目的:为了确定下肢假肢(LLP)的复杂性是否与患者报告的移动性和/或移动性满意度相关,如果这些关联因截肢水平而不同。
方法:队列研究通过大型国家数据库确定参与者,并前瞻性收集自我报告的患者结局。
方法:退伍军人管理局(VA)企业数据仓库,国家假肢病人数据库,参与者的邮件和电话。
方法:347名退伍军人在2018年3月1日至2020年11月30日期间,因糖尿病和/或外周动脉疾病而接受胫骨(TT)或股骨(TF)截肢手术,并接受合格LLP。
方法:基本,中间,和先进的假体复杂性是由准确和可靠的PROClass系统测量。
方法:患者使用运动能力指数-5的高级移动性子量表报告移动性:使用0-10分Likert量表的移动性满意度。
结果:接受中级或高级假肢的下肢截肢者比接受基本假肢的截肢者更有可能实现高级活动能力,中间接近统计显著性,赔率接近两倍(调整后的赔率比(AOR)=1.8,95%置信区间(CI),.98-3.3;p=.06)。TF截肢者的相关性最强,几率超过10倍(aOR=10.2,95%CI,1.1-96.8;p=.04)。相对于基础假体,使用中等复杂度假体与移动性满意度显着相关(调整后的β系数(aβ)=.77,95%CI,.11-1.4;p=.02)。仅在接受TT截肢的患者中观察到统计学上的显着关联(aβ=.79,95%CI,.09-1.5;p=.03)。
结论:假体复杂性与TT截肢者获得高级活动能力无关,但与更高的活动满意度相关。相比之下,假体复杂性与TF截肢者获得高级活动能力相关,但与活动满意度的提高无关.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if lower limb prosthesis (LLP) sophistication is associated with patient-reported mobility and/or mobility satisfaction, and if these associations differ by amputation level.
METHODS: Cohort study that identified participants through a large national database and prospectively collected self-reported patient outcomes.
METHODS: The Veterans Administration (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse, the National Prosthetics Patient Database, participant mailings, and phone calls.
METHODS: 347 Veterans who underwent an incident transtibial (TT) or transfemoral (TF) amputation due to diabetes and/or peripheral artery disease and received a qualifying LLP between March 1, 2018, and November 30, 2020.
METHODS: Basic, intermediate, and advanced prosthesis sophistication was measured by the accurate and reliable PROClass system.
METHODS: Patient-reported mobility using the advanced mobility subscale of the Locomotor Capabilities Index-5; mobility satisfaction using a 0-10-point Likert scale.
RESULTS: Lower limb amputees who received intermediate or advanced prostheses were more likely to achieve advanced mobility than those who received basic prostheses, with intermediate nearing statistical significance at nearly twice the odds (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI), .98-3.3; P=.06). The association was strongest in TF amputees with over 10 times the odds (aOR=10.2, 95% CI, 1.1-96.8; P=.04). The use of an intermediate sophistication prosthesis relative to a basic prosthesis was significantly associated with mobility satisfaction (adjusted β coefficient (aβ)=.77, 95% CI, .11-1.4; P=.02). A statistically significant association was only observed in those who underwent a TT amputation (aβ=.79, 95% CI, .09-1.5; P=.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Prosthesis sophistication was not associated with achieving advanced mobility in TT amputees but was associated with greater mobility satisfaction. In contrast, prosthesis sophistication was associated with achieving advanced mobility in TF amputees but was not associated with an increase in mobility satisfaction.