MCI-to-AD conversion

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阿尔茨海默病(AD)负担的增加强调了对有效诊断和治疗策略的需求。尽管有针对淀粉样蛋白β(Aβ)斑块的治疗方法,疾病改善疗法仍然难以捉摸。早期发现有AD转化风险的轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者至关重要,尤其是抗Aβ治疗。虽然血浆生物标志物有望区分AD和MCI,但缺乏预测认知衰退的证据。这项研究的目的是评估血浆蛋白生物标志物是否可以预测非痴呆个体的认知下降和MCI患者向AD的转化。这项研究是韩国认知老化和痴呆纵向研究(KLOSCAD)的一部分,一个潜在的,基于社区的队列。参与者基于基线时的血浆生物标志物可用性和临床诊断。这项研究包括MCI(n=50),MCI至AD(n=21),和认知障碍(CU,n=40)参与者。六种蛋白质的基线血浆浓度-总tau(tTau),残基181处的磷酸化tau(pTau181),淀粉样β42(Aβ42),淀粉样β40(Aβ40),神经丝轻链(NFL),和胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)-以及三个衍生比率(pTau181/tTau,分析了Aβ42/Aβ40,pTau181/Aβ42)以预测六年随访期内的认知能力下降。基线蛋白质生物标志物被分层为三元(低,中间,和高),并使用线性混合模型(LMM)进行分析,以预测纵向认知变化。此外,进行Kaplan-Meier分析以辨别蛋白质生物标志物是否可以预测MCI亚组中的AD转化。这项前瞻性队列研究表明,血浆NFL可以预测迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)得分的纵向下降。在被归类为淀粉样蛋白阳性的参与者中,NFL生物标志物显示了对MMSE和韩国版阿尔茨海默病注册评估分组联盟(CERAD-TS)总分的预测性能.此外,作为基线预测器,GFAP在CERAD-TS测量中表现出与横断面认知障碍的显着关联,特别是在淀粉样蛋白阳性参与者中。Kaplan-Meier曲线分析表明NFL的预测性能,GFAP,ttau,和Aβ42/Aβ40对MCI至AD转化的影响。这项研究表明,非痴呆参与者的血浆GFAP可能反映了基线横截面CERAD-TS评分,衡量整体认知功能。相反,血浆NFL可预测淀粉样蛋白阳性参与者的MMSE和CERAD-TS评分的纵向下降.卡普兰-迈耶曲线分析表明,NFL,GFAP,ttau,和Aβ42/Aβ40是未来AD转化的潜在稳健预测因子。
    The increasing burden of Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) emphasizes the need for effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Despite available treatments targeting amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques, disease-modifying therapies remain elusive. Early detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients at risk for AD conversion is crucial, especially with anti-Aβ therapy. While plasma biomarkers hold promise in differentiating AD from MCI, evidence on predicting cognitive decline is lacking. This study\'s objectives were to evaluate whether plasma protein biomarkers could predict both cognitive decline in non-demented individuals and the conversion to AD in patients with MCI. This study was conducted as part of the Korean Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging and Dementia (KLOSCAD), a prospective, community-based cohort. Participants were based on plasma biomarker availability and clinical diagnosis at baseline. The study included MCI (n = 50), MCI-to-AD (n = 21), and cognitively unimpaired (CU, n = 40) participants. Baseline plasma concentrations of six proteins-total tau (tTau), phosphorylated tau at residue 181 (pTau181), amyloid beta 42 (Aβ42), amyloid beta 40 (Aβ40), neurofilament light chain (NFL), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-along with three derivative ratios (pTau181/tTau, Aβ42/Aβ40, pTau181/Aβ42) were analyzed to predict cognitive decline over a six-year follow-up period. Baseline protein biomarkers were stratified into tertiles (low, intermediate, and high) and analyzed using a linear mixed model (LMM) to predict longitudinal cognitive changes. In addition, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to discern whether protein biomarkers could predict AD conversion in the MCI subgroup. This prospective cohort study revealed that plasma NFL may predict longitudinal declines in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. In participants categorized as amyloid positive, the NFL biomarker demonstrated predictive performance for both MMSE and total scores of the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer\'s Disease Assessment Packet (CERAD-TS) longitudinally. Additionally, as a baseline predictor, GFAP exhibited a significant association with cross-sectional cognitive impairment in the CERAD-TS measure, particularly in amyloid positive participants. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis indicated predictive performance of NFL, GFAP, tTau, and Aβ42/Aβ40 on MCI-to-AD conversion. This study suggests that plasma GFAP in non-demented participants may reflect baseline cross-sectional CERAD-TS scores, a measure of global cognitive function. Conversely, plasma NFL may predict longitudinal decline in MMSE and CERAD-TS scores in participants categorized as amyloid positive. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis suggests that NFL, GFAP, tTau, and Aβ42/Aβ40 are potentially robust predictors of future AD conversion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脑结构成像指标和基因表达生物标志物先前已用于阿尔茨海默病(AD)的诊断和预后。但这些研究均未探索影像和基因表达生物标志物的整合,以预测未来1-2年的轻度认知障碍(MCI)至AD的转化.
    我们研究了结合基因表达和脑结构成像特征预测MCI到AD转化的优势。用于分类认知正常(CN)对照和AD患者的差异表达基因(DEGs)的选择以先前报道的结果为基准。
    当前的工作建议整合来自两个公共数据集(ADNI和ANM)的脑成像和血液基因表达数据,以预测MCI到AD的转换。提出了一种用于组合来自多个平台的基因表达数据的新管道,并在两个独立的患者队列中进行了评估。
    结合DEG和成像生物标志物预测MCI到AD转化产生0.832-0.876受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC),超过了单独使用成像特征的0.808-0.840AUC。只使用三个DEG,CN与AD预测模型对ADNI的交叉验证AUC达到0.718、0.858和0.873,ANM1和ANM2数据集。
    我们首次表明,与单独使用成像指标相比,将基因表达和成像生物标志物相结合可产生更好的预测性能。提出并评估了一种用于组合来自多个平台的基因表达数据的新管道,以在两个独立的患者队列中产生一致的结果。使用改进的特征选择,我们表明,预测模型与较少的基因表达探针可以达到竞争性能。
    Structural brain imaging metrics and gene expression biomarkers have previously been used for Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) diagnosis and prognosis, but none of these studies explored integration of imaging and gene expression biomarkers for predicting mild cognitive impairment (MCI)-to-AD conversion 1-2 years into the future.
    We investigated advantages of combining gene expression and structural brain imaging features for predicting MCI-to-AD conversion. Selection of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for classifying cognitively normal (CN) controls and AD patients was benchmarked against previously reported results.
    The current work proposes integrating brain imaging and blood gene expression data from two public datasets (ADNI and ANM) to predict MCI-to-AD conversion. A novel pipeline for combining gene expression data from multiple platforms is proposed and evaluated in the two independents patient cohorts.
    Combining DEGs and imaging biomarkers for predicting MCI-to-AD conversion yielded 0.832-0.876 receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC), which exceeded the 0.808-0.840 AUC from using the imaging features alone. With using only three DEGs, the CN versus AD predictive model achieved 0.718, 0.858, and 0.873 cross-validation AUC for the ADNI, ANM1, and ANM2 datasets.
    For the first time we show that combining gene expression and imaging biomarkers yields better predictive performance than using imaging metrics alone. A novel pipeline for combining gene expression data from multiple platforms is proposed and evaluated to produce consistent results in the two independents patient cohorts. Using an improved feature selection, we show that predictive models with fewer gene expression probes can achieve competitive performance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-α) signaling pathway plays a significant role in Alzheimer\'s disease (AD). This study aimed to explore the relationship between TNF-α related inflammatory proteins and pathological markers of AD, and examine their possibility as a predictor of the conversion of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to AD.
    This study included both cross-sectional and longitudinal designs. The levels of TNF-α related inflammatory proteins, Aβ1-42, total-tau(t-tau), phosphorylated tau (p-tau) from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were analyzed in healthy controls (HC, n = 90), MCI (n = 116), and AD participants (n = 75) from the Alzheimer\'s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to evaluate the predictive value of the examined putative AD markers after follow-up visits.
    In the cross-sectional cohort, we observed higher CSF levels of TNF-α related inflammatory proteins in the MCI and AD patients with positive tau pathology. TNF receptors (TNFR) were more closely associated with t-tau and p-tau than Aβ1-42, in HC, MCI and AD subjects. In the longitudinal cohort with a mean follow-up of 30.2 months, MCI patients with high levels of CSF TNFR1 (p = 0.001) and low levels of TNFR2 (p < 0.001) were more likely to develop into AD.
    TNFR-signaling might be involved in the early pathogenesis of AD and TNF receptors may serve as potential predictive biomarkers for MCI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    早期发现对于有效治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)至关重要,筛查轻度认知障碍(MCI)是常见的做法。在已应用于磁共振成像(MRI)评估大脑结构变化的几种深度学习技术中,卷积神经网络(CNN)由于其在使用各种多层感知器的自动特征学习方面的卓越效率而受到欢迎。同时,集成学习(EL)已被证明是通过集成多个模型有利于学习系统性能的鲁棒性。这里,我们提出了一种结合CNN和EL开发的分类器集成,即,CNN-EL方法,使用MRI识别患有MCI或AD的受试者:即,(1)AD与健康认知(HC)之间的分类,(2)MCIC(MCI患者将转换为AD)和HC,和(3)MCIc和MCInc(不会转换为AD的MCI患者)。对于每个二元分类任务,大量的CNN模型进行了训练,应用一组矢状,日冕,或横向MRI切片;然后将这些CNN模型集成到一个集合中。使用分层五次交叉验证方法对集合的性能进行了10次评估。由在矢状之间的二元分类任务中分离两个类别的最可辨别的切片确定的交叉点的数量,日冕,和横向切片集,转变为标准的蒙特利尔神经研究所(MNI)空间,作为评估点所在的大脑区域对AD进行分类的能力的指标。因此,具有最多交叉点的脑区被认为是对AD早期诊断主要有贡献的脑区.结果显示准确率分别为0.84±0.05、0.79±0.04和0.62±0.06,用于将AD与HC,MCIcvs.HC,和MCICvs.MCInc,可与以前的报告和3D深度学习方法(3D-SENet)相媲美,该方法基于使用通道注意力机制的更先进且流行的挤压和激励网络模型。值得注意的是,交叉点准确地定位了颞叶内侧和边缘系统的其他几个结构,即,已知在AD早期被击中的大脑区域。更有趣的是,分类器揭示了AD和MCIC大脑中多种模式的MRI变化,涉及这些关键地区。这些结果表明,作为一种数据驱动的方法,CNN和EL相结合的方法可以定位经过训练的集成模型所指示的最可辨别的大脑区域,同时最大化集成模型的泛化能力,以成功捕获疾病过程早期的AD相关大脑变异;它还可以为理解AD中全脑MRI变化的复杂异质性提供新的见解。需要进一步的研究来检验这一发现的临床意义,倡导的CNN-EL方法帮助理解和评估个体受试者疾病状态的能力,症状负担和进展,以及提倡的CNN-EL方法在检测其他脑部疾病如精神分裂症时定位最可辨别的大脑区域的普遍性,自闭症,和严重的抑郁症,以数据驱动的方式。
    Early detection is critical for effective management of Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) and screening for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is common practice. Among several deep-learning techniques that have been applied to assessing structural brain changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), convolutional neural network (CNN) has gained popularity due to its superb efficiency in automated feature learning with the use of a variety of multilayer perceptrons. Meanwhile, ensemble learning (EL) has shown to be beneficial in the robustness of learning-system performance via integrating multiple models. Here, we proposed a classifier ensemble developed by combining CNN and EL, i.e., the CNN-EL approach, to identify subjects with MCI or AD using MRI: i.e., classification between (1) AD and healthy cognition (HC), (2) MCIc (MCI patients who will convert to AD) and HC, and (3) MCIc and MCInc (MCI patients who will not convert to AD). For each binary classification task, a large number of CNN models were trained applying a set of sagittal, coronal, or transverse MRI slices; these CNN models were then integrated into a single ensemble. Performance of the ensemble was evaluated using stratified fivefold cross-validation method for 10 times. The number of the intersection points determined by the most discriminable slices separating two classes in a binary classification task among the sagittal, coronal, and transverse slice sets, transformed into the standard Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space, acted as an indicator to assess the ability of a brain region in which the points were located to classify AD. Thus, the brain regions with most intersection points were considered as those mostly contributing to the early diagnosis of AD. The result revealed an accuracy rate of 0.84 ± 0.05, 0.79 ± 0.04, and 0.62 ± 0.06, respectively, for classifying AD vs. HC, MCIc vs. HC, and MCIc vs. MCInc, comparable to previous reports and a 3D deep learning approach (3D-SENet) based on a more state-of-the-art and popular Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks model using channel attention mechanism. Notably, the intersection points accurately located the medial temporal lobe and several other structures of the limbic system, i.e., brain regions known to be struck early in AD. More interestingly, the classifiers disclosed multiple patterned MRI changes in the brain in AD and MCIc, involving these key regions. These results suggest that as a data-driven method, the combined CNN and EL approach can locate the most discriminable brain regions indicated by the trained ensemble model while the generalization ability of the ensemble model was maximized to successfully capture AD-related brain variations early in the disease process; it can also provide new insights into understanding the complex heterogeneity of whole-brain MRI changes in AD. Further research is needed to examine the clinical implication of the finding, capability of the advocated CNN-EL approach to help understand and evaluate an individual subject\'s disease status, symptom burden and progress, and the generalizability of the advocated CNN-EL approach to locate the most discriminable brain regions in the detection of other brain disorders such as schizophrenia, autism, and severe depression, in a data-driven way.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号