We present a case report of a patient suffering from chronic low back pain (CLBP) and chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP), both of which were caused and complicated by a physically demanding occupation, a history of mixed martial arts, and lumbar scoliosis. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and radiographic findings were observed following conservative spine rehabilitation. The patient, a 34-year-old male, had experienced chronic spine pain, particularly CLBP and CNSNP, for several years. He reported severe pain and increasing disability after a recent neck injury sustained while practicing jiu-jitsu. Radicular pain, along with numbness and tingling, was noted in the right upper extremity, extending to the first three digits, and there were also altered sensations and temperature changes in both feet. He described sharp, pinching mid-back pain and worsening disability due to the persistent pain, which led him to seek manual manipulative chiropractic spine therapy, though he reported little benefit from it. The patient had relied on over-the-counter pain medications for many years without achieving long-term pain and disability relief, and these medications were no longer used following treatment. Chiropractic BioPhysics® (CBP®) spinal structural rehabilitation protocols were used to improve coronal and sagittal balance, as well as paraspinal muscular strength, addressing posture, mobility, and related aspects. These protocols include postural exercises, postural Mirror Image® traction, and postural spinal manipulative therapy. All PROs improved, with a near resolution of all initial symptoms of chronic spine pain. Outcomes measured included disability indices and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) indicators. Radiographic parameter improvements were significant, demonstrating improved coronal and sagittal balance as a result of the treatment. Following 30 in-office treatments, administered three times per week for 10 weeks, initial outcomes were reassessed. The patient then received 13 in-office treatments periodically over one year, and all initial outcomes were repeated. The improvements remained stable over time. A 26-month follow-up found that the improvements were sustained over a very long period without additional treatment after the 13-month examination. Chronic spine pain, specifically CLBP and CNSNP, is a significant source of suffering and contributes substantially to the global burden of disease. Improvement in HRQoLs, PROs, and objective spine parameters are desirable clinical outcomes. Our case report documents objective improvement in lumbar scoliosis and spine pain, which is rare in conservative studies. This successful treatment of chronic pain with long-term follow-up contributes to the growing evidence supporting conservative, non-surgical treatments for CNSNP and CLBP. Successful management of chronic spine pain was observed in a patient undergoing CBP® treatment. The treatment was designed to address abnormal sagittal and coronal postural balance and radiographic abnormalities indicating spinal misalignment and reassess progress in PROs, as well as objective and subjective HRQoL measures, both following treatment and 13 months later. However, larger studies are needed to draw firm conclusions regarding the efficacy of this treatment for chronic pain.

UNASSIGNED: Systematic review and meta-analysis to examine common static postural parameters between participants with and without low back pain (LBP).
UNASSIGNED: Systematic search on the PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and SCOPUS databases using keywords \'posture\' and \'low back pain\'. Observational studies comparing static postural outcomes (e.g. lumbar lordosis) between participants with and without LBP were included. Two independent reviewers conducted screening, data extraction and quality assessment. Methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute\'s critical appraisal tools.
UNASSIGNED: Studies included in review = 46 (5,097 LBP; 6,974 controls); meta-analysis = 36 (3,617 LBP; 4,323 controls). Quality of included studies was mixed. Pelvic tilt was statistically significantly higher in participants with LBP compared to controls (n = 23; 2,540 LBP; 3,090 controls; SMD:0.23, 95%CI:0.10,0.35, p < 0.01, I2=72%). Lumbar lordosis and sacral slope may be lower in participants with LBP; pelvic incidence may be higher in this group; both were not statistically significant and the between study heterogeneity was high. Thoracic kyphosis and leg length discrepancy showed no difference between groups.
UNASSIGNED: Lumbopelvic mechanisms may be altered in people with LBP, but no firm conclusions could be made. Pelvic tilt appeared to be increased in participants with LBP. Postural variable measurement needs standardisation. Better reporting of study characteristics is warranted.Implications for rehabilitationLumbo pelvic parameters especially pelvic tilt may be altered in people with low back pain, although no firm conclusion could be made due to the high heterogeneity between studies.Postural assessment within low back pain rehabilitation may therefore require an individualistic approach.

OBJECTIVE: Patients frequently complain of low back pain and sacroiliac joint pain (SIP) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We hypothesized that patients with SIP would display different pelvic incidence (PI) values between standing and relaxed sitting positions, indicative of increased motion in the sacroiliac joints.
METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, 94 patients who underwent unilateral THA and experienced SIP were compared with 94 control patients without SIP. SIP was confirmed through clinical tests and investigated using biplanar imaging in both standing and sitting positions. The key parameters analyzed included PI, sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and limb length discrepancy (LLD).
RESULTS: Patients without SIP showed a mean difference in PI of -1.5° (-8°-5°) between standing-to-sitting positions, whereas those with SIP showed a difference of -3.3° (-12°-0°)(P < 0.0001), indicating more motion in the sacroiliac joint during daily activities in the latter group. Patients with SIP showed smaller change in LL between standing-to-sitting positions (mean:6.3°; range:-8°-27°) compared with those without SIP (mean:9.5°; range:-12°-28°)(P = 0.006). No significant differences were noted in functional leg length between patients with (mean:7 mm; range:0-12 mm) and without SIP (mean:7 mm; range:0-11 mm)(P = 0.973).
CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed significant sacroiliac joint motion in patients with SIP post-THA, as indicated by PI changes, increased posterior pelvic tilt, and reduced change in the LL. Contrary to common belief, SIP did not correlate with LLD.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal flexion exposure (SFE) leads to alterations in neuromuscular and mechanical properties of the trunk. While several studies reported changes in intrinsic trunk stiffness following SFE, there is a lack of studies evaluating the effects on lumbar muscle shear modulus (SM). Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate the effects of SFE on lumbar muscle SM and posture.
METHODS: Sixteen young volunteers were included in this clinical study. Passive lumbar muscle SM, lumbar lordosis, lumbar flexion range of motion and sitting height were measured prior to and following a 60-min SFE protocol.
RESULTS: For SM, our results did not show a significant muscle × time interaction effect (p = 0.40). However, we found increased SM (from 6.75 to 15.43% - all p < 0.02) and maximal lumbar flexion (15.91 ± 10.88%; p < 0.01), whereas lumbar lordosis ( - 7.67 ± 13.97%; p = 0.03) and sitting height ( - 0.57 ± 0.32%; p < 0.01) decreased following SFE. Our results showed no significant correlations between the changes in the included outcome measures (p = 0.10-0.83).
CONCLUSIONS: We hypothesized that increased lumbar muscle SM following SFE might be a compensation for decreased passive stability due to viscoelastic deformations of connective tissues, which are indicated by increased maximal lumbar flexion and decreased sitting height. However, there were no significant correlations between the changes of the included outcome measures, which implies that increased muscle SM and reduced lumbar lordosis are more likely an independent consequence of SFE.

OBJECTIVE: Pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) is directly related to poor quality of life in adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) patients. The purpose of the study was to determine the most appropriate postoperative PI-LL value for patients with ADS.
METHODS: The medical records of patients with ADS in our department were retrospectively collected. The data included age, sex, body mass index, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, osteopenia, length of hospital stay, operative duration, estimated blood loss, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, number of fusion levels, lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence, PI-LL, Scoliosis Research Society-22 score, Oswestry Disability Index score, and mechanical complications.
RESULTS: A total of 316 patients were enrolled. PI-LL, lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, Scoliosis Research Society-22 score, Oswestry Disability Index score at the time of last follow-up were 20.7 ± 8.5°, 23.4 ± 14.1°, 4.0 ± 2.1 cm, 3.7 ± 0.9, and 18.1 ± 5.5, respectively. In terms of mechanical complications, 88 patients (27.8%), 34 patients (10.8%), and 19 patients (6.0%) had proximal junctional kyphosis, distal junctional kyphosis, and implant-related complications, respectively. In the fully adjusted model, compared with 0 grade PI-LL group and ++ grade PI-LL group, + grade PI-LL group had the best clinical outcomes and the fewest mechanical complications. The stability of these conclusions was verified in sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Optimal PI-LL value should be 10°-20° after corrective surgery in patients with ADS, which is associated with excellent clinical outcomes and lower complication rates. Previous criteria may be at risk of overcorrection, which may lead to proximal junctional kyphosis.

OBJECTIVE: Previous work comparing ASD to a normative population demonstrated that a large proportion of lumbar lordosis is lost proximally (L1-L4). The current study expands on these findings by collectively investigating regional angles and spinal contours.
METHODS: 119 asymptomatic volunteers with full-body free-standing radiographs were used to identify age-and-PI models of each Vertebra Pelvic Angle (VPA) from L5 to T10. These formulas were then applied to a cohort of primary surgical ASD patients without coronal malalignment. Loss of lumbar lordosis (LL) was defined as the offset between age-and-PI normative value and pre-operative alignment. Spine shapes defined by VPAs were compared and analyzed using paired t-tests.
RESULTS: 362 ASD patients were identified (age = 64.4 ± 13, 57.1% females). Compared to their age-and-PI normative values, patients demonstrated a significant loss in LL of 17 ± 19° in the following distribution: 14.1% had \"No loss\" (mean = 0.1 ± 2.3), 22.9% with 10°-loss (mean = 9.9 ± 2.9), 22.1% with 20°-loss (mean = 20.0 ± 2.8), and 29.3% with 30°-loss (mean = 33.8 ± 6.0). \"No loss\" patients\' spine was slightly posterior to the normative shape from L4 to T10 (VPA difference of 2°), while superimposed on the normative one from S1 to L2 and became anterior at L1 in the \"10°-loss\" group. As LL loss increased, ASD and normative shapes offset extended caudally to L3 for the \"20°-loss\" group and L4 for the \"30°-loss\" group.
CONCLUSIONS: As LL loss increases, the difference between ASD and normative shapes first occurs proximally and then progresses incrementally caudally. Understanding spinal contour and LL loss location may be key to achieving sustainable correction by identifying optimal and personalized postoperative shapes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the 2-year reoperation rates for adjacent segment disease between patients with pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch postoperatively and patients with normal PI-LL measurements.
METHODS: Patients undergoing elective 1- to 2-level lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions between 2016 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Spinopelvic radiographic parameters immediately postoperation were measured, and PI-LL mismatch was determined using the age-adjusted thresholds defined in Lafage et al. After propensity score matching, early reoperation rates were compared between the PI-LL mismatch and normal PI-LL cohorts. Early reoperation was defined as symptomatic adjacent segment disease (ASD) requiring reoperation within 2 years of the index surgery.
RESULTS: A total of 219 patients were identified. The average age was 59 years of age, with 59.8% female. The PI-LL mismatch cohort (n = 148) was younger (57.5 vs. 63.5 years, P < 0.001) and had a higher proportion of Black patients (31.8% vs. 11.3%, P = 0.001) than the normal PI-LL cohort, respectively. A total of 100 patients in the PI-LL mismatch cohort were propensity score matched to 66 patients in the normal PI-LL cohort, resulting in no difference in age (P = 0.177), sex (P = 0.302), race (P = 0.727), or body mass index (P = 0.892). Using these matched cohorts, the rate of early reoperation for ASD was 8.0% in the PI-LL mismatch cohort and 9.1% in the normal PI-LL cohort (P = 0.805), with a mean time to reoperation of 1.28 and 1.33 years, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: After propensity score matching, PI-LL mismatch was not associated with early reoperation for ASD in patients undergoing 1- to 2-level lumbar fusions for degenerative conditions.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate postoperative pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes to determine age-adjusted PI-LL targets. Method: The dataset encompassed a range of variables, including age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, presence of osteopenia, hospital stay, operative duration, blood loss, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, number of fusion levels, lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence, and PI-LL. The non-linear relationship between PI-LL and clinical outcomes was examined using a curve analysis, with adjustments made for potential confounding variables. Upon identification of a non-linear relationship, a two-piecewise regression model was employed to determine the threshold effect. Results: A total of 280 patients were enrolled. In the fully adjusted model, the optimal PI-LL target for patients aged 45-54 years old was PI-LL < 10°, the optimal target for patients aged 55-74 was 10-20°, and the optimal target for patients older than 75 years was more suitable for PI-LL > 20°. In the curve-fitting graph, it could be seen that the relationship between PI-LL and HRQOL outcomes was not linear in each age group. The peaks of the curves within each group occurred at different locations. Higher and lower thresholds for optimal surgical goals were determined using the two-piecewise regression model from the SRS-22 score and the ODI score. Conclusions: This study showed that the optimal PI-LL after corrective surgery in adult degenerative scoliosis patients should be adjusted according to age.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the impact of L4-L5 minimally invasive surgery (MIS)- transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) on adjacent-level parameters.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study performed on consecutive patients between January 2015 and December 2019. The index- and adjacent-level segmental lordosis (SL) and disc angle (DA) were measured. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected preoperatively and at 3-24 months postoperatively. Factors influencing changes in adjacent-level parameters and the occurrence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 117 adult patients, averaging 65.5 years of age and slight preponderance of female (56.4%), were analyzed. L4-L5 SL decreased at 2 years (P < 0.05), but L4-L5 DA significantly increased at all timepoints (P < 0.05). While L3-L4 SL and DA significantly decreased at all timepoints (P < 0.05), L5-S1 SL decreased at 3 and 12 months (P < 0.05) and L5-S1 DA only significantly decreased at 2 years (P < 0.05). All PROs improved significantly (P < 0.0001). The ASDeg rate was 19.7% at 2.2 years. Cephalad and caudal ASDeg rates were 12.0% and 10.3%, respectively. Eight patients (6.8%) required adjacent-level reoperations, mainly at L3-L4 (6 cases). The use of expandable cage significantly reduced the odds of caudal ASDeg (OR 0.15, P = 0.037), but had no significant effect on cephalad ASDeg.
CONCLUSIONS: L4-L5 MIS-TLIF had a more consistent effect on L3-L4 than L5-S1. Although adjacent-level SL and DA decreased over time, their association with ASDeg appears limited, suggesting a multifactorial etiology. L4-L5 MIS-TLIF provides demonstrable clinical benefits with lasting PRO improvements and low adjacent-level reoperations.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of vertebral and disc wedging on the contribution of lumbar lordosis and the change of disc thickness before and after walking based on MRI.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study. A total of 96 normally developing children, aged 5.7 ± 3.0 years old, 55 boys and 41 girls. They were divided into 3 groups: Pre-walking group, Walking group, and Post-walking group.
METHODS: lumbar lordosis Angle (LLA), the sum of the lumbar disc wedge Angle (∑D), the sum of the lumbar vertebral body wedge Angle (∑B), disc height (DH).
RESULTS: (1) LLA, ∑D, ∑B, and DHL1-S1 were 33.2 ± 8.7°, 14.1 ± 8.6°, 11.9 ± 8.6°, and 6.9 ± 1.2 mm, 7.6 ± 1.4 mm, 8.2 ± 1.6 mm, 8.9 ± 1.7 mm, 8.5 ± 1.8 mm. (2) The difference in LLA values between the Pre-walking and the Post-walking group was statistically significant. DH were significantly different among the three groups. (3) In the Post-walking group, LLA value of girls was significantly higher than that of boys, and DHL3 - 4 and DHL4 - 5 values of girls were significantly lower than that of boys. (4) Age had a low positive correlation with LLA and ∑D and a moderate to strong positive correlation with DH; LLA showed a moderate positive correlation with ∑D, and a low positive correlation with ∑B and DH.
CONCLUSIONS: Age and walking activity are the influencing factors of lumbar lordosis and disc thickening. Walking activity can significantly increase lumbar lordosis, and age is the main factor promoting lumbar disc thickening. DHL4-5 was the thickest lumbar intervertebral disc with the fastest intergroup thickening. Disc wedging contributes more to lumbar lordosis than vertebral wedging.