Pneumonia is a lower respiratory tract infection caused by the inability to clear pathogens from the lower airway and alveoli. Cytokines and local inflammatory markers are released, causing further damage to the lungs through the accumulation of white blood cells and fluid congestion, leading to pus in the parenchyma. The Infectious Diseases Society of America defines pneumonia as the presence of new lung infiltrate with other clinical evidence supporting infection, including new fever, purulent sputum, leukocytosis, and decline in oxygenation. Importantly, lower respiratory infections remain the most deadly communicable disease. Pneumonia is subdivided into three categories: (1) community acquired, (2) hospital acquired, and (3) ventilator associated. Therapy for each differs based on the severity of the disease and the presence of risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

The primary objective of this study was to assess the negative predictive value of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal swabs in MRSA diabetic foot infections. MEDLINE and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to May 1, 2020. The following search string was used: (methicillin-resistant S. aureus OR MRSA) AND (nasal OR nares) AND (diabetic OR foot OR diabetic foot infections). All studies that contained data comparing MRSA nasal swab positivity to wound cultures from diabetic foot infections and met the inclusion criteria were included. Among the 86 relevant studies, 6 studies with 8706 diabetic patients were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline extension for Diagnostic Test Accuracy reviews was followed. The primary meta-analysis outcomes were the negative and positive predictive values of MRSA nasal swabs for MRSA diabetic foot infections. The pooled specificity and pooled sensitivity were determined by generating hierarchical summary receiver characteristic operating curves. In the bivariate meta-analysis, involving the 6 studies, pooled sensitivity and specificity was 41.7% (95% confidence interval = 32.9, 51) and 94.1% (95% confidence interval = 89.5, 96.8), respectively. In low-moderate MRSA prevalence levels (<15%), negative predictive value of MRSA nasal swab was >90% and positive predictive value was <55%. This meta-analysis suggests that in patients with diabetic foot infections, the nasal swab MRSA screen has a poor positive predictive value but an excellent negative predictive value in regions of low to moderate prevalence of MRSA diabetic foot infections.

Pneumonia is a lower respiratory tract infection caused by the inability to clear pathogens from the lower airway and alveoli. Cytokines and local inflammatory markers are released, causing further damage to the lungs through the accumulation of white blood cells and fluid congestion, leading to pus in the parenchyma. The Infectious Diseases Society of America defines pneumonia as the presence of new lung infiltrate with other clinical evidence supporting infection, including new fever, purulent sputum, leukocytosis, and decline in oxygenation. Importantly, lower respiratory infections remain the most deadly communicable disease. Pneumonia is subdivided into three categories: (1) community acquired, (2) hospital acquired, and (3) ventilator associated. Therapy for each differs based on the severity of the disease and the presence of risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to examine the clinical value of serial MRSA surveillance cultures to rule out a MRSA diagnosis on subsequent cultures during a patient\'s surgical intensive care unit (SICU) admission.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study to evaluate patients who received a MRSA surveillance culture at admission to the SICU (n = 6,915) and collected and assessed all patient cultures for MRSA positivity during their admission. The primary objective was to evaluate the transition from a MRSA negative surveillance on admission to MRSA positive on any subsequent culture during a patient\'s SICU stay. Percent of MRSA positive cultures by type following MRSA negative surveillance cultures was further analyzed.
RESULTS: 6,303 patients received MRSA nasal surveillance cultures at admission with 21,597 clinical cultures and 7,269 MRSA surveillance cultures. Of the 6,163 patients with an initial negative, 53 patients (0.87%) transitioned to MRSA positive. Of the 139 patients with an initial positive, 30 (21.6%) had subsequent MRSA positive cultures. Individuals who had an initial MRSA surveillance positive status on admission predicted MRSA positivity rates for cultures in qualitative lower respiratory cultures (64.3% versus. 3.1%), superficial wound (60.0% versus 1.6%), deep wound (39.0% versus 0.8%), tissue culture (26.3% versus 0.6%), and body fluid (20.8% versus 0.7%) cultures when compared to MRSA negative patients on admission.
CONCLUSIONS: Following MRSA negative nasal surveillance cultures patients showed low likelihood of MRSA infection suggesting empiric anti-MRSA treatment is unnecessary for specific patient populations. SICU patient\'s MRSA status at admission should guide empiric anti-MRSA therapy.