背景:实现大湄公河次区域消除疟疾目标的挑战,包括泰国,是间日疟原虫疟疾的优势,对控制措施表现出极大的弹性。
目的:这项概念验证研究旨在为在低地方性环境中实施伯氨喹大规模药物治疗(pMDA)作为消除间日疟原虫的策略提供证据。
方法:该研究采用了混合方法试验,以彻底评估有效性,安全,可接受性,和pMDA的社区参与。定量部分设计为2期集群交叉随机对照试验。通过乡村卫生志愿者的直接观察治疗(DOT),将干预措施提高到国家预防和控制标准。定性部分采用了深入访谈和头脑风暴讨论。该研究涉及泰国南部2个省2个地区的7个集群,间日疟原虫传播持续较低。在定量部分,在pMDA组和对照组之前和之后3个月进行了5次横断面血液调查。pMDA的有效性是通过比较两组之间每1000人之间的间日疟原虫感染比例来确定的。使用多级零膨胀负二项模型,针对聚类和时间作为协变量和相互作用进行了调整。安全性数据包括给药后的不良事件。主题内容分析用于评估利益相关者的可接受性和参与度。
结果:在pMDA前期,pMDA组(n=1536)和对照组(n=1577)间日疟原虫感染比例分别为13.0(95%CI8.2-20.4)和12.0(95%CI7.5-19.1),分别。pMDA后第3个月,pMDA(n=1430)和对照组(n=1420)的比例分别为8.4(95%CI4.6-15.1)和5.6(95%CI2.6-11.5),分别。组间没有发现统计学上的显著差异。两组所有集群的疟疾病例数量都有所减少,因此,pMDA的影响尚无定论。没有重大的安全问题。研究参与者和公共卫生保健提供者在地方和国家层面的接受度很高,他们认为pMDA提高了社区的意识。
结论:pMDA与高依从性相关,安全,和耐受性,但它可能不会显著影响间日疟原虫的传播。因为这是一个概念验证研究,我们决定不使用更大的集群和样本扩大干预范围.目前正在实施涉及用伯氨喹和DOT的靶向伯氨喹治疗策略的替代方法。我们在现场护理中心的有效医疗保健工作人员方面取得了成功,有效的社区合作,以及地方和国家当局的承诺。我们的努力提高了消除疟疾倡议的可接受性。建议社区参与以实现消除目标。
背景:泰国临床试验注册TCTR20190806004;https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20190806004.
BACKGROUND: A challenge in achieving the malaria-elimination target in the Greater Mekong Subregion, including Thailand, is the predominance of Plasmodium vivax malaria, which has shown extreme resilience to control measures.
OBJECTIVE: This proof-of-concept study aimed to provide evidence for implementing primaquine mass drug administration (pMDA) as a strategy for P. vivax elimination in low-endemicity settings.
METHODS: The study employed a mixed-methods trial to thoroughly evaluate the effectiveness, safety, acceptability, and community engagement of pMDA. The quantitative part was designed as a 2-period cluster-crossover randomized controlled trial. The intervention was pMDA augmented to the national prevention and control standards with directly observed treatment (DOT) by village health volunteers. The qualitative part employed in-depth interviews and brainstorming discussions. The study involved 7 clusters in 2 districts of 2 southern provinces in Thailand with persistently low P. vivax transmission. In the quantitative part, 5 cross-sectional blood surveys were conducted in both the pMDA and control groups before and 3 months after pMDA. The effectiveness of pMDA was determined by comparing the proportions of P. vivax infections per 1000 population between the 2 groups, with a multilevel zero-inflated negative binomial model adjusted for cluster and time as covariates and the interaction. The safety data comprised adverse events after drug administration. Thematic content analysis was used to assess the acceptability and engagement of stakeholders.
RESULTS: In the pre-pMDA period, the proportions of P. vivax infections in the pMDA (n=1536) and control (n=1577) groups were 13.0 (95% CI 8.2-20.4) and 12.0 (95% CI 7.5-19.1), respectively. At month 3 post-pMDA, these proportions in the pMDA (n=1430) and control (n=1420) groups were 8.4 (95% CI 4.6-15.1) and 5.6 (95% CI 2.6-11.5), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups. The number of malaria cases reduced in all clusters in both groups, and thus, the impact of pMDA was inconclusive. There were no major safety concerns. Acceptance among the study participants and public health care providers at local and national levels was high, and they believed that pMDA had boosted awareness in the community.
CONCLUSIONS: pMDA was associated with high adherence, safety, and tolerability, but it may not significantly impact P. vivax transmission. As this was a proof-of-concept study, we decided not to scale up the intervention with larger clusters and samples. An alternative approach involving a targeted primaquine treatment strategy with primaquine and DOT is currently being implemented. We experienced success regarding effective health care workforces at point-of-care centers, effective collaborations in the community, and commitment from authorities at local and national levels. Our efforts boosted the acceptability of the malaria-elimination initiative. Community engagement is recommended to achieve elimination targets.
BACKGROUND: Thai Clinical Trials Registry TCTR20190806004; https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20190806004.