BACKGROUND: Atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) is a newly discovered condition associated with longstanding atrial fibrillation. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the outcomes of the maze procedure and mitral regurgitation (MR) surgery in AFMR and atrial fibrillation in comparison with those in degenerative MR (DMR).
METHODS: Patients who underwent mitral valve repair/replacement with a maze procedure at a hospital (July 2012-August 2021) were included. We excluded patients aged below 18 years undergoing concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting or atrial septal defect repair and those with MR etiology other than ARMR or DMR.
RESULTS: We included 35 patients with AFMR and 50 patients with DMR. Patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. Long-term outcomes revealed no significant differences in the ratio of cardiac mortality, stroke, or hospital readmission. However, after the maze procedure, the sinus rhythm restoration rate was significantly lower (62% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.001), a junctional rhythm state (p < 0.001) and permanent pacemaker insertion for sick sinus syndrome (SSS) (p = 0.03) were significantly more common in AFMR than DMR. On postoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), the pulmonary artery systolic pressure was significantly less decreased in the AFMR group than in the DMR group compared with that on preoperative TTE (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: AFMR showed excellent mitral valve surgery outcomes, similar to DMR, but had a significantly higher risk of pacemaker insertion for SSS after the maze procedure.

The maze procedure for atrial fibrillation carries risks, including pleural effusion. We report a case of a 54-year-old woman with right-sided pleural effusion post maze surgery, presenting with dyspnoea. Despite treatment, complications arose, including atrial flutter. Prompt recognition and multidisciplinary management led to a favourable outcome. This case underscores the importance of vigilance for rare post-operative complications and highlights the need for collaborative care in optimising patient outcomes following cardiac surgeries. Further research is warranted to refine management strategies for such occurrences.
CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare providers should remain vigilant for rare complications, for example right-sided haemothorax, following cardiac surgeries such as the maze procedure to initiate timely management and ensure favourable outcomes.The post-maze procedure, atrial flutter or macroreentrant atrial tachycardia may resist standard medical treatment, emphasising the importance of considering catheter ablation as a therapeutic option to improve patient outcomes.Empowering patients with knowledge about potential post-procedure complications and associated symptoms facilitates early reporting, enabling prompt intervention by healthcare providers and leading to improved treatment outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Evaluating outcomes of concurrent Cox-Maze procedures in elderly patients undergoing high-risk cardiac surgery.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients aged over 70 years with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) from 2011 to 2017 who had two or more other cardiac procedures. They were subdivided into two groups: 1. Cox-Maze IV AF ablation. 2. No-Surgical AF treatment. A propensity match score was used to generate a homogeneous cohort and to eliminate confounding variables. Heart rhythm was assessed from Holter reports or 12-lead ECG. Follow-up data was collected through telephone consultations and medical records.
RESULTS: There were 239 patients. Median follow up was 61 months. 70 patients had Cox-Maze IV procedures (29.3%). Demographic, intra- and post-operative outcomes were similar between groups although duration of pre-operative AF was shorter in Cox-Maze group (p = 0.001). There was no significant 30-day mortality difference in propensity matched cohorts (n = 84. P = 0.078). Sinus rhythm at annual and latest follow-up was 84.9% and 80.0% respectively in Maze group - 160 patients (66.9%) were alive at long-term follow-up with good survival outcomes in Cox Maze group. There was a high proportion of patients in NYHA 1 status in Cox-Maze group. No differences observed in freedom from stroke (p = 0.80) or permanent pacemaker (p = 0.33) between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical ablation is beneficial in elderly patients undergoing high-risk surgery - promoting excellent long-term freedom from AF and symptomatic / prognostic benefits, without added risk. Therefore, surgical risk should not be reason to deny benefits of concomitant AF-ablation.
BACKGROUND: Not required.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze and compare the outcomes of mitral valve surgery for atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) and for degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR).
METHODS: Patients with AFMR or DMR who underwent mitral valve repair/replacement at 2 institutions between January 2012 and December 2022 were included. Patients <18 years of age and patients undergoing concomitant cardiac surgery (except for the maze procedure or tricuspid annuloplasty) were excluded. Propensity score analysis was used to adjust for baseline differences.
RESULTS: A total of 642 patients were enrolled. After propensity score analysis, 164 patients were classified into the DMR group, and 82 patients were classified into the AFMR group. All matched patients in both groups had atrial fibrillation. In DMR and AFMR, the 5-year freedom from readmission for heart failure and cardiac death was 96.3% in the DMR group versus 88.6% in the AFMR group (P = .045) and freedom from readmission for cardiac death in the 2 groups was 100% and 90.0%, respectively (P = .002). The recurrence rate of significant mitral regurgitation (MR) after mitral valve repair was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = .699, log-rank test), and the 5-year freedom from MR recurrence (moderate or greater) was 89.8% and 93.0%, respectively. After the maze procedure, significantly more patients in the AFMR group than the DMR group were in junctional rhythm (49.1% vs 3.3%; P < .001) and required permanent pacemaker insertion during the follow-up period (11.4% vs 1.5% after 5 years; P = .041, log-rank test).
CONCLUSIONS: AFMR was associated with acceptable outcomes of mitral valve surgery, and mitral valve repair is a good treatment option. However, significantly more patients were in junctional rhythm after the maze procedure, needing more permanent pacemaker insertion.

A 34-year-old woman presented with palpitations and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Workup revealed anterior mitral valve prolapse with severe mitral regurgitation. She was referred for surgical repair and underwent a mitral valve replacement, tricuspid valve repair, and bi-atrial cryoMAZE procedure with left atrial appendage ligation. Her postoperative course was complicated by inferior wall myocardial infarction. She subsequently presented with palpitations and underwent electrophysiology study and ablation. This case illustrates pitfalls associated with the surgical MAZE procedure and highlights the challenges in postoperative atrial arrhythmias diagnosis and management.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia and is often found during times of other cardiac pathologies that require surgical management including coronary revascularization and valve surgery. Surgical ablation of AF, most frequently performed through the Cox-Maze IV procedure, is highly effective in restoring sinus rhythm. Despite robust society guideline recommendations for concomitant surgical ablation (CSA) for AF, the practice has yet to be widely adopted. In this review, we discuss the current indications for CSA, its efficacy in maintaining freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias, stroke, and adverse long-term outcomes, the safety profile of SA when performed alongside cardiac surgical cases, and challenges with its implementation across the most common concomitant cardiac operations. In conclusion, we present a reminder to multidisciplinary heart teams to consider CSA when indicated for their patients.

Background: One way to treat atrial fibrillation is through surgical ablation. However, the literature only provides information on patient follow-up results for up to 5 years. Methods: In order to assess long-term monitoring data over ten years, this retrospective study included 58 patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation who underwent Mini Maze surgical ablation at Santaros Clinics between 1 February 2009 and 1 June 2014. The follow-up time after surgery was 144 ± 48 months. We evaluated the absence of atrial fibrillation, echocardiographic and clinical parameters, and EHRA score. Results: Sinus rhythm remained in 69.4%, 75.5%, 55.6%, and 44.1% of patients with paroxysmal AF, and 68,2%, 59.1%, 50%, and 41.9% of patients with persistent AF (p = 0.681). In the post-operative period, one patient (1.7%) had a transient ischemic attack, and another patient (1.7%) had a thoracotomy for post-operative bleeding. A total of 20% of patients were diagnosed with a post-operative respiratory tract infection. EHRA scores showed that patients\' quality of life improved after they underwent Mini Maze surgical ablation. Conclusions: Despite AF recurrences after surgery, quality of life remains better than before surgery, showing that Mini Maze surgery is an effective and safe second-line treatment method for atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze the impact of concomitant Maze procedure on the clinical and rhythm outcomes, and echocardiographic parameters in tricuspid repair for patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).
METHODS: Patients who had severe TR and persistent AF and underwent tricuspid valve (TV) repair were included in the study. Both primary TR and secondary TR were included in the current study. The study population was stratified according to Maze procedure. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) at 15 years post-surgery. Propensity-score matching analyses was performed to adjust baseline differences.
RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-one patients who underwent tricuspid repair for severe TR and persistent AF from 1994 to 2021 were included, and 198 patients (53.4%) underwent concomitant Maze procedure. The maze group showed 10-year sinus rhythm (SR) restoration rate of 55%. In the matched cohort, the maze group showed a lower cumulative incidence of cardiac death (4.6% vs. 14.4%, P = 0.131), readmission for heart failure (8.1% vs. 22.2%, P = 0.073), and MACCE (21.1% vs. 42.1%, P = 0.029) at 15 years compared to the non-maze group. Left atrial (LA) diameter significantly decreased in the maze group at 5 years (53.3 vs. 59.6 mm, P < 0.001) after surgery compared to preoperative level, and there was a significant difference in the change of LA diameter over time between the two groups (P = 0.013).
CONCLUSIONS: The Maze procedure during TV repair in patients with severe TR and persistent AF showed acceptable SR rates and lower MACCE rates compared to those without the procedure, while also promoting LA reverse remodeling.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Recent developments in surgical devices, including left atrial appendage closure, have enabled surgeons to perform aggressive operations for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the outcomes of AF surgery in emergent cases have not been extensively studied.
OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of AF surgery in emergency surgery cases associated with cardiovascular events. We enrolled 18 patients who underwent various types of AF surgery due to emergencies, including acute aortic dissection (n = 6), acute myocardial infarction (n = 5), bleeding due to perforation from radiofrequency catheter ablation (n = 4), acute mitral regurgitation (n = 2), and cardiac tumor (n = 1). Four and ten patients underwent the full maze procedure and pulmonary vein isolation, respectively. Ganglionated plexi ablation was also performed in three patients as part of a combined procedure. The left atrial appendage was solely closed in four patients.
RESULTS: There was no surgical mortality or major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in our patient series. The rates of freedom of recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia at 1 and 3 years were 92.9% and 82.5%, respectively. After a mean follow-up period of 46.7 ± 25.8 months, no thromboembolism events were observed in the patients. Furthermore, no cardiovascular death was recorded.
CONCLUSIONS: The surgical procedures for AF are safe and effective in cases requiring emergency surgery.