Long-term memory

长期记忆
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    单词的长期记忆在幼儿学习语言的能力发展中起着至关重要的作用。在狗中,学习对象标签的能力仅存在于一小群独特的单词学习者(GWL)狗中。因为它们非常罕见,人们对他们获得如此大词汇的机制知之甚少。在目前的研究中,我们测试了5只GWL犬在获取对象-标签图谱2年后检索12个标记对象的能力.这些狗被证明记得三到九个物体的标签。结果揭示了GWL狗获得异常大的对象名称词汇量的过程。由于记忆在语言发展中起着至关重要的作用,这些狗为研究非语言物种的标签保留提供了独特的机会。
    Long-term memory of words has a crucial role in the developing abilities of young children to acquire language. In dogs, the ability to learn object labels is present in only a small group of uniquely gifted word learner (GWL) dogs. As they are very rare, little is known about the mechanisms through which they acquire such large vocabularies. In the current study, we tested the ability of five GWL dogs to retrieve 12 labelled objects 2 years after the object-label mapping acquisition. The dogs proved to remember the labels of between three and nine objects. The results shed light on the process by which GWL dogs acquire an exceptionally large vocabulary of object names. As memory plays a crucial role in language development, these dogs provide a unique opportunity to study label retention in a non-linguistic species.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近的研究强调了COVID-19后认知缺陷的存在,这种缺陷持续到急性感染,无论最初的疾病严重程度。短期和长期记忆障碍是患者报告的核心缺陷之一,并在客观的记忆表现测试中观察到。我们旨在通过检查任务中的性能来扩展以前的研究,该任务使我们能够直接比较和对比不同时间尺度的记忆。更具体地说,我们评估了短期和长期记忆中的背景-空间关联,这些关联是在一次共同会话期间编码的,并且在与健康对照组相比的轻度COVID-19康复的非住院个体中,使用等效任务在不同持续时间进行了探测.这种方法等同于记忆材料和响应需求的所有方面,隔离仅由记忆时间尺度引起的表现变化,从而使我们能够量化COVID-19对认知的影响。除了提供准确性和响应时间的措施,该任务还提供了对内存表示精度的敏感连续读出,特别是通过检查保留在内存中的空间位置的分辨率。结果表明,从轻度COVID-19感染中恢复的个体的长期记忆能力受到选择性损害。短期记忆表现保持与健康对照相当。具体来说,证明了长期记忆表示的精度差,诊断后几天有所改善。对于短期记忆性能没有观察到这种关系。我们的发现揭示了从轻度COVID-19中恢复的个体对空间上下文长期记忆表征的精确度的特定损害,并证明了长期记忆随着时间的推移而恢复的证据。Further,实验设计提供了一个精心控制和敏感的框架来评估不同持续时间的记忆,有可能提供与COVID-19相关的记忆缺陷的更详细的表型分析。
    Recent studies have highlighted the presence of cognitive deficits following COVID-19 that persist beyond acute infection, regardless of the initial disease severity. Impairments in short- and long-term memory are among the core deficits reported by patients and observed in objective tests of memory performance. We aimed to extend previous studies by examining performance in a task that allows us to directly compare and contrast memories at different timescales. More specifically, we assessed both short- and long-term memories for contextual-spatial associations encoded during a common session and probed at different durations using an equivalent task in non-hospitalized individuals recovering from mild COVID-19 compared to healthy controls. The approach equated all aspects of memory materials and response demands, isolating performance changes resulting only from memory timescales and thus allowing us to quantify the impact of COVID-19 on cognition. In addition to providing measures of accuracy and response times, the task also provided a sensitive continuous readout of the precision of memory representations, specifically by examining the resolution with which spatial locations were retained in memory. The results demonstrated selective impairment of long-term memory performance in individuals recovering from mild COVID-19 infection. Short-term memory performance remained comparable to healthy controls. Specifically, poor precision of long-term memory representations was demonstrated, which improved with days since diagnosis. No such relationship was observed for short-term memory performance. Our findings reveal a specific impairment to the precision of spatial-contextual long-term memory representations in individuals recovering from mild COVID-19 and demonstrate evidence of recovery in long-term memory over time. Further, the experimental design provides a carefully controlled and sensitive framework to assess memory across different durations with the potential to provide more detailed phenotyping of memory deficits associated with COVID-19 in general.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    越来越多的证据表明,错误记忆可能发生在工作记忆(WM)任务中,在学习和测试之间只有几个语义相关的单词和几秒钟。Abadie和Camos(2019)提出了一种新模型,通过描述发音排练和注意力刷新的作用来解释错误记忆的形成,WM中主动维护信息的两种主要机制。然而,该模型仅在识别任务中进行了测试。在本研究中,我们报告了在召回任务中测试模型的四个实验,其中WM中信息的主动维护在检索中起着更重要的作用。在较短的保留间隔内保留了与语义相关的项目的简短列表,其中充满了并发任务,该任务要么损害了每个WM维护机制的使用,要么不使用。参与者被要求在并发任务(即时测试)后立即或稍后回忆项目,在几组试验结束时(延迟试验)。在即时测试中,当WM维护受损时,语义错误更频繁。具体来说,排练防止了即时测试中语义错误的发生,虽然在这个测试中清爽对它们的发生没有影响,但增加的语义错误仅在延迟测试中产生。这些结果支持Abadie和Camos(2019)模型,并进一步证明了WM中主动信息维护在错误记忆出现中的作用。讨论了这些发现对理解WM-LTM关系的意义。
    There is growing evidence that false memories can occur in working memory (WM) tasks with only a few semantically related words and seconds between study and test. Abadie and Camos (2019) proposed a new model to explain the formation of false memories by describing the role of articulatory rehearsal and attentional refreshing, the two main mechanisms for actively maintaining information in WM. However, this model has only been tested in recognition tasks. In the present study, we report four experiments testing the model in recall tasks in which the active maintenance of information in WM plays a more important role for retrieval. Short lists of semantically related items were held for a short retention interval filled with a concurrent task that either impaired or not the use of each of the WM maintenance mechanisms. Participants were asked to recall the items immediately after the concurrent task (immediate test) or later, at the end of a block of several trials (delayed test). In the immediate test, semantic errors were more frequent when WM maintenance was impaired. Specifically, rehearsal prevented the occurrence of semantic errors in the immediate test, while refreshing had no effect on their occurrence in this test, but increased semantic errors produced only in the delayed test. These results support Abadie and Camos (2019) model and go further by demonstrating the role of active information maintenance in WM in the emergence of false memories. The implications of these findings for understanding WM-LTM relationships are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    精化已成为一种潜在的维持机制,涉及长期记忆(LTM)对工作记忆(WM)性能的重大贡献。当前研究的目的是确定在有利条件下是否可以自发实施详尽的策略。在四个实验中,空闲时间的分布是在一个复杂的跨度任务中操纵的,同时保持空闲时间和认知负荷的总量不变。由于阐述需要时间来设置,与具有许多短空闲时间周期的条件相比,实验1在具有较少的长空闲时间周期的条件下引起更好的WM性能。然而,因为这种好处在延迟召回期间没有持续,以下实验旨在通过操纵应该调节阐述的因素来进一步研究这种影响。在实验2中,一半的参与者没有收到有关策略的具体说明,而另一半被鼓励使用详细的策略。在实验3中,要维持的刺激是否具有对详细阐述至关重要的LTM表示(即,单词或伪词)。最后,最后一个实验使用了自我策略报告,以更好地了解参与者自发采用的WM维护策略的性质。尽管空闲时间操纵对WM召回有一致的影响,对LTM召回和所报告的策略类型意外缺乏影响,这对阐述的解释性假设提出了挑战.讨论了影响WM性能的众所周知因素的替代解释,重点放在WM中直接语义维护的潜在贡献上。
    Elaboration has emerged as a potential maintenance mechanism involved in the substantial contribution of long-term memory (LTM) to working memory (WM) performance. The objective of the current study was to determine whether elaborative strategies could be spontaneously implemented under favorable conditions. Across four experiments, the distribution of free-time periods was manipulated in a complex span task, while keeping the total amount of free time and cognitive load constant. As elaboration requires time to be set up, Experiment 1 elicited better WM performance in a condition with fewer long free-time periods compared to a condition with many short free-time periods. However, because this benefit did not persist during delayed recall, the following experiments aimed to further investigate this effect by manipulating factors supposed to modulate elaboration. In Experiment 2, half of the participants received no specific instructions regarding strategies whereas the other half were encouraged to use elaborative strategies. In Experiment 3, the to-be-maintained stimuli did or did not have LTM representations that are essential for elaboration (i.e., words or pseudowords). Finally, the last experiment used a self-strategy report to better understand the nature of the WM maintenance strategies spontaneously employed by participants. Despite a consistent effect of free time manipulation on WM recall, the explanatory assumption of elaboration was challenged by the unexpected lack of effect on LTM recall and on the type of strategy reported. Alternative explanations stemming from well-known factors influencing WM performance are discussed, and emphasis is placed on the potential contribution of direct semantic maintenance in WM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    故事回忆是一种情景记忆范式,在对衰老影响感兴趣的研究人员中很受欢迎,疾病,和/或对记忆功能的损害;在研究神经典型的年轻人的个体差异研究人员中,它不那么受欢迎。差异心理学家可能偏爱其他情景记忆范式的一个原因是,对故事回忆进行评分的前景令人生畏,因为它通常需要手动评分数百或数千个自由回忆的叙述。在这项研究中,我调查了两个与得分故事回忆有关的问题,以进行个体差异研究。首先,通过对故事回忆进行评分以记忆中心和外围细节是否有任何收获,或者一个分数就足够了。第二,我调查了是否可以使用计算方法自动评分-即,BERTSCore和GPT-4。共有235人参与了这项研究。在潜在变量级别,中枢和外周因素高度相关(r=.99),这两个因素与外部因素相关(即,流体智能,结晶的智力,和工作记忆容量)类似。关于自动评分,BERTSCore和GPT-4衍生得分均与手动衍生得分密切相关(r≥.97);此外,从各种评分方法估计的因素都显示出与外部因素相关的相似模式。因此,差异心理学家可以通过忽略细节类型和使用自动化方法来简化评分。需要进一步的研究,特别是自动化方法,由于BERTSCore和GPT-4得出的评分偶尔都是leptokurtic,而手动评分则不是.
    Story recall is an episodic memory paradigm that is popular among researchers interested in the effects of aging, disease, and/or injury on memory functioning; it is less popular among individual-differences researchers studying neurotypical young adults. One reason differential psychologists may favor other episodic memory paradigms is that the prospect of scoring story recall is daunting, as it typically requires manually scoring hundreds or thousands of freely recalled narratives. In this study, I investigated two questions related to scoring story recall for individual differences research. First, whether there is anything to gain by scoring story recall for memory of central and peripheral details or if a single score is sufficient. Second, I investigated whether scoring can be automated using computational methods - namely, BERTScore and GPT-4. A total of 235 individuals participated in this study. At the latent variable level, central and peripheral factors were highly correlated (r = .99), and the two factors correlated with external factors (viz., fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, and working memory capacity) similarly. Regarding automated scoring, both BERTScore and GPT-4 derived scores were strongly correlated with manually derived scores (r ≥ .97); additionally, factors estimated from the various scoring methods all showed a similar pattern of correlations with the external factors. Thus, differential psychologists may be able to streamline scoring by disregarding detail type and by using automated approaches. Further research is needed, particularly of the automated approaches, as both BERTScore and GPT-4 derived scores were occasionally leptokurtic while manual scores were not.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已经研究了执行功能在长期记忆中的作用。我们描述了一个单案例研究,由一名45岁的男性患者组成,右额叶中风住院。中风后,患者在日常活动中有记忆改变.然而,短期记忆测试的表现没有显著改变.长期记忆评估包括中风前和中风后,语义,程序记忆。还评估了获取新学习(听觉语言和视觉再现)所涉及的特定技能,以及执行职能。结果证明短期记忆没有受到影响。关于长期记忆,观察到卒中前和卒中后知识之间存在显着差异,前者保存得更好,揭示了顺行性健忘症。中风前的长期记忆也受到影响,但只是关于情景知识,保留语义和程序记忆(偶发性逆行性健忘症)。执行职能也被改变了,这可能是影响新学习的获取和巩固的一个因素,尽管短期记忆没有明显改变。因此,执行功能可能是获得新学习的决定因素,不管短期记忆过程,至少部分。根据本研究的结果,这些功能的改变可能导致顺行性健忘症。这需要将执行功能作为内存评估的固有部分进行评估。
    The role of executive functions in long-term memory has been studied. We describe a single-case study, consisting of a 45-year-old male patient, hospitalized for right frontal stroke. After the stroke, the patient had memory alterations in everyday activities. However, performance in short-term memory tests was not significantly altered. Long-term memory assessments included pre- and post-stroke episodic, semantic, and procedural memories. Specific skills involved in the acquisition of new learning (auditory-verbal and visual reproduction) were also evaluated, as well as executive functions. The results evidence that short-term memory was not affected. Regarding long-term memory, significant differences were observed between pre- and post-stroke knowledge, the former being better preserved, which reveals anterograde amnesia. Pre-stroke long-term memory was also affected, but only with respect to episodic knowledge, with semantic and procedural memories preserved (episodic retrograde amnesia). Executive functions were altered as well, which could have been a factor affecting the acquisition and consolidation of new learning, despite the fact that short-term memory was not significantly altered. Therefore, executive functions might be a determinant factor in the acquisition of new learning, regardless of short-term memory processes, at least partially. According to the results of the present study, alterations in these functions might lead to anterograde amnesia. This entails the need to evaluate executive functions as an intrinsic part of memory evaluation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然上下文对长期记忆(LTM)的影响是有据可查的,它对工作记忆(WM)和LTM之间相互作用的影响仍然知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们使用延迟匹配样本任务来探索这些交互,参与者(6名男性,16女性)在连续六次试验中遇到了相同的目标对象,促进从WM到LTM的过渡。在这些目标重复的一半中,背景颜色改变了。我们使用脑电图(EEG)中的对侧延迟活动(CDA)测量了目标的WM存储。我们的结果表明,与任务无关的上下文变化会触发WM中长期记忆的重新激活。这种重新激活可能归因于WM和海马模式分离中的内容-上下文结合。重要性陈述理解记忆更新机制以响应变化的上下文是至关重要的,因为上下文在塑造长期记忆中起着关键作用。这项研究表明,第一次,不相关的上下文变化会触发视觉工作记忆中学习记忆的重新激活。这一观察结果强调了上下文更新期间多内存交互的重要性。挑战传统的记忆模型,这些模型假设每次使用时都会强制重新激活长期记忆,相反,我们的结果揭示了一个选择性的再激活过程,尤其是在过渡到新环境期间。这一发现阐明了记忆的适应性,并增强了我们对记忆存储和检索过程的理解。
    While the influence of context on long-term memory (LTM) is well documented, its effects on the interaction between working memory (WM) and LTM remain less understood. In this study, we explored these interactions using a delayed match-to-sample task, where participants (6 males, 16 females) encountered the same target object across six consecutive trials, facilitating the transition from WM to LTM. During half of these target repetitions, the background color changed. We measured the WM storage of the target using the contralateral delay activity in electroencephalography. Our results reveal that task-irrelevant context changes trigger the reactivation of long-term memories in WM. This reactivation may be attributed to content-context binding in WM and hippocampal pattern separation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于其广泛存在和潜在的健康影响,生物体中的氟化物(F-)暴露仍然是一个重大问题。研究其检测以及随后对水生动物如Lymnaeastagnalis行为的影响提供了宝贵的见解。我们的研究重点是阐明F检测中涉及的感官途径及其对进食和记忆形成的影响。我们探索了两种潜在的检测机制:通过外皮直接流向神经元;以及通过osphradium-osphradial神经节-osphradium神经通路向中枢神经系统(CNS)的感觉输入(蜗牛使用该系统进行多种化合物的嗅觉)。将F-注射到蜗牛中不会改变进食行为或中枢神经活动,这表明内在化可能不是主要的检测模式。相比之下,切断桡神经消除了F-对进食和记忆形成的抑制作用,在F-感知和行为变化中牵涉到径向通路。这一发现支持了桡神经信号介导F-行为效应的观点。我们的研究强调了感官途径在F-检测和行为调节中的重要性。了解这些机制可以为生物体如何应对和适应环境化学压力(如F-)提供重要见解。
    Fluoride (F-) exposure in organisms remains a significant concern due to its widespread presence and potential health implications. Investigating its detection and subsequent effects on behaviour in aquatic organisms like Lymnaea stagnalis provides valuable insights. Our study focused on elucidating the sensory pathways involved in F- detection and its impact on feeding and memory formation. We explored two potential detection mechanisms: direct flow across the integument onto neurons; and sensory input to the central nervous system (CNS) via the osphradium-osphradial ganglion-osphradial nerve pathway (snails use this system for olfactory sensation of multiple compounds). Injection of F- into snails did not alter feeding behaviour or central neuronal activity, suggesting that internalization might not be the primary detection mode. In contrast, severing the osphradial nerve abolished F-\'s suppressive effects on feeding and memory formation, implicating the osphradial pathway in F- sensing and behavioural changes. This finding supports the idea that osphradial nerve signaling mediates the behavioural effects of F-. Our study underscores the importance of sensory pathways in F- detection and behavioural modulation in L. stagnalis. Understanding these mechanisms could provide critical insights into how organisms respond to and adapt to environmental chemical stressors like F-.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    拥有良好的记忆力对于执行日常任务至关重要。人们不能学习,plan,如果他们没有记忆,就能有效地记住或导航生活。当过去犯的错误会重复并且无法吸取有关危险的教训时,人们可能处于危险之中。在社区中,创伤性脑损伤(TBI)很常见,患有TBI的人经常有记忆问题。研究TBI如何影响记忆是至关重要的,以更好地理解潜在的机制,并为具有一系列病理和严重程度的患者量身定制康复。因此,本文旨在综述TBI对记忆影响的相关研究。这篇综述研究了最近的研究,以了解和理解TBI和记忆之间的联系。包括短期记忆(STM),工作记忆(WM)和长期记忆(LTM)。这无疑将对如何解决TBI后可能出现的内存问题产生重大影响。虚拟现实和其他技术进步为医学界提供了一种研究康复治疗的新途径。
    Having a good memory is essential for carrying out daily tasks. People cannot study, plan, remember or navigate life effectively if they are memoryless. People may be at risk when mistakes made in the past will be repeated and lessons regarding danger cannot be learned. In the community, traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common and individuals with TBI frequently have memory problems. It is crucial to study how TBI affects memory to better understand the underlying mechanism and to tailor rehabilitation for patients with a range of pathologies and severity levels. Thus, this paper aimed to review studies related to TBI\'s effect on memory. This review examined recent studies to learn more regarding and comprehend the connection between TBI and memory, including short-term memory (STM), working memory (WM) and long-term memory (LTM). This will undoubtedly have a big impact on how memory problems that may arise after TBI will be addressed. Virtual reality and other technological advancements have given the medical community a new way to investigate rehabilitative therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    许多理论认为,积极保持工作记忆(WM)中的信息可以预测其在情节长期记忆(LTM)中的保留,如更多WM时间的有益效果所揭示的。在四个实验中,我们检查了为有意的WM维护提供更多时间是否确实会驱动LTM。在简单跨度(短时间)的试验中给出了四个单词的序列,慢跨度(长时间),和复杂的跨度(长时间分心;实验1-2)。长时间间隔需要在出现空白屏幕(慢跨度)或算术问题的单词之间暂停相等的持续时间,以大声朗读并解决(复杂跨度)。在实验1-3中,参与者要么连续回忆单词(有意编码),要么完成不回忆任务(附带编码)。在实验4中,所有参与者都被指示对单词进行有意编码,试验在连续召回或不召回任务中随机结束。为了确保对编码组之间的单词进行类似的处理,参与者通过按键默默地决定每个单词是有生命的还是非生命的东西(即,动画判断;实验1和3-4)或大声朗读单词,然后按空格键(实验2)。实验结束时的意外延迟记忆测试评估了LTM。应用贝叶斯认知模型来消除绑定和项目记忆的歧义,揭示了空闲时间对绑定记忆的一致益处,这些益处特定于WM中的有意编码。这表明有意在WM中保存信息所花费的时间对于LTM是特殊的,因为WM是维护绑定的系统。
    Many theories assume that actively maintaining information in working memory (WM) predicts its retention in episodic long-term memory (LTM), as revealed by the beneficial effects of more WM time. In four experiments, we examined whether affording more time for intentional WM maintenance does indeed drive LTM. Sequences of four words were presented during trials of simple span (short time), slow span (long time), and complex span (long time with distraction; Experiments 1-2). Long time intervals entailed a pause of equivalent duration between the words that presented a blank screen (slow span) or an arithmetic problem to read aloud and solve (complex span). In Experiments 1-3, participants either serially recalled the words (intentional encoding) or completed a no-recall task (incidental encoding). In Experiment 4, all participants were instructed to intentionally encode the words, with the trials randomly ending in the serial-recall or no-recall task. To ensure similar processing of the words between encoding groups, participants silently decided whether each word was a living or nonliving thing via key press (i.e., an animacy judgment; Experiments 1 and 3-4) or read the words aloud and then pressed the space bar (Experiment 2). A surprise delayed memory test at the end of the experiment assessed LTM. Applying Bayesian cognitive models to disambiguate binding and item memory revealed consistent benefits of free time to binding memory that were specific to intentional encoding in WM. This suggests that time spent intentionally keeping information in WM is special for LTM because WM is a system that maintains bindings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号