RAS pathway mutations, which are present in 30% of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) at diagnosis, confer a high risk of resistance to and progression after hypomethylating agent (HMA) therapy, the current standard of care for the disease. Here, using single-cell, multi-omics technologies, we seek to dissect the biological mechanisms underlying the initiation and progression of RAS pathway-mutated CMML. We identify that RAS pathway mutations induce transcriptional reprogramming of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) and downstream monocytic populations in response to cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic inflammatory signaling that also impair the functions of immune cells. HSPCs expand at disease progression after therapy with HMA or the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax and rely on the NF-κB pathway effector MCL1 to maintain survival. Our study has implications for the development of therapies to improve the survival of patients with RAS pathway-mutated CMML.

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is well known to be complicated by systemic inflammatory autoimmune disease (SIADs). However, it remains unclear how the prognosis after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in patients with MDS is impacted by SIADs that occur before allo-HSCT. Therefore, we hypothesized that SIADs before allo-HSCT may be a risk factor for negative outcomes after allo-HSCT in patients with MDS. We conducted a single-center, retrospective, observational study of sixty-nine patients with MDS or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia who underwent their first allo-HCT. Fourteen of the patients had SIADs before allo-HSCT. In multivariate analysis, the presence of SIADs before allo-HSCT was an independent risk factor for overall survival (HR, 3.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.34-8.42, p = 0.009). Endothelial dysfunction syndrome was identified in five of 14 patients with SIADs who required immunosuppressive therapy or intensive chemotherapy, and notably, all patients with uncontrollable SIADs at allo-HSCT developed serious endothelial dysfunction syndrome and died in the early phase after allo-HSCT. The development of SIADs in the context of MDS is thought to reflect the degree of dysfunction of hematopoietic cells in MDS and suggests a higher risk of disease progression. In addition, MDS patients with SIADs before allo-HSCT are considered to be at higher risk of endothelial dysfunction syndrome because of preexisting vascular endothelial dysfunction due to SIADs. In conclusion, SIADs before allo-HSCT constitute an independent risk factor for death in MDS patients undergoing allo-HSCT.

暂无摘要。

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal disease derived from bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells, with a poor prognosis. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo- HSCT) is one of the curable methods for CMML. The outcome of patient transplantation is influenced by various factors such as disease characteristics and comorbidities. Based on the existing prognostic stratification system, screening suitable CMML patients for transplantation and early transplantation is beneficial for their long-term survival. Doctors can evaluate the survival status of CMML patients after transplantation based on the newly developed transplant prognosis model and make targeted medical decisions.
慢性粒-单核细胞白血病（CMML）是一种来源于骨髓造血干细胞的克隆性疾病，预后较差。异基因造血干细胞移植（allo-HSCT）是可治愈CMML的方法之一。患者移植后结局受疾病特征和患者共病等多种因素影响。根据现有预后分层系统，筛选出适合移植的CMML患者并早期移植，有利于其长期生存。医生可根据新开发的移植预后模型评估移植后CMML患者的生存情况并作出针对性的医疗决策。.

UNASSIGNED: Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs) arise after exposure to cytotoxic therapies and are associated with high-risk genetic features and poor outcomes. We analyzed a cohort of patients with therapy-related chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (tCMML; n = 71) and compared its features to that of de novo CMML (dnCMML; n = 461). Median time from cytotoxic therapy to tCMML diagnosis was 6.5 years. Compared with dnCMML, chromosome-7 abnormalities (4% vs 13%; P = .005) but not complex karyotype (3% vs 7%; P = .15), were more frequent in tCMML. tCMML was characterized by higher TP53 mutation frequency (4% vs 12%; P = .04) and lower NRAS (6% vs 22%, P = .007) and CBL (4% vs 12%, P = .04) mutation frequency. Prior therapy with antimetabolites (odd ratio [OR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.42; P = .01) and mitotic inhibitors (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.06-1.44; P = .009) was associated with NF1 and SETBP1 mutations whereas prior mitotic inhibitor therapy was associated with lower TET2 mutation frequency (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.92; P = .01). Although no differences in median overall survival (OS) were observed among tCMML and dnCMML (34.7 months vs 35.9 months, P = .26), multivariate analysis for OS revealed that prior chemotherapy was associated with increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.07-2.89; P = .026). Compared with a cohort of therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome, tCMML had lower TP53 mutation frequency (12% vs 44.4%, P < .001) and less unfavorable outcomes. In summary, tCMML does not exhibit the high-risk features and poor outcomes of t-MNs.

UNASSIGNED: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a heterogeneous disease presenting with either myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic features. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only potentially curative option, but the inherent toxicity of this procedure makes the decision to proceed to allo-HCT challenging, particularly because patients with CMML are mostly older and comorbid. Therefore, the decision between a nonintensive treatment approach and allo-HCT represents a delicate balance, especially because prospective randomized studies are lacking and retrospective data in the literature are conflicting. International consensus on the selection of patients and the ideal timing of allo-HCT, specifically in CMML, could not be reached in international recommendations published 6 years ago. Since then, new, CMML-specific data have been published. The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Practice Harmonization and Guidelines (PH&G) Committee assembled a panel of experts in the field to provide the first best practice recommendations on the role of allo-HCT specifically in CMML. Recommendations were based on the results of an international survey, a comprehensive review of the literature, and expert opinions on the subject, after structured discussion and circulation of recommendations. Algorithms for patient selection, timing of allo-HCT during the course of the disease, pretransplant strategies, allo-HCT modality, as well as posttransplant management for patients with CMML were outlined. The keynote message is, that once a patient has been identified as a transplant candidate, upfront transplantation without prior disease-modifying treatment is preferred to maximize chances of reaching allo-HCT whenever possible, irrespective of bone marrow blast counts.

BACKGROUND: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder with overlapping features of myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms, characterized by prominent monocytosis and an inherent risk for leukemic transformation (~15%-20% over 3-5 years).
METHODS: Newly revised diagnostic criteria include sustained (>3 months) peripheral blood (PB) monocytosis (≥0.5 × 109/L; monocytes ≥10% of leukocyte count), consistent bone marrow (BM) morphology, <20% BM or PB blasts (including promonocytes), and cytogenetic or molecular evidence of clonality. Cytogenetic abnormalities occur in ~30% of patients, while >95% harbor somatic mutations: TET2 (~60%), SRSF2 (~50%), ASXL1 (~40%), RAS pathway (~30%), and others. The presence of ASXL1 and DNMT3A mutations and absence of TET2 mutations negatively impact overall survival (ASXL1WT/TET2MT genotype being favorable).
METHODS: Several risk models serve similar purposes in identifying high-risk patients that are considered for allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) earlier than later. Risk factors in the Mayo Molecular Model (MMM) include presence of truncating ASXL1 mutations, absolute monocyte count >10 × 109/L, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, platelet count <100 × 109/L, and the presence of circulating immature myeloid cells; the resulting 4-tiered risk categorization includes high (≥3 risk factors), intermediate-2 (2 risk factors), intermediate-1 (1 risk factor), and low (no risk factors); the corresponding median survivals were 16, 31, 59, and 97 months. CMML is also classified as being \"myeloproliferative (MP-CMML)\" or \"myelodysplastic (MD-CMML),\" based on the presence or absence of leukocyte count of ≥13 × 109/L.
METHODS: ASCT is the only treatment modality that secures cure or long-term survival and is appropriate for MMM high/intermediate-2 risk disease. Drug therapy is currently not disease-modifying and includes hydroxyurea and hypomethylating agents; a recent phase-3 study (DACOTA) comparing hydroxyurea and decitabine, in high-risk MP-CMML, showed similar overall survival at 23.1 versus 18.4 months, respectively, despite response rates being higher for decitabine (56% vs. 31%).
UNASSIGNED: These include systemic inflammatory autoimmune diseases, leukemia cutis and lysozyme-induced nephropathy; the latter requires close monitoring of renal function during leukocytosis and is a potential indication for cytoreductive therapy.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

Chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) is a rare haematological disorder characterized by monocytosis and dysplastic changes in myeloid cell lineages. Accurate risk stratification is essential for guiding treatment decisions and assessing prognosis. This study aimed to validate the Artificial Intelligence Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes (AIPSS-MDS) in CMML and to assess its performance compared with traditional scores using data from a Spanish registry (n = 1343) and a Taiwanese hospital (n = 75). In the Spanish cohort, the AIPSS-MDS accurately predicted overall survival (OS) and leukaemia-free survival (LFS), outperforming the Revised-IPSS score. Similarly, in the Taiwanese cohort, the AIPSS-MDS demonstrated accurate predictions for OS and LFS, showing superiority over the IPSS score and performing better than the CPSS and molecular CPSS scores in differentiating patient outcomes. The consistent performance of the AIPSS-MDS across both cohorts highlights its generalizability. Its adoption as a valuable tool for personalized treatment decision-making in CMML enables clinicians to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from different therapeutic interventions. Future studies should explore the integration of genetic information into the AIPSS-MDS to further refine risk stratification in CMML and improve patient outcomes.