Massive rotator cuff tear

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在比较术后3个月的临床结果,6个月,12个月,以及在关节镜下修复(ARCR)大量肩袖撕裂(MRCT)后接受有监督的物理治疗(PT)或家庭运动计划的患者的最新随访。
    方法:对2015年1月至2018年12月期间在单个中心接受MRCTARCR后接受有监督的PT或家庭治疗的患者数据库进行了回顾性回顾,并进行了至少24个月的随访。在他们术后2周的常规随访中,患者可以在家庭PT和监督PT之间进行选择.收集患者报告的结果(PRO)和活动范围(ROM),并在术前和3个月的队列之间进行比较。6个月,12个月,和最新的后续行动。患者达到或超过最小临床重要差异(MCID)和患者接受疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)的症状状态(PASS)的百分比,美国肩肘外科评分(ASES),在每个时间点记录两个队列的肩峰值和主观肩峰值(SSV)。并发症,愈合,满意,并报告了重返工作岗位。在最近的随访中通过超声评估愈合。
    结果:符合研究标准的患者有99例:在有监督的PT队列中有61例,在以家庭为基础的队列中,有38人。受监督的PT和以家庭为基础的队列在手术后53±20和55±16个月(p=0.496)返回诊所进行最新随访。分别。比较肌腱受累时没有差异(SS,p=0.574;IS,p=0.288;SScp=0.592),撕裂回缩(p=0.603),或高级脂肪渗透(SS,p=0.684;IS,p-0.397;SScp=0.473)基于术前MRI评估和手术相关因素,包括前(p=0.473)或后(p=0.386)幻灯片,固定结构(p=0.829),或完全修复(p=0.912)。两个队列在基线显示相似的PRO和ROM。术后3个月各组的PROs和ROM相似,6个月,12个月,和最新的后续行动。然而,在家庭队列中,ASES(71.4vs61.2;p=0.013)和FF(135°vs118°;p=0.023)在3个月的随访中明显更高。两组在3个月时分别获得了MCID和PASS,6个月,和12个月的随访。在最新的后续行动中,监督PT和基于家庭的队列在VAS方面实现了MCID和PASS(75%对81%,p=0.573;70%对72%,p=0.911),ASES(76%对74%,p=0.777;72%对72%,p=0.873),和SSV(82%对84%,p=0.734;72%对66%,p=0.489),分别。满意,愈合,并发症,恢复工作的速度相似。
    结论:在最近的随访中,使用基于家庭的方案进行康复的患者在MRCTARCR后表现出与有监督的PT患者相似的功能评分和愈合。尽管家庭治疗的患者在3个月的随访中获得了更高的FF和ASES,这些指标从术后6个月开始具有可比性.对于每个时间点的PRO,类似地实现MCID和PASS。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative clinical outcomes at the 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and latest follow-up in patients undergoing supervised physical therapy (PT) or a home-based exercise program after arthroscopic repair (ARCR) of massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs).
    METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent either supervised PT or home-based therapy after ARCR of MRCTs between January 2015 and December 2018 at a single center with a minimum 24-month follow-up. At their 2-week postoperative routine follow-up, patients were allowed to choose between home-based and supervised PT. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and range of motion (ROM) were collected and compared between cohorts preoperatively and at the 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and latest follow-up. The percentage of patients reaching or exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient accepted symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score, and Subjective Shoulder Value was recorded for both cohorts at each time point. Complications, healing, satisfaction, and return to work were reported. Healing was evaluated via ultrasound at the latest follow-up.
    RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients met the study criteria: 61 in the supervised PT cohort and 38 in the home-based cohort. The supervised PT and home-based cohorts returned to the clinic for their most recent follow-up at 53 ± 20 and 55 ± 16 months (P = .496) after surgery, respectively. There was no difference when comparing tendon involvement (supraspinatus, P = .574; infraspinatus, P = .288; subscapularis, P = .592), tear retraction (P = .603), or high-grade fatty infiltration (supraspinatus, P = .684; infraspinatus, P = .397; subscapularis, P = .473) based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment and surgery-related factors, including anterior (P = .473) or posterior (P = .386) slides, fixation constructs (P = .829), or complete repair (P = .912). Both cohorts showed similar PROs and ROM at baseline. Postoperative PROs and ROM were similar among groups at the 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and latest follow-up. However, ASES (71.4 vs 61.2; P = .013) and forward flexion (135° vs 118°; P = .023) were significantly higher at 3-month follow-up in the home-based cohort. Both groups comparably achieved MCID and PASS for PROs at the 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up. At the latest follow-up, the supervised PT and home-based cohort achieved MCID and PASS for visual analog scale (75% vs 81%, P = .573; 70% vs 72%, P = .911), ASES (76% vs 74%, P = .777; 72% vs 72%, P = .873), and Subjective Shoulder Value (82% vs 84%, P = .734; 72% vs 66%, P = .489), respectively. Satisfaction, healing, complication, and return-to-work rates were similar.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing rehabilitation using a home-based protocol showed largely similar functional scores and healing to those with supervised PT after ARCR of MRCTs at the latest follow-up. Although patients with home-based therapy achieved higher forward flexion and ASES at the 3-month follow-up, these became comparable starting at the 6-month postoperative mark. MCID and PASS were achieved similarly for PROs at each time point.
    METHODS: Level III, retrospective case series comparison.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究的目的是评估球囊垫片植入物相对于部分修复(PR)的成本效用,用于全层巨大肩袖撕裂(MRCT)的手术治疗。
    方法:使用来自前瞻性,随机化,单盲,184例随机患者的多中心对照试验。我们的模型是基于患者在手术后可能具有的各种事件路径构建的。每个患者进展到给定结果的概率和与每个结果相关的质量调整生命年(QALY)来自临床试验数据。增量成本效用比(ICUR)和增量净货币收益(INMB)是根据概率敏感性分析计算的,使用蒙特卡洛模拟1000名假想患者通过决策分析模型进行的。单向灵敏度和阈值分析是通过不同的成本进行的,事件概率,和QALY估计。
    结果:球囊垫片的ICUR为$106,851(95%CI,$96,317至$119,143),相对于PR,用于MRCT的手术治疗。在所有患者中,与PR相比,球囊间隔具有更大的2年QALY增益(球囊间隔为0.20±0.02,PR为0.18±0.02),但2年总成本高得多(气球间隔器9,701±939美元,PR为6,315±627美元)。在$50,000/QALY支付意愿(WTP)阈值下,PR与气球间隔器的正INMB$1,802(95%CI,$1,653至$1,951)相关。
    结论:与PR相比,球囊间隔器是一项“中间值”创新,用于在术后2年内治疗MRCT,其ICUR值在50,000美元至150,000美元的WTP阈值范围内。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-utility of a Balloon Spacer implant relative to partial repair (PR) for the surgical treatment of full-thickness massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT).
    METHODS: A decision-analytic model comparing Balloon Spacer versus PR was developed using data from a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multi-center controlled trial of 184 randomized patients. Our model was constructed based on the various event pathways a patient could have after the procedure. The probability that each patient progressed to a given outcome and the quality-adjusted life years (QALY) associated with each outcome were derived from the clinical trial data. Incremental cost utility ratio (ICUR) and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) were calculated based on a probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulations of 1,000 hypothetical patients progressing through the decision-analytic model. One-way sensitivity and threshold analyses were performed by varying cost, event probability, and QALY estimates.
    RESULTS: Balloon Spacer had an ICUR of $106,851 (95% CI, $96,317 to $119,143) relative to PR for surgical treatment of MRCT. Across all patients, Balloon Spacer was associated with greater 2-year QALY gain compared to PR (0.20 ± 0.02 for Balloon Spacer versus 0.18 ± 0.02 for PR), but with substantially higher total 2-year cost ($9,701 ± $939 for Balloon Spacer versus $6,315 ± $627 for PR). PR was associated with a positive INMB of $1,802 (95% CI, $1,653 to $1,951) over Balloon Spacer at the $50,000/QALY willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold.
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared to PR, Balloon Spacer is an \"intermediate value\" innovation for treatment of MRCT over a 2-year postoperative period with an ICUR value that falls within the $50,000 to $150,000 WTP threshold.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    由于肌腱回缩,修复大量肩袖撕裂(MRCT)通常在技术上具有挑战性,法氏囊纤维化,和通常发生的肌肉脂肪浸润,通常导致不良结果和不可预测的预后。尽管已经报道了一些其他的手术管理选择,缺乏支持在前上和后上不可修复的肩袖撕裂合并时进行肌腱转移的文献。我们描述了一种情况,其中采用背阔肌和下斜方肌肌腱的联合转移来治疗影响肩袖前后上部的MRCT。
    方法:一名64岁男性在7个月前发生创伤性肩关节前脱位后,右肩出现明显疼痛和活动范围受限。MRI显示冈上肌撕裂(>5cm),冈底,和肩胛骨下腱有明显的脂肪浸润(GoutallierIV)。患者接受了下斜方肌肌腱向大结节的开放转移,背阔肌向小结节的开放转移。在最后的后续行动中,术后2.5年,患者表现出无痛的功能活动范围,并可以恢复日常活动。
    尽管有其他手术选择,在本病例中观察到的积极结果可能归因于旋转强度的恢复和跨肩部力耦合的重建。
    结论:本报告描述了成功实施治疗MRCT影响肩袖前上部和后上部的手术治疗方案。
    UNASSIGNED: Repairing massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) can often be technically challenging due to tendon retraction, bursal fibrosis, and muscular fatty infiltration that usually occurs, often resulting in poor outcomes and an unpredictable prognosis. Although some other surgical management options have been reported, there is a lack of literature supporting tendon transfers in the presence of combined anterior and posterior-superior irreparable rotator cuff tears. We describe a case where a combined transfer of the latissimus dorsi and lower trapezius tendons was employed to treat an MRCT affecting the anterior and posterior superior portions of the rotator cuff.
    METHODS: A 64-year-old male presented significant pain and limited range of motion in the right shoulder following a traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation seven months prior. MRI showed retracted tears (> 5 cm) of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis tendons with significant fatty infiltration (Goutallier IV). The patient underwent an open transfer of the lower trapezius tendon to the greater tuberosity and the latissimus dorsi to the lesser tuberosity. At the final follow-up, 2.5 years postoperatively, the patient exhibited a painless functional range of motion and could resume daily activities.
    UNASSIGNED: Although there are alternative surgical options available, the positive outcomes observed in the presented case may be attributed to the restoration of rotational strength and the re-establishment of force coupling across the shoulder.
    CONCLUSIONS: This report describes the successful implementation of a surgical treatment option for managing MRCT affecting the anterior and posterior superior portions of the rotator cuff.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:越来越多,巨大的不可修复的肩袖撕裂由于其高的再撕裂率而提出了治疗挑战。这种眼泪的可修复性取决于眼泪大小等因素,涉及肌腱的数量,肌腱回缩程度,肌肉萎缩,脂肪渗透,以及关节炎的存在与否。描述了非手术和几种手术治疗方案,每种方案都有其特定的适应症,禁忌症,优点,和缺点。桥接重建恢复了上肩袖组织并阻止了肱骨头的上迁移。他的评论的目的是探索现有的关于中介接枝力学的文献,适应症,外科技术,和临床结果。它的目的是了解这些参数如何有助于将使用插入移植物的桥接重建纳入外科医生的实践中,以管理大量不可修复的肩袖撕裂。
    结果:无法修复的大量肩袖撕裂的间位移植物可以是自动的,allow-,异种移植物,或合成材料,最适合相对年轻的患者,没有肱骨关节炎,脂肪浸润和肌肉萎缩.可用的短期至中期结果研究报告功能良好,临床,和放射学的改善与桥接重建利用脱细胞真皮基质同种异体移植。用于处理不可修复的后上袖带撕裂的间位移植物可改善临床和放射学结果,并将并发症降至最低,因此为肩部外科医生的医疗设备提供了可行且有价值的手术技术。
    OBJECTIVE: Increasingly, massive irreparable rotator cuff tears present a treatment challenge due to their high re-tear rates. The reparability of such tears depends on factors like tear size, the number of involved tendons, tendon retraction extent, muscular atrophy, fatty infiltration, and the presence or absence of arthritis. There are non-surgical and several surgical treatment options described each with their specific indications, contraindications, pros, and cons. Bridging reconstruction restores the superior rotator cuff tissue and arrests humeral head superior migration. The purpose of his review is to explore the existing literature on interpositional graft mechanics, indications, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes. It aims to understand how these parameters can facilitate the incorporation of bridging reconstruction using interpositional grafts into a surgeon\'s practice for managing massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.
    RESULTS: Interpositional grafts for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears can either be auto-, allo-, xenografts, or synthetic material and are best suited for patients who are relatively younger, no glenohumeral arthritis, and minimal to no fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy. Short to medium term outcome studies available report good functional, clinical, and radiological improvements with bridging reconstruction utilizing acellular dermal matrix allograft. Interpositional grafts for management of irreparable posterosuperior cuff tears provides improved clinical and radiological outcomes with minimal complications and thus a viable and valuable surgical technique for a shoulder surgeon\'s armamentarium.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:反向全肩关节置换术(rTSA)的患病率迅速增长。随着手术适应症的扩大,rTSA治疗后结局满意的患者比例尚未明确.本系统文献综述探讨rTSA术后患者的总体满意度,并根据手术指征定义患者满意度。
    方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,对描述rTSA后患者满意度的研究进行了文献检索。如果他们在至少2年的随访中调查rTSA后的患者满意度,则包括论文。收集了患者人口统计学数据,包括年龄,性别,体重指数(BMI)。后续持续时间,手术指征,并且还记录了与患者满意度相关的患者报告结局指标(PROM).
    结果:在45项纳入的研究中,共有5234名患者和5288名患者。总体研究人群为61.2%的女性,平均年龄为71.1岁(范围23-99)。最终随访时记录满意度结果,平均随访49.1个月(范围24-228)。患者总体满意度为77.7%至87.8%,取决于患者满意度PROMs。当根据诊断进行分层时,与诊断为袖带撕裂性关节病(CTA)或大规模肩袖撕裂(MRCT)的患者相比,诊断为盂肱骨关节炎(GHOA)的患者在所有指标上的满意度均较高.
    结论:这项系统评价表明,接受GHOA的rTSA患者,CTA,或MRCT对他们的程序普遍满意,满意度最高的是GHOA。专注于患者满意度可以以非常可理解和切实的形式提供对医疗保健质量的最佳整体评估。总体满意率是患者教育的宝贵信息,可以用作有效手术咨询的一部分。
    BACKGROUND: The prevalence of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has grown rapidly. As indications for the procedure expand, the proportion of patients who have satisfactory outcomes after rTSA has not been well defined. This systematic literature review explores overall patient satisfaction after rTSA and defines patient satisfaction based on indication for surgery.
    METHODS: A literature search was performed for studies describing patient satisfaction after rTSA in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Papers were included if they investigated patient satisfaction after rTSA at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Data were collected on patient demographics, including age, gender, and body mass index. Follow-up duration, indication for surgery, and patient reported outcome measures relating to patient satisfaction were also recorded.
    RESULTS: There were a total of 5234 patients and 5288 shoulders from the 45 included studies. The overall study population was 61.2% female and the average age was 71.1 years (range 23-99). Satisfaction results were recorded at final follow-up, with average follow-up of 49.1 months (range 24-228). Overall patient satisfaction ranged from 77.7% to 87.8%, depending on patient satisfaction patient reported outcome measures. When stratified by diagnosis, patients with a diagnosis of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) rated better satisfaction on all metrics when compared to patients with a diagnosis of cuff tear arthropathy or massive rotator cuff tear.
    CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review demonstrated that patients who undergo rTSA for either GHOA, cuff tear arthropathy, or massive rotator cuff tear are generally satisfied with their procedure, with the rate of satisfaction highest in GHOA. Focusing on patient satisfaction may provide the best overall assessment of health care quality in a very understandable and tangible form. Overall satisfaction rate is valuable information for patient education and can be utilized as part of effective surgical counseling.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于大多数肩部外科医生来说,解决大量的肩袖撕裂已经缩回的两端提出了一个重大的挑战。这项研究引入了一种技术,被称为“三明治增强技术”,“将肱二头肌肌腱(LHBT)的长头整合到单排肩袖修复中。程序,在患者处于侧卧位的情况下进行关节镜检查,包括将LHBT和肩袖组织连接到更大的结节上。这有效地将它们夹在肩袖占用空间内。该技术的目标是增强完全插入的袖带边缘的厚度。从而为维修提供更好的支持。三明治增强技术,将二头肌整合到肩袖修复中,已显示出积极的临床结果和中等的解剖学结果。在大或大量肩袖撕裂的情况下,它还可以防止肱骨头的高级迁移。需要进一步的研究来评估该程序的长期有效性。
    For most shoulder surgeons, addressing massive rotator cuff tears that have retracted ends poses a significant challenge. This study introduces a technique, termed the \"sandwich augmentation technique,\" which incorporates the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) into a single-row rotator cuff repair. The procedure, performed arthroscopically with the patient in the lateral decubitus position, involves attaching the LHBT and rotator cuff tissues together to the greater tuberosity. This effectively sandwiches them within the rotator cuff footprint. The goal of this technique is to enhance the thickness of the fully interposed cuff margin, thereby providing better support for the repair. The sandwich augmentation technique, which integrates the biceps into the rotator cuff repair, has demonstrated positive clinical outcomes and moderate anatomical results. It also prevents superior migration of the humeral head in cases of large or massive rotator cuff tears. Further research is required to assess the long-term effectiveness of this procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨肩袖残端分类与上囊重建(SCR)术后预后的相关性。
    方法:本研究纳入了2013年6月至2021年5月期间接受SCR的75例患者。基于残端分类,在术前T2加权的冠状视图中使用肌腱断裂部位与三角肌的信号强度比,脂肪抑制MRI扫描,患者分为1型、2型和3型,比例分别为<0.8、0.8-1.3和>1.3(44、17和14例患者,分别)。美国肩肘外科医生(ASES),常数,术后至少1年随访,评估疼痛和活动范围的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分.在X线平片上评估了根据Hamada分类的肩关节距离和RC撕裂性关节病。在术后3个月和12个月以及之后每年通过MRI评估术后移植物的完整性。移植物失败定义为完全不连续。
    结果:SCR术后临床和放射学结果明显改善。与2型和3型患者相比,1型患者的ASES评分明显较高(1、2和3型=84±10、75±15和76±14;所有P=0.014),恒定分数(类型1、2和3=65±5、61±9和56±13;所有P=0.005),和向前屈曲(类型1、2和3=155±10、154±15和145±13;所有P=0.013)。然而,组间的这些统计学差异低于肩袖修复后ASES和Constant评分确定的最低临床重要差异值.1型组术后移植物失败率低于其他两组;差异无统计学意义(P=0.749)。
    结论:残端分类类型1的患者表现出明显更好的功能评分(ASES和VAS评分)和前向屈曲;然而,这些差异的临床重要性可能有限.残端分类可用于预测术后临床结果。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the correlation between rotator cuff stump classification and postoperative outcomes after superior capsular reconstruction (SCR).
    METHODS: A total of 75 patients who underwent SCR between June 2013 and May 2021 were included in this study. Based on stump classification using the signal intensity ratio of the tendon rupture site to the deltoid muscle in the coronal view of preoperative T2-weighted, fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging scans, the patients were classified into types 1, 2, and 3 with ratios of <0.8, 0.8-1.3, and >1.3 (44, 17, and 14 patients, respectively). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain and range of motion were evaluated at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up postoperatively. The acromiohumeral distance and rotator cuff arthropathy according to the Hamada classification were assessed on plain radiography. The graft integrity was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging at 3 and 12 months postoperatively and annually thereafter.
    RESULTS: Clinical and radiological outcomes were significantly improved after SCR. In comparison with type 2 and 3 patients, type 1 patients had significantly higher ASES scores (type 1, 2, and 3 = 84 ± 10, 75 ± 15, and 76 ± 14; all P = .014), Constant scores (type 1, 2, and 3 = 65 ± 5, 61 ± 9, and 56 ± 13; all P = .005), and forward flexion (type 1, 2, and 3 = 155 ± 10, 154 ± 15, and 145 ± 13; all P = .013). However, these statistical differences between groups were below the established minimum clinically important difference values for the ASES and Constant scores after rotator cuff repair. The graft failure rate after surgery was lower in the type 1 group than that in the other 2 groups; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .749).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stump classification type 1 showed significantly better functional scores (ASES and VAS scores) and forward flexion; however, the clinical importance of these differences may be limited. Stump classification may be useful for predicting postoperative clinical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    文献计量分析是一种有用的工具,用于衡量一个主题的学术影响及其研究越来越少的方面。这项研究的目的是使用文献计量学分析来综合分析评估巨大肩袖撕裂(mRCT)的治疗和预后的研究中引文指数最高的50篇文章。
    这项横断面研究确定了截至2022年12月发布的Scopus数据库中的文章。使用的关键词是“巨大的肩袖撕裂”。“文章按时间顺序排序。记录发布年份和引用次数。通过将引用次数除以发表的年数[1引用/1年发表(2021)=CI为1]来计算每篇文章的引用指数(CI)。其中,对50篇具有highestCI的文章进行了评估。对收集的每个变量的数据评估频率和分布。
    这些搜索方法产生了625篇有关mRCT研究的文章(范围从1986年1月到2022年12月)。十大最具影响力的文章中有四篇是在2010年代发表的。发表频率最高的证据水平(LOE)是证据水平4(41%)。《关节镜》杂志在前50名中发表人数最多(26%),其次是《骨与关节外科杂志》和《美国运动医学杂志》(各20%)。临床研究占排名前50位的88%。病例系列(38%)占主导地位,而系统评价(20%)和随机对照试验(8%)则不太普遍.大多数研究集中在某些干预措施的临床结果(62%),主要比较多种干预措施。
    尽管mRCT的患病率相对较高(占所有眼泪的40%),本课题仅占所有肩袖研究的一小部分。这项分析已经确定了与mRCT有关的发现的差距和局限性,以便研究人员针对未研究的主题提出研究问题,并影响这种临床困难诊断的未来治疗和结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Bibliometric analysis is a useful tool for measuring the scholarly impact of a topic and its more and less heavily studied aspects. The purpose of this study is to use bibliometric analysis to comprehensively analyze the 50 articles with the highest citation indices in studies evaluating the treatment and outcomes of massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs).
    UNASSIGNED: This cross-sectional study identified articles within the Scopus database published through December 2022. Keywords used were \"massive rotator cuff tear.\" Articles were sorted in chronological order. The year published and number of citations were recorded. A citation index (CI) was calculated for each article by dividing the number of citations by number of years published [1 citation/1 year published (2021) = CI of 1]. Of these, the 50 articles with the highest CIs were carried forward for evaluation. Frequencies and distributions were assessed for data of each variable collected.
    UNASSIGNED: These search methods produced 625 articles regarding mRCT research (ranging from January 1986 to December 2022). Four of the top 10 most impactful articles were published in the 2010s. The level of evidence (LOE) published with the greatest frequency was level of evidence 4 (41%). The journal Arthroscopy published the highest number within the top 50 (26%) followed by the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and the American Journal of Sports Medicine (20% each). Clinical studies composed 88% of the top 50. Case series (38%) predominated, while systematic reviews (20%) and randomized control trials (8%) were less prevalent. The majority of studies concentrated on the clinical outcomes of certain interventions (62%), mainly comparing multiple interventions.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite the relatively high prevalence of mRCTs (40% of all tears), this topic comprises only a small proportion of all rotator cuff research. This analysis has identified gaps within and limitations of the findings concerning mRCTs for researchers to propose research questions targeting understudied topics and influence the future treatment and outcomes of this clinically difficult diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    以前曾报道过由一名外科医生进行的反向肩关节成形术(RSA)的中期结果。这项研究的目的是调查这些患者的最低10年临床和影像学结果。
    在这项前瞻性队列研究中,采用Constant-Murley评分(CMS)对27例患者进行RSA术后肩袖大面积撕裂伴或不伴偏心性骨关节炎(OA)或同心性OA的评估,运动范围(ROM),和放射学评估。
    在平均12年的随访中,与基线值相比,CMS和ROM显着改善(所有P<.001)。一旦根据诊断进行了分层,在有/无偏心OA的肩袖大面积撕裂患者和有同心OA的患者之间,ROM或总CMS没有差异.与先前研究的中期值相比,ROM和CMS均未降低,对于总体人群和诊断分层组。在66.7%的病例中报告了肩胛骨切口,这与中期随访时报告的数据相似。长期评价钙化率为59.3%,中期随访时,相同病例系列人群(51.9%;P=.785)与整个人群(47%;P=.358)之间无差异.
    RSA导致患者术后长达17年的良好临床和功能结果,随着时间的推移,CMS没有减少。未发现植入物松动,肩胛骨缺口率为66%,主要是1级或2级。
    UNASSIGNED: The medium-term results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) that has been performed by a single surgeon have been previously reported. The purpose of this study was to investigate the minimum 10-year clinical and radiographic outcomes of these patients.
    UNASSIGNED: In this prospective cohort study, 27 patients were evaluated after RSA for massive rotator cuff tear with or without eccentric osteoarthritis (OA) or concentric OA with the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), range of motion (ROM), and a radiologic assessment.
    UNASSIGNED: At a mean 12-year follow-up, the CMS and ROM were significantly improved when compared with the baseline values (all P < .001). Once stratified by diagnosis, no difference in the ROM or total CMS was found between patients with massive rotator cuff tear with/without eccentric OA and those with concentric OA. Neither ROM nor CMS decreased when compared to the mid-term values of the previous study, for both the overall population and the diagnosis-stratified groups. Scapular notching was reported in 66.7% of cases that was similar to the data reported at mid-term follow-up. The calcification rate was 59.3% at the long-term evaluation, and there were no differences between the same case-series population (51.9%; P = .785) and the whole population at mid-term follow-up (47%; P = .358).
    UNASSIGNED: RSA led to excellent clinical and functional outcomes for patients up to 17 years postoperatively, and there was no decrease in the CMS over time. No loosening of implants was noted, and the rate of scapular notching was 66%, mostly grade 1 or 2.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评论的目的是提供一种相对新颖但有争议的手术装置(InSpace肩峰下球囊,史崔克,卡拉马祖,MI)可以很容易地结合到肩部外科医生的医疗设备中。作者回顾了InSpace的关键临床和手术决策方面。概述了推荐的手术技术和康复方案。作者介绍了球囊垫片在无法修复的肩袖撕裂的连续护理中的细微差别。
    结果:去年,已经发表了两项I级临床试验,这些研究的数据提供了关于肩峰下球囊垫片实用性的相互矛盾的证据。当前的综述将这两项最新研究进行了对比,并提供了一个框架,通过该框架可以实际了解有关临床决策的可用证据。目前,文献支持使用InSpace的有限适应症:老年人,低需求的患者具有保留的活动范围,具有不可修复的手术,后上肩袖撕裂,肩胛骨下完整。InSpace肩峰下球囊间隔器是一种简单的装置,可以在不可修复的肩袖撕裂患者的子集中产生临床结果的实质性改善。InSpace不是复杂的灵丹妙药,无法修复的肩袖撕裂.在这个多样化且令人沮丧的患者群体中,个性化决策是必要的。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the review is to provide an updated overview of a relatively novel but controversial surgical device (InSpace subacromial balloon, Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI) that can be readily incorporated into the armamentarium of the shoulder surgeon. The authors review the critical clinical and surgical decision-making aspects of InSpace. A recommended surgical technique and rehabilitation protocol are outlined. The authors present a nuanced view of the balloon spacer in the continuum of care of the irreparable rotator cuff tear.
    RESULTS: Within the last year, two Level I clinical trials have been published, and the data from these studies offer conflicting evidence regarding the utility of the subacromial balloon spacer. The current review contrasts these two recent studies and offers a framework by which the available evidence can be practically understood with respect to clinical decision-making. The literature currently supports a limited indication for use of InSpace: the elderly, low-demand patient with preserved active range of motion with an operatively irreparable, posterosuperior rotator cuff tear with an intact subscapularis. The InSpace subacromial balloon spacer is a simple device that can yield substantial improvements in clinical outcomes among a subset of patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears. InSpace is not a panacea for the complex, irreparable rotator cuff tear. Individualized decision-making is necessary in this diverse and challening patient population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号