MLH1 plays a critical role in DNA mismatch repair and genome maintenance. MLH1 deficiency promotes cancer development and progression, but the mechanism underlying MLH1 regulation remains enigmatic. In this study, we demonstrated that MLH1 protein is degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system and have identified vital cis-elements and trans-factors involved in MLH1 turnover. We found that the region encompassing the amino acids 516 to 650 is crucial for MLH1 degradation. The mismatch repair protein PMS2 may shield MLH1 from degradation as it binds to the MLH1 segment key to its turnover. Furthermore, we have identified the E3 ubiquitin ligase UBR4 and the deubiquitylase USP5, which oppositely modulate MLH1 stability. In consistence, UBR4 or USP5 deficiency affects the cellular response to nucleotide analog 6-TG, supporting their roles in regulating mismatch repair. Our study has revealed important insights into the regulatory mechanisms underlying MLH1 proteolysis, critical to DNA mismatch repair related diseases.

The human alkylation B (AlkB) homologs, ALKBH2 and ALKBH3, respond to methylation damage to maintain genomic integrity and cellular viability. Both ALKBH2 and ALKBH3 are direct reversal repair enzymes that remove 1-methyladenine (1meA) and 3-methylcytosine (3meC) lesions commonly generated by alkylating chemotherapeutic agents. Thus, the existence of deficiencies in ALKBH proteins can be exploited in synergy with chemotherapy. In this study, we investigated possible interactions between ALKBH2 and ALKBH3 with other proteins that could alter damage response and discovered an interaction with the mismatch repair (MMR) system. To test whether the lack of active MMR impacts ALKBH2 and/or ALKBH3 response to methylating agents, we generated cells deficient in ALKBH2, ALKBH3, or both in addition to Mlh homolog 1 (MLH1), another MMR protein. We found that MLH1koALKBH3ko cells showed enhanced resistance toward SN1- and SN2-type methylating agents, whereas MLH1koALKBH2ko cells were only resistant to SN1-type methylating agents. Concomitant loss of ALKBH2 and ALKBH3 (ALKBH2ko3ko) rendered cells sensitive to SN1- and SN2-agents, but the additional loss of MLH1 enhanced resistance to both types of damage. We also showed that ALKBH2ko3ko cells have an ATR-dependent arrest at the G2/M checkpoint, increased apoptotic signaling, and replication fork stress in response to methylation. However, these responses were not observed with the loss of functional MLH1 in MLH1koALKBH2ko3ko cells. Finally, in MLH1koALKBH2ko3ko cells, we observed elevated mutant frequency in untreated and temozolomide treated cells. These results suggest that obtaining a more accurate prognosis of chemotherapeutic outcome requires information on the functionality of ALKBH2, ALKBH3, and MLH1.

Background: In cancer care, the MLH1 gene is crucial for DNA mismatch repair (MMR), serving as a vital tumor suppressor. Evaluating MLH1 protein expression status, followed by analysis of MLH1 promoter methylation, has become a key diagnostic and prognostic approach. Our study investigates the complex link between MLH1 methylation and prognosis in endometrial adenocarcinoma (EA) patients. Methodology: MLH1 methylation status was accessed by a Pyrosequencing (PSQ) assay. Qualitative positivity for methylation was established if it exceeded the 11% cut-off; as well, a quantitative methylation analysis was conducted to establish correlations with clinicopathological data, relapse-free survival, and disease-free survival. Results: Our study revealed that 33.3% of patients without MLH1 methylation experienced relapses, surpassing the 23.3% in patients with methylation. Furthermore, 16.7% of patients without methylation succumbed to death, with a slightly higher rate of 17.6% in methylated patients. Qualitative comparisons highlighted that the mean methylation rate in patients experiencing relapse was 35.8%, whereas in those without relapse, it was 42.2%. This pattern persisted in disease-specific survival (DSS), where deceased patients exhibited a higher mean methylation level of 49.1% compared to living patients with 38.8%. Conclusions: Our findings emphasize the efficacy of PSQ for evaluating MLH1 methylation. While unmethylation appears to be associated with a higher relapse rate, the survival rate does not seem to be influenced by methylation. Quantitative percentages suggest that elevated MLH1 methylation is linked to relapse and mortality, though a study with a larger sample size would be essential for statistically significant results.

Patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) showing mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency may benefit from immunotherapy. Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a hallmark of MMR deficiency (MMR-D). Here, we estimated the prevalence of MSI in PC, investigated germline and somatic mutations in the three MMR genes (MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6), and assessed the relationship between MMR genes mutations and MSI status in PC. Clinical specimens from PC patients were analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing, including paired normal and tumor specimens from 155 patients, tumor-only specimens from 86 patients, and normal-only specimens from 379 patients. The MSI status of 235 PCs was assessed via PCR. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline variants in the MMR genes were identified in 1.1% of patients, while somatic variants were found in 2.6% of patients. No MSI-H tumors were detected. One patient carried two variants (P (VAF = 0.57) and LP (VAF = 0.25)) simultaneously; however, their germline/somatic status remains unknown due to the investigation focusing solely on the tumor and MSI analysis was not performed for this patient. MSI is rare in PC, even in tumors with MMR genes mutations. Our findings underscore the importance of assessing tumor MMR-D status in PC patients with confirmed Lynch syndrome when deciding whether to prescribe immunotherapy.

Prime editing (PE), a recent progression in CRISPR-based technologies, holds promise for precise genome editing without the risks associated with double-strand breaks. It can introduce a wide range of changes, including single-nucleotide variants, insertions, and small deletions. Despite these advancements, there is a need for further optimization to overcome certain limitations to increase efficiency. One such approach to enhance PE efficiency involves the inhibition of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system, specifically MLH1. The rationale behind this approach lies in the MMR system\'s role in correcting mismatched nucleotides during DNA replication. Inhibiting this repair pathway creates a window of opportunity for the PE machinery to incorporate the desired edits before permanent DNA repair actions. However, as the MMR system plays a crucial role in various cellular processes, it is important to consider the potential risks associated with manipulating this system. The new versions of PE with enhanced efficiency while blocking MLH1 are called PE4 and PE5. Here, we explore the potential risks associated with manipulating the MMR system. We pay special attention to the possible implications for human health, particularly the development of cancer.

The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system promotes genome stability and protects humans from certain types of cancer. Its primary function is the correction of DNA polymerase errors. MutLα is an important eukaryotic MMR factor. We have examined the contributions of MutLα to maintaining genome stability. We show here that loss of MutLα in yeast increases the genome-wide mutation rate by ∼130-fold and generates a genome-wide mutation spectrum that consists of small indels and base substitutions. We also show that loss of yeast MutLα leads to error-prone MMR that produces T > C base substitutions in 5\'-ATA-3\' sequences. In agreement with this finding, our examination of human whole-genome DNA sequencing data has revealed that loss of MutLα in induced pluripotent stem cells triggers error-prone MMR that leads to the formation of T > C mutations in 5\'-NTN-3\' sequences. Our further analysis has shown that MutLα-independent MMR plays a role in suppressing base substitutions in N3 homopolymeric runs. In addition, we describe that MutLα preferentially protects noncoding DNA from mutations. Our study defines the contributions of MutLα-dependent and independent mechanisms to genome-wide MMR.

The pathological huntingtin (HTT) trinucleotide repeat underlying Huntington disease (HD) continues to expand throughout life. Repeat length correlates both with earlier age at onset (AaO) and faster progression, making slowing its expansion an attractive therapeutic approach. Genome-wide association studies have identified candidate variants associated with altered AaO and progression, with many found in DNA mismatch repair (MMR)-associated genes. We examine whether lowering expression of these genes affects the rate of repeat expansion in human ex vivo models using HD iPSCs and HD iPSC-derived striatal medium spiny neuron-enriched cultures. We have generated a stable CRISPR interference HD iPSC line in which we can specifically and efficiently lower gene expression from a donor carrying over 125 CAG repeats. Lowering expression of each member of the MMR complexes MutS (MSH2, MSH3, and MSH6), MutL (MLH1, PMS1, PMS2, and MLH3), and LIG1 resulted in characteristic MMR deficiencies. Reduced MSH2, MSH3, and MLH1 slowed repeat expansion to the largest degree, while lowering either PMS1, PMS2, or MLH3 slowed it to a lesser degree. These effects were recapitulated in iPSC-derived striatal cultures where MutL factor expression was lowered. CRISPRi-mediated lowering of key MMR factor expression to levels feasibly achievable by current therapeutic approaches was able to effectively slow the expansion of the HTT CAG tract. We highlight members of the MutL family as potential targets to slow pathogenic repeat expansion with the aim to delay onset and progression of HD and potentially other repeat expansion disorders exhibiting somatic instability.

UNASSIGNED: MLH1, one of the MMR proteins, is linked to DNA replication, its role being to repair the incorrect DNA sequences and to replace them with proper ones. The loss of the MLH1 gene expression is part of Lynch syndrome which can lead to a series of cancers like colorectal and endometrial ones. The aim of this paper is to correlate the levels of MLH1 in four different bio-logical fluids with clinicopathological features in colorectal cancer patients in order to predict them with high probability. Therefore, a mathematical model with given code in Matlab has been proposed to get the clinicopathological features with high probability by only introducing the values for MLH1 concentrations. All these data can be obtained in a very short time even before surgery which can be very helpful the surgeon and the oncologist.
UNASSIGNED: Four types of samples (whole blood, saliva, urine and tissue) were analyzed using stochastic microsensors; concentrations of MLH1 were determined and compared with different macroscopic and micro-scopic pathological features to obtain mathematical models for early, non-invasive diagnostic of colorectal adenocarcinoma.
UNASSIGNED: There have been established criteria and mathematical models for tumor location, TNM grading system, depth of the tumor, lymphatic, vascular and perineural invasions and the presence of mucus in the tumoral mass.
UNASSIGNED: By using whole blood, saliva and urine samples, the location can be approximated. The proposed mathematical models aimed to allow a minim/noninvasive characterization of the tumor and its location which can help the surgeon and the oncologist to choose faster the personalized treatment.

The accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes during the Meiosis I reductional division in most sexually reproducing eukaryotes requires crossing over between homologs. In baker\'s yeast approximately 80% of meiotic crossovers result from Mlh1-Mlh3 and Exo1 acting to resolve double-Holliday junction intermediates in a biased manner. Little is known about how Mlh1-Mlh3 is recruited to recombination intermediates to perform its role in crossover resolution. We performed a gene dosage screen in baker\'s yeast to identify novel genetic interactors with Mlh1-Mlh3. Specifically, we looked for genes whose lowered dosage reduced meiotic crossing over using sensitized mlh3 alleles that disrupt the stability of the Mlh1-Mlh3 complex and confer defects in mismatch repair but do not disrupt meiotic crossing over. To our surprise we identified genetic interactions between MLH3 and DMC1, the recombinase responsible for recombination between homologous chromosomes during meiosis. We then showed that Mlh3 physically interacts with Dmc1 in vitro and in vivo. Partial complementation of Mlh3 crossover functions was observed when MLH3 was expressed under the control of the CLB1 promoter (NDT80 regulon), suggesting that Mlh3 function can be provided late in meiotic prophase at some functional cost. A model for how Dmc1 could facilitate Mlh1-Mlh3\'s role in crossover resolution is presented.

Background Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a genetic condition caused by errors in DNA repair genes that cause colorectal cancer (CRC). The literature contradicts the frequency of MSI in sporadic CRCs and its effect on prognosis. This study investigated the distribution of clinicopathologic features and the relationship between MSI and survival outcomes. Methodology This is a retrospective study of 101 consecutive cases of CRC and immunohistochemical studies. All cases were retrospectively reviewed and reevaluated by histological grade, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor borders, dirty necrosis, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), Crohn\'s-like lymphoid reaction, mucinous and medullary differentiation, and tumoral budding from pathological slides. An immunohistochemical study was performed in appropriate blocks for using MLH-1, MSH-2, MSH-6, and PMS-2. We collected the clinical stage, pathological tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, age, sex, tumor diameter, distant metastasis, localization, and survival information from patients\' clinical data. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding age, gender, tumor diameter, histological grade, tumor border, dirty necrosis, TILs, N and M stage, perineural and lymphovascular invasion, mucinous differentiation, medullary differentiation, and tumor budding characteristics of the patients. The MSI-H group was more frequently located in the right colon and transverse colon (p < 0.001), and the T stage was higher among them than in the MSI-L group (p = 0.014). Upon multivariate regression analysis, MSI status had no significant effect on survival time. Age and stage N and M were independent prognostic factors for colon cancer prognosis. Conclusions Our study presented the distribution of clinicopathological features and their relationship with MSI for 101 regional CRC patients. MSI status was detected by immunohistochemistry. Identifying MSI in CRCs may help personalize therapy planning. As the distribution of the features may vary from population to population, further investigations are needed on this topic.