UNASSIGNED: Background. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment in allergy. Its efficacy has been demonstrated in the treatment of Local Allergic Rhinitis (LAR) in adults. This study intends to evaluate the effectiveness of AIT in specific nasal reactivity of paediatric patients with LAR. Methods. Patients diagnosed with LAR to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dp) were submitted to subcutaneous AIT (SCIT) (depigmented-polymerized Dp allergen extracts) for 3 years. Nasal allergen challenge (NACs) with Dp extract were performed before and 3 years after AIT. NAC response was assessed with peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) and symptom score of Lebel. NACs were considered positive when there was a flow decrease of ≥ 20% in PNIF and a score of symptoms ≥ 3 points. Demographic data and NAC results were analysed. Results. We included 32 paediatric patients (mean age 9.9±3.08 years, 18 female) and 10 adult patients, (mean age 30.4±12.2 years, 7 female). The symptom score obtained at the 1st minute, 5th minute, 15th minute and 30th minute in response to NAC, were reduced after AIT. The nasal inspiratory flow decrease induced by NAC was also reduced after AIT.  This reduction in nasal reactivity was observed in paediatric and in adult patients, both with statistical significance. Conclusions. AIT induced a decrease in Dp-nasal specific reactivity in children with LAR. This decline of nasal response to allergen exposure, after AIT treatment, emphasis the interest of this therapeutic approach in LAR, even in paediatric patients.

Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) represents a medical provocation for allergists and otorhinolaryngologists. LAR is considered to be a subtype of allergic rhinitis (AR) that affects a great percentage of patients who were, for decades, diagnosed as having chronic non-allergic rhinitis. The clinical picture is represented by rhinorrhea, sneezing, and nasal itching correlated with specific pollen season or dust, mold, or pet interior exposure. Usual assessment of AR (skin prick testing and serum IgE assessment) produces negative results. Specialized centers in allergology and ENT around the globe use a nasal allergen challenge, assessment of local IgE, basophil activation test (BAT), and nasal cytology in the diagnostic approach to the disease, taking into account their current limitations. The impact of LAR on quality-of-life indicators is the same as in AR. Treatment for LAR is similar to that for AR and is the same as for AR: allergen exposure avoidance, drug therapy, and allergen immunotherapy. This scoping review gathers the current up-to-date open access evidence available on PubMed on the subject of LAR.

Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is defined by a clinical history suggestive of allergic rhinitis (AR), negativity of systemic IgE measurement and positive response to nasal allergen challenge (NAC). The term local respiratory allergy includes LAR, local allergic asthma (positive response in bronchial allergen challenge) and dual allergic rhinitis defined by the coexistence of AR and LAR. LAR worsens in severity and presence of comorbidities over time, and it is an independent entity from AR. Prevalence is higher in Mediterranean countries. LAR onset occurs during childhood in 36% of cases. Physiopathological features of LAR are: increased nasal eosinophilic inflammation, tryptase and eosinophil cationic protein, and presence of nasal specific IgE in secretions of 20-40% of subjects. A recent study demonstrated increase in sequential class switch recombination to IgE markers in mucosa of LAR with accumulation of IgE+ CD38+ plasmablasts. Moreover, there is increased expression in B cells of mucosal homing receptors CXCR3+ and CXCR4 in peripheral blood, with accumulation of Th9 and Th2 cells. NAC is the gold standard in the diagnosis of LAR. The measurement of specific IgE in nasal secretions basophil activation test or are still not suitable for diagnosis. There is ample evidence of the usefulness of allergen immunotherapy in the treatment in LAR after 4 DBPCRT in 152 patients. In conclusion, knowledge about LAR is continuously increasing, with detailed definition of physiopathological mechanisms and new phenotypes. More awareness of the disease should be promoted among different specialists, and NAC must be considered an essential diagnostic tool in any age group, including children.

BACKGROUND: Epithelial barrier disruption is the initial cause of various diseases. We previously reported that acupoint catgut embedding (AE) improves tight junction proteins (TJs) in rats with allergic rhinitis. However, whether AE improves the epithelial barrier in local allergic rhinitis (LAR) remains unknown.
METHODS: A total of 36 Sprague Dawley (SD) male rats aged 5-7 weeks were divided into 6 groups with 6 rats each: control group, LAR model group, false acupoint embedding + LAR group, acupoint embedding + LAR group, capsaicin + LAR group, and tunicamycin + acupoint embedding + LAR group. Behavioral observation, ELISA to detect inflammatory factors in nasal lavage fluid and serum IgE, nasal mucosal permeability test, hematoxylin-eosin staining, PCR to detect Substance P (SP), Western blot, and immunofluorescence to detect endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) index and TJs were used to investigate the mechanism of AE in LAR.
RESULTS: AE improved the symptoms and pathological features of nasal mucosa of LAR rats, reduced the inflammatory factors (IL4, IL5, IL13) of nasal lavage fluid, and showed no significant change in serum IgE levels in all groups. In addition, AE decreased the expression of SP in nasal mucosa of LAR rats, inhibited ERS, increased the expression of tight junction protein, reduced the permeability of nasal mucosa, and improved the function of nasal mucosal barrier.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that AE can improve the nasal mucosal barrier function of LAR by reducing the expression of SP, inhibiting ERS and increasing the expression of TJs, thus enhancing the nasal mucosal barrier function.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is defined by chronic nasal symptoms, absence of atopy, positive nasal allergen challenge (NAC) and a good response to subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT). We sought to investigate SCIT capacity to induce local and systemic blocking antibodies in LAR patients.
METHODS: A RDBPC study of grass SCIT was performed, with participants receiving either SCIT (Group A; n = 10) or placebo (Group B; n = 14) in the first 6 months. Both groups subsequently received SCIT for 12 months at Year 2. Nasal and serum antibodies (IgG4, IgA1 and IgA2) and their inhibitory capacity were measured at multiple timepoints.
RESULTS: The allergen concentration tolerated increased significantly at 6 months (Group A; p = .047) and 24 months (Group B; p = .049) compared with baseline and persisted until the end of the study. Induction of serum sIgA1 to Phl p was seen in Groups A and B, albeit the former being induced earlier (1.71-fold, p = .027). A significant induction in sIgG4 to Phl p 1 and 5 was observed in serum of Group A (p = .047 and p = .0039) and sIgA2 to Phl p in Group B (p = .032 and p = .0098) at 18 and 24 months, respectively. Both local and systemic blocking antibodies can inhibit allergen-IgE complexes binding to CD23 on B cells, and this correlated with level of allergen tolerated intra-nasally in Group A (serum; 𝜌 = -.47, p = .0006, nasal; 𝜌 = -.38, p = .0294).
CONCLUSIONS: Grass pollen SCIT induced functional systemic blocking antibodies that correlate with the concentration of allergen tolerated following NAC, highlighting their potential as a biomarker of SCIT in LAR.

BACKGROUND: Nasal decongestants, like phenylephrine and pseudoephedrine, are commonly used to relieve nasal obstruction in conditions such as allergic rhinitis. They induce nasal passage dilation through vasoconstriction but can lead to serious side effects like hypertension and rebound congestion. Despite being easily accessible over the counter, their usage patterns and awareness of side effects are not well studied.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess the utilization pattern and public knowledge of nasal decongestants in Al-Qunfudah governorate, Saudi Arabia, in 2023.
METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study assessed the utilization pattern of nasal decongestants among those who were 10 years of age and older and resided in Al-Qunfudah governorate and its villages. Data were collected in three months, from June to August 2023, using a self-administered survey that was disseminated among the general population at Al-Qunfudah governorate on different electronic platforms like Twitter (X Corp., San Francisco, CA, United States) and Snapchat (Snap Inc., Santa Monica, CA, United States). RStudio (version 4.3.0) was used for the statistical analysis. The knowledge score showed a non-normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test p value < 0.001). For normally distributed qualitative variables, the factors related to nasal decongestant use were assessed using Pearson\'s Chi-squared test. Fisher\'s exact test was applied when more than 20% of cells had frequencies less than 5. A generalized linear regression model was used to assess the independent predictors of higher knowledge scores. A p-value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.
RESULTS: Based on 410 responses, nearly 77% (n = 314) of the participants have ever used nasal decongestants. A total of 118 out of 314 (37.6%) used these medications twice daily for less than five days (81.2%, n = 255). A total of 192 (61.1%) participants used nasal decongestants based on physicians\' prescriptions. Few respondents (12.9%, n = 53) and (33.2%, n = 136) correctly identified nasal mucosal ulceration and nasal dryness as adverse effects of prolonged nasal decongestants\' use. However, 84.6% (n = 347) ignored their contraindications, and 55.1% (n = 226) had no idea about rebound congestion. Overall, participants displayed a moderate level of knowledge regarding nasal decongestants, with a median knowledge score of 5.0. Being a student (beta = 1.12, 95%CI, 0.19 to 2.05, p = 0.019) and being a female were independently associated with better knowledge scores (beta = 0.97, 95%CI, 0.40 to 1.54, p < 0.001). Those who ever used nasal decongestants (beta = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.07 to 1.34, p = 0.030) and those who used them three times a day (beta = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.11 to 1.99, p = 0.029) had higher knowledge scores.
CONCLUSIONS: More than two-thirds (76.6%) of the Al-Qunfudah general population in Saudi Arabia utilized nasal decongestants. The utilization pattern of nasal decongestants highlighted short-term usage for nasal obstruction. Despite the moderate level of knowledge of the general population about nasal decongestants, many gaps were noted regarding their systemic contraindications, side effects, and the risks of rebound congestion. A focus group discussion is advised to get a full and deep perception of the public regarding this common type of medication. Health education programs are recommended regarding this category of medications, warning them about ineffective self-medication.

The term \"local allergic rhinitis\" has gained popularity as a clinical entity in recent years. Despite the apparent contradiction in the definitions of \"nasal\" and \"local,\" we offer insights based on our extensive experience in the field. Local allergic rhinitis has been recognized and treated for many years, so it is not a new discovery. The nasal provocation test, which was introduced in the 1980s, was critical in identifying allergic rhinitis cases with suggestive symptoms but negative allergy tests. Our reflections aim to contribute to a precise terminological decision that is consistent with various points of view.

UNASSIGNED: Roles of ILC2s in allergic rhinitis (AR) and local allergic rhinitis (LAR) are unclear. In this study, we are determined to find the levels of autophagy and mitophagy of ILC2s in allergic nasal inflammation.
UNASSIGNED: ELISA was used to detect type 2 inflammatory cytokines. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining were used to compare the eosinophil (EOS) infiltration of nasal tissue specimens. Flow cytometry was used to detect the levels of ILC2s and Th2 cells. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Western blot (WB) were used to detect the levels of Beclin1, LC3, p62, PINK1, Parkin, FUNDC1, and BNIP3 in nasal mucosa. The levels of autophagy related proteins and mitophagy related proteins of the ILC2s were detected by WB. The number of autophagosomes of ILC2s was observed by transmission electron microscopy. The co-localization levels of GFP-LC3 and Mito tracker in ILC2s were observed by confocal microscopy using immunofluorescence.
UNASSIGNED: We found that the level of type 2 inflammation in AR and LAR mice was significantly increased. The levels of autophagy and mitophagy of AR and LAR mice in nasal mucosa and ILC2s were both increased.
UNASSIGNED: ILC2s may be associated with the occurrence and development of nasal allergic inflammation. The abnormal increase of autophagy and mitophagy levels in the nose may be associated with the incidence of AR and LAR. Abnormal autophagy and mitophagy levels of ILC2s cells may be one of the causes of allergic nasal inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is a condition involving a localized nasal allergic response in absence of systemic atopy. Most studies on LAR have been performed in adults. We aimed to describe clinical characteristics of LAR pediatric patients, its clinical evolution over a 7-year follow-up period and to study the role of basophil activation test (BAT), for its diagnosis.
METHODS: Forty-four children with non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) were included (24 males, 20 females, aged under 15 years). Nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT) and BAT were performed with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Phleum pratense.
RESULTS: Seven patients (16%) were diagnosed of LAR. Six reacted to D pteronyssinus and one to P pratense. All LAR and 86% of NAR patients presented perennial symptoms. Fifty-seven percent of NAR and LAR patients referred persistent symptoms. Around half of NAR and LAR patients reported mild-moderate clinical manifestations. Three LAR patients associated conjunctival symptoms, proportionally more than NAR patients (19%, 7 out of 37). NAR patients presented bronchial asthma (n = 10) more frequently than LAR children (n = 1). More than half of LAR and NAR patients presented family history of atopy. BAT was negative in all LAR patients. On follow-up, 3 LAR patients and 10 of the 25 NAR patients who agreed to be retested, presented systemic sensitization. Dust mites were the most frequent allergen involved.
CONCLUSIONS: LAR should be ruled out in children with NAR. Almost half of children with LAR develop systemic sensitization over time. BAT shows low sensitivity for the diagnosis of LAR in children.