MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events

MACE,主要不良心血管事件
  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:自从开始广泛接种COVID-19疫苗以来,已经注意到COVID-19疫苗相关心肌炎(VA心肌炎)的发病率增加,尤其是男性青少年。
    方法:在21天内接种COVID-19疫苗后疑似心肌炎<18岁的患者纳入PedMYCVAC队列,儿童心肌炎前瞻性多中心注册中的一项子研究“MYKKE”。初次入院时的临床数据,监测3个月和9个月的随访,并与已确认的非疫苗相关性心肌炎(NVA心肌炎)的儿科患者进行比较,以调整各种基线特征。
    结果:从2021年7月至2022年12月,纳入了15个中心的56例VA心肌炎患者(中位年龄16.3岁,91%男性)。最初,11例患者(20%)左心室射血分数轻度降低(LVEF;45-54%)。没有严重的心力衰竭,观察到移植或死亡。在3个月随访的49例患者中(中位数(IQR)94(63-118)天),14例患者(29%)有残留症状,最常见的非典型间歇性胸痛和疲劳。23例患者(47%)仍有诊断异常。在9个月随访(259(218-319)天)的21例患者中,所有患者均无症状,9例(43%)仍有诊断异常.这些残留物大多是磁共振成像中残留的晚期钆增强。NVA心肌炎患者(n=108)更常出现心力衰竭症状(p=0.003),心律失常(p=0.031),左心室扩张(p=0.045),降低LVEF(p<0.001)和主要心脏不良事件(p=0.102)。
    结论:儿科患者COVID-19疫苗相关性心肌炎的病程似乎较轻,并且与非疫苗相关性心肌炎不同。由于相当多的残留症状和随访时的诊断异常,需要进一步的研究来确定其长期影响。
    Since the onset of widespread COVID-19 vaccination, increased incidence of COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis (VA-myocarditis) has been noted, particularly in male adolescents.
    Patients <18 years with suspected myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination within 21 days were enrolled in the PedMYCVAC cohort, a substudy within the prospective multicenter registry for pediatric myocarditis \"MYKKE.\" Clinical data at initial admission, 3- and 9-months follow-up were monitored and compared to pediatric patients with confirmed non-vaccine-associated myocarditis (NVA-myocarditis) adjusting for various baseline characteristics.
    From July 2021 to December 2022, 56 patients with VA-myocarditis across 15 centers were enrolled (median age 16.3 years, 91% male). Initially, 11 patients (20%) had mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; 45%-54%). No incidents of severe heart failure, transplantation or death were observed. Of 49 patients at 3-months follow-up (median (IQR) 94 (63-118) days), residual symptoms were registered in 14 patients (29%), most commonly atypical intermittent chest pain and fatigue. Diagnostic abnormalities remained in 23 patients (47%). Of 21 patients at 9-months follow-up (259 (218-319) days), all were free of symptoms and diagnostic abnormalities remained in 9 patients (43%). These residuals were mostly residual late gadolinium enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging. Patients with NVA-myocarditis (n=108) more often had symptoms of heart failure (P = .003), arrhythmias (P = .031), left ventricular dilatation (P = .045), lower LVEF (P < .001) and major cardiac adverse events (P = .102).
    Course of COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis in pediatric patients seems to be mild and differs from non-vaccine-associated myocarditis. Due to a considerable number of residual symptoms and diagnostic abnormalities at follow-up, further studies are needed to define its long-term implications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    低纤维蛋白溶解是最近公认的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者复发性心血管事件的危险因素。但是这方面的机械决定因素还没有得到很好的理解。在STEMI患者中,我们表明,全血中内源性纤维蛋白溶解的有效性部分取决于纤维蛋白原水平,高敏C反应蛋白,和剪切诱导的血小板反应性,后者与凝血酶生成的速度直接相关。我们的发现加强了细胞成分的作用以及凝血和炎症途径之间的双向串扰作为低纤维蛋白溶解决定因素的证据。
    Hypofibrinolysis is a recently-recognized risk factor for recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but the mechanistic determinants of this are not well understood. In patients with STEMI, we show that the effectiveness of endogenous fibrinolysis in whole blood is determined in part by fibrinogen level, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, and shear-induced platelet reactivity, the latter directly related to the speed of thrombin generation. Our findings strengthen the evidence for the role of cellular components and bidirectional crosstalk between coagulatory and inflammatory pathways as determinants of hypofibrinolysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]浓度升高是动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的独立危险因素,包括冠状动脉疾病,中风,外周动脉疾病,等等。新出现的数据表明,即使在有效降低血浆低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的情况下,Lp(a)也会增加心血管事件的风险。然而,存在令人困惑的问题,包括潜在的遗传因素,Lp(a)测定,可能的个人进行分析,风险增加的临界点,和临床干预。在中国人口中,Lp(a)表现出独特的患病率,并以特定的方式调节各种心血管疾病。因此,阐明Lp(a)在心血管疾病中的作用,探索中国人群Lp(a)患病率增加的防治措施是有价值的。北京心脏学会专家的这份科学声明将介绍与Lp(a)相关研究的详细知识,并结合中国人口观察,以提供关键点的参考。
    Elevated concentration of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, including coronary artery disease, stroke, peripheral artery disease, and so on. Emerging data suggest that Lp(a) contributes to the increased risk for cardiovascular events even in the setting of effective reduction of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Nevertheless, puzzling issues exist covering potential genetic factors, Lp(a) assay, possible individuals for analysis, a cutoff point of increased risk, and clinical interventions. In the Chinese population, Lp(a) exhibited a distinctive prevalence and regulated various cardiovascular diseases in specific ways. Hence, it is valuable to clarify the role of Lp(a) in cardiovascular diseases and explore prevention and control measures for the increase in Lp(a) prevalence in the Chinese population. This Beijing Heart Society experts\' scientific statement will present the detailed knowledge concerning Lp(a)-related studies combined with Chinese population observations to provide the key points of reference.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:目前尚不清楚糖尿病(DM)是否会影响替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在东亚急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者中的相对安全性和有效性。
    UNASSIGNED:作者试图根据接受侵入性治疗的东亚ACS患者的糖尿病状况评估替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷的安全性和有效性。
    UNASSIGNED:这项对TICAKOREA(替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在韩国急性冠脉综合征患者中的临床重大出血,旨在进行侵入性治疗)试验的预设分析包括800名韩国患者。主要安全性终点为12个月时的临床显著出血(PLATO[血小板抑制和临床结果]主要或次要出血);疗效终点为主要不良心血管事件(心血管死亡,心肌梗塞,和中风)。
    未经证实:800名患者,216(27.0%)患有DM。在非糖尿病组中,替格瑞洛组12个月内临床显著出血的发生率明显高于氯吡格雷组(10.2%vs4.3%;HR:2.45;95%CI:1.27-4.70;P=0.007),并且在糖尿病组中倾向于更高(13.8%vs8.0%;HR:1.87;95%CI:0.54-4.36;P=0.15;治疗与DM之间无显著交互作用(P=64)。糖尿病组(10.8%vs6.0%;HR:1.90;95%CI:0.71-5.07;P=0.20)和非糖尿病组(8.5%vs5.7%;HR:1.51;95%CI:0.81-2.81;P=0.19)的主要不良心血管事件发生率无明显差异,无明显交互作用(P-for-interaction=0.71)。
    未经授权:在接受早期侵入性治疗的韩国ACS患者中,糖尿病状态不影响替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷的相对安全性和有效性.(替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在亚洲/韩国急性冠脉综合征患者中的安全性和有效性,旨在进行侵入性治疗[TICAKOREA];NCT02094963)。
    UNASSIGNED: It is still unknown whether diabetes mellitus (DM) affects the relative safety and efficacy of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
    UNASSIGNED: The authors sought to assess the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel according to the diabetic status of East Asian patients with ACS undergoing invasive management.
    UNASSIGNED: This prespecified analysis of the TICA KOREA (Clinically Significant Bleeding With Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Korean Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Intended for Invasive Management) trial included 800 Korean patients. The primary safety endpoint was clinically significant bleeding (PLATO [Platelet Inhibition and Clinical Outcomes] major or minor bleeding) at 12 months; the efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke).
    UNASSIGNED: Of 800 patients, 216 (27.0%) had DM. The incidence of clinically significant bleeding within 12 months was significantly higher with ticagrelor than clopidogrel in the nondiabetic group (10.2% vs 4.3%; HR: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.27-4.70; P = 0.007) and tended to be higher in the diabetic group (13.8% vs 8.0%; HR: 1.87; 95% CI: 0.54-4.36; P = 0.15); there was no significant interaction between treatment-arm and DM (P for interaction = 0.64). The incidences of major adverse cardiovascular events were not significantly different after ticagrelor or clopidogrel both in the diabetic group (10.8% vs 6.0%; HR: 1.90; 95% CI: 0.71-5.07; P = 0.20) and in the nondiabetic group (8.5% vs 5.7%; HR: 1.51; 95% CI: 0.81-2.81; P = 0.19) without significant interaction (P-for-interaction = 0.71).
    UNASSIGNED: In Korean ACS patients undergoing early invasive management, diabetes status did not affect the relative safety and efficacy of ticagrelor and clopidogrel. (Safety and Efficacy of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Asian/Korean Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Intended for Invasive Management [TICA KOREA]; NCT02094963).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    几十年来,阿司匹林一直是心血管疾病一级预防的基石,然而,它在一级预防中的使用近年来受到了挑战。根据最近的试验,2022年USPSTF指南降低了在一级预防中使用阿司匹林的建议,这些试验表明在一级预防中使用阿司匹林具有低到中性的益处和增加的出血风险。然而,这些试验纳入的患者患动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的风险相对较低,出血风险较高,这可能导致试验结果为阴性.当根据个体风险个性化治疗时,预防ASCVD是理想的。冠状动脉钙(CAC)评分是动脉粥样硬化的有力标志,并以分级方式可靠地预测ASCVD风险。多项研究表明,使用CAC≥100来识别将从一级预防中使用阿司匹林中受益的患者。此外,aCAC=0确定阿司匹林会导致净伤害的患者。在从一级预防到二级预防的连续风险中,CAC可能确定亚临床ASCVD患者使用阿司匹林的风险水平。ACC/AHA2019一级预防指南建议使用CAC重新分类风险并指导他汀类药物和阿司匹林的个性化分配。尽管USPSTF过去没有认可CAC的使用,鉴于使用CAC指导包括阿司匹林在内的初级预防治疗的大量证据,在临床实践中,使用CAC来确定阿司匹林的获益超过其风险的斑块负担水平,并在一级预防中个性化分配阿司匹林似乎是合理的.未来评估预防性治疗作用的研究和随机试验应使用CAC评分进行风险分层。
    Aspirin has been a cornerstone for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease for decades, however its use in primary prevention has been challenged in recent years. The 2022 USPSTF guidelines lowered the recommendation for the use of aspirin in primary prevention based on the recent trials that demonstrated a low to neutral benefit and an increased bleeding risk with the use of aspirin in primary prevention. However, these trials enrolled patients at a relatively low risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and higher bleeding risk which could have contributed to the negative results of the trials. ASCVD prevention is ideal when therapies are personalized based on individual risk. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is a robust marker of atherosclerosis and reliably predicts the ASCVD risk in a graded fashion. Several studies have demonstrated the use of a CAC≥100 to identify patients who will benefit from the use of aspirin in primary prevention. Furthermore, a CAC=0 identifies patients in whom aspirin would lead to net harm. In the continuum of risk from primary to secondary prevention, CAC is likely to identify the level of risk that warrants aspirin use in patients with subclinical ASCVD. The ACC/AHA 2019 primary prevention guidelines recommend the use of CAC to reclassify risk and guide personalized allocation of statins and aspirin. Although the USPSTF has not endorsed the use of CAC in the past, given an extensive body of evidence for use of CAC to guide primary preventive therapies including aspirin, it seems reasonable to use CAC to identify the level of plaque burden at which the benefit of aspirin outweighs its risk in clinical practice and personalize theallocation of aspirin in primary prevention. Future studies and randomized trials assessing the role of preventive therapies should use CAC score for risk stratification.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    糖尿病总是与微血管和大血管并发症有关。心血管和肾脏并发症是这些人群发病和死亡的主要原因。钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂是一类新型的抗糖尿病药物。这些药物显示了有希望的心血管和肾脏保护机制,并导致死亡率和住院率降低。这些药物的益处有望扩展到非糖尿病患者,并改善心血管和肾脏结局。在这个简短的审查,我们概述了这些药物的潜在心肾益处及其对改善血糖的未来意义,心血管,和肾脏结果。
    Diabetes Mellitus is always associated with both microvascular and macrovascular complications. Cardiovascular and renal complications are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in these populations. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors are a new class of antidiabetic drugs. These drugs have shown promising cardiovascular and renal protective mechanisms and resulted in decreased mortality and hospitalization. The benefits of these drugs are expected to expand to non-diabetic patients and provide improved cardiovascular and renal outcomes. In this brief review, we outline the potential cardiorenal benefits of these drugs and their future implication to improve glycemic, cardiovascular, and renal outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    延长释放(ER)纳曲酮/安非他酮(NB)在四个随机组中与安慰剂相比,体重减轻更大,56周的审判。NB与长期维持体重减轻的关系仍然未知。
    我们对四个第三阶段进行了事后分析,随机化,双盲,安慰剂对照,56周的研究(COR-I,COR-II,COR-BMOD,和COR-DM),安慰剂对照心血管结局试验LIGHT(208周),和随机的,开放标签试验点燃(78周)。纳入的受试者用NB32mg/360mg或安慰剂治疗,与基线,第16周和最终时间点数据。主要结果是Kaplan-Meier估计的每个研究的体重减轻维持长达204周。
    我们的分析包括来自10,198个参与者的数据(NB=5412;安慰剂=4786)。与NB相比,体重下降≥5%或≥10%的患者比例在数值上较高。安慰剂在所有研究和时间点。在第52周和第56周,在COR-BMOD和COR-I/-II中,在第52周和第104周和第208周的LIGHT研究中,≥5%的体重减轻维持差异具有统计学意义。对于≥10%的减肥保养,在第52周和第56周,COR-I/COR-II差异有统计学意义.
    这些数据表明,NB可以作为长期,全面的减肥和减肥维护策略。
    OrexigenTherapeutics,公司和加拿大BauschHealth。
    UNASSIGNED: Extended-release (ER) naltrexone/bupropion (NB) was associated with greater weight loss than placebo in four randomized, 56-week trials. The association of NB with longer-term maintenance of weight loss remains unknown.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of four phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 56-week studies (COR-I, COR-II, COR-BMOD, and COR-DM), the placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcomes trial LIGHT (208 weeks), and the randomized, open-label trial IGNITE (78 weeks). Included subjects were treated with NB 32 mg/360 mg or placebo, with baseline, week 16, and final time point data. The primary outcome was Kaplan-Meier-estimated weight loss maintenance in each study for up to 204 weeks.
    UNASSIGNED: Our analysis included data from 10,198 particpants (NB=5412; placebo=4786). Proportions of patients with ≥5% or ≥10% weight loss maintenance were numerically higher for NB vs. placebo in all studies and time points. Differences were statistically significant for ≥5% weight loss maintenance in COR-BMOD and COR-I/-II at weeks 52 and 56 and the LIGHT study at weeks 52, 104, and 208. For ≥10% weight loss maintenance, differences were statistically significant in COR-I/COR-II at weeks 52 and 56.
    UNASSIGNED: These data suggest that NB could be used as part of long-term, comprehensive weight loss and weight loss maintenance strategies.
    UNASSIGNED: Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc. and Bausch Health Canada.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:血液中维生素D水平与心血管疾病风险之间的关系尚有争议。据我们所知,这是对超过100,000名患者数据的首次比较荟萃分析,旨在检查低维生素D水平与不良心血管事件的相关性。
    UNASSIGNED:在线数据库,包括PubMed、询问Embase和CochraneCentral,以比较维生素D(HVD)和对照组的心血管结局。评估的结果包括主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的差异,死亡率,心肌梗塞,和心力衰竭。使用随机效应模型计算未调整的比值比(OR),其置信区间(CI)为95%,P小于0.05为统计学意义。
    UNASSIGNED:本分析共纳入8项研究,包括426,039例患者。HVD组MACE发生率较高(OR1.92,95%CI1.24至2.98,p=0.003),而HVD与全因死亡率无显著关联(OR1.77,95%CI0.75-4.17,p=0.19),心肌梗死风险(OR0.69,95%CI0.39至1.24,p=0.22),和心力衰竭(OR1.20,95%CI0.34至4.25,p=0.78)。
    未经评估:这项荟萃分析表明,维生素D的血液水平低与MACE有关,但是全因死亡率没有这种差异,观察到心肌梗死或心力衰竭。在选定的人群中适当补充维生素D可能具有心脏保护作用,因此需要进行广泛的试验。
    UNASSIGNED: The relation between blood vitamin D levels and the risk of cardiovascular outcomes is debatable. To our knowledge this is the first comparative meta-analysis of more than 100,000 patients\' data with the aim to inspect the relevance of low vitamin D levels with adverse cardiovascular events.
    UNASSIGNED: Online databases including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central were queried to compare the cardiovascular outcomes among hypovitaminosis D (HVD) and control group. The outcomes assessed included differences in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), mortality, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated using a random-effect model with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and P less than 0.05 as a statistical significance.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 8 studies including 426,039 patients were included in this analysis. HVD group was associated with a higher incidence of MACE (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.98, p = 0.003), while there was no significant association of HVD and all-cause mortality (OR 1.77, 95% CI 0.75 to 4.17, p = 0.19), risk of myocardial infarction (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.24, p = 0.22), and heart failure (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.34 to 4.25, p = 0.78).
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis suggested that low blood levels of vitamin D are associated with MACE, but no such difference in all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction or heart failure was observed. Appropriate supplementation of vitamin D in selected populations might be cardioprotective in nature and warrants extensive trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经批准:比较高动力LVEF(HDLVEF)的COVID-19患者与LVEF正常或降低的患者的特征和结局。
    未经评估:回顾性研究。
    未经授权:拉什大学医学中心。
    未经批准:在1682例COVID-19住院的成年患者中,419例在入院期间进行了经胸超声心动图(TTE)检查,符合研究纳入标准。
    未经评估:参与者被分为降低(LVEF<50%),正常(≥50%和<70%),和高动力(≥70%)LVEF组。
    未经评估:LVEF被评估为60天死亡率的预测因子。采用Logistic回归对年龄和BMI进行校正。
    UNASSIGNED:LVEF降低组和LVEF正常组患者60天死亡率无差异(校正比值比[aOR]0.87,p=0.68)。然而,与正常LVEF组患者相比,HDLVEF患者60天死亡的可能性更高(aOR2.63[CI:1.36-5.05];p<0.01).HDLVEF组的60天死亡率也高于LVEF降低组(aOR3.34[CI:1.39-8.42];p<0.01)。
    未经证实:COVID-19住院期间高动力LVEF的存在与60天死亡风险增加相关,机械通风的要求,血管升压药,和重症监护室。
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 patients with a hyperdynamic LVEF (HDLVEF) to those with a normal or reduced LVEF.
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective study.
    UNASSIGNED: Rush University Medical Center.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 1682 adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 419 had a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) during admission and met study inclusion criteria.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants were divided into reduced (LVEF < 50%), normal (≥50% and <70%), and hyperdynamic (≥70%) LVEF groups.
    UNASSIGNED: LVEF was assessed as a predictor of 60-day mortality. Logistic regression was used to adjust for age and BMI.
    UNASSIGNED: There was no difference in 60-day mortality between patients in the reduced LVEF and normal LVEF groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.87, p = 0.68). However, patients with an HDLVEF were more likely to die by 60 days compared to patients in the normal LVEF group (aOR 2.63 [CI: 1.36-5.05]; p < 0.01). The HDLVEF group was also at higher risk for 60-day mortality than the reduced LVEF group (aOR 3.34 [CI: 1.39-8.42]; p < 0.01).
    UNASSIGNED: The presence of hyperdynamic LVEF during a COVID-19 hospitalization was associated with an increased risk of 60-day mortality, the requirement for mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, and intensive care unit.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:血管内碎石术(IVL)可用于在严重冠状动脉钙化(CAC)中辅助支架部署。
    方法:包括使用IVL治疗CAC病变的研究。主要结果包括临床和血管造影成功。次要结果,包括流明增益,最大钙厚度,和最终血管造影部位的钙角,最小管腔面积部位,和最小的支架面积,通过随机效应模型进行分析,以计算合并的标准化平均差。三级结果包括安全事件比率。
    结果:共纳入7项研究(760例患者)。主要结果:IVL的合并临床和血管造影成功事件比率分别为94.4%和94.8%,分别。在次要结果的标准逆方差的随机效应模型上显示:IVL的最小管腔直径增加为4.68mm(p值<0.0001,95%CI1.69-5.32);IVL疗程后狭窄区域的直径减少为-5.23mm(95CI-22.6-12.8)。在最小管腔面积(MLA)和最终最小支架面积(MSA)部位,平均管腔面积增加为1.42mm2(95%CI1.06-1.63;p<0.00001)和1.34mm2(95%CI0.71-1.43;p<0.00001),分别。IVL降低了MLA位点的钙厚度(SMD-0.22;95%CI-0.40-0.04;P=0.02);MLA位点的钙角不受影响。三级结局:最常见的并发症是主要不良心血管事件(n=48/669)。最不常见的并发症是血管突然闭合(n=1/669)。
    结论:证据表明,IVL安全有效地促进支架展开,在治疗严重钙化冠状动脉病变方面具有较高的血管造影和临床成功率。
    BACKGROUND: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) can be used to assist stent deployment in severe coronary artery calcifications (CAC).
    METHODS: Studies employing IVL for CAC lesions were included. The primary outcomes included clinical and angiographic success. The secondary outcomes, including lumen gain, maximum calcium thickness, and calcium angle at the final angiography site, minimal lumen area site, and minimal stent area site, were analyzed by the random-effects model to calculate the pooled standardized mean difference. Tertiary outcomes included safety event ratios.
    RESULTS: Seven studies (760 patients) were included. The primary outcomes: pooled clinical and angiographic success event ratio parentage of IVL was 94.4% and 94.8%, respectively. On a random effect model for standard inverse variance for secondary outcomes showed: minimal lumen diameter increase with IVL was 4.68 mm (p-value < 0.0001, 95% CI 1.69-5.32); diameter decrease in the stenotic area after IVL session was -5.23 mm (95 CI -22.6-12.8). At the minimal lumen area (MLA) and final minimal stent area (MSA) sites, mean lumen area gain was 1.42 mm2 (95% CI 1.06-1.63; p < 0.00001) and 1.34 mm2 (95% CI 0.71-1.43; p < 0.00001), respectively. IVL reduced calcium thickness at the MLA site (SMD -0.22; 95% CI -0.40-0.04; P = 0.02); calcium angle was not affected at the MLA site. The tertiary outcomes: most common complication was major adverse cardiovascular events (n = 48/669), and least common complication was abrupt closure of the vessel (n = 1/669).
    CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that IVL safely and effectively facilitates stent deployment with high angiographic and clinical success rates in treating severely calcified coronary lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号