OBJECTIVE: To explore the prevention and management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following major orthopaedic surgery (MOS) by fostering doctor-to-patient cultivation of musculoskeletal ability, guided by King\'s theory of goal attainment.
METHODS: A cohort of patients (n = 116) undergoing MOS was selected for the study, and were divided into two groups: the regular group and the observation group, with patients in the regular group experiencing routine nursing care and management and those in the observation group undergoing musculoskeletal ability cultivation based on King\'s theory of goal attainment. Baseline data, limb vascular ultrasonography, coagulation function, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, VTE prevention efficacy, Exercise of Self-care Ability Scale (ESCA) score, and nursing satisfaction were analysed comparatively.
RESULTS: There was no significant within-group difference in baseline data (P > 0.05). Following the interventions, the observation group demonstrated statistically significant reductions in the Musculoskeletal-Integrated Imaging Score, various dimensions of WOMAC scores, and D-dimer (D-D) levels (P < 0.05) both in comparison to their levels before interventions and to those observed in the regular group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the observation group exhibited increases in prothrombin time levels and various dimensions of ESCA scores (P < 0.05) post-intervention, surpassing the pre-intervention levels and those obtained in the regular group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the observation group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of VTE (P < 0.05) and higher nursing satisfaction (P < 0.05) compared to the regular group.
CONCLUSIONS: Nursing intervention measures, utilizing doctor-to-patient cultivation of musculoskeletal ability based on King\'s theory of goal attainment, have demonstrated a significant clinical benefit for VTE prevention and control in post-MOS patients. This approach not only effectively prevented VTE in post MOS patients but also enhanced their satisfaction towards nursing care.

BACKGROUND: Haemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked recessive bleeding disorder caused by lack or deficiency of coagulation factor VIII.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the incidence and treatment-related risk factors of inhibitor development after intensive FVIII replacement for major orthopaedic surgery in previous treated persons with HA.
METHODS: A total of 151 HA who underwent 221 major orthopaedic surgical procedures after intensive FVIII treatment were reviewed. The results of inhibitor tests were collected. Potential clinical risk factors for inhibitor development were analyzed.
RESULTS: 111 people were diagnosed with severe HA. Thirty-seven persons (24.5%) had history of previous intensive FVIII treatment for surgical procedure. They received a mean perioperative cumulative FVIII of 498 iu/kg within first week after surgery. Seven cases (4.6%) developed an inhibitor post-operatively in our study. Surgical procedure for pseudotumor and the group of persons who experienced postoperative complications had the higher incidence of inhibitor development (9.5%, 13.3% respectively). Only previous history for intensive FVIII exposure was considered as a significant predictor for postoperative inhibitor development after multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR: 29.5, P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of inhibitor development in previously treated persons with HA undergoing major orthopaedic surgery was 4.6% and the history of previous intensive FVIII treatment for surgery was associated with higher risk of inhibitor development.

Background: venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the most common complications after major orthopaedic surgery. Recent studies have suggested that aspirin may also be effective in preventing VTE, but it is still controversial whether it can be routinely used. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of aspirin against oral anticoagulants in the prevention of VTE following total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or hip fracture surgery (HFS). Methods: Relevant publications have been obtained using electronic search databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trials. gov. from inception to 20 July 2023. Only RCTs evaluating the efficacy and safety of aspirin compared with oral anticoagulants undergoing major orthopaedic surgery were included in the meta-analysis. The primary outcome reported was any VTE event (including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE)). Secondary outcomes included mortality, major bleeding (including gastrointestinal bleed, cerebrovascular hemorrhage, or any bleeding requiring a return to the theater), minor bleeding (ecchymosis, epistaxis, hematuria), and wound complications. The risk of bias for all included studies was assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration\'s tool. Results: After screening 974 studies, 12 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included, involving 5,088 participants, including 2,540 participants in aspirin, 2,205 participants in rivaroxaban, and 323 participants in warfarin. Aspirin was found to be less effective than oral anticoagulants in thromboprophylaxis after major orthopedic surgery (RR = 1.206, 95% CI 1.053-1.383). After subgroup analysis according to the type of oral anticoagulant, the results showed that aspirin was similar to rivaroxaban and inferior to warfarin. Considering that the studies in the warfarin group were all conducted before 2000, our results need to be further confirmed. In addition, the aspirin group had a higher risk of VTE than the control group in other subgroups, including a follow-up time of ≤3 months, type of procedure as TKA, high-dose aspirin (≥650 mg qd), and no combined use of mechanical prophylaxis. In terms of safety events, aspirin did not show significant differences in major bleeding (RR = 0.952, 95% CI 0.499-1.815), all-cause mortality (RR = 1.208, 95% CI 0.459-3.177), and wound-related events (RR = 0.618, 95% CI 0.333-1.145) compared with oral anticoagulants, and aspirin was associated with a reduction in the risk of minor bleeding (RR = 0.685, 95% CI 0.552-0.850) events and total bleeding (RR = 0.726, 95% CI 0.590-0.892). Conclusion: Aspirin reduces bleeding risk after major orthopedic surgery compared with oral anticoagulants, but may sacrifice VTE prevention to some extent. Updated evidence is needed to analyze the thromboprophylaxis effects of aspirin in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=463481, identifier CRD42023463481.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially fatal complication after arthroplasty. Numerous prophylactic strategies and studies to reduce VTEs have focused on the duration of the hospital stay and on few extramural hospitals. This study aimed to investigate extramural hospital management of VTE after total hip/knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) in China with a novel survey tool.
METHODS: A total of 180 patients undergoing arthroplasty, including 68 THA patients and 112 TKA patients, were enrolled in this study. All patients received anticoagulant treatment management. A survey querying VTE management and adherence, such as therapy information, understanding of anticoagulation, satisfaction with the ability of medical staff, and satisfaction with health care costs, was administered by a questionnaire (TKA/THA Patients\' Experience with Anticoagulation in the Post-discharge Period) for quality improvement.
RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 65.27 ± 13.62 years. All patients knew their follow-up times. 85 % of them were suggested that re-examine at the next 14 days, and the others at the next 28 days. All patients continued to visit the orthopaedic clinic after discharge without choosing other types of outpatient services, such as an anticoagulant clinic or home visit with a nurse/pharmacist or remote evaluation by telephone. A total of 96.6 % of all patients used new oral anticoagulants, and the most common treatment duration was 2-4 weeks (93.3 %). 48 % informed their physicians that they were taking anticoagulation medications when they visited ophthalmology, dentistry, dermatology, and other departments. The overall rate of satisfaction with anticoagulation management was 81.67 %, and 6.67 % of patients were not unsatisfied with their medical expenses. Patient compliance decreased with increasing follow-up time. Continuous follow-ups after discharge significantly improved patient compliance.
CONCLUSIONS: These results elucidate how we can improve the quality of anticoagulation. Continuous follow-up appointments for 30 days after discharge, especially for individuals over 65 years old, significantly improved patient satisfaction and reduced the incidence of VTE and medical costs.

Thromboembolism prophylaxis is well-established in major orthopaedic surgery (hip and knee arthroplasty and hip fracture surgery), with low-molecular-weight heparins the most often chosen agent. In recent years, however, direct-acting anticoagulants have been gaining ground and can be used in this scenario (except for hip fracture surgery). In the US, even aspirin could be indicated for low-risk patients who undergo hip or knee arthroplasty. For other orthopaedic procedures (leg surgery below the knee, ankle and foot; knee arthroscopy; arm surgery; and spine surgery), thromboembolism prophylaxis requires individualisation based on the patient\'s risk factors and the surgery\'s characteristics, given that the risk of venous thromboembolic disease is minor. In this patient group, the agent of choice is low-molecular-weight heparin, given that direct-acting anticoagulants are not approved for these types of surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Perioperative coagulation monitoring and transfusions were evaluated.
METHODS: 70 cases were included. Time points: before (PRE), after surgery (POST), day 1, day 3, day 7. Standard and patient near tests were assessed. Groups were: Transfused (TG); Control (CG).
RESULTS: 23 patients were transfused (TG), 47 were not (CG). PRE haemoglobin was reduced, coagulation time (CT) was prolonged in TG. FIBTEM decrease was higher in TG. Leukocytes were elevated in TG. ASPI decreased, TRAP and ADP aggregability increased in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: CT, haemoglobin and fibrinogen were associated with transfusion. TRAP and ADP aggregability increased and could account for thromboembolism.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to analyse concomitant drug use and its association with outcome in patients (N = 17 701) receiving rivaroxaban or standard of care (SOC) for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after major orthopaedic surgery in the non-interventional, phase IV XAMOS (Xarelto® in the prophylaxis of post-surgical venous thromboembolism after elective major orthopaedic surgery of hip or knee) study.
METHODS: Concomitant drug use was at the discretion of the treating physician. Prespecified co-medications of interest were cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4/P-glycoprotein inhibitors/inducers, platelet aggregation inhibitors (PAIs) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Crude event incidences were compared between rivaroxaban and SOC groups.
RESULTS: CYP3A4/P-glycoprotein inhibitor/inducer use was infrequent, in contrast to PAI (~7%) and NSAID (~52%) use. Rivaroxaban was associated with a lower incidence of overall symptomatic thromboembolic events compared with SOC, regardless of co-medication use. In both treatment groups, PAI users, with higher age and prevalence of cardiovascular co-morbidities, had similar higher (>7-fold) incidences of symptomatic arterial but not venous thromboembolic events compared with non-users. NSAID use had no influence on thromboembolic events. However, odds ratios (ORs) for major bleeding events (European Medicines Agency definition) were higher in NSAID users compared with non-users in rivaroxaban [OR = 1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06, 2.13] and SOC (OR = 1.70; CI 1.16, 2.49) groups. In PAI users, ORs for major bleeding events were no different from those of non-users in both the rivaroxaban (OR = 1.49; CI 0.84, 2.65) and SOC (OR = 1.46; CI 0.82, 2.62) groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of NSAIDs in XAMOS was frequent and associated with a higher frequency of bleeding events in patients receiving rivaroxaban or SOC, although the benefit-risk profile of rivaroxaban compared with SOC was maintained.

OBJECTIVE: Symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) complicates approximately 4% of major orthopaedic surgical procedures performed without thromboprophylaxis. Randomised clinical trials demonstrate primary thromboprophylaxis reduces VTE rates to <1%, with low rates of clinically important bleeding, using low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), oral FXa inhibitors or thrombin inhibitors. We reviewed the rates of VTE in patients undergoing major hip/knee joint surgery at Waitemata District Health Board (WDHB).
METHODS: Cases of VTE within 90 days of orthopaedic surgery were identified by retrospective audit of data from the haematology VTE database. The number of major hip/knee joint surgeries at WDHB from January 2006 to December 2010 was obtained from clinical coding data.
RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of VTE within 90 days of surgery was 3.29%. The median time from surgery to diagnosis was 7 days. Deep vein thrombosis comprised 75% of cases, 77.6% distal and 23.2% proximal. Pulmonary embolism comprised 26.5% of VTE; 47.7% had right heart strain on computed tomography/echocardiography. Hip fracture surgery comprised one-third of patients. Of patients developing VTE, 85.5% had chemical thromboprophylaxis - aspirin 73%, LMWH 20 mg 16%, LMWH 40 mg 16%, therapeutic LMWH 3%, unfractionated heparin twice daily 1%, and warfarin 4%; 75.6% received mechanical prophylaxis, while 4% of patients received no prophylaxis.
CONCLUSIONS: VTE incidence after major hip/knee joint surgery at WDHB is high, with pulmonary embolism comprising almost one-third of all VTE in this study, indicating the prophylaxis given is suboptimal. Implementation of appropriate, extended duration prophylaxis as per evidence-based guidelines is required to reduce these rates.

Surgeons consider the benefit-to-harm ratio when making decisions regarding the use of anticoagulant venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis. We evaluated the benefit-to-harm ratio of the use of newer anticoagulants as thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery using the likelihood of being helped or harmed (LHH), and assessed the effects of variation in the definition of major bleeding on the results. A systematic literature search was performed to identify phase II and phase III studies that compared regulatory authority-approved newer anticoagulants to the low-molecular-weight heparin enoxaparin in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery. Analysis of outcomes data estimated the clinical benefit (number-needed-to-treat [NNT] to prevent one symptomatic VTE) and clinical harm (number-needed-to-harm [NNH] or the NNT to cause one major bleeding event) of therapies. We estimated each trial\'s benefit-to-harm ratio from NNT and NNH values, and expressed this as LHH = (1/NNT)/(1/NNH) = NNH/NNT. Based on reporting of efficacy and safety outcomes, most studies favoured enoxaparin over fondaparinux, and rivaroxaban over enoxaparin. However, when using the LHH metric, most trials favoured enoxaparin over both fondaparinux and rivaroxaban when they included surgical-site bleeding that did not require reoperation in the definition of major bleeding. The exclusion of bleeding at surgical site which did not require reoperation shifted the benefit-to-harm ratio in favour of the newer agents. Variations in the definitions of major bleeding may change the benefit-to-harm ratio and subsequently affect its interpretation. Clinical trials should attempt to improve the consistency of major bleeding reporting.