UNASSIGNED: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant sorafenib treatment compared with placebo in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent local ablation.
UNASSIGNED: The SORAMIC trial is a randomised controlled trial with diagnostic, local ablation, and palliative sub-study arms. After initial imaging within the diagnostic study, patients were assigned to local ablation or palliative arms. In the local ablation cohort, patients were randomised 1:1 to local ablation + sorafenib vs. local ablation + placebo. The primary endpoint was time-to-recurrence (TTR). Secondary endpoints were local control rate and safety in terms of adverse events and quality-of-life.
UNASSIGNED: The recruitment was terminated prematurely after 104 patients owing to slow recruitment. One patient was excluded because of a technical failure. Fifty-four patients were randomised to local ablation + sorafenib and 49 to local ablation + placebo. Eighty-eight patients who underwent standardised follow-up imaging comprised the per-protocol population. The median TTR was 15.2 months in the sorafenib arm and 16.4 months in the placebo arm (hazard ratio 1.1; 95% CI 0.53-2.2; p = 0.82). Out of 136 lesions ablated within the trial, there was no difference in local recurrence rate between sorafenib (6/69, 8.6%) and placebo groups (5/67, 5.9%; p = 0.792).Overall (92.5% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.008) and drug-related (81.4% vs. 55.1%, p = 0.003) adverse events were more common in the sorafenib arm compared with the placebo arm. Dose reduction because of adverse events were common in the sorafenib arm (79.6% vs. 30.6%, p <0.001).
UNASSIGNED: Adjuvant sorafenib did not improve in TTR or local control rate after local ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma within the limitations of an early terminated trial.
UNASSIGNED: Local ablation is the standard of care treatment in patients with early stages of hepatocellular carcinoma, along with surgical therapies. However, there is a risk of disease recurrence during follow-up. Sorafenib, an oral medication, is a routinely used treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. This study found that sorafenib treatment after local ablation in people with early hepatocellular carcinoma did not significantly improve the disease-free period compared with placebo.
UNASSIGNED: EudraCT 2009-012576-27, NCT01126645.

UNASSIGNED: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and ablative external beam radiotherapy (ablative RT) are commonly used to treat small intrahepatic malignancies. We meta-analysed oncologic outcomes and systematically reviewed the clinical consideration of tumour location and size.
UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched on February 24, 2022. Studies comparing RFA and ablative RT, providing one of the endpoints (local control or survival), and encompassing ≥5 patients in each arm were included.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty-one studies involving 4,638 patients were included. Regarding survival, the odds ratio (OR) was 1.204 (p = 0.194, favouring RFA, not statistically significant) among all studies, 1.253 (p = 0.153) among hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) studies, and 1.002 (p = 0.996) among colorectal cancer metastasis studies. Regarding local control, the OR was 0.458 (p <0.001, favouring ablative RT) among all studies, 0.452 (p <0.001) among HCC studies, favouring the ablative RT arm, and 0.649 (p = 0.484) among colorectal cancer metastasis studies. Pooled 1- and 2-year survival rates for HCC studies were 91.8% and 77.7% after RFA, and 89.0% and 76.0% after ablative RT, respectively; and for metastasis studies were 88.2% and 66.4% after RFA and 82.7% and 60.6% after RT, respectively. Literature analysis suggests that ablative RT can be more effective than RFA for tumours larger than 2-3 cm or for specific sublocations in the liver (e.g. subphrenic or perivascular sites), with moderate quality of evidence (reference to the grading system of the American Society for Radiation Oncology Primary Liver Cancer Clinical Guidelines). The pooled grade ≥3 complication rates were 2.9% and 2.8% in the RFA and ablative RT arms, respectively (p = 0.952).
UNASSIGNED: Our study shows that ablative RT can yield oncologic outcomes similar to RFA, and suggests that it can be more effective for the treatment of tumours in locations where RFA is difficult to perform or for large-sized tumours.
UNASSIGNED: This study was registered with PROSPERO (Protocol No: CRD42022332997).
UNASSIGNED: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and ablative radiotherapy (RT) are non-surgical modalities for the treatment of small intrahepatic malignancies. Ablative RT showed oncologic outcomes at least similar to those of RFA, and was more effective at specific locations (e.g. perivascular or subphrenic locations).

UNASSIGNED: Effective transbronchial ablation of lung nodules requires precise catheter delivery to the target lesion and freedom from the bronchoscope for safety throughout the procedure and to allow for multiple catheter insertions. A fully detachable, outside-the-scope (OTS) probe system was developed that attaches to a flexible bronchoscope. Using this system, the operator can deploy the probe in the target and completely detach it from the scope. Our aim was to demonstrate the endobronchial deployment accuracy and feasibility of an OTS, detachable, simulated ablation catheter driven to peripheral lung targets in ex vivo-ventilated human lung models.
UNASSIGNED: A balloon catheter inflated with radiopaque contrast was used as a simulated peripheral target in freshly explanted lungs from lung transplant recipients. A simulated ablation catheter was positioned outside and aligned to the tip of the bronchoscope using the OTS system. Under fluoroscopic guidance, the bronchoscope and the catheter were driven toward the target in mechanically ventilated lungs. Once the catheter tip was confirmed within the target, the OTS system was released and the probe was detached from the scope. The bronchoscope was retracted and fluoroscopy was used to confirm the position of the catheter.
UNASSIGNED: Twelve peripheral targets were simulated. The ablation catheter was successfully deployed with its tip positioned within 5 mm from the target and confirmed stability during multiple cycles of ventilation.
UNASSIGNED: A novel, detachable, OTS system can be successfully deployed in peripheral lung targets with potential clinical applications for multiple procedures in advanced bronchoscopy where scope freedom is advantageous.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the therapy response and safety of microwave (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of liver metastases using a dual ablation system.
METHODS: Fifty patients with liver metastases (23 men, mean age: 62.8 ± 11.8 years) were randomly assigned to MWA or RFA for thermal ablation using a one generator dual ablation system. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was acquired before treatment and 24 h post ablation. The morphologic responses to treatment regarding size, volume, necrotic areas, and diffusion characteristics were evaluated by MRI. Imaging follow-up was obtained for one year in three months intervals, whereas clinical follow-up was obtained for two years in all patients.
RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received MWA and 24 patients received RFA (mean diameter: 1.6 cm, MWA: 1.7 cm, RFA: 1.5 cm). The mean volume 24 h after ablation was 37.0 cm3 (MWA: 50.5 cm3, RFA: 22.9 cm3, P < 0.01). The local recurrence rate was 0% (0/26) in the MWA-group and 8.3% (2/24) in the RFA-group (P = 0.09). The rate of newly developed malignant formations was 38.0% (19/50) for both groups (MWA: 38.4%, RFA: 37.5%, P = 0.07). The overall survival rate was 70.0% (35/50) after two years (MWA: 76.9%, RFA: 62.5%, P = 0.60). No major complications were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, MWA and RFA are both safe and effective methods for the treatment of liver metastases with MWA generating greater volumes of ablation. No significant differences were found for overall survival, rate of neoplasm, or major complications between both groups.

Video 1EUS-guided microwave ablation of an unresectable pancreatic mass using a novel generator platform and a specialized 19.5-gauge needle antenna.

UNASSIGNED: Percutaneous ablation is an important part of management strategy for liver tumors. While radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation are the most widely used ablative techniques, cryoablation (CA) has several technical advantages but has been underused till recently. In this study, we report the initial experience with percutaneous CA of liver tumors.
UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective evaluation of consecutive patients with liver tumors who underwent percutaneous CA between October 2018 and August 2019. The ablation procedures were performed under combined ultrasound and computed tomography guidance using argon-helium-based CA systems. The baseline tumor characteristics (including size and location), Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage, and Child-Pugh score were recorded. Each patient underwent a follow-up after 1 month and at 3 months subsequently. Technical success, complete response, local tumor progression, and overall survival were evaluated.
UNASSIGNED: Nine patients (mean age, 62.4 years, median age, 66 years, five men and four women) with 10 liver tumors (mean size, 2.22 cm) underwent CA. Seven (77.8%) patients had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and 2 patients had solitary liver metastasis. One patient with HCC had two lesions, while the rest had only one lesion. Of the two metastatic lesions, one was from carcinoma of the cervix and the other was from jejunal neuroendocrine tumor. Five tumors were located adjacent to the gallbladder, two lesions were adjacent to the right portal vein, two lesions were subcapsular, and one lesion was adjacent to the stomach. Technical success was achieved in all the patients. Complete response was achieved in 7 (77.8%) patients. The median follow-up period was 7 months (range, 3-12 months). There was no local tumor progression and no death during the follow-up period. No procedure-related complication was seen.
UNASSIGNED: Percutaneous CA of hepatic tumors is technically feasible and is a safe and effective ablative technique.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a standard treatment for small inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Studies on mid- and long-term outcome of RFA as first-line therapy for HCC from India are limited.
UNASSIGNED: We evaluated consecutive HCC patients who underwent RFA as primary treatment modality at our institute between July 2009 and April 2016. The median follow-up period was 26 months, range 1-84 months. We evaluated post-RFA tumor response, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and local tumor progression (LTP). Prognostic factors were also analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: In 147 patients (male:female = 121:26; mean age, 59.2 years), 209 RFA sessions were done for 228 lesions (mean size of 21.5 ± 8.3 mm, range 10-50 mm). Primary success rate was 94.2%. The estimated cumulative proportion survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 90.2%, 63.8%, and 60.2%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of LTP estimated at 1, 3, and 5 years was 13.1%, 19.7%, and 20.1%, respectively. The mean estimate of LTP-free survival was 53.6 months (95% confidence interval: 0.49-0.58) which is 58.2 months in <3 cm lesions and 20.4 months in >3 cm lesions (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in LTP rates between lesions in perivascular versus nonperivascular location (P = 0.71) and surface versus parenchymal lesions (P = 0.66). The mean DFS was 30.3 months (95% CI: 25.6-35.0). For OS, age and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B were significant factors while for LTP, tumor size >3 cm was significant. Higher baseline alpha-fetoprotein level and LTP were poor predictors for DFS. Complication rate per RFA session was 7/209 (3.3%).
UNASSIGNED: RFA is a safe and effective curative modality for first-line treatment of HCC < 3 cm.

UNASSIGNED: The present study aimed to evaluate the short-term clinical feasibility and efficacy of the minimally invasive endoscopic technique (MIET) for the treatment of symptomatic benign bone lesions.
UNASSIGNED: This single-institution retrospective study investigated 34 patients with symptomatic benign bone lesions from December 2015 to June 2017. Patients involved in this study presented with definite indications for surgical intervention. All procedures were performed under endoscopic guidance for direct visualization followed by complete curettage of tumor tissue. There were 19 males and 15 females, with a mean age of 33.3 ± 12.7 years (range, 17-68 years). The lesions were located in the upper extremities (20, 58.8%), lower extremities (9, 26.5%) and pelvis (5, 14.7%). Primary outcomes were measured before and after intervention using the visual analog scale (VAS), the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) stage and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) scoring system.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 34 patients included in this study, all completed follow-up examinations, with a mean follow-up duration of 22.4 ± 7.6 months (range, 13-35 months). Significantly improved VAS, MSTS and SF-36 scores were observed at 3 months after the initial treatment (P < 0.001), suggesting enhanced pain relief and improved functional recovery and quality of life following surgery. All procedures were technically successful, with the exception of 3 cases (8.8%) manifesting access site numbness; these patients recovered within the follow-up period through symptomatic treatment alone. Only 2 patients (5.9%; one osteoblastoma and one enchondroma) experienced local recurrence and underwent standard open curettage within the follow-up period. All patients showed functional stability without any major complications.
UNASSIGNED: The MIET is an effective and safe alternative treatment for symptomatic benign bone lesions. The short-term efficacy of MIET was favorable and associated with improved pain palliation, quality of life and functional recovery.

UNASSIGNED: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is usually a fatal malignancy with rising incidence globally. Surgical resection currently remains the only curative treatment. However, as only a minority of iCCA is amenable to resection, new therapeutic modalities are needed. Our aims were to systematically review and perform a meta-analysis on the existing literature regarding the use of ablative therapies for iCCA and to assess their efficacy as a treatment modality by calculating pooled survival results and investigate associations between prognostic factors and survival.
UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive search of the PubMed database for relevant articles was performed. Studies assessing survival in patients with iCCA undergoing ablation were included. Data were extracted on patient, tumour and treatment characteristics and survival. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool the data. Galbraith plots were used to investigate heterogeneity; bubble plots were formulated using regression-based meta-analysis.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 10 studies were included in the final analysis, yielding an aggregate of 206 patients (69.5% males, median age: 51.2-72.5) and 320 tumours. Of all patients, 70.4% were recurrent cases of iCCA, and 29.6% were cases of primary iCCA. The median overall survival ranged from 8.7 to 52.4 months. Pooled 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 76% (95% confidence interval: 68-83%), 33% (21-44%) and 16% (7-26%), respectively. No significant association was found between the median age, number of tumours or median tumour size and 1-year survival.
UNASSIGNED: Ablative therapies display promising potential as treatment modalities for iCCA. However, further research is necessary to validate these findings.