Medication safety

用药安全
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:通过评估药物在酒精戒断综合征(AWS)中的安全性和有效性,确定最合适的苯巴比妥给药方案。数据来源:2023年10月使用PubMed和书目挖掘进行了全面的文学搜索。研究选择和数据提取:需要在文章中建立已建立的单药苯巴比妥方案,以纳入分析。实施地点并不妨碍评价,苯巴比妥的给药途径也不是。数据综合:这篇综述评估了六篇出版物,出现了两种主要的苯巴比妥给药方案。虽然基于固定的给药策略和基于体重的给药策略产生了,方案内的剂量导致使用相同或相对相似的剂量,分别。每一项研究的主要结果都有统计学上的显着下降,使用苯巴比妥作为单一疗法被证明可以改善AWS症状,显著减少重症监护病房和住院时间,减少辅助药物的使用,减少呼吸机的使用,并防止癫痫发作。结论:尽管苯二氮卓类药物一直是AWS的临床一线疗法,研究表明,苯巴比妥的药代动力学稳定性和临床益处支持苯巴比妥方案的创建,作为单一疗法,在医院或机构中为AWS患者提供服务。
    Objective: To determine the most appropriate phenobarbital dosing regimen by evaluating the safety and efficacy of the drug when specifically used in alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). Data sources: A comprehensive literary search was conducted using PubMed and bibliographic mining in October 2023. Study selection and data extraction: An established monotherapy phenobarbital regimen needed to be established within the article to be included in analysis. Location of implementation was not a deterrent to evaluation, nor was the route of phenobarbital administration. Data synthesis: Six publications were evaluated in this review, and two main phenobarbital dosing regimens emerged. While fix-based dosing strategies and weight-based dosing strategies resulted, the dosing within the regimens resulted in the same or relatively similar doses employed, respectively. Each of the studies had a statistically significant decrease in their primary outcome being studied, and the use of phenobarbital as monotherapy was proven to improve AWS symptoms, significantly decrease intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, decrease the use of adjunctive medications, decrease the use of a ventilator, and prevent seizures. Conclusions: Despite benzodiazepines having been the clinical first-line therapy for AWS, research shows that the pharmacokinetic stability and clinical benefits of phenobarbital are in support creation of phenobarbital protocols, as monotherapy, in hospitals or institutions for patients with AWS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:许多药剂师认为,培训不足和由此导致的缺乏信心阻碍了医疗紧急情况的参与。没有足够的信息详细说明药剂师应对儿科医疗紧急情况的培训计划。这项研究的主要目的是比较参与儿科医疗急诊培训(PedMET)计划前后的能力得分。次要目标包括比较参与儿科医疗紧急情况的信心和知识,资源和错误预防工具的知识,准备药物的中位时间描述,以及模拟过程中最常见的错误。
    方法:设计了全面的教学讲座和基于模拟的培训,并包含评估药剂师与儿科医疗紧急情况相关知识的前后能力。包括自我评估,以确定药剂师对知识和药物准备的信心水平。征求了参与者的反馈意见,以确定该计划的改进领域。质量改进卓越报告标准(SQUIRE)2.0用于报告调查结果。
    结果:29名接受过不同培训的药剂师(例如,居住权与非居住权)和经验水平在2021年7月至2023年3月之间完成了该计划。能力得分从中位数的86%提高到97%(p值<0.001)。药剂师对他们在医疗紧急情况下准备复杂药物的能力的信心显着提高(p值=0.001)。
    结论:在实施基于教学和模拟的培训之后,药剂师的知识和信心增加。药剂科应考虑为所有应对儿科医疗紧急情况的药剂师实施特定的药剂师培训计划。
    OBJECTIVE: It is perceived by many pharmacists that inadequate training and the resulting lack of confidence hinder participation in medical emergencies. There is insufficient information detailing training programs for pharmacists responding to pediatric medical emergencies. The primary objective of this study was to compare competency scores pre and post participation in the pediatric medical emergency training (PedMET) program. The secondary objectives included comparing confidence and knowledge for participation in pediatric medical emergencies, knowledge of resources and error prevention tools, description of the median time to prepare medications, and the most common errors that occurred during simulation.
    METHODS: A comprehensive didactic lecture and simulation-based training were designed and contained pre- and post-competencies to assess pharmacists\' knowledge related to pediatric medical emergencies. Self-assessments were included to determine pharmacists\' confidence levels in knowledge and preparation of medications. Feedback was solicited from participants to identify areas of improvement for the program. Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) 2.0 was used to report findings.
    RESULTS: Twenty-nine pharmacists of diverse training (e.g., residency vs nonresidency) and experience levels completed the program between July 2021 and March 2023. Competency scores improved from a median of 86% to 97% (p value < 0.001). Significant improvement was detected in pharmacists\' confidence in their ability to prepare complex medications during medical emergencies (p value = 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Following the implementation of didactic and simulation-based training, pharmacists\' knowledge and confidence increased. Departments of pharmacy should consider implementing pharmacist--specific training programs for all pharmacists who respond to pediatric medical emergencies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是确定为儿科患者提供护理的医院中与β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂(BL/BLI)剂量描述相关的现行做法,并确定标准化BL/BLI剂量交流和订购基于药物的整体策略的感知含义。
    方法:通过4个儿科药房和感染性疾病列表服务器分发了27项电子调查。调查问题与医院人口统计有关,给药沟通实践,BL/BLI订购和标签实践,安全使用BL/BLI的障碍,以及潜在的标准化对整体药物传播战略的影响。采用SPSS进行定量分析,采用MAXQDA进行定性分析。
    结果:在排除不完整的响应并对同一机构的多个响应进行协调后,对总共140个独特的调查响应进行了分析。总的来说,56.2%的机构为儿科患者按BL部分订购BL/BLIs,22%的机构按BL部分订购成人患者。大约一半(51.8%)的受访者认为,将药物标准化至总药物会对他们的机构产生负面影响;对潜在影响的看法因机构的订购策略而异。
    结论:BL/BLIs的沟通和订购在机构之间以及儿科和成人患者之间不一致。在短期内,人们认为标准化会加剧体制挑战。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to define current practices related to beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) dose descriptions in hospitals that provide care for pediatric patients and to identify perceived implications of standardizing BL/BLI dose communication and ordering to a total drug-based strategy.
    METHODS: A 27-item electronic survey was distributed via 4 pediatric pharmacy and infectious diseases listservs. Survey questions pertained to hospital demographics, dosing communication practices, BL/BLI ordering and labeling practices, obstacles to safe BL/BLI use, and the effects of potential standardization to a total drug communication strategy. SPSS was used for quantitative analysis and MAXQDA was used for qualitative analysis.
    RESULTS: A total of 140 unique survey responses were analyzed after exclusion of incomplete responses and reconciliation of multiple responses from the same institution. Overall, 56.2% of institutions order BL/BLIs by BL component for pediatric patients, and 22% of institutions order by BL component for adult patients. Approximately half (51.8%) of respondents felt that standardizing to total drug would have a negative effect at their institution; perception of potential effect varied based on the institution\'s ordering strategy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Communication and ordering of BL/BLIs is inconsistent across institutions and between pediatric and adult patients. In the short term, the perception is that standardization would compound institutional challenges.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们旨在评估退伍军人事务医疗保健系统中抗生素预防与拔牙后不良结局之间的关系。
    方法:我们在2015-2019年对接受拔牙的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。主要暴露是抗生素预防。主要结果是7天内的拔牙后并发症(例如,肺泡骨炎和手术部位感染);次要结果是随后的医疗护理,涉及7天内拔牙后口腔并发症。多变量逻辑回归模型评估了抗生素预防对每个结果的独立影响。
    结果:在接受拔牙的385,880次访问中,122,810(31.8%)接受了抗生素预防。总的来说,3387(0.9%)经历了拔牙后并发症,350(0.09%)在7天内接受了与拔牙后口腔并发症相关的医疗护理。在多变量回归中,糖尿病是抗生素预防和拔牙后并发症之间关联的统计学显著(p=0.01)效应调节剂.在没有糖尿病的患者的就诊中,抗生素预防与拔牙后并发症几率增加显著相关(比值比[OR]=1.25,95%置信区间[CI]:1.13-1.38),但在糖尿病患者的访视中没有观察到显著的效果(OR=1.03,95%CI:0.92-1.15).抗生素预防与拔牙后的医疗护理没有显着相关(OR=1.04;95%CI:0.83-1.30)。
    结论:在这个大型回顾性队列中,我们观察到,在并发症发生率较低的情况下,抗生素预防对拔牙后并发症或后续医疗服务利用没有显著的保护作用.这些数据表明,在类似环境中使用抗生素预防可能需要重新评估,以尽量减少不必要的抗生素使用。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the association between antibiotic prophylaxis and adverse outcomes following tooth extraction within the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing dental extractions in 2015-2019. The primary exposure was antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome was post-extraction complication within 7 days (e.g., alveolar osteitis and surgical site infection); the secondary outcome was subsequent medical care relating to a post-extraction oral complication within 7 days. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the independent effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on each outcome.
    RESULTS: Of 385,880 visits with a dental extraction, 122,810 (31.8%) received antibiotic prophylaxis. Overall, 3387 (0.9%) experienced a post-extraction complication and 350 (0.09%) received medical care relating to a post-extraction oral complication within 7 days. In multivariable regression, diabetes was a statistically significant (p = 0.01) effect modifier of the association between antibiotic prophylaxis and post-extraction complication. Among visits for patients without diabetes, antibiotic prophylaxis was significantly associated with an increased odds of post-extraction complication (odds ratio [OR] = 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-1.38), but among visits for patients with diabetes no significant effect was observed (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.92-1.15). Antibiotic prophylaxis was not significantly associated with post-extraction medical care (OR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.83-1.30).
    CONCLUSIONS: In this large retrospective cohort, we observed no significant protective effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on post-extraction complications or subsequent medical care utilization in a setting with low complication rates. These data suggest that use of antibiotic prophylaxis in similar settings may need to be re-evaluated to minimize unnecessary antibiotic use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:以前的研究和安全倡导团体已经提出了老年人积极参与药物安全的各种行为。然而,对于老年人在非卧床环境中如何看待这些行为的重要性和合理性,人们知之甚少.
    目的:本研究旨在评估老年人对门诊环境中8种用药安全行为的重要性和合理性的看法,并将他们的反应与年轻人的反应进行比较。
    方法:我们使用众包对美国1222名成年人进行了一项调查,以评估可能增强社区用药安全性的患者行为。根据文献共确定了8种安全行为,例如将药物带到办公室访问,在家里确认药物,管理药物补充,使用患者门户,组织药物,检查药物,得到帮助,知道药物。在与初级保健提供者合作的背景下,以5点Likert评分量表询问受访者对这些行为的重要性和合理性的看法。我们在重要性和合理性方面评估了行为的相对排名,并使用统计检验检查了这些维度在各个年龄段之间的关联。
    结果:在1222名成年参与者中,125(10.2%)年龄在65岁或以上。大多数参与者是白人,受过大学教育,患有慢性疾病。老年人对所有8种行为的重要性和合理性均明显高于年轻人(组合行为P<.001)。对于两个年龄组,确认药物的重要性最高(平均得分=3.78),而了解药物的合理性最高(平均得分=3.68)。使用患者门户的重要性(平均得分=3.53)和合理性(平均得分=3.49)排名最低。所识别行为的感知重要性和合理性之间存在显著相关性,系数范围为0.436至0.543(所有P<.001)。
    结论:老年人认为确定的安全行为比年轻人更重要和合理。然而,两个年龄组都认为专业人士极力推荐的行为是最不重要和合理的。患者参与战略,常见和特定于年龄组,应考虑提高门诊环境中的用药安全性。
    BACKGROUND: Previous research and safety advocacy groups have proposed various behaviors for older adults to actively engage in medication safety. However, little is known about how older adults perceive the importance and reasonableness of these behaviors in ambulatory settings.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess older adults\' perceptions of the importance and reasonableness of 8 medication safety behaviors in ambulatory settings and compare their responses with those of younger adults.
    METHODS: We conducted a survey of 1222 adults in the United States using crowdsourcing to evaluate patient behaviors that may enhance medication safety in community settings. A total of 8 safety behaviors were identified based on the literature, such as bringing medications to office visits, confirming medications at home, managing medication refills, using patient portals, organizing medications, checking medications, getting help, and knowing medications. Respondents were asked about their perception of the importance and reasonableness of these behaviors on a 5-point Likert rating scale in the context of collaboration with primary care providers. We assessed the relative ranking of behaviors in terms of importance and reasonableness and examined the association between these dimensions across age groups using statistical tests.
    RESULTS: Of 1222 adult participants, 125 (10.2%) were aged 65 years or older. Most participants were White, college-educated, and had chronic conditions. Older adults rated all 8 behaviors significantly higher in both importance and reasonableness than did younger adults (P<.001 for combined behaviors). Confirming medications ranked highest in importance (mean score=3.78) for both age groups while knowing medications ranked highest in reasonableness (mean score=3.68). Using patient portals was ranked lowest in importance (mean score=3.53) and reasonableness (mean score=3.49). There was a significant correlation between the perceived importance and reasonableness of the identified behaviors, with coefficients ranging from 0.436 to 0.543 (all P<.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Older adults perceived the identified safety behaviors as more important and reasonable than younger adults. However, both age groups considered a behavior highly recommended by professionals as the least important and reasonable. Patient engagement strategies, common and specific to age groups, should be considered to improve medication safety in ambulatory settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:遗漏时间关键的药物剂量可能会导致患者预后不良。关于电子药物管理(EMM)系统的影响的出版物很少,包括自动分配柜(ADC),及时用药。这项研究旨在评估EMM系统的影响,包括ADC,在EMM实施后6个月和30个月及时给药,重点关注可预防的时间关键药物剂量遗漏和记录的不给药原因。方法:从2019年3月1周和2021年3月4周的电子用药记录(EMR)中获得未服用常规住院药物的剂量数据。遗漏是在下一个适当剂量之前未施用的剂量。使用卫生服务指南定义了时间关键药物。未施用剂量的原因来自数字健康报告整理的EMR中的护理文档。未给予时间关键药物剂量的原因被定义为“有效”或“可预防”。结果:在2019年和2021年,对620和2524例患者进行了44,756和146,940次预定药物剂量的审查。其中,未施用4385(9.8%)和19,610(13.4%)剂量。2019年和2021年,分别为593例(1.3%)和1811例(1.2%),p<0.0001,不给予时间关键剂量。可预防的时间关键剂量遗漏从2019年的0.20%下降到2021年的0.15%(p=0.015)。与没有ADC的病房相比,有ADC的病房的时间关键剂量遗漏率显着降低(1.1%vs1.3%,p=0.014)。结论:随着EMM系统的引入,没有给予时间关键药物的比率有所下降,包括在24个月期间减少可预防的遗漏率。定期评估时间关键的药物管理将有助于改善患者安全。
    Background: The omission of time-critical medication doses may result in poor patient outcomes. There are few publications about the influence of electronic medication management (EMM) systems, including automated dispensing cabinets (ADC), on timely medication administration. The study aimed to evaluate the influence of EMM systems, including ADCs, on timely medication administration 6 and 30 months after EMM implementation, focussing on preventable time-critical medication dose omissions and documented reasons for not administering a dose.Methods: Data on doses of regular inpatient medications not administered were obtained from electronic medication records (EMR) over 1 week in March 2019 and 4 weeks in March 2021. An omission was a dose not administered before the next due dose. Time-critical medications were defined using the health service\'s guidelines. Reasons for doses not being administered were obtained from nursing documentation in the EMR collated from digital health reports. Reasons for time-critical medication doses not given were defined as \'valid\' or \'preventable\'.Results: In 2019 and 2021, 620 and 2524 patients with 44,756 and 146,940 scheduled medication doses were reviewed. Of these, 4385 (9.8%) and 19,610 (13.4%) doses were not administered. In 2019 and 2021, there were 593 (1.3%) and 1811 (1.2%), p < 0.0001, time-critical doses not administered. Preventable time-critical dose omissions decreased from 0.20% in 2019 to 0.15% (p = 0.015) in 2021. Wards with ADCs had a significantly lower rate of time-critical dose omissions compared to those without ADCs (1.1% vs 1.3%, p = 0.014).Conclusion: With the introduction of an EMM system, there was a decrease in the rate of time-critical medications not administered, including a reduced rate of preventable omissions over the 24-month period. Regular assessment of time-critical medication administration will help target patient safety improvements.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    开发了静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)风险筛查表,以记录已确定的VTE风险因素,包括血栓形成,VTE的历史,产后出血,和剖腹产,以及为减轻这些风险和减少静脉血栓栓塞并发症而采取的具体行动的文件。
    在引入VTE风险筛查表(2022年3月)之前,对评估VTE风险和适当的血栓预防处方的医院指南的合规性进行了评估。还评估了新的VTE风险筛查表格的有效性(2023年4月)。使用患者出院摘要和患者医疗记录(包括用药图表)来审查VTE风险评估的文档和血栓预防处方的详细信息。
    在74名产后患者中,37.8%的人在引入VTE风险筛查表之前记录了VTE风险评估。在37名确定为需要药物预防的中度至高度VTE风险的患者中,70.3%(n=26)的患者接受了适当的药物预防。在引入风险筛查表格后,共有67人产前,产后,和妇科患者进行了研究。其中,32.8%(n=22)的患者的所有必填字段都已适当完成。当使用的形式,26.9%(n=7)的产后和88%(n=22)的妇科患者被评为中或高风险,所有人都在24小时内接受了医学检查。88%(n=22)的妇科,43.8%(n=7)的产前,和38.5%(n=10)的产后患者,所有这些都是适当的规定。
    指南审查和介绍VTE风险筛查表对于提供VTE风险评估的指导和确定需要预防的患者是有价值的。
    UNASSIGNED: The venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk screening forms were developed to allow for recording identified risk factors for VTE including thrombophilia, history of VTE, postpartum hemorrhage, and cesarean delivery, and documentation of specific actions taken to mitigate these risks and reduce complications due to VTE.
    UNASSIGNED: Compliance with hospital guidelines in assessing VTE risk and appropriate prescribing of thromboprophylaxis was evaluated prior to the introduction of VTE risk screening forms (March 2022). Efficacy of the new VTE risk screening forms was also assessed (April 2023). Patient discharge summaries and patient medical records including medication charts were used to review the documentation of VTE risk assessments and details of thromboprophylaxis prescribing.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 74 postnatal patients, 37.8% had VTE risk assessment documented prior to the introduction of VTE risk screening forms. Of 37 patients identified to be at moderate to high risk of VTE requiring pharmacological prophylaxis, 70.3% (n = 26) were appropriately prescribed pharmacological prophylaxis. After the risk screening forms were introduced, a total of 67 antenatal, postnatal, and gynecologic patients were studied. Of these, 32.8% (n = 22) of patients had all required fields completed appropriately. When using the forms, 26.9% (n = 7) of postnatal and 88% (n = 22) of gynecological patients were rated as medium or high risk, and all received medical review within 24 hours. Pharmacological prophylaxis was indicated in 88% (n = 22) of gynecological, 43.8% (n = 7) of antenatal, and 38.5% (n = 10) of postnatal patients, and all were appropriately prescribed.
    UNASSIGNED: The guideline review and introduction of VTE risk screening forms was valuable to provide guidance in the risk assessment for VTE and to identify patients requiring prophylaxis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们旨在绘制与丹麦家庭保健中的药物管理和时间消耗相关的任务。来自五个城市的护理人员(n=30)在10周内进行了随访,并执行了与药物管理有关的任务。登记了时间消耗和公民用药信息。共注册269门课程,包括163次(61%)家访,76(28%)个办公室课程,29个(11%)的临床课程和1个(0.4%)的急性访问。在与药物管理相关的定义类别中,“记录保存和沟通”(62%,n=167),'配药'(48%,n=129)和\'标识\'(30%,n=81)是最经常执行的。在一半的课程中(55%,n=147),护理人员至少被打断过一次.在药物管理上花费的时间中位数少于在大多数分配的时间段内分配的时间(82%),中位多余时间为5.1分钟(范围0.02-24分钟)。公民(n=32)根据需要使用了11种(四分位距[IQR]9-13)常规药物和2种(IQR1-4),69%(n=22)使用高风险情况药物。总之,丹麦家庭医疗保健的员工执行各种与药物相关的任务,并且经常被中断工作。员工花费的时间少于分配的时间,但不能根据最佳实践指导完全解决所有任务。
    We aimed to map tasks related to medication management and time consumption in Danish home health care. Nursing staff (n = 30) from five municipalities were followed during a 10-week period and tasks related to medication management, time consumption and information on citizens\' medication were registered. A total of 269 courses were registered, including 163 (61%) home visits, 76 (28%) in-office courses, 29 (11%) in-clinic courses and 1 (0.4%) acute visit. Of defined categories related to medication management, \'record-keeping and communication\' (62%, n = 167), \'dispensing\' (48%, n = 129) and \'identification\' (30%, n = 81) were most often performed. During half of courses (55%, n = 147), the nursing staff was interrupted at least one time. The median time spent on medication management was less than the time allocated in most of allocated time slots (82%), with a median excess time of 5.1 min (range 0.02-24 min). Citizens (n = 32) used a median of 11 (interquartile range [IQR] 9-13) regular medications and 2 (IQR 1-4) as-needed, and 69% (n = 22) used high-risk situation medications. In conclusion, employees in Danish home health care perform diverse medication-related tasks and are frequently interrupted in their work. Employees spend less time than allocated but do not fully solve all tasks according to best practice guidance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:开发,部署,评估一个国家,基于电子健康记录(EHR)的仪表板,以支持美国退伍军人事务医疗保健系统(VA)中生物和有针对性的合成疾病改善剂(b/tsDMARD)的安全处方。
    方法:我们提取并显示乙型肝炎(HBV),丙型肝炎(HCV),以及使用PowerBI(Microsoft)从EHR为b/tsDMARD用户提供的结核病(TB)筛查数据,并于2022年将仪表板部署到美国各地的VA设施;我们在部署后观察了44周的设施。
    方法:我们检查了医护人员参与的仪表板与完成所有筛查的患者百分比之间的关联(HBV,HCV,和TB)在设施级别使用中断的时间序列。根据会话的频率,设施分为高参与度和低参与度/无参与度类别。我们对仪表板部署前和部署后的完整筛选中的变化进行了建模。
    方法:所有VA设施均符合纳入条件;排除的设施参与仪表板设计或有<20名患者接受b/tsDMARDs。使用PowerBI审核日志数据捕获来自设施人员的会话计数。每周根据通过仪表板本身提取的EHR数据评估结果。
    结果:共包括117个设施(为41,224名退伍军人规定的b/tsDMARDs提供服务)。在部署仪表板之前,在所有设施中,61.5%的患者完成了所有筛查,在研究期间,这一比例提高到66.3%。最大的改善(15个百分点,60.3%-75.3%)发生在高参与度的设施中(高参与度和低参与度/无参与度组之间的干预后结果差异为每周0.17个百分点(pp),95%置信区间(0.04pp,0.30pp);p=0.01)。
    结论:我们观察到,在与仪表板高度接触的设施中,潜伏性感染的筛查有了显著改善,与会议较少的人相比。
    OBJECTIVE: To develop, deploy, and evaluate a national, electronic health record (EHR)-based dashboard to support safe prescribing of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying agents (b/tsDMARDs) in the United States Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (VA).
    METHODS: We extracted and displayed hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV), and tuberculosis (TB) screening data from the EHR for users of b/tsDMARDs using PowerBI (Microsoft) and deployed the dashboard to VA facilities across the United States in 2022; we observed facilities for 44 weeks post-deployment.
    METHODS: We examined the association between dashboard engagement by healthcare personnel and the percentage of patients with all screenings complete (HBV, HCV, and TB) at the facility level using an interrupted time series. Based on frequency of sessions, facilities were grouped into high- and low/none-engagement categories. We modeled changes in complete screening pre- and post-deployment of the dashboard.
    METHODS: All VA facilities were eligible for inclusion; excluded facilities participated in design of the dashboard or had <20 patients receiving b/tsDMARDs. Session counts from facility personnel were captured using PowerBI audit log data. Outcomes were assessed weekly based on EHR data extracted via the dashboard itself.
    RESULTS: Totally 117 facilities (serving a total of 41,224 Veterans prescribed b/tsDMARDs) were included. Before dashboard deployment, across all facilities, 61.5% of patients had all screenings complete, which improved to 66.3% over the course of the study period. The largest improvement (15 percentage points, 60.3%-75.3%) occurred among facilities with high engagement (post-intervention difference in outcome between high and low/none-engagement groups was 0.17 percentage points (pp) per week, 95% confidence interval (0.04 pp, 0.30 pp); p = 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: We observed significant improvements in screening for latent infections among facilities with high engagement with the dashboard, compared with those with fewer sessions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号