Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising new modality for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). The current study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of SBRT in patients with LAPC (NCT03648632).
This prospective single institution phase II study recruited patients with histologically or cytologically proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreas after more than two months of combination chemotherapy with no sign of progressive disease. Patients were prescribed 50-60 Gy in 5-8 fractions. Patients were initially treated on a standard linac (n = 4). Since 2019, patients were treated using online magnetic resonance (MR) image-guidance on a 1.5 T MRI-linac, where the treatment plan was adapted to the anatomy of the day. The primary endpoint was resection rate.
Twenty-eight patients were enrolled between August 2018 and March 2022. All patients had non-resectable disease at time of diagnosis. Median follow-up from inclusion was 28.3 months (95 % CI 24.0-NR). Median progression-free and overall survival from inclusion were 7.8 months (95 % CI 5.0-14.8) and 16.5 months (95 % CI 10.7-22.6), respectively. Six patients experienced grade III treatment-related adverse events (jaundice, nausea, vomiting and/or constipation). One of the initial four patients receiving treatment on a standard linac experienced a grade IV perforation of the duodenum. Six patients (21 %) underwent resection. A further one patient was offered resection but declined.
This study demonstrates that SBRT in patients with LAPC was associated with promising overall survival and resection rates. Furthermore, SBRT was safe and well tolerated, with limited severe toxicities.

We characterized the on-board megavoltage imager (MVI) of a magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy machine for beam output checks. Linearity and repeatability of its dose response were investigated. Alignment relative to the beam under clinical circumstances was evaluated for a year using daily measurements. Linearity and short-term repeatability were excellent. Long-term repeatability drifted 0.8 % per year, which can be overcome by monthly cross calibrations. Long-term alignment was stable. Thus, the MVI has suitable characteristics for beam output checks.

OBJECTIVE: MRI-linear accelerator (MRI-Linac) systems allow for daily tracking of MRI changes during radiotherapy (RT). Since one common MRI-Linac operates at 0.35 T, there are efforts towards developing protocols at that field strength. In this study we demonstrate the implementation of a post-contrast 3DT1-weighted (3D-T1w) and dynamic contrast-enhancement (DCE) protocol to assess glioblastoma response to RT using a 0.35 T MRI-Linac.
METHODS: The protocol implemented was used to acquire 3D-T1w and DCE data from a flow phantom and two patients with glioblastoma (a responder and a non-responder) who underwent RT on a 0.35 T MRI-Linac. The detection of post-contrast-enhanced volumes was evaluated by comparing the 3DT1w images from the 0.35 T MRI-Linac to images obtained using a 3 T scanner. The DCE data were tested temporally and spatially using data from a flow phantom and patients. Ktrans maps were derived from DCE at three time points (a week before treatment-Pre RT, four weeks through treatment-Mid RT, and three weeks after treatment-Post RT) and were validated with patients\' treatment outcomes.
RESULTS: The 3D-T1w contrast-enhancement volumes were visually and volumetrically similar between 0.35 T MRI-Linac and 3 T. DCE images showed temporal stability, and associated Ktrans maps were consistent with patient response to treatment. On average, Ktrans values showed a 54 % decrease and 8.6 % increase for a responder and non-responder respectively when Pre RT and Mid RT images were compared.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the feasibility of obtaining post-contrast 3D-T1w and DCE data from patients with glioblastoma using a 0.35 T MRI-Linac system.

For commissioning and quality assurance for adaptive workflows on the MR-linac, a dosimeter which can measure time-resolved dose during MR image acquisition is desired. The Blue Physics model 10 scintillation dosimeter is potentially an ideal detector for such measurements. However, some detectors can be influenced by the magnetic field of the MR-linac. To assess the calibration methods and magnetic field dependency of the Blue Physics scintillator in the 1.5 T MR-linac. Several calibration methods were assessed for robustness. Detector characteristics and the influence of the calibration methods were assessed based on dose reproducibility, dose linearity, dose rate dependency, relative output factor (ROF), percentage depth dose profile, axial rotation and the radial detector orientation with respect to the magnetic field. The potential application of time-resolved dynamic dose measurements during MRI acquisition was assessed. A variation of calibration factors was observed for different calibration methods. Dose reproducibility, dose linearity and dose rate stability were all found to be within tolerance and were not significantly affected by different calibration methods. Measurements with the detector showed good correspondence with reference chambers. The ROF and radial orientation dependence measurements were influenced by the calibration method used. Axial detector dependence was assessed and relative readout differences of up to 2.5% were observed. A maximum readout difference of 10.8% was obtained when rotating the detector with respect to the magnetic field. Importantly, measurements with and without MR image acquisition were consistent for both static and dynamic situations. The Blue Physics scintillation detector is suitable for relative dosimetry in the 1.5 T MR-linac when measurements are within or close to calibration conditions.

A 1.5T MRI combined with a linear accelerator (Unity®, Elekta; Stockholm, Sweden) is a device that shows promise in MRI-guided stereotactic body radiation treatment (SBRT). Previous studies utilized the manufacturer\'s pre-set MRI sequences (i.e., T2 Weighted (T2W)), which limited the visualization of pancreatic and intra-abdominal tumors and organs at risk (OAR). Here, a T1 Weighted (T1W) sequence was utilized to improve the visualization of tumors and OAR for online adapted-to-position (ATP) and adapted-to-shape (ATS) during MRI-guided SBRT. Twenty-six patients, 19 with pancreatic and 7 with intra-abdominal cancers, underwent CT and MRI simulations for SBRT planning before being treated with multi-fractionated MRI-guided SBRT. The boundary of tumors and OAR was more clearly seen on T1W image sets, resulting in fast and accurate contouring during online ATP/ATS planning. Plan quality in 26 patients was dependent on OAR proximity to the target tumor and achieved 96 ± 5% and 92 ± 9% in gross tumor volume D90% and planning target volume D90%. We utilized T1W imaging (about 120 s) to shorten imaging time by 67% compared to T2W imaging (about 360 s) and improve tumor visualization, minimizing target/OAR delineation uncertainty and the treatment margin for sparing OAR. The average time-consumption of MRI-guided SBRT for the first 21 patients was 55 ± 15 min for ATP and 79 ± 20 min for ATS.

Glioblastoma changes during chemoradiotherapy are inferred from high-field MRI before and after treatment but are rarely investigated during radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning network to automatically segment glioblastoma tumors on daily treatment set-up scans from the first glioblastoma patients treated on MRI-linac. Glioblastoma patients were prospectively imaged daily during chemoradiotherapy on 0.35T MRI-linac. Tumor and edema (tumor lesion) and resection cavity kinetics throughout the treatment were manually segmented on these daily MRI. Utilizing a convolutional neural network, an automatic segmentation deep learning network was built. A nine-fold cross-validation schema was used to train the network using 80:10:10 for training, validation, and testing. Thirty-six glioblastoma patients were imaged pre-treatment and 30 times during radiotherapy (n = 31 volumes, total of 930 MRIs). The average tumor lesion and resection cavity volumes were 94.56 ± 64.68 cc and 72.44 ± 35.08 cc, respectively. The average Dice similarity coefficient between manual and auto-segmentation for tumor lesion and resection cavity across all patients was 0.67 and 0.84, respectively. This is the first brain lesion segmentation network developed for MRI-linac. The network performed comparably to the only other published network for auto-segmentation of post-operative glioblastoma lesions. Segmented volumes can be utilized for adaptive radiotherapy and propagated across multiple MRI contrasts to create a prognostic model for glioblastoma based on multiparametric MRI.

MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) is a highly complex treatment modality, allowing adaptation to anatomical changes occurring from one treatment day to the other (inter-fractional), but also to motion occurring during a treatment fraction (intra-fractional). In this vision paper, we describe the different steps of intra-fractional motion management during MRIgRT, from imaging to beam adaptation, and the solutions currently available both clinically and at a research level. Furthermore, considering the latest developments in the literature, a workflow is foreseen in which motion-induced over- and/or under-dosage is compensated in 3D, with minimal impact to the radiotherapy treatment time. Considering the time constraints of real-time adaptation, a particular focus is put on artificial intelligence (AI) solutions as a fast and accurate alternative to conventional algorithms.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy with multileaf collimator (MLC)-tracking is a promising technique for intra-fractional motion management, achieving high dose conformality without prolonging treatment times. To improve beam-target alignment, the geometric error due to system latency should be reduced by using temporal prediction.
OBJECTIVE: To experimentally compare linear regression (LR) and long-short-term memory (LSTM) motion prediction models for MLC-tracking on an MRI-linac using multiple patient-derived traces with different complexities.
METHODS: Experiments were performed on a prototype 1.0 T MRI-linac capable of MLC-tracking. A motion phantom was programmed to move a target in superior-inferior (SI) direction according to eight lung cancer patient respiratory motion traces. Target centroid positions were localized from sagittal 2D cine MRIs acquired at 4 Hz using a template matching algorithm. The centroid positions were input to one of four motion prediction models. We used (1) a LSTM network which had been optimized in a previous study on patient data from another cohort (offline LSTM). We also used (2) the same LSTM model as a starting point for continuous re-optimization of its weights during the experiment based on recent motion (offline+online LSTM). Furthermore, we implemented (3) a continuously updated LR model, which was solely based on recent motion (online LR). Finally, we used (4) the last available target centroid without any changes as a baseline (no-predictor). The predictions of the models were used to shift the MLC aperture in real-time. An electronic portal imaging device (EPID) was used to visualize the target and MLC aperture during the experiments. Based on the EPID frames, the root-mean-square error (RMSE) between the target and the MLC aperture positions was used to assess the performance of the different motion predictors. Each combination of motion trace and prediction model was repeated twice to test stability, for a total of 64 experiments.
RESULTS: The end-to-end latency of the system was measured to be (389 ± 15) ms and was successfully mitigated by both LR and LSTM models. The offline+online LSTM was found to outperform the other models for all investigated motion traces. It obtained a median RMSE over all traces of (2.8 ± 1.3) mm, compared to the (3.2 ± 1.9) mm of the offline LSTM, the (3.3 ± 1.4) mm of the online LR and the (4.4 ± 2.4) mm when using the no-predictor. According to statistical tests, differences were significant (p-value <0.05) among all models in a pair-wise comparison, but for the offline LSTM and online LR pair. The offline+online LSTM was found to be more reproducible than the offline LSTM and the online LR with a maximum deviation in RMSE between two measurements of 10%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first experimental comparison of different prediction models for MRI-guided MLC-tracking using several patient-derived respiratory motion traces. We have shown that among the investigated models, continuously re-optimized LSTM networks are the most promising to account for the end-to-end system latency in MRI-guided radiotherapy with MLC-tracking.

Possible advantages of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) for the treatment of brain tumors include improved definition of treatment volumes and organs at risk (OARs) that could allow margin reductions, resulting in limited dose to the OARs and/or dose escalation to target volumes. Recently, hybrid systems integrating a linear accelerator and an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan (MRI-linacs, MRL) have been introduced, that could potentially lead to a fully MRI-based treatment workflow.
We performed a systematic review of the published literature regarding the adoption of MRL for the treatment of primary or secondary brain tumors (last update November 3, 2022), retrieving a total of 2487 records; after a selection based on title and abstracts, the full text of 74 articles was analyzed, finally resulting in the 52 papers included in this review.
Several solutions have been implemented to achieve a paradigm shift from CT-based radiotherapy to MRgRT, such as the management of geometric integrity and the definition of synthetic CT models that estimate electron density. Multiple sequences have been optimized to acquire images with adequate quality with on-board MR scanner in limited times. Various sophisticated algorithms have been developed to compensate the impact of magnetic field on dose distribution and calculate daily adaptive plans in a few minutes with satisfactory dosimetric parameters for the treatment of primary brain tumors and cerebral metastases. Dosimetric studies and preliminary clinical experiences demonstrated the feasibility of treating brain lesions with MRL.
The adoption of an MRI-only workflow is feasible and could offer several advantages for the treatment of brain tumors, including superior image quality for lesions and OARs and the possibility to adapt the treatment plan on the basis of daily MRI. The growing body of clinical data will clarify the potential benefit in terms of toxicity and response to treatment.

OBJECTIVE: The current study investigated the impact of abdominal compression on motion and the delivered dose during non-gated, magnetic resonance image (MRI)-guided radiation ablation of adrenal gland metastases.
METHODS: Thirty-one patients with adrenal gland metastases treated to 45-60 Gy in 3-8 fractions on a 1.5 T MRI-linac were included in the study. The patients were breathing freely (n = 14) or with motion restricted by using an abdominal compression belt (n = 17). The time-resolved position of the target in online 2D cine MR images acquired during treatment was assessed and used to estimate the dose delivered to the GTV and abutting luminal organs at risk (OAR).
RESULTS: The median (range) 3D root-mean-square target position error was significantly higher in patients treated without a compression belt [2.9 (1.9-5.6) mm] compared to patients using the belt [2.1 (1.2-3.5) mm] (P < 0.01). The median (range) GTV V95% was significantly reduced from planned 98.6 (65.9-100) % to delivered 96.5 (64.5-99.9) % due to motion (P < 0.01). Most prominent dose reductions were found in patients showing either large target drift or respiration motion and were mainly treated without abdominal compression. Motion did not lead to an increased number of constraint violations for luminal OAR.
CONCLUSIONS: Acceptable target coverage and dose to OAR was observed in the vast majority of patients despite intra-fractional motion during adaptive MRI-guided radiation ablation. The use of abdominal compression significantly reduced the target position error and prevented the most prominent target coverage degradations and is, therefore, recommended as motion management at MRI-linacs.