Lymphatic Irradiation

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对免疫检查点抑制剂的癌症抗性促使研究利用放射疗法的免疫刺激特性来克服免疫逃避并改善治疗反应。然而,放疗-免疫治疗联合治疗的临床获益不大.常规伴随的肿瘤引流淋巴结照射(DLNIR)可能是罪魁祸首。作为产生抗肿瘤免疫的关键位点,DLN对于放射治疗的原位疫苗接种效果是必不可少的。同时,由于转移性扩散,保留DLN通常不可行。使用雌性小鼠转移性疾病的小鼠模型,在这里,我们证明了延迟(佐剂),但不是新佐剂,DLNIR克服了伴随的DLNIR对放射免疫疗法功效的不利影响。此外,我们确定IR诱导的CCR7-CCL19/CCL21归巢轴破坏是DLNIR有害影响的关键机制。我们的研究提出延迟DLNIR作为一种策略,以最大限度地提高放射免疫疗法在不同肿瘤类型和疾病阶段的疗效。
    Cancer resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors motivated investigations into leveraging the immunostimulatory properties of radiotherapy to overcome immune evasion and to improve treatment response. However, clinical benefits of radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations have been modest. Routine concomitant tumor-draining lymph node irradiation (DLN IR) might be the culprit. As crucial sites for generating anti-tumor immunity, DLNs are indispensable for the in situ vaccination effect of radiotherapy. Simultaneously, DLN sparing is often not feasible due to metastatic spread. Using murine models of metastatic disease in female mice, here we demonstrate that delayed (adjuvant), but not neoadjuvant, DLN IR overcomes the detrimental effect of concomitant DLN IR on the efficacy of radio-immunotherapy. Moreover, we identify IR-induced disruption of the CCR7-CCL19/CCL21 homing axis as a key mechanism for the detrimental effect of DLN IR. Our study proposes delayed DLN IR as a strategy to maximize the efficacy of radio-immunotherapy across different tumor types and disease stages.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    接受辅助放疗的左侧乳腺癌女性因缺血性心脏病导致的心脏死亡率增加;迄今为止,尚未确定晚期心脏/肺部发病率或死亡率的阈值剂量。我们调查了接受全面淋巴结照射的左侧乳腺癌女性发生心脏死亡和放射性肺炎的可能性。还解决了自由呼吸(FB)和深吸气屏气(DIBH)技术之间的剂量学参数差异。根据NTCP计算,与FB技术相比,DIBH的心源性死亡概率显著降低(p<0.001).放射性肺炎的风险没有临床意义。FB和DIBH计划之间的覆盖率没有差异。对于V20,V30和同侧总肺容积,DIBH计划中健康结构的剂量明显低于FB计划。吸气门控减少了心脏吸收的剂量而不影响目标范围,从而降低了心脏死亡的可能性。
    Women with left-sided breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiotherapy have increased incidence of cardiac mortality due to ischemic heart disease; to date, no threshold dose for late cardiac/pulmonary morbidity or mortality has been established. We investigated the likelihood of cardiac death and radiation pneumonitis in women with left-sided breast cancer who received comprehensive lymph node irradiation. The differences in dosimetric parameters between free-breathing (FB) and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) techniques were also addressed. Based on NTCP calculations, the probability of cardiac death was significantly reduced with the DIBH compared to the FB technique (p < 0.001). The risk of radiation pneumonitis was not clinically significant. There was no difference in coverage between FB and DIBH plans. Doses to healthy structures were significantly lower in DIBH plan than in FB plan for V20, V30, and ipsilateral total lung volume. Inspiratory gating reduces the dose absorbed by the heart without compromising the target range, thus reducing the likelihood of cardiac death.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    局部放疗在乳腺癌患者术后病情控制中起着重要作用。放射治疗时间表从常规分数到低分数变化。这篇综述的目的是深入了解乳腺癌患者低分割区域淋巴结照射(RNI)的数据。本系统评价是根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)框架的首选报告项目构建的。电子数据库,如PubMed,从2023年1月1日至2023年3月31日,对Cochrane和EMBASE进行了搜索,以确定以英语发表的有关乳房切除术后患者的低分割RNI的研究。搜索是使用国家医学图书馆的医学主题标题(MeSH)术语进行的,例如“区域节点照射”,使用不同的布尔运算符(和/或)的“乳腺癌中的低分割”和“低分割”。还对所收录文章的参考列表进行了手动搜索,以确保没有其他未从主要搜索中识别的病例。被认为潜在合格的研究由相同的独立审稿人鉴定和评估以确认合格性。RNI数据主要来自北京的一项随机研究和START试验的汇总数据。也有来自回顾性和单一机构研究的数据,以及一些II期研究,其中使用不同剂量分割和放射治疗技术的患者数量有限。这些试验中使用的剂量在1-4周内在5-19个部分中为26-47.7Gy。≥2级肺纤维化和淋巴水肿发生率分别为2%-7.9%和3%-19.8%。≥2级肩关节功能障碍和臂丛神经病变的范围为0.2%-28%和0%-<1%,分别。在1-3周内以5至15个部分递送26-40Gy的剂量范围的后期效应与常规部分较少/相似。当前数据显示,与常规分馏RNI相比,低分馏RNI的毒性率较低/相似。在1-3周内以5至15个部分递送的26Gy至40Gy的剂量对于RNI是安全的。数据有限,超低分割26Gy/5个级分/1周似乎也是安全的。然而,我们正在等待长期结局,许多试验正在讨论其疗效和安全性.
    Locoregional radiotherapy play an important role in controlling the disease after surgery in patients with breast cancer. Radiotherapy schedules vary from conventional fraction to hypofractionation. The purpose of this review is to get an insight into the data on regional nodal irradiation (RNI) with hypofractionation in patients with breast cancer. This systematic review was constructed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) framework. Electronic databases such as PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE were searched from January 1, 2023 to March 31, 2023 to identify studies published in English language on hypofractionated RNI in post mastectomy patients. The search was carried out with the National Library of Medicine\'s Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms like \"regional nodal irradiation,\" \"hypofractionated\" and \"hypofractionation in breast cancer\" with different Boolean operators (and/or). A manual search of reference lists of included articles was also performed to make sure there were no additional cases unidentified from the primary search. Studies deemed potentially eligible were identified and assessed by same independent reviewers to confirm eligibility. RNI data are mainly from a randomized study from Beijing and pooled data from START trials. There are also data from retrospective and single institutional studies and a few phase II studies with limited number of patients using different dose fractionations and techniques of radiotherapy. Doses used in these trials ranged from 26-47.7 Gy in 5-19 fractions over 1-4 weeks. Grade ≥ 2 pulmonary fibrosis and lymphedema rate ranged from 2%-7.9% and 3%-19.8% respectively. Grade ≥ 2 shoulder dysfunction and brachial plexopathy ranged from 0.2%-28% and 0%-< 1%, respectively. Late effects with a dose range of 26-40 Gy delivered in 5 to 15 fractions over 1-3 weeks were less/similar to conventional fraction. Current data showed lower/similar rates of toxicity with hypofractionated RNI compared with conventional fractionation RNI. Doses of 26 Gy to 40 Gy delivered in 5 to 15 fractions over 1-3 weeks are safe for RNI. With limited data, ultra-hypofractionation 26 Gy/5 fractions/1 week also seems to be safe. However, long-term outcome is awaited and many trials are going on to address its efficacy and safety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:鉴于知识的严重缺乏,我们旨在通过一项前瞻性多机构研究,评估前列腺癌(PCa)盆腔淋巴结照射(PNI)患者晚期血液学毒性的临床/剂量学预测因子.
    方法:前瞻性收集临床/剂量测定/血液检测数据,包括基线时的淋巴细胞计数(ALC),中/端PNI,PNI后3/6个月和每6个月至5年。身体的DVH,回肠(BMILEUM),腰骶椎(BMLS),下骨盆(BMPELVIS),提取整个骨盆(BMTOT)。当前分析集中于2年CTCAEv4.03级≥2(G2)淋巴细胞减少(ALC<800/μL)。首先确定了更好区分有/无毒性患者的DVH参数。在数据预处理以限制过拟合之后,结合DVH和临床信息的多变量逻辑回归模型被确定,并通过bootstrap进行内部验证.
    结果:可获得499例患者的完整数据:46例患者(9.2%)出现G2+晚期淋巴细胞减少。BMLS/BMPELVIS/BMTOT和Body的DVH参数与增加的G2淋巴细胞减少有关。结果模型中保留的变量为基线时的ALC[HR=0.997,95CI0.996-0.998,p<0.0001],烟雾(是/否)[HR=2.9,95CI1.25-6.76,p=0.013]和BMLS-V≥24Gy(cc)[HR=1.006,95CI1.002-1.011,p=0.003]。当考虑急性G3+淋巴细胞减少(是/否)时,它保留在模型中[HR=4.517,95CI1.954-10.441,p=0.0004].模型的性能相对较高(AUC=0.87/0.88),并通过验证得到证实。
    结论:PNI后PCa的两年淋巴细胞减少在很大程度上受到基线ALC的调节,具有急性G3+淋巴细胞减少症的独立作用。BMLS-V24是最佳剂量学预测因子:BMTOT的约束(V10Gy<1520cc,V20Gy<1250cc,V30Gy<850cc),和BMLS(V24y<307cc)被建议潜在地降低风险。
    OBJECTIVE: Given the substantial lack of knowledge, we aimed to assess clinical/dosimetry predictors of late hematological toxicity on patients undergoing pelvic-nodes irradiation (PNI) for prostate cancer (PCa) within a prospective multi-institute study.
    METHODS: Clinical/dosimetry/blood test data were prospectively collected including lymphocytes count (ALC) at baseline, mid/end-PNI, 3/6 months and every 6 months up to 5-year after PNI. DVHs of the Body, ileum (BMILEUM), lumbosacral spine (BMLS), lower pelvis (BMPELVIS), and whole pelvis (BMTOT) were extracted. Current analysis focused on 2-year CTCAEv4.03 Grade ≥ 2 (G2+) lymphopenia (ALC < 800/μL). DVH parameters that better discriminate patients with/without toxicity were first identified. After data pre-processing to limit overfitting, a multi-variable logistic regression model combining DVH and clinical information was identified and internally validated by bootstrap.
    RESULTS: Complete data of 499 patients were available: 46 patients (9.2 %) experienced late G2+ lymphopenia. DVH parameters of BMLS/BMPELVIS/BMTOT and Body were associated to increased G2+ lymphopenia. The variables retained in the resulting model were ALC at baseline [HR = 0.997, 95 %CI 0.996-0.998, p < 0.0001], smoke (yes/no) [HR = 2.9, 95 %CI 1.25-6.76, p = 0.013] and BMLS-V ≥ 24 Gy (cc) [HR = 1.006, 95 %CI 1.002-1.011, p = 0.003]. When acute G3+ lymphopenia (yes/no) was considered, it was retained in the model [HR = 4.517, 95 %CI 1.954-10.441, p = 0.0004]. Performances of the models were relatively high (AUC = 0.87/0.88) and confirmed by validation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Two-year lymphopenia after PNI for PCa is largely modulated by baseline ALC, with an independent role of acute G3+ lymphopenia. BMLS-V24 was the best dosimetry predictor: constraints for BMTOT (V10Gy < 1520 cc, V20Gy < 1250 cc, V30Gy < 850 cc), and BMLS (V24y < 307 cc) were suggested to potentially reduce the risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    IMN辩论仍然是开放的,可能永远不会因为本评论和争议文章中概述的原因而结束。
    The IMN debate is still open and may never be closed for reasons outlined in this Comments and Controversies piece.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:全骨髓照射(TMI)和全骨髓和淋巴照射(TMLI)具有优势。然而,根据TMI和TMLI计划勾画靶病变是一项费力且耗时的工作.此外,尽管TMI和TMLI之间的靶病变的描绘不同,临床区别不明确,TMI期间的淋巴结(LN)面积覆盖率仍不确定。因此,本研究根据TMI计划计算LN区域覆盖率。Further,训练并评估了用于描绘LN区域的基于深度学习的模型。
    方法:在根据TMI计划治疗的患者中,对全身区域LN区域进行手动轮廓绘制。估算了TMI计划中划定的LN区域的剂量覆盖率。为了训练用于自动分割的深度学习模型,我们从其他患者获得了其他全身计算机断层扫描数据.将患者和数据分为训练/验证和测试组,并使用“nnU-NET”框架开发模型。使用Dice相似系数(DSC)评估训练后的模型,精度,召回,和Hausdorff距离95(HD95)。测量并比较了使用深度学习模型手动绘制和修剪预测结果所需的时间。
    结果:TMI计划对LN区域的剂量覆盖率为V100%(接受100%处方剂量的体积百分比),V95%,V90%的中值为46.0%,62.1%,73.5%,分别。最低的V100%值在腹股沟(14.7%),髂外(21.8%),和主动脉旁(42.8%)LN。DSC的中值,精度,召回,训练模型的HD95分别为0.79、0.83、0.76和2.63。手动轮廓绘制和简单修改的预测轮廓绘制的时间在统计学上有显着差异。
    结论:腹股沟的剂量覆盖率,外髂关节,根据TMI计划进行治疗时,主动脉旁LN区域次优.这项研究表明,使用深度学习自动划定LN区域可以促进TMLI的实现。
    BACKGROUND: Total marrow irradiation (TMI) and total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) have the advantages. However, delineating target lesions according to TMI and TMLI plans is labor-intensive and time-consuming. In addition, although the delineation of target lesions between TMI and TMLI differs, the clinical distinction is not clear, and the lymph node (LN) area coverage during TMI remains uncertain. Accordingly, this study calculates the LN area coverage according to the TMI plan. Further, a deep learning-based model for delineating LN areas is trained and evaluated.
    METHODS: Whole-body regional LN areas were manually contoured in patients treated according to a TMI plan. The dose coverage of the delineated LN areas in the TMI plan was estimated. To train the deep learning model for automatic segmentation, additional whole-body computed tomography data were obtained from other patients. The patients and data were divided into training/validation and test groups and models were developed using the \"nnU-NET\" framework. The trained models were evaluated using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), precision, recall, and Hausdorff distance 95 (HD95). The time required to contour and trim predicted results manually using the deep learning model was measured and compared.
    RESULTS: The dose coverage for LN areas by TMI plan had V100% (the percentage of volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose), V95%, and V90% median values of 46.0%, 62.1%, and 73.5%, respectively. The lowest V100% values were identified in the inguinal (14.7%), external iliac (21.8%), and para-aortic (42.8%) LNs. The median values of DSC, precision, recall, and HD95 of the trained model were 0.79, 0.83, 0.76, and 2.63, respectively. The time for manual contouring and simply modified predicted contouring were statistically significantly different.
    CONCLUSIONS: The dose coverage in the inguinal, external iliac, and para-aortic LN areas was suboptimal when treatment is administered according to the TMI plan. This research demonstrates that the automatic delineation of LN areas using deep learning can facilitate the implementation of TMLI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用深度学习(DL)和基于图谱(AB)的分割模型,通过增强高危器官(OAR)和临床目标体积(CTV)的描绘来改善全骨髓和淋巴照射(TMLI)的工作流程。
    方法:对我院优化的95个TMLI方案进行分析。测试了两个商业DL软件来分割18个OAR。使用20名TMLI患者建立淋巴结CTV(CTV_LN)勾画的AB模型。AB模型对20例独立患者进行了评估,并通过校正自动轮廓测试了半自动方法。根据拓扑协议,将生成的OAR和CTV_LN轮廓与手动轮廓进行了比较,剂量统计,和时间工作量。开发了临床决策树来定义每个OAR的特定轮廓策略。
    结果:两个DL模型在OAR中实现了0.84[0.71;0.93]和0.85[0.70;0.93]的中值[四分位距]骰子相似系数(DSC)。手动和两种DL模型之间的绝对中位数Dmean差异为2.0[0.7;6.6]%和2.4[0.9;7.1]%。AB模型实现了CTV_LN划界的中值DSC为0.70[0.66;0.74],手动修订后增加到0.94[0.94;0.95],最小的Dmean差异。自2022年9月以来,我们的机构已为所有TMLI患者实施了DL和AB模型,将完成整个分割过程所需的时间从5小时减少到2小时。
    结论:DL模型可以简化OAR的TMLI轮廓过程。对于使用AB模型进行淋巴结勾画,仍然需要手动修订。
    OBJECTIVE: To improve the workflow of total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) by enhancing the delineation of organs at risk (OARs) and clinical target volume (CTV) using deep learning (DL) and atlas-based (AB) segmentation models.
    METHODS: Ninety-five TMLI plans optimized in our institute were analyzed. Two commercial DL software were tested for segmenting 18 OARs. An AB model for lymph node CTV (CTV_LN) delineation was built using 20 TMLI patients. The AB model was evaluated on 20 independent patients, and a semiautomatic approach was tested by correcting the automatic contours. The generated OARs and CTV_LN contours were compared to manual contours in terms of topological agreement, dose statistics, and time workload. A clinical decision tree was developed to define a specific contouring strategy for each OAR.
    RESULTS: The two DL models achieved a median [interquartile range] dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.84 [0.71;0.93] and 0.85 [0.70;0.93] across the OARs. The absolute median Dmean difference between manual and the two DL models was 2.0 [0.7;6.6]% and 2.4 [0.9;7.1]%. The AB model achieved a median DSC of 0.70 [0.66;0.74] for CTV_LN delineation, increasing to 0.94 [0.94;0.95] after manual revision, with minimal Dmean differences. Since September 2022, our institution has implemented DL and AB models for all TMLI patients, reducing from 5 to 2 h the time required to complete the entire segmentation process.
    CONCLUSIONS: DL models can streamline the TMLI contouring process of OARs. Manual revision is still necessary for lymph node delineation using AB models.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:一种新型的CT-直线加速器(千伏扇形束CT-直线加速器)已被引入全骨髓和淋巴照射(TMLI)治疗中。其集成的千伏扇形束CT(kVFBCT)不仅可用于图像引导(IGRT),还可用于重新计算剂量。
    目的:本研究报告了我们在CT直线加速器上进行TMIL治疗的临床常规,以及基于IGRTFBCT图像集计划和重新计算的剂量分布比较。
    方法:本研究选择了5例接受uRT-linac506cTMLI治疗的男性和6例女性患者的11组数据。计划目标体积包括下颌骨和淋巴保护区的所有骨骼排除。在两个部分中对下颌骨的所有骨骼骨排除规定了10Gy的计划剂量,在两个部分中对淋巴保护区规定了12Gy。每个TMLI计划包含两个子计划,一个动态IMRT用于上半身,另一个VMAT用于下肢。两次尝试在重叠区域获得均匀的剂量,即,应用两个具有不同等中心的计划来处理两个部分,并使用剂量梯度匹配方案。CT扫描,包括规划CT和IGRTFBCT,被缝合到全身CT扫描以评估剂量分布。
    结果:Planupper的平均开束时间为30.6分钟,范围从24.9到37.5分钟,Planower的平均开束时间为6.3min,范围从5.7到8.2分钟。对于计划的剂量分布,94.79%的PTVbone被10Gy(V10)的处方剂量覆盖,94.68%的PTV淋巴被12Gy(V12)的处方剂量覆盖。对于重新计算的剂量分布,92.17%的PTVbone被10Gy(V10)的处方剂量覆盖,90.07%的PTV淋巴被12Gy(V12)的处方剂量覆盖。结果表明,计划V10,V12和交付V10,V12之间存在显着差异(p<0.05)。在选定的器官上,计划剂量和重新计算剂量之间没有显着差异(p>0.05)。右侧晶状体除外(p<0.05,Dmax)。右晶状体的实际递送最大剂量明显大于其计划剂量。
    结论:在CT直线加速器上进行TMLI治疗,临床质量可接受,有效率高。对IGRTFBCT上重新计算的剂量的评估表明治疗以足够的目标覆盖率进行。
    BACKGROUND: A novel CT-linac (kilovolt fan-beam CT-linac) has been introduced into total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) treatment. Its integrated kilovolt fan-beam CT (kV FBCT) can be used not only for image guidance (IGRT) but also to re-calculate the dose.
    OBJECTIVE: This study reported our clinical routine on performing TMIL treatment on the CT-linac, as well as dose distribution comparison between planned and re-calculated based on IGRT FBCT image sets.
    METHODS: 11 sets of data from 5 male and 6 female patients who had underwent the TMLI treatment with uRT-linac 506c were selected for this study. The planning target volumes consist of all skeletal bones exclusion of the mandible and lymphatic sanctuary sites. A planned dose of 10 Gy was prescribed to all skeletal bones exclusion of the mandible in two fractions and 12 Gy in two fractions was prescribed to lymphatic sanctuary sites. Each TMLI plan contained two sub-plans, one dynamic IMRT for the upper body and the other VMAT for the lower extremity. Two attempts were made to obtain homogeneous dose in the overlapping region, i.e., applying two plans with different isocenters for the treatment of two fractions, and using a dose gradient matching scheme. The CT scans, including planning CT and IGRT FBCT, were stitched to a whole body CT scan for dose distribution evaluation.
    RESULTS: The average beam-on time of Planupper is 30.6 min, ranging from 24.9 to 37.5 min, and the average beam-on time of Planlower is 6.3 min, ranging from 5.7 to 8.2 min. For the planned dose distribution, the 94.79% of the PTVbone is covered by the prescription dose of 10 Gy (V10), and the 94.68% of the PTVlymph is covered by the prescription dose of 12 Gy (V12). For the re-calculated dose distribution, the 92.17% of the PTVbone is covered by the prescription dose of 10 Gy (V10), and the 90.07% of the PTVlymph is covered by the prescription dose of 12 Gy (V12). The results showed that there is a significant difference (p < 0.05) between planning V10, V12 and delivery V10, V12. There is no significant difference (p > 0.05) between planned dose and re-calculated dose on selected organs, except for right lens (p < 0.05, Dmax). The actual delivered maximum dose of right lens is apparently larger than the planned dose of it.
    CONCLUSIONS: TMLI treatment can be performed on the CT-linac with clinical acceptable quality and high efficiency. Evaluation of the recalculated dose on IGRT FBCT suggests the treatment was delivered with adequate target coverage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    描述了在恒河猴模型中涉及新型全淋巴照射(TLI)调节方法的移植后肾移植耐受性诱导方案的开发。我们通过使用TomoTherapyTLI建立混合嵌合状态并输注供体造血细胞(HC),研究了对MHC1单倍型匹配的肾脏移植的耐受性的可行性。假设嵌合状态允许消除所有免疫抑制(IS)药物,同时长期保留同种异体移植物功能,而不会发生移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)或排斥。11个肾移植受者的实验组接受了耐受性诱导方案,并将结果与接受相同条件但未输注供体HC的对照组(n=7)进行比较。在实验组的两名接受者中完成了混合嵌合状态和操作耐受性的发展。两名受者均从所有IS中撤出,并继续维持正常的肾移植功能4年,而没有排斥或GVHD。当IS被消除时,对照组中没有动物达到耐受性。这种新颖的实验模型证明了当在1单倍型匹配的非人灵长类动物受体的肾脏和HC联合移植中使用TLI移植后调节方案实现混合嵌合状态时诱导长期操作耐受性的可行性。
    Development of a post-transplant kidney transplant tolerance induction protocol involving a novel total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) conditioning method in a rhesus macaque model is described. We examined the feasibility of acheiving tolerance to MHC 1-haplotype matched kidney transplants by establishing a mixed chimeric state with infusion of donor hematopoietic cells (HC) using TomoTherapy TLI. The chimeric state was hypothesized to permit the elimination of all immunosuppressive (IS) medications while preserving allograft function long-term without development of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) or rejection. An experimental group of 11 renal transplant recipients received the tolerance induction protocol and outcomes were compared to a control group (n = 7) that received the same conditioning but without donor HC infusion. Development of mixed chimerism and operational tolerance was accomplished in two recipients in the experimental group. Both recipients were withdrawn from all IS and continued to maintain normal renal allograft function for 4 years without rejection or GVHD. None of the animals in the control group achieved tolerance when IS was eliminated. This novel experimental model demonstrated the feasibility for inducing of long-term operational tolerance when mixed chimerism is achieved using a TLI post-transplant conditioning protocol in 1-haplotype matched non-human primate recipients of combined kidney and HC transplantation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    目的:由于具有多个等中心的大型治疗场,采用体积调制电弧疗法(VMAT)的全骨髓淋巴照射(TMLI)具有挑战性,连接处的场匹配,目标被许多处于危险中的器官包围。这项研究旨在根据我们中心的早期经验,描述我们使用VMAT技术进行TMLI治疗的安全剂量递增和准确剂量递送的方法。
    方法:每位患者均以头部第一仰卧位和脚第一仰卧位进行计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描,大腿中部有重叠。在Eclipse治疗计划系统(VarianMedicalSystemsInc.,帕洛阿尔托,CA),并在Clinac2100C/D线性加速器中进行治疗(VarianMedicalSystemsInc.,帕洛阿尔托,CA).
    结果:5例患者在9个部分中以13.5Gy的处方剂量治疗,15例患者在10个部分中以15Gy的递增剂量治疗。对于15Gy的处方剂量,95%的临床目标体积(CTV)和计划目标体积(PTV)的平均剂量为14.3±0.3Gy和13.6±0.7Gy,13.5Gy的处方剂量为13±0.2Gy和12.3±0.3Gy,分别。在两个时间表中对肺的平均剂量为8.7±0.6Gy。执行治疗计划所花费的总时间对于第一部分是大约2小时,对于随后的部分是1.5小时。每位患者在5天内的平均室内时间为15.5小时,导致其他患者的常规治疗时间表可能发生变化。
    结论:本可行性研究重点介绍了我们机构采用VMAT技术安全实施TMLI的方法。通过采用的治疗技术,可以将剂量提高到目标,并充分覆盖并节省关键结构。我们中心的这种方法的临床实施可以作为一个实用的指南,让其他热衷于启动这项服务的人安全地启动基于VMAT的TMLI计划。
    Total marrow lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is challenging due to large treatment fields with multiple isocenters, field matching at junctions, and targets being surrounded by many organs at risk. This study aimed to describe our methodology for safe dose escalation and accurate dose delivery of TMLI treatment with the VMAT technique based on early experience at our center.
    Computed tomography (CT) scans were acquired in head-first supine and feet-first supine orientations for each patient with an overlap at mid-thigh. VMAT plans were generated for 20 patients on the head-first CT images with either three or four isocenters in the Eclipse treatment planning system (Varian Medical Systems Inc., Palo Alto, CA) and the treatment was delivered in a Clinac 2100 C/D linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems Inc., Palo Alto, CA).
    Five patients were treated with a prescription dose of 13.5 Gy in 9 fractions and 15 patients were treated with an escalated dose of 15 Gy in 10 fractions. The mean doses to 95% of the clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) were 14.3 ± 0.3 Gy and 13.6 ± 0.7 Gy for the prescription doses of 15 Gy, and 13 ± 0.2 Gy and 12.3 ± 0.3 Gy for the prescription doses of 13.5 Gy, respectively. Mean dose to the lung in both schedules was 8.7 ± 0.6 Gy. The overall time taken to execute the treatment plans was approximately 2 h for the first fraction and 1.5 h for subsequent fractions. The average in-room time of 15.5 h per patient over 5 days leads to potential changes in the regular treatment schedules for other patients.
    This feasibility study highlights the methodology adopted for safe implementation of TMLI with the VMAT technique at our institution. Escalation of dose to the target with adequate coverage and sparing of critical structures was achieved with the adopted treatment technique. Clinical implementation of this methodology at our center could serve as a practical guide to start the VMAT-based TMLI program safely by others who are keen to start this service.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号