The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic value of clinical examination and complementary imaging in the exploration of a breast lump or microcalcifications occurring in a postmenopausal woman taking hormonal replacement therapy (HRT), based on a systematic review of the literature in order to make recommendations for HRT management.
A literature review was conducted using Medline, Cochrane Library data and international recommendations in French and English until 2020.
In the presence of a clinical breast mass in postmenopausal women, there is no clinical evidence to rule out cancer. A double evaluation by mammography and ultrasound is recommended and allows the imaging to be classified into 5 BI-RADS categories. The diagnostic management of masses classified BI-RADS 4 and 5 should be based on percutaneous sampling, with microbiopsy being the first step. A total of four situations may arise: 1. Clinical examination has detected a breast mass, but there is no imaging abnormality. In this case, the imaging NPV is high (>96%). If the clinical lesion increases in size, a tissue biopsy should be performed, while continued routine breast screening is recommended if the lesion remains stable and HRT can be continued. 2. Clinical examination, mammography, and ultrasound are in favour of a cyst. Simple cysts can be punctured if painful. There is no contraindication to continuing HRT in the case of simple cysts. Management options for complicated and complex cysts are no different from those offered to women without HRT. Continuation of HRT must consider their histological nature. 3. Clinical examination, mammography, and ultrasonography suggest a benign solid tumour. The management of these benign breast lesions (fibroadenoma…) is not different in women taking an HRT and there is no contraindication to continue the HRT. 4: Clinical examination, imaging and microbiopsy diagnose a malignant tumour. It is imperative that the HRT be stopped, whatever the hormonal dependence of the tumour and whether it is invasive or in situ. The management of the cancerous tumour must consider the updated breast cancer treatment guidelines. In the presence of microcalcifications, the course of action to be taken depends on the BI-RADS classification, established according to the morphology and arrangement of the calcifications. In case of suspicious microcalcifications (BI-RADS 4 or 5), a guided macrobiopsy should be performed. Diagnostic and therapeutic management in these patients is no different from that offered to women without HRT. Discontinuation of HRT is necessary in cases of malignancy (in situ or invasive cancer).
A rigorous multidisciplinary approach is necessary for the exploration of a breast mass or microcalcifications in a postmenopausal woman.

The development of the mammary imaging (mammography, ultrasound, MRI) enables the discovery of more and more lesions. The BI-RADS lexicon is the reference book for their descriptive analysis. Four elementary images must be individualized: masses and architectural distortion described in 3 imaging techniques, asymmetries and microcalcifications described in mammography. The aim of this work was to review three of these images: mass, architectural distortion and asymmetry, allowing the various actors involved in senology to propose an up-to-date diagnostic and interventional strategy, based on their positive predictive values (PPV) or negative predictive values of cancer and allowing the classification BI-RADS of the lesion. The masses are the most often encountered lesions as well in screening as in diagnosis. Their PPV is superior in diagnosis than in screening and it increases with the age. Their irregular forms, their spiculated outlines and their evolutionary character are the most relevant elements of suspicion. The architectural distortion is the rarest image and always classified suspect BI-RADS 4, except in case of a known scar. The asymmetry is less common; its PPV is low and rises only in case of evolutionary asymmetry.

The persistent sciatic artery is a rare cause of painful buttock mass with L5-S1 radicular signs. A 56-year-old man presents a right painful buttock mass with L5-S1 radicular symptoms for 3 years. The surgical exploration found a pulsatile vascular mass like a persistent sciatic artery aneurysm. This vascular pathology is a misunderstood embryogenesis anomaly. The treatment aims to avoid serious complications. This pathology must be known from plastic surgeon.