Background: Over 60% of single-gene diseases in newborns are autosomal dominant variants. Noninvasive prenatal testing for monogenic conditions (NIPT-SGG) is cost-effective and timesaving, but not widely applied. This study introduces and validates NIPT-SGG in detecting 25 monogenic conditions. Methods: NIPT-SGG with a 30-gene panel applied next-generation sequencing and trio assays to confirm de novo variants. Diagnostic tests confirmed NIPT-detected cases. Results: Among 93 pregnancies with ultrasound findings, 11 (11.8%) fetuses were screened and diagnosed with monogenic diseases, mostly with Noonan syndrome. NIPT-SGG determined >99.99% of actual positive and negative cases, confirmed by diagnostic tests. No false-negatives or false-positives were reported. Conclusion: NIPT-SGG effectively identifies the fetuses affected with monogenic diseases, which is a promisingly safe and timely antenatal screening option for high-risk pregnancies.

The use of race in maternal serum screening is problematic because race is a social construct rather than a distinct biological classifier. Nevertheless, laboratories offering this testing are encouraged to use race-specific cutoff values for maternal serum screening biomarkers to determine the risk of fetal abnormalities. Large cohort studies examining racial differences in maternal serum screening biomarker concentrations have yielded conflicting results, which we postulate may be explained by genetic and socioeconomic differences between racial cohorts in different studies. We recommend that the use of race in maternal serum screening should be abandoned. Further research is needed to identify socioeconomic and environmental factors that contribute to differences in maternal serum screening biomarker concentrations observed between races. A better understanding of these factors may facilitate accurate race-agnostic risk estimates for aneuploidy and neural tube defects.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the frequency and profile of non-mosaic sex chromosome abnormalities detected in prenatal diagnosis over the past 10 years.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed pregnancies diagnosed with non-mosaic sex chromosome abnormalities between January 2012 and December 2021, using karyotyping and/or single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array. Maternal age, indications for testing, and outcomes were recorded.
RESULTS: Traditional karyotyping identified 269 (0.90 %) cases of non-mosaic sex chromosome abnormalities among 29,832 fetuses, including 249 cases of numerical abnormalities, 15 unbalanced structural abnormalities, and 5 balanced structural abnormalities. The overall detection rate of common sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) was 0.81 %, with 47,XXY, 47,XXX, 47,XYY, and 45,X accounting for 0.32 , 0.19, 0.17, and 0.13 % respectively. All showed a fluctuating upward trend over the study period, except for 45,X. During the first five years (2012-2016), the major indication for testing was advanced maternal age (AMA), followed by abnormal ultrasound, abnormal noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), and abnormal maternal serum screening (MSS). In the second five years (2017-2021), the most frequent indication was abnormal NIPT, followed by AMA, abnormal ultrasound, and abnormal MSS. Among the 7,780 cases that underwent SNP array in parallel, an additional 29 clinically significant aberrations were detected. The most frequent aberration was a microdeletion in the Xp22.31 region, which was associated with X-linked ichthyosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Fetal sex chromosome abnormalities are important findings in prenatal diagnosis. The application of NIPT and SNP array technology has greatly improved the detection of SCAs and submicroscopic aberrations associated with sex chromosomes.

OBJECTIVE: We present molecular cytogenetic characterization of de novo concomitant distal 8p deletion of 8p23.3p23.1 and Xp and Xq deletion of Xp22.13q28 due to an unbalanced X;8 translocation detected by amniocentesis.
METHODS: A 33-year-old primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because of a Down syndrome risk of 1/52 at the first-trimester maternal serum screening calculated from 0.29 multiples of the median (MoM) of pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), 1.14 MoM of free β-hCG and 0.46 MoM of placental growth factor (PlGF). Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 45,X,add(8)(p23.1). The parental karyotypes were normal. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from cultured amniocytes revealed a 137-Mb deletion of Xp22.13q28 and a 10.53-Mb deletion of 8p23.3p23.1. The karyotype thus was 45,X,der(8)t(X;8)(p22.13;p23.1). Prenatal ultrasound revealed pericardial effusion and skin edema. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a 568-g malformed fetus was delivered with hypertelorism and low-set ears. The cord blood had a karyotype of 45,X,der(8)t(X;8)(p22.13;p23.1). aCGH analysis of the cord blood revealed the result of arr [GRCH37 (hg19)] 8p23.3p23.1 (191,530-10,724,642) × 1.0, arr Xp22.13q28 (18,194,098-155,232,907) × 1.0.
CONCLUSIONS: aCGH analysis is useful elucidating the genetic nature of an aberrant chromosome with an additional maternal of unknown origin attached to a chromosome terminal region.

BACKGROUND: Prenatal invasive genetic testing is commonly recommended to pregnancies of early-onset FGR or FGR combined with a structural defect. Our study aimed to explore the genetic findings for FGR without structural malformations according to cytogenetic karyotyping and single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP array) technology over a 10-year period.
METHODS: A total of 488 pregnancies diagnosed with FGR without structural malformation were retrospectively reviewed. Cytogenetic karyotyping was performed on all the subjects, and SNP array was available from 272 of them. Based on the gestational age at onset, the cohort was classified into four groups: ≤ 24, 25-28, 29-32, and > 32 weeks of gestation. According to the ultrasound findings, they were grouped into isolated FGR, FGR with soft markers, and FGR with non-structural anomalies. In pregnancies of young maternal age, based on the results of maternal serum screening (MSS), they were categorized into high-risk and low-risk MSS groups.
RESULTS: Nineteen (3.9%) cases of chromosomal abnormalities were detected by cytogenetic karyotyping, including 11 cases of numerical abnormalities, 5 cases of structural abnormalities, and 3 cases of mosaicism. Trisomy 21 was the most frequent abnormality. Abnormal karyotypes were more frequently observed in cases diagnosed at ≤ 24 weeks (7.2%) than those in any other group. Among pregnancies with normal karyotype, an incremental yield of 4.2% were revealed by SNP array technology regarding clinically relevant aberrations. The additional detection rates by SNP array in cases diagnosed at ≤ 24 weeks (6.5%), cases with soft markers (9.5%), and cases with high-risk MSS (12.0%) were higher than those in other groups within each classification. All the cases with abnormal karyotypes and 7 out of 11 pregnancies with clinically relevant anomalies revealed by SNP array alone resulted in pregnancy terminations.
CONCLUSIONS: Chromosome abnormality is an important etiology for FGR with no associated structural malformations, and plays a crucial role in pregnancies decision-making. SNP array improves the detection of genetic anomalies especially in FGR diagnosed at ≤ 24 weeks, FGR combined with soft makers, and FGR combined with high-risk MSS.

Objective: This study aims to estimate the maternal age-related risk of Down syndrome in an Asian population. Methods: We performed a retrospective data analysis including a total of 206,295 pregnant women who presented for second-trimester maternal serum screening for Down syndrome at Hubei Maternal and Child Health Hospital for the years 2008-2017. Cases were assigned to three groups: ≤26 years of age, 27-33 years of age, and ≥34 years of age. The incidence of Down Syndrome was calculated for each age group. The differences between groups were tested using the chi-square (χ2) test. Results: The incidence of Down syndrome in women ≤26 years of age, 27-33 years of age, and ≥34 years of age was 0.67‰, 0.29‰, and 2.07‰ respectively. Statistically significant difference was found between the three age groups (χ2 = 79.748, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Down syndrome rate was significantly higher in women ≥34 years of age. Younger women (≤26 years of age) had a significantly higher risk for Down\'s syndrome, compared to women aged 27-33.

OBJECTIVE: Chromosomal abnormalities are one of the genetic disorders caused by abnormal chromosome number or structure and can endanger multiple organs, morphology and function of the systems in the human body. This study aims to investigate the relationship between prenatal diagnosis indications and abnormal karyotypes to improve prenatal screening.
METHODS: The karyotype analyses were carried out on 4646 pregnant women with prenatal diagnosis indications referred to the first medical center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from 2012 to 2019. The incidence, distribution, and statistical features of chromosomal abnormality of different prenatal diagnosis indications were analyzed, and the relationships with the prenatal diagnosis indications were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 351 fetal chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 4646 karyotypes, with an incidence of 7.6%. The chromosomal abnormality incidence in the single indication group, two indications group, and three indications group was 5.8%, 16.1%, and 70.0%, respectively, indicating a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Advanced maternal age (AMA), high-risk maternal serum screening (MSS), and non-invasive prenatal DNA testing (NIPT) were the important indications for predicting abnormal karyotype. The number of prenatal diagnosis indications was highly correlated with fetal chromosomal abnormalities. The overall incidence of chromosomal abnormalities showed a tendency to increase with age. The incidence of Trisomy 21 was 3.2%, accounting for 42.5% of all chromosomal abnormalities, and the incidence tended to increase with maternal age.
CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal karyotype analysis of pregnant women with prenatal diagnosis indications can effectively prevent the birth of defective children. AMA, MSS and NIPT were the important indications for predicting abnormal karyotype. In addition, the number of prenatal diagnosis indications is highly correlated with chromosomal abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE: We present partial monosomy 8p (8p23.2→pter) and partial trisomy 15q (15q21.2→qter) and incidental detection of a familial chromosome translocation of paternal origin in a pregnancy associated with increased nuchal translucency (NT) and an abnormal maternal serum screening result.
METHODS: A 29-year-old primigravid woman underwent chorionic villus sampling (CVS) at 13 weeks of gestation because of an increased NT thickness of 3.2 mm at 12 weeks of gestation and an abnormal maternal serum screening for Down syndrome result with a calculated risk of 1/29. Her husband was 33 years old, and there was no family history of congenital malformations. CVS revealed a derived chromosome 8 or der(8). Cytogenetic analysis of the parents revealed a karyotype of 46,XY,t(8;15)(p21.3;q13) in the father and a karyotype of 46,XX in the mother. The CVS result was 46,XY,der(8)t(8;15)(p21.3;q13)pat. The woman requested for amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed a result of arr 8p23.3p23.2 (191,530-2,625,470) × 1.0, arr 15q21.2q26.3 (50,903,432-102,338,129) × 3.0 with a 2.434-Mb deletion of 8p23.3-p23.2 including DLGAP2, CLN8 and ARHGEF10, and a 51.435-Mb duplication of 15q21.2-q26.3 including CYP19A1 and IGF1R. Conventional cytogenetic analysis of cultured amniocytes revealed the result of 46,XY,der(8) t(8;15)(p23.2;q21.2)pat in the fetus. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a malformed fetus was delivered with characteristic craniofacial dysmorphism.
CONCLUSIONS: Maternal serum screening and NT screening may incidentally detect familial unbalanced reciprocal translocations, and aCGH analysis is useful for a precise determination of the breakpoints of the translocation and the involvement of the related genes under such a circumstance.

UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the effectiveness of alpha-fetoprotein variants (AFP-L2, AFP-L3) in fetal screening for Trisomy 18 in place of alpha fetoprotein (AFP).
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective case-control study was conducted. Collectively, 39 pregnant women bearing Trisomy 18 fetuses and 48 pregnant women with clinically normal and healthy fetuses were included. The serum AFP-L2 and AFP-L3 concentrations were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The likelihood ratio method and Python software were used to construct the risk model with AFP, free β-hCG, AFP-L2, and AFP-L3 to predict Trisomy 18. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the optimal cutoff value, while the area under the curve (AUC) was used to assess the screening performance of AFP-L2 and AFP-L3 for fetal Trisomy 18.
UNASSIGNED: Compared to values observed for the control group, AFP-L2 and AFP-L3 concentrations which were significantly higher (both p< .001) in pregnant women with Trisomy 18 fetuses were 7.95 ± 3.57 ng/mL and 2.53 ± 1.80 ng/mL, respectively. Comparisons across multiple modeling methods showed that the highest AUC of screened Trisomy 18 fetuses (0.992, 0.986, and 0.976) was yielded by AFP-L2 + AFP-L3 + free β-hCG, AFP-L2 + free β-hCG, and AFP-L3 + free β-hCG, with a sensitivity of 1.000 indicated in both instances. In different modeling methods, the order of AUC values was AFP-L2 + AFP-L3 + free β-hCG > AFP-L2 + free β-hCG > AFP-L3 + free β-hCG > AFP + free β-hCG.
UNASSIGNED: AFP-L2 and AFP-L3 showed higher sensitivity and specificity as substitutes for AFP in screening Trisomy 18. These two markers indeed improved the screening efficiency and reduced the false positive rate, when compared with AFP only.

In 2019, the Korean Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine developed the first Korean clinical practice guidelines for prenatal aneuploidy screening and diagnostic testing. These guidelines were developed by adapting established clinical practice guidelines in other countries that were searched systematically, and the guidelines aim to assist in decision making of healthcare providers providing prenatal care and to be used as a source for education and communication with pregnant women in Korea. This article delineates clinical practice guidelines specifically for maternal serum screening for fetal aneuploidy and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening. A total of 19 key questions (12 for maternal serum and 7 for cfDNA screening) were defined. The main recommendations are: 1) Pregnant women should be informed of common fetal aneuploidy that can be detected, risks for chromosomal abnormality according to the maternal age, detection rate and false positive rate for common fetal aneuploidy with each screening test, limitations, as well as the benefits and risks of invasive diagnostic testing, 2) It is ideal to give counseling about prenatal aneuploidy screening and diagnostic testing at the first prenatal visit, and counseling is recommended to be given early in pregnancy, 3) All pregnant women should be informed about maternal serum screening regardless of their age, 4) cfDNA screening can be used for the screening of trisomy 21, 18, 13 and sex-chromosome aneuploidy. It is not recommended for the screening of microdeletion, 5) The optimal timing of cfDNA screening is 10 weeks of gestation and beyond, and 6) cfDNA screening is not recommended for women with multiple gestations. The guideline was reviewed and approved by the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.