OBJECTIVE: MET exon 14 skipping alterations (METex14+) represent a heterogeneous subgroup of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with distinct biological and genomic features. We characterized this heterogeneity in a large cohort, integrating genomic and transcriptomic profiling with clinical outcomes, to elucidate the histologic and molecular traits and survival patterns of METex14+ NSCLC.
METHODS: NSCLC tissue samples (n = 28,739) underwent DNA-based next-generation sequencing (592 genes, NextSeq) or whole-exome sequencing (NovaSeq), RNA-sequencing including whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS, NovaSeq), and PD-L1 IHC (Dako 22C3) at Caris Life Sciences. Immune cell fractions were estimated from bulk RNA sequencing (quanTIseq). Real-world survival data (mOS) was calculated from insurance claims. Statistical analyses employed Chi-square, Fisher\'s exact, or Mann-Whitney U and log-rank tests and were corrected for hypothesis testing where applicable.
RESULTS: A total of 711 METex14+ cases were detected. Of 575 cases of defined histology, 77 (13.6 %) were squamous (Sq), 474 (82.3 %) were nSq (non-squamous), and 24 (4.1 %) were adenosquamous. Mutations in POT1 and BRCA2 were enriched, and amplifications in MDM2, HMGA2, CDK4, and MET were common in METex14+ tumors. TMB-high and TP53 mutated tumors were reduced in METex14+ independent of histology. KEAP1 (2.1 vs 14.7 %) and STK11 mutations (0.8 vs 17.1 %) were reduced only in METex14+ nSq (vs METex14+ Sq, q < 0.05). While the prevalence of PD-L1 high tumors was enriched in METex14+ independent of histology, T-cell inflamed tumors were enriched only in nSq METex14+. B-cells and CD8+ T-cells (1.07-1.43-fold) were enriched in nSq METex14+, and dendritic cells (0.32 fold) were reduced only in METex14+ Sq. METex14+ tumors had a modest improvement in mOS compared to METex14- tumors (mOS = 22.9 m vs 18.6 m, HR = 0.914, p = 0.04). Moreover, METex14+ tumors who received immunotherapy (IO) had a modest improvement in survival (mOS = 27.5 m vs 21.8 m; HR = 0.803, p = 0.03) compared to those who did not receive IO. METex14+ nSq tumors were associated with improved mOS compared to METex14+ Sq tumors (mOS = 27.7 vs 8.9 m, HR = 0.493, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: METex14+ alterations are a heterogeneous subgroup of NSCLC. Our analysis reveals that METex14+ nSq exhibit improved survival compared to METex14+ Sq. The distinct genomic and transcriptomic variations across histologies warrant clinical consideration.

BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutation is a rare alteration in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), occurring in about 3%-4% of cases. Here we report disease and patient characteristics, and efficacy and tolerability of MET inhibitors among advanced METex14 NSCLC patients from the Italian real-world registry ATLAS.
METHODS: Clinical-pathological and molecular data, and treatment efficacy/tolerability outcomes were retrospectively collected from the ATLAS registry.
RESULTS: From July 2020 to July 2023 a total of 146 METex14 advanced NSCLC patients were included across 27 Italian centers. Median age was 74 years, and most patients were male (52%), with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < 2 (72%) and adenocarcinoma subtype (83%). One hundred and twenty-five out of 146 (86%) patients received at least one line of systemic anticancer therapy. Fifty-six (38%) were treated with capmatinib and 34 (23%) with tepotinib. 29% and 52% of them received targeted treatment in the first and second line, respectively. In the cohort of patients treated with MET inhibitors, the response rate (RR) was 37% (33% in previously treated patients and 46% in treatment-naïve) with a disease control rate of 62%. With a median follow-up of 10.8 months, progression-free survival was 6.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3-8.3 months] and overall survival was 10.7 months (95% CI 7.2-19.3 months). In patients with measurable brain metastases (17 cases), the intracranial RR was 41%. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 12% of patients with grade 3 peripheral edema in 7% of cases. A fatal adverse reaction occurred in one patient due to pneumonitis. TRAEs-related dose reduction and discontinuation were reported in 6% and 8% of cases, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Capmatinib and tepotinib represent an effective treatment option in NSCLC patients with METex14. Real-world efficacy outcomes are worse than those reported in prospective clinical trials. Their activity is more pronounced in the treatment-naïve population, suggesting that this is the right setting in the management of patients with METex14.

In the diagnostic workup of poorly differentiated tumors, T-cell receptor (TCR) clonality has long been considered as evidence of T-cell lymphoma. MET exon 14 skipping (METex14) is a mutation typically seen in lung adenocarcinoma. Herein, we present the first report of METex14 lung adenocarcinoma with isolated monoclonal TCRγ gene rearrangement. A 69-year-old woman presented to an outside hospital with pleural effusions. A pleural decortication demonstrated malignant cells positive for CD30 and CD138 but negative for BerEP4, KRT5, and EMA. An equivocal HHV8 staining was interpreted as positive, leading to the erroneous outside diagnosis of primary effusion lymphoma. Additional workup at our institution revealed a lack of HHV8 and T-cell markers but the presence of TCRγ clonality, pankeratin, and TTF1 expression. Repeat TCRγ testing on the in-house biopsy was negative for clonality. Next-generation sequencing detected METex14, confirming the diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma. The potential diagnostic pitfall and prognostic/predictive implications are discussed.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive cancer genomic profiling tests have recently been used clinically to guide optimal treatment. Currently approved tests use DNA from tissue or plasma samples to analyze a few hundred genes. RNA panels complement DNA panels to detect fusion and exon skipping.
METHODS: Between April 2017 and March 2022, we analyzed non-small cell lung cancer samples using Todai OncoPanel, a matched tumor/normal pair panel targeting both DNA and RNA. Publicly available genomic data was downloaded from the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database on 2022/11/3.
RESULTS: Sixty non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) samples were analyzed. With the DNA panel, 32 samples (53%) had TP53 loss-of-function mutations. Among adenocarcinoma, 17 (33%) had EGFR activating mutations, and 6 (12%) had ERBB2 activating mutations. One BRCA1 and one BRCA2 pathogenic germline variant were also detected. With the RNA panel, 11 fusion genes were detected, all in adenocarcinoma. Specifically, EML4-ALK and KIF5B-RET were detected from one sample each, and 9 others were all novel fusions with unknown pathogenicity. In addition, 4 of 60 (7%) NSCLC samples harbored MET exon 14 skipping. Analysis of the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database found 37 MET exon 14 splice site mutations in 1514 NSCLC samples (2%, p = 0.039).
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of NSCLC with Todai OncoPanel detected many druggable targets. Its RNA panel may detect MET exon 14 skipping with high sensitivity.

UNASSIGNED: Acquired MET gene amplification, MET exon 14 skip mutations, or MET fusions can emerge as resistance mechanisms to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with lung cancer. The efficacy and safety of combining MET TKIs (such as crizotinib, capmatinib, or tepotinib) with parent TKIs to target acquired MET resistance are not well characterized.
UNASSIGNED: Multi-institutional retrospective chart review identified 83 patients with metastatic oncogene-driven NSCLC that were separated into the following two pairwise matched cohorts: (1) MET cohort (n = 41)-patients with acquired MET resistance continuing their parent TKI with a MET TKI added or (2) Chemotherapy cohort (n = 42)-patients without any actionable resistance continuing their parent TKI with a platinum-pemetrexed added. Clinicopathologic features, radiographic response (by means of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1), survival outcomes, adverse events (AEs) (by means of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0), and genomic data were collected. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Multivariate modeling adjusted for lines of therapy, brain metastases, TP53 mutations, and oligometastatic disease.
UNASSIGNED: Within the MET cohort, median age was 56 years (range: 36-83 y). Most patients were never smokers (28 of 41, 68.3%). Baseline brain metastases were common (21 of 41, 51%). The most common oncogenes in the MET cohort were EGFR (30 of 41, 73.2%), ALK (seven of 41, 17.1%), and ROS1 (two of 41, 4.9%). Co-occurring TP53 mutations (32 of 41, 78%) were frequent. Acquired MET alterations included MET gene amplification (37 of 41, 90%), MET exon 14 mutations (two of 41, 5%), and MET gene fusions (two of 41, 5%). After multivariate adjustment, the objective response rate (ORR) was higher in the MET cohort versus the chemotherapy cohort (ORR: 69.2% versus 20%, p < 0.001). Within the MET cohort, MET gene copy number (≥10 versus 6-10) did not affect radiographic response (54.5% versus 68.4%, p = 0.698). There was no difference in ORR on the basis of MET TKI used (F [2, 36] = 0.021, p = 0.978). There was no difference in progression-free survival (5 versus 6 mo; hazard ratio = 0.64; 95% confidence interval: 0.34-1.23, p = 0.18) or overall survival (13 versus 11 mo; hazard ratio = 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.42-1.35, p = 0.34) between the MET and chemotherapy cohorts. In the MET cohort, dose reductions for MET TKI-related toxicities were common (17 of 41, 41.4%) but less frequent for parent TKIs (two of 41, 5%). Grade 3 AEs were not significant between crizotinib, capmatinib, and tepotinib (p = 0.3). The discontinuation rate of MET TKIs was 17% with no significant differences between MET TKIs (p = 0.315). Among pre- and post-treatment biopsies (n = 17) in the MET cohort, the most common next-generation sequencing findings were loss of MET gene amplification (15 of 17, 88.2%), MET on-target mutations (seven of 17, 41.2%), new Ras-Raf-MAPK alterations (three of 17, 17.6%), and EGFR gene amplification (two of 17, 11.7%).
UNASSIGNED: The efficacy and safety of combining MET TKIs (crizotinib, capmatinib, or tepotinib) with parent TKIs for acquired MET resistance are efficacious. Radiographic response and AEs did not differ significantly on the basis of the underlying MET TKI used. Loss of MET gene amplification, development of MET on-target mutations, Ras-Raf-MAPK alterations, and EGFR gene amplification were molecular patterns found on progression with dual parent and MET TKI combinations.

Brain tumors represent a heterogeneous group of neoplasms characterized by a high degree of aggressiveness and a poor prognosis. Despite recent therapeutic advances, the treatment of brain tumors, including glioblastoma (GBM), an aggressive primary brain tumor associated with poor prognosis and resistance to therapy, remains a significant challenge. Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are critical during development and in adulthood. Dysregulation of RTKs through activating mutations and gene amplification contributes to many human cancers and provides attractive therapeutic targets for treatment. Under physiological conditions, the Met RTK, the hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) receptor, promotes fundamental signaling cascades that modulate epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) involved in tissue repair and embryogenesis. In cancer, increased Met activity promotes tumor growth and metastasis by providing signals for proliferation, survival, and migration/invasion. Recent clinical genomic studies have unveiled multiple mechanisms by which MET is genetically altered in GBM, including focal amplification, chromosomal rearrangements generating gene fusions, and a splicing variant mutation (exon 14 skipping, METex14del). Notably, MET overexpression contributes to chemotherapy resistance in GBM by promoting the survival of cancer stem-like cells. This is linked to distinctive Met-induced pathways, such as the upregulation of DNA repair mechanisms, which can protect tumor cells from the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy. The development of MET-targeted therapies represents a major step forward in the treatment of brain tumours. Preclinical studies have shown that MET-targeted therapies (monoclonal antibodies or small molecule inhibitors) can suppress growth and invasion, enhancing the efficacy of conventional therapies. Early-phase clinical trials have demonstrated promising results with MET-targeted therapies in improving overall survival for patients with recurrent GBM. However, challenges remain, including the need for patient stratification, the optimization of treatment regimens, and the identification of mechanisms of resistance. This review aims to highlight the current understanding of mechanisms underlying MET dysregulation in GBM. In addition, it will focus on the ongoing preclinical and clinical assessment of therapies targeting MET dysregulation in GBM.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MET exon 14 skipping (METΔ14ex) remains controversial.
METHODS: 110 consecutive METΔ14ex NSCLC patients receiving first-line chemotherapy (CHT) and/or immunotherapy (IO) in 10 German centers between 2016-2022 were analyzed.
RESULTS: Combined CHT-IO was given to 35/110 (32%) patients, IO alone to 43/110 (39%), and CHT to 32/110 (29%) upfront. Compared to CHT, CHT-IO showed longer progression-free survival (median PFS 6 vs. 2.5 months, p = 0.004), more objective responses (ORR 49% vs. 28%, p = 0.086) and numerically longer overall survival (OS 16 vs. 10 months, p = 0.240). For IO monotherapy, OS (14 vs. 16 months) and duration of response (26 vs. 22 months) were comparable to those of CHT-IO. Primary progressive disease (PD) was more frequent with IO compared to CHT-IO (13/43 vs. 3/35, p = 0.018), particularly for never-smokers (p = 0.041). Higher PD-L1 TPS were not associated with better IO outcomes, but TP53 mutated tumors showed numerically improved ORR (56% vs. 32%, p = 0.088) and PFS (6 vs. 3 months, p = 0.160), as well as longer OS in multivariable analysis (HR=0.54, p = 0.034) compared to their wild-type counterparts. Any second-line treatment was administered to 35/75 (47%) patients, with longer survival for capmatinib or tepotinib compared to crizotinib (PFS 10 vs. 3 months, p = 0.013; OS 16 vs. 13 months, p = 0.270).
CONCLUSIONS: CHT-IO is superior to CHT, and IO alone also effective for METΔ14ex NSCLC, especially in the presence of TP53 mutations and independent of PD-L1 expression, but never-smokers are at higher risk of primary PD.

Lung cancer stands as a leading cause of mortality in China, with EGFR mutations frequently identified as pivotal driver genes. Osimertinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting EGFR mutations, is typically employed as a first-line treatment for EGFR-sensitive mutations; nevertheless, resistance can emerge. In this case report, we present the case of a 53-year-old non-smoking male diagnosed with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma bearing an EGFR exon 19 deletion. This patient eventually developed resistance to both Erlotinib and Osimertinib after 28 months of treatment. Subsequent genetic testing uncovered the emergence of new MET exon 14 skipping and MET fusion, coexisting with the initial EGFR exon 19 deletion. In light of this complex molecular profile, the patient was administered a combination therapy consisting of Osimertinib and Capmatinib. This novel approach yielded a partial response, and notably, the patient experienced a progression-free survival exceeding 7 months. Vigilant monitoring of the patient\'s progress revealed the disappearance of the MET exon 14 skipping and a notable improvement in the patient\'s symptoms. This case report underscores the potential efficacy of Osimertinib and Capmatinib combination therapy as a viable treatment strategy for patients harboring EGFR-mutated lung cancer who develop resistance to first-line EGFR inhibitors due to MET activation.

UNASSIGNED: NSCLC with MET exon 14 skipping mutation (METex14) is associated with poor outcomes. Integration of novel targeted therapies is challenging because of barriers in testing and drug access. We, therefore, sought to characterize the treatment patterns, outcomes, and emerging issues of treatment sequencing in patients with METex14-mutant NSCLC.
UNASSIGNED: We reviewed all NSCLC cases with METex14 alterations between 2014 and 2020 across four Canadian cancer centers. Demographics, disease characteristics, systemic therapy, overall response rates (ORRs), survival, and toxicity were summarized.
UNASSIGNED: Among 64 patients with METex14-mutant NSCLC, the median overall survival was 23.1 months: 127.0 months in stage 1, 27.3 months in resected stage 2 and 3, and 16.6 months in unresectable stage 3 or 4 disease, respectively. In patients with advanced disease, 22% were too unwell for systemic treatment. MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were administered to 28 patients with an ORR of 33%, median progression-free survival of 2.7 months, and 3.8 months for selective TKIs. Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors were given to 25 patients-the ORR was 44% and progression-free survival was 10.6 months. No responses were seen with subsequent MET TKIs after initial TKI treatment. Grade 3 or higher toxicities occurred in 64% of patients who received MET TKI after PD-1 inhibitors versus 8% in those who did not receive PD-1 inhibitors.
UNASSIGNED: Many patients with advanced METex14 NSCLC were too unwell to receive treatment. PD-1 inhibitors seem effective as an initial treatment, although greater toxicity was seen with subsequent MET TKIs. Thus, timely testing for METex14 skipping and initial therapy are imperative to improving patient survival.

OBJECTIVE: Tyrosine kinase (TK) alterations, such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion, neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion, c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) fusion and mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) exon 14 skipping, have been reported in colorectal cancers (CRC). We have previously reported CRCs with NTRK fusion among our cohort. However, their clinicopathological features have not been fully elucidated.
RESULTS: Tissue microarray (TMA)-based immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on 951 CRC lesions from 944 patients. IHC was evaluated as positive or negative for ALK and ROS1 and 0 to 3+ for c-MET. For ALK and ROS1 IHC-positive cases, RNA-based imbalanced gene expression assays, Archer FusionPlex assays and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) followed by Sanger sequencing were performed. For c-MET IHC 3+ cases, RT-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing were performed. ALK IHC was positive in three cases (0.2%) and all showed imbalanced ALK gene expression. The following ALK fusions were confirmed: EML4 (exon 21)::ALK (exon 20), EML4 (exon 6)::ALK (exon 19) and HMBOX1 (exon 6)::ALK (exon 20). Two showed microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient, and all were located in the right colon. ROS1 IHC was positive in one case; however, imbalanced expression and ROS1 fusion was negative. Forty-two cases (4.4%) showed c-MET IHC3+. MET exon 14 skipping was confirmed in nine cases. All cases were microsatellite stable/MMR-proficient, and eight were located in the left colon and rectum.
CONCLUSIONS: CRCs with these TK alterations had distinct clinicopathological features. Together with our previous study, 15 cases (1.6%) harboured targetable TK alterations (three NTRK fusion, three ALK fusion, nine MET exon 14 skipping).