目标:私募股权(PE)公司越来越多地收购眼科业务;对护理利用和支出的影响知之甚少。我们研究了收购PE后利用率和医疗保险支出的变化。
方法:回顾性队列研究。
方法:2017年至2018年期间,PE在123项实践中获得了762名临床医生;在20,549项从未获得的实践中,有34,807名临床医生。
方法:我们在事件研究框架内使用差异差异方法分析了Medicare按服务付费索赔(2012-2019)与新的国家眼科实践PE收购数据库,以比较实践获得后的变化与未获得的实践变化。
方法:看到的受益人人数;玻璃体内注射和用于注射的药物;眼科医生和验光师服务的支出,辅助服务,和玻璃体内注射.
结果:比较PE获得性与非获得性实践随时间的变化,每位PE验光师每季度的受益人相对增加23.92%(4.20名受益人,95%CI,1.73至6.67);眼科医生没有变化;每个受益人的支出相对增加5.06%($9.66,95%CI,-2.82至22.14)。临床医生服务支出下降1.62%(-2.37美元,95%CI,-5.78至1.04),包括每个受益人每季度在眼科医生服务上的支出增加5.46%(17.70美元,95%CI,-2.73至38.15),验光师减少4.60%(-5.76美元,95%CI,-9.17至-2.34)。辅助服务支出下降7.56%(-2.19美元,95%CI4.19至-0.22);玻璃体内注射支出增长25.0%(20.02美元,95%CI-1.38至41.41)。玻璃体内注射次数增加了5.10%(1.83,95%CI,-0.1~3.80),包括74.09%(8.38次注射,95%CI,0.01至16.74)使用昂贵的药物(雷珠单抗),减少12.91%(-3.40次注射,95%CI-6.86至0.07),用于廉价注射(贝伐单抗)。事件研究显示,采集后雷珠单抗注射剂的增加和贝伐单抗注射剂的减少一致且通常具有统计学意义。
结论:尽管并非所有结果均达到统计学意义,这项研究表明,体育实践对利用率或总支出的总体影响很小或没有,但增加了每位验光师看到的独特患者的数量和昂贵的玻璃体内注射的使用。
OBJECTIVE: Private equity (PE) firms increasingly are acquiring ophthalmology practices; little is known of their influence on care use and spending. We studied changes in use and Medicare spending after PE acquisition.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: Seven hundred sixty-two clinicians in 123 practices acquired by PE between 2017 and 2018 and 34 807 clinicians in 20 549 never-acquired practices.
METHODS: We analyzed Medicare fee-for-service claims (2012-2019) combined with a novel national database of PE acquisitions of ophthalmology practices using a difference-in-differences method within an event study framework to compare changes after a practice was acquired with changes in practices that were not acquired.
METHODS: Numbers of beneficiaries seen; intravitreal injections and medications used for injections; and spending on ophthalmologist and optometrist services, ancillary services, and intravitreal injections.
RESULTS: Comparing PE-acquired with nonacquired practices showed a 23.92% increase (n = 4.20 beneficiaries; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.73-6.67) in beneficiaries seen per PE optometrist per quarter and no change for ophthalmologists, while spending per beneficiary increased 5.06% ($9.66; 95% CI, -2.82 to 22.14). Spending on clinician services decreased 1.62% (-$2.37; 95% CI, -5.78 to 1.04), with ophthalmologist services increasing 5.46% ($17.70; 95% CI, -2.73 to 38.15) and optometrists decreasing 4.60% (-$5.76; 95% CI, -9.17 to -2.34) per beneficiary per quarter. Ancillary services decreased 7.56% (-$2.19; 95% CI, 4.19 to -0.22). Intravitreal injection costs increased 25.0% ($20.02; 95% CI, -1.38 to 41.41) with the number increasing 5.10% (1.83; 95% CI, -0.1 to 3.80). There was a 74.09% increase (8.38 injections; 95% CI, 0.01-16.74) in ranibizumab and a 12.91% decrease (-3.40 injections; 95% CI, -6.86 to 0.07) in bevacizumab after acquisition. The event study showed consistent and often statistically significant increases in ranibizumab injections and decreases in bevacizumab injections after acquisition.
CONCLUSIONS: Although not all results reached statistical significance, this study suggested that PE acquisition of practices showed little or no overall effect on use or total spending, but increased the number of unique patients seen per optometrist and the use of expensive intravitreal injections.
BACKGROUND: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.