BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairments are common in alcohol use disorder (AUD), but only a few studies have investigated the accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in this population. We examined the accuracy and precision of the MoCA in detecting cognitive impairment in a sample of patients with AUD. In addition, we investigated whether the MoCA predicts premature discontinuation from treatment.
METHODS: A sample of 126 persons with AUD undergoing treatment in specialist health services were administered the MoCA and a battery of 12 neuropsychological tests. Five cognitive domains were derived from the reference tests. A composite total score from these tests was used as a reference criterion for determining correct and incorrect classifications for the MoCA. We analyzed the optimal cut-off score for the MoCA and the accuracy and agreement of classification between the MoCA and the reference tests.
RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyzes yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77 (95% CI [0.67, 0.87]). Applying 25 as the cut-off, MoCA sensitivity was 0.77 and specificity 0.62. The PPV was 0.53. The NPV was 0.84. Using a cut-off score of 24 yielded a lower sensitivity 0.60, but specificity was significantly better i.e., 0.79. PPV was 0.68. The NPV was 0.82. Kappa agreement between MoCA and the reference tests was fair to moderate, 0.38 for the cut-off of 25, and 0.44 for the cut-off of 24. MoCA did not predict discontinuation from treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate limitations in the classification accuracy of the MoCA in predicting cognitive impairment in AUD. Achieving the right balance between accurately identifying impaired cases without including too many false positives can be challenging. Further, MoCA does not predict discontinuation from treatment. Overall, the results do not support MoCA as a time-efficient screening instrument.

Objective: For over half a century, studies of rare diseases using in-person cognitive tools have faced challenges, such as long study periods and small sample sizes (e.g. n = 10). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was widely employed to assess mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We aimed to validate a modified online version of the MoCA in a large sample of a rare disease (population prevalence < .01%). Method: First, we analyzed 20 previous findings (n = 1,377), comparing the MoCA scores between large groups of neurotypically healthy (NH; n = 837) and cerebellar ataxia (CA; n = 540), where studies were conducted in-person. Second, we administered the MoCA in-person to a group of NH (n = 41) and a large group of CA (n = 103). Third, we administered a video conferencing version of the MoCA to NH (n = 38) and a large group of CA (n = 83). Results: We observed no performance differences between online and in-person MoCA administration in the NH and CA groups (p > .05, η2 = 0.001), supporting reliability. Additionally, our online CA group had lower MoCA scores than the NH group (p < .001, Hedges\' g = 0.68). This result is consistent with previous studies, as demonstrated by our forest plot across 20 previous in-person findings, supporting construct validity. Conclusion: The results indicate that an online screening tool is valid in a large sample of individuals with CA. Online testing is not only time and cost-effective, but facilitates disease management and monitoring, ultimately enabling early detection of MCI.

BACKGROUND: Both cognitive impairment and malnutrition are common in hemodialysis (HD) patients and are associated with increased hospitalization rates, infection, poor clinical outcomes, and mortality. The study investigated the association between cognitive and nutrition status among end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients undergoing hemodialysis.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 115 patients with ESKD who underwent regular hemodialysis (HD). Data collection included the use of screening tools for mild cognitive impairment (MCI), specifically Thai Mental State Examination (TMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). In addition, we collected data using nutritional screening tools including Malnutrition Inflammation Score (MIS) and Nutrition Alert Form (NAF). Our primary outcome was to demonstrate whether there was a relationship between TMSE/MoCA and MIS/NAF scores in this population. Secondary outcomes were a prevalence of MCI and malnutrition status in ESKD patients, an association between TMSE and MoCA with other surrogate nutritional markers, and factors affecting MCI in such patients.
RESULTS: A total of 109 patients undergoing HD completed our protocol. Their mean age was 63.42 (± 15.82) years, and 51.38% were male. Mean TMSE and MoCA were 23.98 (± 5.06) points and 18.3 (± 6.40) points, respectively. The prevalence of TMSE ≤ 23 and MoCA ≤ 24 were 39.45% and 83.49%, respectively. TMSE had a statistically significant negative correlation with MIS (R2 = 0.16, p < 0.001) and NAF. MoCA also negatively correlated with MIS and NAF. The age, total educational year, the status of whether having a caregiver, serum albumin, serum phosphorus level, handgrip strength, and lean mass tissue were correlated with TMSE.
CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional parameters, including MIS score, NAF score, serum albumin, lean tissue mass, and lean tissue index, significantly correlate with TMSE and MoCA.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the collection methods for perilymph fluid biopsy during cochlear implantation, detect levels of amyloid β 42 and 40 (Aβ42 and Aβ40), and total tau (tTau) analytes with a high-precision assay, to compare these levels with patient age and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, and explore potential mechanisms and relationships with otic pathology.
METHODS: Prospective study.
METHODS: Tertiary referral center.
METHODS: Perilymph was collected from 25 patients using polyimide tubing to avoid amyloid adherence to glass, and analyzed with a single-molecule array advanced digital enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay platform for Aβ40, Aβ42, and tTau. Cognition was assessed by MoCA.
RESULTS: Perilymph volumes ranged from ∼1 to 13 µL, with analyte concentrations spanning 2.67 to 1088.26 pg/mL. All samples had detectable levels of tTau, Aβ40, and Aβ42, with a significant positive correlation between Aβ42 and Aβ40 levels. Levels of Aβ42, Aβ40, and tTau were positively correlated with age, while MoCA scores were inversely correlated with age. tTau and Aβ42/Aβ40-ratios were significantly correlated with MoCA scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Alzheimer\'s disease-associated peptides Aβ42, Aβ40, and tau analytes are detectable in human perilymph at levels approximately 10-fold lower than those found in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). These species increase with age and correlate with cognitive impairment indicators, suggesting their potential utility as biomarkers for cognitive impairment in patients undergoing cochlear implantation. Future research should investigate the origin of these analytes in the perilymph and their potential links to inner ear pathologies and hearing loss, as well as their relationships to CSF and plasma levels in individuals.

Standardized neuropsychological instruments are used to evaluate cognitive impairment, but few have been psychometrically evaluated in American Indians. We collected Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in 403 American Indians 70 to 95 years, as well as age, sex, education, bilingual status, depression symptoms, and other neuropsychological instruments. We evaluated inferences of psychometric validity, including scoring inference using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling, generalizability inference using reliability coefficient, and extrapolation inference by examining performance across different contexts and substrata. The unidimensional (total score) model had good fit criteria. Internal consistency reliability was high. MoCA scores were positively associated with crystallized cognition (ρ = 0.48, p < .001) and inversely with depression symptoms (ρ = -0.27, p < .001). Significant differences were found by education (d = 0.79, p < .05) depression (d = 0.484, p < .05), and adjudicated cognitive status (p = .0001) strata; however, MoCA was not sensitive or specific in discriminating cognitive impairment from normal cognition (area under the curve <0.5). MoCA scores had psychometric validity in older American Indians, but education and depression are important contextual features for score interpretability. Future research should evaluate cultural or community-specific adaptations, to improve test discriminability in this underserved population.

Prolonged physical and mental health changes, known as post-COVID conditions (PCC), could impair the quality-of-life (QoL) of healthcare workers. The aim of this study was to identify factors that contribute to cognitive impairments and QoL among COVID-19 survivors working as healthcare workers. This cross-sectional study involved healthcare workers at Prof. Dr. Chairuddin P. Lubis Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital, Medan, Indonesia. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was used to assess the cognitive function, while the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire was used to evaluate the QoL. Factors associated with cognitive and QoL status were examined using Mann-Whitney and Chi-squared tests. A total of 100 COVID-19 survivors were included in the study, most of whom were female (74%), aged ≤35 years (95%), and were doctors (62%). Only 22% of the participants had a normal BMI, 93% had a history of mild COVID-19, and 54% had one comorbidity. The Overall MoCA score averaged 24.18±2.86, indicating mild cognitive impairment among the groups. The distribution of MoCA scores had similar patterns with no significant differences based on age, gender, comorbidities, BMI, COVID-19 severity, and frequency of COVID-19 infection. Interestingly, the number of vaccine doses received by the participants had a statistically significant associated with MoCA scores of which those receiving more than two doses had higher cognitive scores than those with only two doses (p=0.008). Based on categorized MoCA scores (normal vs cognitive impairment), none assessed factors were not significantly associated with cognitive outcomes. The WHOQOL-BREF scores ranged from 62.5 to 95.5, with a mean±SD of 83.67±7.03. None of the assessed factors were associated with WHOQOL-BREF scores among COVID-19 survivors. These findings highlight the need for further study to explore the protective role of vaccination frequency in cognitive impairment and the factors underlying the resilience in QoL among survivors.

OBJECTIVE: The effects of antiseizure medications (ASMs) on cognitive functions have not been fully elucidated. The primary aim of this study was to demonstrate potential changes in cognitive functions in patients diagnosed with epilepsy from both neuropsychological and electrophysiological perspectives. Our secondary objective was to assess the effects of administered ASM on cognitive functions by categorizing patients into different monotherapy and polytherapy groups.
METHODS: A single-center, prospective patient registry study was conducted between May 2022 and June 2023. The inclusion criteria included epilepsy patients aged 18 to 50 years who were receiving ASM) treatment, either as inpatients or outpatients, and who did not have any syndromic diagnosis that may lead to cognitive disfunciton (such as primary progressive myoclonic epilepsies, Down syndrome and so on), and did not diagnosed previously or during examination that could affect dementia or cognitive functions. Patients who were scheduled to initiate new ASM treatment were evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale and Event-Related Potentials (ERP) assessment both before commencing treatment and three months thereafter.
RESULTS: A total of 320 participants were included in the study; 20 healthy controls and 300 epilepsy patients were included. Statistically significant differences were observed between the healthy control group and the epilepsy group in terms of average Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores and event-related potentials (ERPs) (n200, p300 latencies, n2p3 amplitudes) (p<0.05). Similarly, statistically significant differences were observed between the monotherapy and polytherapy groups in terms of average MoCA and ERP scores (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the detrimental effects of certain ASMs, particularly topiramate and carbamazepine, on cognitive functions. Furthermore, the negative impact on cognitive performance became more pronounced with an increasing number of concurrently used ASMs (polytherapy), with topiramate showing notable effects.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the effect of pharmacological modulation of the rehabilitation process with the drug mexidol as an adjuvant component of the rehabilitation treatment of cognitive-emotional disorders in patients who have suffered acute cerebral insufficiency (ACI) due to acute cerebrovascular accident or traumatic brain injury.
METHODS: The study was conducted as a randomized interventional prospective study and consisted of 5 visits. Patients were divided into 2 groups: main (n=30, standard therapy + Mexidol IV 500 mg per day for 10 days, followed by Mexidol FORTE 250 orally, 1 tablet 3 times a day for 8 weeks) and control (n=30, standard therapy for 66 days).
RESULTS: The study randomized 60 patients who underwent ACN and received rehabilitation treatment in accordance with regional routing. In the main group, there was an improvement in cognitive functions comparable to the control group (p<0.001, in both groups there was an improvement in the Schulte test «work efficiency» and «total execution time», according to the MoCA scale (visit 5 - 23.8±2.6 vs 22.9±31, p=0.227). A significant superiority of the main group over the control group was shown in such indicators as a decrease in anxiety (according to the HADS scale) (visit 4 - 2.6±2.4 vs 4.4±2.4, p=0.004), a decrease in the severity of depression (according to the Beck scale) (visit 3 - 7.5±4.5 vs 11.4±5.6, p=0.005). There was a tendency for the main group to be superior in terms of muscle strength (according to the MRC scale (visit 4 - 3.3±5.1 vs 2.1±2.2, p=0.051), level of vital activity (according to the ShRM - visit 5 - 2.9±0.7 vs 3.3±0.6, p=0.053). A statistically significant increase in the level of mobility of patients in the group using the drug Mexidol was proven compared to the control group (the difference in the Rivermead index at the 5th visit was 10.3±2.8 and 8.0±2.8, respectively, p=0.006), the average increase in the Rivermead index by visit 5 (5.4±2.1 vs 3.4±1.6, p<0.001). A decrease in intensive care aftereffects syndrome (ITS) scores was detected in both groups; a statistically significant decrease in the severity of ITS in relation to the previous visit was detected only in the group using the drug Mexidol (p<0.001). In the main group, the best indicators of the dynamics of systolic cerebral blood flow velocity and overshoot coefficient were also determined, compared to the control group. There were no adverse events recorded in the study.
CONCLUSIONS: A positive modulating effect of Mexidol has been demonstrated in terms of accelerating the restoration of tolerance to cognitive loads, improving the psycho-emotional background by reducing symptoms of anxiety and depression, and secondary improving the results of motor rehabilitation in the early recovery period in patients who have undergone ACI, including those with manifestations of PIT syndrome. During the study, no adverse events were recorded, as well as significant differences in vital functions in the study groups, which indicates comparable safety of therapy in the control and main groups.
UNASSIGNED: Оценка эффекта фармакологической модуляции реабилитационного процесса препаратом Мексидол в качестве адъювантного компонента реабилитационного лечения когнитивно-эмоциональных нарушений у пациентов, перенесших острую церебральную недостаточность (ОЦН) вследствие острого нарушения мозгового кровообращения или черепно-мозговой травмы.
UNASSIGNED: Проведено рандомизированное интервенционное проспективное исследование, которое состояло из 5 визитов. Пациенты разделены на группы основную (ОГ, n=30, получали стандартную терапию и Мексидол в/в 500 мг/сут 10 дней с последующим назначением препарата Мексидол ФОРТЕ 250 перорально по 1 таблетке 3 раза в сутки 8 нед) и сравнения (ГС, n=30, получали только стандартную терапию в течение 66 дней).
UNASSIGNED: В ОГ отмечено сопоставимое с ГС улучшение когнитивных функций (p<0,001) (в обеих группах улучшение результатов выполнения теста Шульте по критериям «эффективность работы» и «суммарное время выполнения», по шкале MoCA (на визите 5 — 23,8±2,6 и 22,9±3,0 балла, p=0,227)). Показано значимое превосходство ОГ над ГС по таким показателям, как уменьшение выраженности тревоги (шкала HADS), визит 4 — 2,6±2,4 против 4,4±2,4 балла (p=0,004), и депрессии (шкала Бека), визит 3 — 7,5±4,5 против 11,4± 5,6 балла (p=0,005). Отмечена тенденция превосходства ОГ по показателям мышечной силы (шкала MRC), визит 4 — 3,3±5,1 против 2,1±2,2 балла (p=0,051) и уровня жизнедеятельности (по ШРМ), визит 5 — 2,9±0,7 против 3,3±0,6 балла (p=0,053). Доказано статистически значимое повышение уровня мобильности пациентов ОГ по сравнению с ГС (разница значений индекса Ривермид на визите 5 — 10,3±2,8 и 8,0±2,8 балла, p=0,006), среднее повышение индекса Ривермид к визиту 5 — 5,4±2,1 против 3,4±1,6 баллов (p<0,001). Выявлено снижение баллов синдрома последствий интенсивной терапии (ПИТС) в обеих группах, статистически значимое снижение выраженности ПИТС по отношению к предыдущему визиту выявлено только в ОГ (p<0,001). В ОГ также определялись лучшие, по сравнению с контролем, показатели динамики систолической скорости мозгового кровотока и коэффициента овершута. В исследовании не было зарегистрировано нежелательных явлений (НЯ).
UNASSIGNED: Продемонстрирован положительный модулирующий эффект препарата Мексидол в отношении ускорения восстановления толерантности к когнитивным нагрузкам, улучшения психоэмоционального фона за счет снижения симптомов тревоги и депрессии и вторичного улучшения результатов двигательной реабилитации в раннем восстановительном периоде у пациентов, перенесших ОЦН, в том числе с проявлениями ПИТС. В ходе исследования не зарегистрировано НЯ и значимых отличий жизненно важных функций, что указывает на сопоставимую безопасность терапии в ОГ и ГС.

Neurofilament light chain (NFL) is a biomarker for neuroaxonal damage and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) for reactive astrocytosis. Both processes occur in cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), but studies investigating the potential of NFL and GFAP as markers for CAA are lacking. We aimed to investigate NFL and GFAP as biomarkers for neuroaxonal damage and astrocytosis in CAA.
For this cross-sectional study serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected between 2010 and 2020 from controls, (pre)symptomatic Dutch-type hereditary (D-CAA) mutation-carriers and participants with sporadic CAA (sCAA) from two prospective CAA studies at two University hospitals in the Netherlands. NFL and GFAP levels were measured with Simoa-assays. The association between NFL and GFAP levels and age, cognitive performance (MoCA), CAA-related MRI markers (CAA-CSVD-burden) and Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels in CSF were assessed with linear regression adjusted for confounders. The control group was divided in age < 55 and ≥55 years to match the specific groups.
We included 187 participants: 28 presymptomatic D-CAA mutation-carriers (mean age 40 years), 29 symptomatic D-CAA participants (mean age 58 years), 59 sCAA participants (mean age 72 years), 33 controls < 55 years (mean age 42 years) and 38 controls ≥ 55 years (mean age 65 years). In presymptomatic D-CAA, only GFAP in CSF (7.7*103pg/mL vs. 4.4*103pg/mL in controls; P<.001) was increased compared to controls. In symptomatic D-CAA, both serum (NFL:26.2pg/mL vs. 12.5pg/mL; P=0.008, GFAP:130.8pg/mL vs. 123.4pg/mL; P=0.027) and CSF (NFL:16.8*102pg/mL vs. 7.8*102pg/mL; P=0.01 and GFAP:11.4*103pg/mL vs. 7.5*103pg/mL; P<.001) levels were higher than in controls and serum levels (NFL:26.2pg/mL vs. 6.7pg/mL; P=0.05 and GFAP:130.8pg/mL vs. 66.0pg/mL; P=0.004) were higher than in pre-symptomatic D-CAA. In sCAA, only NFL levels were increased compared to controls in both serum (25.6pg/mL vs. 12.5pg/mL; P=0.005) and CSF (20.0*102pg/mL vs 7.8*102pg/mL; P=0.008). All levels correlated with age. Serum NFL correlated with MoCA (P=0.008) and CAA-CSVD score (P<.001). NFL and GFAP in CSF correlated with Aβ42 levels (P=0.01/0.02).
GFAP level in CSF is an early biomarker for CAA and is increased years before symptom onset. NFL and GFAP levels in serum and CSF are biomarkers for advanced CAA.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1325215.].