was 36.6 months for the control and hernia groups respectively (p = 0.81). Eighty-three patients had unilateral inguinal hernia repair, 22 had a bilateral inguinal hernia repair, 95 had a ventral hernia repair, and 44 had an umbilical hernia repair. The median operative time was 112 min for the control group and 160 min for hernia groups (p < 0.001). We did not find statistically significant differences in minor complications (Clavien ≤ 2). Although the postoperative readmissions in 90-days were higher in the hernia group (18 vs. 7, p = 0.038), none was associated with mesh complications. Limitation includes the retrospective design of the study. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with simultaneous hernia repair and mesh placement is safe and does not increase complications related to the mesh. In our experience, hernia repair increases the operative time, usually due to initial peritoneal flap dissection and final suturing. Therefore, we believe that hernia repair with mesh during RARP is safe and spares patients the additional impacts of an additional surgical procedure.

Mesh infection following hernia repair is one of the most dreaded complications of hernia surgery. Mesh sinus, infected seromas, mesh extrusion, and mesh-related enteric fistulas are common complications associated with synthetic mesh. This study aimed to review the microbiota of mesh infection in 100 patients submitted to mesh explantation.
We reviewed the charts of patients presenting with a history of mesh infection lasting or arising six months or more after mesh placement. All patients who submitted to abdominal wall repair with complete removal of an infected mesh and presenting a positive culture were included. The microbiology analysis was based on positive cultures obtained from the fluids and tissues surrounding the mesh or positive cultures of the mesh. Microorganisms were divided into gram-positive or gram-negative, aerobic or anaerobic, and fungi.
Pure aerobic gram-positive cultures were encountered in 50% of the patients, followed by a combination of aerobic gram-positive/gram-negative (8%) and pure gram-negative cultures (6%). Anaerobes were recovered from 31% of patients. Fungi were recovered from 6%. Staphylococcus aureus was identified in 64% of cultures, with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus present in 42% and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus in 22%. Among aerobic gram-negative infections, six (17%) were caused by multi-resistant bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, Acinetobacter baumanii, Klebsiella pneumoniae complex, and Enterobacter cloacae complex.
Staphylococcus aureus plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of synthetic mesh infection. Staphylococcus aureus, isolated in 64% of cultures, accounted for most single bacterial infections and was the prevalent germ in mesh sinus and infected seromas. Gram-negative infection occurred in 35%. Anaerobes occurred in 31%, commonly encountered in polymicrobial infections. Most fungi cultures happened in patients with enteric fistulas.

BACKGROUND: A meshoma formation and erosion to the small intestine is rare. Herein, we report one case of a meshoma that was not treated early; causing it to displace and erode the small intestine, with infection, complete control of symptoms was achieved after removal of the infected patch mass, no recurrence of hernia after 2 years of follow-up.
METHODS: A 62-year-old male patient presented with recurrent abdominal pain repeatedly for 1 wk, which has worsened 2 d before admition, accompanied by fever. Five years before presentation he underwent right inguinal hernia Plug and patch repair approach. Two years ago, a computed tomography scan revealed a right lower abdominal mass with soft tissue density, measuring approximately 30 mm × 17 mm, which was diagnosed as meshoma that was not treated. The patient had poorly controlled diabetes in the past year.
CONCLUSIONS: The formation of meshoma is rare, and that if not treated in time it might erode and require resection of the involved organ.

Mesh infection is a devastating complication of sterile hernia repair surgery. This study was performed to assess the short- and long-term outcomes following treatment for mesh infection after inguinal hernia repair.
This single-center retrospective study included all patients who developed mesh infection after inguinal hernia repair from January 2018 to December 2020. Patient demographics, mesh infection characteristics, microbiology, features of surgery, short- and long-term outcomes, and follow-up data were analyzed.
In total, 120 patients (8 women, 112 men; mean age, 54.4 years; mean body mass index, 24.8 kg/m2) were treated for mesh infection. The cultures were positive in 88 patients; 62.5% of these were positive for Staphylococcus aureus. Laparoscopic exploration was performed in 108 patients. Seventy patients underwent complete removal of infected mesh, and 50 underwent partial removal. During the short-term follow-up, 11 patients developed a minor wound infection and were treated with dressings and antibiotics, 1 developed a wound infection requiring debridement, 30 developed seromas, and 3 developed hematomas that did not require surgical intervention. During the mean follow-up of 39.1 months, 4 patients developed hernia recurrence, 2 experienced chronic pain, and 23 developed recurrent infection requiring reoperation in the partial mesh removal group (in contrast, only 4 patients in the complete mesh removal group developed recurrent infection, with a statistically significant difference).
The outcome of mesh infection after inguinal hernia repair treated by mesh removal is satisfactory. Systematic individualized treatment by experienced experts based on the patient\'s previous repair technique, implanted mesh, and physical condition is recommended.