Likelihood ratio (LR)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    亲属关系推断一直是法医遗传学中的一个主要问题,当没有先验假设并且多个个体之间的关系未知时,它仍有待解决。在这项研究中,我们使用大规模平行测序对46份谱系样本中的91个微单倍型进行了基因分型,并通过计算似然比(LR)推断了它们的相关性.根据模拟和真实数据,在存在和不存在相关性假设的情况下,采用不同的治疗方法.通过基于真实谱系样本计算谱系可能性来重建多个个体的谱系。结果表明,91MHs可以将二级亲属与无关个体区分开来。并且需要更高的多态性位点来区分二度或更远的亲戚与其他程度的关系,但是可以通过将搜索的可疑关系扩展到具有较低LR值的其他关系来获得正确的分类。如果他们密切相关,则可以成功重建具有未知关系的多个个体。我们的研究为没有先验假设的亲属关系推断提供了解决方案,并探讨了当多个个体的关系未知时进行谱系重建的可能性。
    Kinship inference has been a major issue in forensic genetics, and it remains to be solved when there is no prior hypothesis and the relationships between multiple individuals are unknown. In this study, we genotyped 91 microhaplotypes from 46 pedigree samples using massive parallel sequencing and inferred their relatedness by calculating the likelihood ratio (LR). Based on simulated and real data, different treatments were applied in the presence and absence of relatedness assumptions. The pedigree of multiple individuals was reconstructed by calculating pedigree likelihoods based on real pedigree samples. The results showed that the 91 MHs could discriminate pairs of second-degree relatives from unrelated individuals. And more highly polymorphic loci were needed to discriminate the pairs of second-degree or more distant relative from other degrees of relationship, but correct classification could be obtained by expanding the suspected relationship searched to other relationships with lower LR values. Multiple individuals with unknown relationships can be successfully reconstructed if they are closely related. Our study provides a solution for kinship inference when there are no prior assumptions, and explores the possibility of pedigree reconstruction when the relationships of multiple individuals are unknown.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与其同源体源在遗传标记上的参考谱相比,肿瘤基因组中的变异可导致等位基因变化。这给肿瘤样本的来源鉴定带来了挑战,如临床收集的病理石蜡包埋组织和切片。在这项研究中,开发了一个概率模型来计算似然比(LR)来解决这个问题,它利用短串联重复序列(STR)基因分型数据。该模型的核心是将肿瘤组织视为正常细胞和肿瘤细胞的混合物,并在执行计算时引入STR变体的发生率(Φ)和正常细胞的百分比(Mxn)作为先验参数。还研究了LR值与φ或Mxn之间的关系。来自17名结肠直肠癌患者的肿瘤样品和参考血液样品的分析显示,所有样品的Log10(LR)值大于1014。在非贡献者测试中,99.9%的四分位数具有小于0的Log10(LR)值。当辩方的假设考虑到肿瘤样本来自患者亲属的可能性时,仍然获得了大于0的LR。此外,这项研究表明,LR值随着φ的减小和Mxn的增加而增加。最后,通过考虑Mxn的置信区间,为每个肿瘤样品提供LR区间值。本文提出的概率模型可以处理肿瘤等位基因变异性的可能性,并为临床实践和法医学鉴定中确定肿瘤起源的证据强度提供了评估。
    Variations in the tumor genome can result in allelic changes compared to the reference profile of its homogenous body source on genetic markers. This brings a challenge to source identification of tumor samples, such as clinically collected pathological paraffin-embedded tissue and sections. In this study, a probabilistic model was developed for calculating likelihood ratio (LR) to tackle this issue, which utilizes short tandem repeat (STR) genotyping data. The core of the model is to consider tumor tissue as a mixture of normal and tumor cells and introduce the incidence of STR variants (φ) and the percentage of normal cells (Mxn) as a priori parameters when performing calculations. The relationship between LR values and φ or Mxn was also investigated. Analysis of tumor samples and reference blood samples from 17 colorectal cancer patients showed that all samples had Log 10(LR) values greater than 1014. In the non-contributor test, 99.9% of the quartiles had Log 10(LR) values less than 0. When the defense\'s hypothesis took into account the possibility that the tumor samples came from the patient\'s relatives, LR greater than 0 was still obtained. Furthermore, this study revealed that LR values increased with decreasing φ and increasing Mxn. Finally, LR interval value was provided for each tumor sample by considering the confidence interval of Mxn. The probabilistic model proposed in this paper could deal with the possibility of tumor allele variability and offers an evaluation of the strength of evidence for determining tumor origin in clinical practice and forensic identification.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Published Erratum
    [这更正了文章DOI:10.3389/fgene.2021.636821。].
    [This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.636821.].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    比较枪声残留物分析解决了相关的法医问题,例如“怀疑X枪声是Y吗?”。更正式,它权衡了H1形式的假设证据:在嫌疑人手上发现的枪弹残留物颗粒与在犯罪现场发现的枪弹残留物颗粒来自同一来源,而H2:两组颗粒来自不同来源。目前,专家通过使用他们的知识和经验评估颗粒的元素组成来进行这种分析。本研究的目的是基于代表性数据构建似然比(LR)系统。这样的LR系统可以通过使电子显微镜分析的结果的解释更有经验地支持专家。在这项研究中,我们从机器学习文献中选择了统计模型作为构建该系统的候选人,因为这些模型已经被证明对大型和高维数据集很好地工作。使用随后的校准步骤确保系统输出良好校准的LR。在案例数据上开发和验证系统,并在独立的卡盒数据数据集上执行额外的验证步骤。结果表明,该系统在两个数据集上都表现良好。我们讨论了在案例工作中实施该方法之前需要进行的未来工作。
    Comparative gunshot residue analysis addresses relevant forensic questions such as \'did suspect X fire shot Y?\'. More formally, it weighs the evidence for hypotheses of the form H1: gunshot residue particles found on suspect\'s hands are from the same source as the gunshot residue particles found on the crime scene and H2: two sets of particles are from different sources. Currently, experts perform this analysis by evaluating the elemental composition of the particles using their knowledge and experience. The aim of this study is to construct a likelihood-ratio (LR) system based on representative data. Such an LR system can support the expert by making the interpretation of the results of electron microscopy analysis more empirically grounded. In this study we chose statistical models from the machine learning literature as candidates to construct this system, as these models have been shown to work well for large and high-dimensional datasets. Using a subsequent calibration step ensured that the system outputs well-calibrated LRs. The system is developed and validated on casework data and an additional validation step is performed on an independent dataset of cartridge data. The results show that the system performs well on both datasets. We discuss future work needed before the method can be implemented in casework.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    A comparative study has been carried out, comparing two different methods to estimate activity level likelihood ratios (LRa) using Bayesian Networks. The first method uses the sub-source likelihood ratio (log10LRϕ) as a \'quality indicator\'. However, this has been criticised as introducing potential bias from population differences in allelic proportions. An alternative method has been introduced that is based upon the total RFU of a DNA profile that is adjusted using the mixture proportion (Mx) which is calculated from quantitative probabilistic genotyping software (EuroForMix). Bayesian logistic regressions of direct transfer data showed that the two methods were comparable. Differences were attributed to sampling error, and small sample sizes of secondary transfer data. The Bayesian approach facilitates comparative studies by taking account of sampling error; it can easily be extended to compare different methods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Bayesian logistic regression is used to model the probability of DNA recovery following direct and secondary transfer and persistence over a 24 h period between deposition and sample collection. Sub-source level likelihood ratios provided the raw data for activity-level analysis. Probabilities of secondary transfer are typically low, and there are challenges with small data-sets with low numbers of positive observations. However, the persistence of DNA over time can be modelled by a single logistic regression for both direct and secondary transfer, except that the time since deposition must be compensated by an offset value for the latter. This simplifies the analysis. Probabilities are used to inform an activity-level Bayesian Network that takes account of alternative propositions e.g. time of assault and time of social activities. The model is extended in order to take account of multiple contacts between person of interest and \'victim\'. Variables taken into account include probabilities of direct and secondary transfer, along with background DNA from unknown individuals. The logistic regression analysis is Bayesian - for each analysis, 4000 separate simulations were carried out. Quantile assignments enable calculation of a plausible range of probabilities and sensitivity analysis is used to describe the corresponding variation of LRs that occur when modelled by the Bayesian network. It is noted that there is need for consistent experimental design, and analysis, to facilitate inter-laboratory comparisons. Appropriate recommendations are made. The open-source program written in R-code ALTRaP (Activity Level, Transfer, Recovery and Persistence) enables analysis of complex multiple transfer propositions that are commonplace in cases-work e.g. between those who cohabit. A number of case examples are provided. ALTRaP can be used to replicate the results and can easily be modified to incorporate different sets of data and variables.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Firearm evidence identification has been challenged by the 2008 and 2009 National Research Council (NRC) reports and by legal proceedings on its fundamental assumptions, its procedure involving subjective interpretations, and the lack of a statistical foundation for evaluation of error rates or other measures for the weight of evidence. To address these challenges, researchers of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) recently developed a Congruent Matching Cells (CMC) method for automatic and objective firearm evidence identification and quantitative error rate evaluation. Based on the CMC method, a likelihood ratio (LR) procedure is proposed in this paper aiming to provide a scientific basis for firearm evidence identification and a method for evaluation of the weight of evidence. The initial LR evaluations using two sets of 9mm cartridge cases\' breech face impression images with different sample sizes, imaging methods and ammunition showed that for all the declared identifications of the tested 2D and 3D image pairs, the evaluated LRs for the least favorable scenario were well above an order of 106, which provides Extremely Strong Support for a prosecution proposition (e.g. a same-source proposition) in a Bayesian frame. The LR evaluations also showed that for all the declared exclusions of the tested 3D image pairs, the evaluated LRs for the least favorable scenario were above an order of 102, which provides Moderately Strong Support for a defense proposition (e.g. a different-source proposition) in a Bayesian frame.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Sibling assessment using the 15 autosomal short tandem repeat (STR) loci included in the Identifiler® kit can be difficult when comparing an unidentified party to an alleged sibling. Therefore, we investigated the likelihood ratio (LR) and the total number of shared alleles (TNSA) for sibship determination using the 21 autosomal STR loci included in the GlobalFiler™ kit. We computationally generated the genotypes of 10,000 sibling pairs and 10,000 unrelated pairs based on previously reported allele frequencies of the 15 Identifiler loci and the remaining 6 GlobalFiler loci. The LR and the TNSA were then calculated in each pair using the 15 and 21 loci. Next, these calculations were applied to 22 actual sibling pairs. LR values ⩾ 10,000 were observed in 48% of the sibling pairs using the 15 loci and in 80% of the sibling pairs using the 21 loci. The TNSA distribution between siblings and unrelated pairs was more divergent in GlobalFiler than in Identifiler. TNSA values ⩾ 20 were found only in true siblings in Identifiler, while TNSA values ⩾24 in GlobalFiler. In Identifiler, all pairs with TNSA ⩾ 24 had LR values ⩾ 10,000 and the same was true in GlobalFiler for TNSA ⩾29. Therefore, increasing the number of loci is very efficient for sibship determination. The LR is most reliable for determining sibship. However, TNSA values may be useful for the preliminary method of LR values because LR value demonstrated a significantly positive correlation with TNSA value in both Identifiler and GlobalFiler.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号