Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-Phase

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Asciminib靶向BCR::ABL1肉豆蔻酰基口袋,保持针对BCR的活动::ABL1T315I,对大多数批准的三磷酸腺苷竞争性酪氨酸激酶抑制剂具有抗性。我们报告了最新的I期结果(NCT02081378),评估了48例T315I突变的慢性期慢性髓细胞性白血病(CML-CP;数据截止时间:2021年1月6日)重度预治疗的48例接受T315I突变的慢性期慢性髓细胞性白血病患者的安全性/耐受性和抗白血病活性。平均暴露时间为2年,56.3%的患者继续接受asciminib。总的来说,62.2%的可评估患者达到BCR::ABL1≤1%的国际规模(IS);47.6%和81.3%的ponatinib预处理和-naive患者,分别,达到BCR::ABL1IS≤1%。在45名可评估的患者中,48.9%实现了主要分子反应(MMR,BCR::ABL1IS≤0.1%),包括34.6%和68.4%的普纳替尼预处理和初治患者,分别。MMR一直维持到22名患者中的19名达到数据截止为止。最常见的≥3级不良事件(AE)包括脂肪酶水平升高(18.8%)和血小板减少(14.6%)。5例(10.4%)患者出现AE导致停药,包括2名因COVID-19停药并死亡的患者;这是唯一报告的死亡病例。这些结果显示了阿西替尼的有效性,包括近50%的普纳替尼预处理患者,并确认其风险收益状况,支持将其用作T315I突变的CML-CP的治疗选择。
    Asciminib targets the BCR::ABL1 myristoyl pocket, maintaining activity against BCR::ABL1T315I, which is resistant to most approved adenosine triphosphate-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We report updated phase I results (NCT02081378) assessing safety/tolerability and antileukemic activity of asciminib monotherapy 200 mg twice daily in 48 heavily pretreated patients with T315I-mutated chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP; data cutoff: January 6, 2021). With 2 years\' median exposure, 56.3% of patients continued receiving asciminib. Overall, 62.2% of evaluable patients achieved BCR::ABL1 ≤1% on the International Scale (IS); 47.6% and 81.3% of ponatinib-pretreated and -naive patients, respectively, achieved BCR::ABL1IS ≤1%. Of 45 evaluable patients, 48.9% achieved a major molecular response (MMR, BCR::ABL1IS ≤0.1%), including 34.6% and 68.4% of ponatinib-pretreated and -naive patients, respectively. MMR was maintained until data cutoff in 19 of 22 patients who achieved it. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) included increased lipase level (18.8%) and thrombocytopenia (14.6%). Five (10.4%) patients experienced AEs leading to discontinuation, including 2 who discontinued asciminib and died due to COVID-19; these were the only deaths reported. These results show asciminib\'s effectiveness, including in almost 50% of ponatinib pretreated patients, and confirm its risk-benefit profile, supporting its use as a treatment option for T315I-mutated CML-CP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)患者管理的进步使他们的生存率与健康者相当。因此,随着人们越来越关注生活质量,他们的护理范围不断扩大,包括养育孩子。尽管酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)在怀孕期间是禁忌的,因为它们具有致畸作用,它们对男性生育力的影响不太清楚,动物研究和病例报告/系列的结果相互矛盾。我们比较了精子分析参数,作为男性生育能力的黄金标准评估,在TKI治疗前后的11例CP-CML患者中。中位治疗时间为5.1年(范围:2.5-16.5)。精子浓度,%累进,治疗前后的总动力和总动力没有显着差异(分别为p=0.376、0.569和0.595)。我们的结果表明,TKI治疗后男性患者的生育能力没有损害。更大的样本量对于支持/反驳我们的发现至关重要。
    Advancements in the management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) allowed them to achieve survival comparable with their healthy counterparts. Consequently, their care has widened with growing focus on quality of life, including parenting children. Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are contraindicated in pregnancy given their teratogenic effect, their effect on male fertility is less clear with contradictory results from animal studies and case reports/series. We compared the sperm analysis parameters, as the gold-standard assessment for male fertility, of 11 patients with CP- CML before and after TKI therapy. Median therapy duration was 5.1 years (range: 2.5-16.5). The sperm concentration, % progressive, and total motility before and after therapy were not significantly different (p = 0.376, 0.569, and 0.595, respectively). Our results suggest no impairment in fertility potential in male patients after TKI therapy. A larger sample size is crucial to support/refute our findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:伊马替尼在白血病细胞中的生物利用度降低导致临床反应不良。我们研究了伊马替尼的遗传多态性对190例慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者的药代动力学和临床反应的影响。
    方法:使用焦磷酸测序对单核苷酸多态性进行基因分型。使用液相色谱-串联质谱法测量伊马替尼的血浆谷水平。
    结果:携带ABCB1TT基因型的患者(rs1045642、rs2032582和rs1128503),CYP3A5-rs776746的GG基因型和ABCG2-rs2231142多态性的AA基因型显示伊马替尼浓度较高。ABCB1的T等位基因患者(rs1045642,rs2032582和rs1128503),ABCG2-rs2231142的等位基因和CYP3A5-rs776746多态性的G等位基因显示出更好的细胞遗传学反应和分子反应。在多变量分析中,CYP3A5-rs776746G等位基因的携带者表现出更高的完全细胞遗传学反应(CCyR)和主要分子反应(MMR)。同样,ABCB1-rs1045642和rs1128503的T等位基因患者的CCyR率显著升高.ABCG2-rs2231142等位基因A的患者与较高的MMR率相关。CYP3A5-rs776746的AA基因型和ABCB1-rs104562的CC基因型以及rs1128503多态性与伊马替尼失败的较高风险相关。CYP3A5-rs776746的G等位基因患者表现出更高的贫血发生率,ABCB1-rs2032582的T等位基因显示腹泻发生率增加。
    结论:ABCB1,ABCG2和CYP3A5基因的基因分型可以在CML患者的治疗中考虑,以调整治疗和优化临床结果。
    BACKGROUND: Diminished bioavailability of imatinib in leukemic cells contributes to poor clinical response. We examined the impact of genetic polymorphisms of imatinib on the pharmacokinetics and clinical response in 190 patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML).
    METHODS: Single nucleotide polymorphisms were genotyped using pyrophosphate sequencing. Plasma trough levels of imatinib were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
    RESULTS: Patients carrying the TT genotype for ABCB1 (rs1045642, rs2032582, and rs1128503), GG genotype for CYP3A5-rs776746 and AA genotype for ABCG2-rs2231142 polymorphisms showed higher concentration of imatinib. Patients with T allele for ABCB1 (rs1045642, rs2032582, and rs1128503), A allele for ABCG2-rs2231142, and G allele for CYP3A5-rs776746 polymorphisms showed better cytogenetic response and molecular response. In multivariate analysis, carriers of the CYP3A5-rs776746 G allele exhibited higher rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR). Similarly, patients with the T allele of ABCB1-rs1045642 and rs1128503 demonstrated significantly increased CCyR rates. Patients with the A allele of ABCG2-rs2231142 were associated with higher MMR rates. The AA genotype for CYP3A5-rs776746, and the CC genotype for ABCB1-rs104562, and rs1128503 polymorphisms were associated with a higher risk of imatinib failure. Patients with the G allele for CYP3A5-rs776746 exhibited a higher incidence of anemia, and T allele for ABCB1-rs2032582 demonstrated an increased incidence of diarrhea.
    CONCLUSIONS: Genotyping of ABCB1, ABCG2, and CYP3A5 genes may be considered in the management of patients with CML to tailor therapy and optimize clinical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    达沙替尼是第二代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)之一,已被批准用于一线和二线治疗慢性期CML(CP-CML)患者。胸腔积液(PE)是与达沙替尼使用相关的独特毒性。我们的目的是研究使用达沙替尼治疗CP-CML的患者队列中胸腔积液的发生率以及TKI转换后的安全性。总共390名患者在CP-CML的治疗过程中接受了达沙替尼治疗。共有69名患者(17.6%)发展为任何级别的PE。约33例(48%)患者出现CTCAE2级PE,34(49%)3级,只有1名患者发展为4级PE。在34例(49%)患者中观察到PE复发。虽然只有12名患者(17.3%)在PE发展后继续使用达沙替尼,其他57例患者停用了达沙替尼.13例患者改用博舒替尼治疗,其中6例(46%)患者重新发展为PE。虽然只有12.5%的患者出现胸水再积聚,但患者改用伊马替尼,没有患者改用尼洛替尼重新发展PE。在使用达沙替尼治疗CP-CML的患者中,TKI改为博舒替尼与46%的PE复发风险相关。在改用伊马替尼或尼洛替尼的患者中,复发性PE的发生率明显降低。
    Dasatinib is one of the second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) which is approved for the treatment of patients with chronic phase CML (CP-CML) both in the front line and in the second line setting. Pleural effusion (PE) is a unique toxicity associated with dasatinib use. Our aim was to study the incidence of pleural effusion in our cohort of patients who were treated with dasatinib for CP-CML and the safety upon TKI switch. A total of 390 patients were treated with dasatinib during their course of treatment for CP-CML. A total of 69 patients (17.6%) developed any grade of PE. About 33 (48%) patients developed CTCAE grade 2 PE, 34 (49%) grade 3 and only 1 patient developed grade 4 PE. Recurrence of PE was observed in 34 (49%) patients. While only 12 patients (17.3%) continued using dasatinib after development of PE, dasatinib was discontinued in the other 57 patients. Therapy was switched to bosutinib in 13 patients out of which 6 (46%) patients re-developed PE. While only 12.5% patients developed re-accumulation of pleural fluid in patients switched to imatinib, none of the patients switched to nilotinib re-developed PE. A change in TKI to bosutinib was associated with a 46% risk of recurrence of PE in patients who develop PE on dasatinib for the treatment of CP-CML. The incidence of recurrent PE was markedly lower in patient switched to imatinib or nilotinib.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:BCR的双重抑制:ABL1酪氨酸激酶和BCL-2可能潜在地加深慢性粒细胞白血病慢性期(CML-CP)的应答率。本研究评估了达沙替尼和维奈托克联合用药的安全性和有效性。
    方法:在这项2期试验中,患有CML-CP或加速期(克隆演变)的患者接受达沙替尼50mg/天,共3个疗程;在第4疗程加用维奈托克,共3年.维奈托克的初始剂量为200毫克/天,但后来减少到200毫克/天,持续14天,并在达到分子反应(MR)4.5后,以100mg/天的剂量,每疗程7天。经过3年的结合,患者接受达沙替尼单药治疗.主要终点是联合用药12个月时的主要分子反应率(MMR)。
    结果:65例患者接受治疗。他们的平均年龄为46岁(范围,23-73).到12个月的组合,MMR,MR4和MR4.5的发生率为86%,53%,45%,分别。经过42个月的中位随访,4年无事件生存率和总生存率分别为96%和100%,分别。组合的结果与单药达沙替尼的历史结果相当(两种策略的累积12个月MMR率为79%)。联合用药的3-4级中性粒细胞减少症的发生率为22%,单药达沙替尼的发生率为11%(p<.001)。
    结论:达沙替尼和维奈托克治疗CML-CP安全有效。该组合的累积缓解率与单药达沙替尼相似。需要进一步的随访以评估持久的深层分子反应和无治疗缓解的比率。
    BACKGROUND: The dual inhibition of the BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase and BCL-2 could potentially deepen the response rates of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of dasatinib and venetoclax.
    METHODS: In this phase 2 trial, patients with CML-CP or accelerated phase (clonal evolution) received dasatinib 50 mg/day for three courses; venetoclax was added in course 4 for 3 years. The initial venetoclax dose was 200 mg/day continuously but reduced later to 200 mg/day for 14 days, and to 100 mg/day for 7 days per course once a molecular response (MR)4.5 was achieved. After 3 years of combination, patients were maintained on single-agent dasatinib. The primary end point was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months of combination.
    RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were treated. Their median age was 46 years (range, 23-73). By 12 months of combination, the MMR, MR4, and MR4.5 rates were 86%, 53%, and 45%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 42 months, the 4-year event-free and overall survival rates were 96% and 100%, respectively. Outcomes with the combination were comparable to historical outcomes with single-agent dasatinib (cumulative 12-months MMR rate of 79% with both strategies). The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was 22% with the combination and 11% with single-agent dasatinib (p < .001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with dasatinib and venetoclax was safe and effective in CML-CP. The cumulative response rates with the combination were similar to those with single-agent dasatinib. Further follow-up is needed to evaluate the rates of durable deep molecular response and treatment-free remission.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase IV
    BYOND研究评估了每天一次500mg博舒替尼对先前的酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)耐药/不耐受的慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)患者的疗效和安全性。这些事后分析通过对先前TKI的耐药或不耐受(伊马替尼耐药vs达沙替尼/尼罗替尼耐药vsTKI不耐受)评估了博舒替尼的疗效和安全性,和博舒替尼与先前的TKIs之间的交叉不耐受(伊马替尼,达沙替尼,尼洛替尼),费城染色体阳性慢性期CML患者。数据在≥3年随访后报告。在156例费城染色体阳性慢性期CML患者中,53人对伊马替尼耐药,29达沙替尼/尼罗替尼耐药,和74对所有先前的TKIs不耐受;在任何时间累积完全细胞遗传学应答率为83.7%,61.5%,和86.8%,任何时间累积主要分子反应率为72.9%,40.7%,和82.4%,分别。在接受伊马替尼治疗的141、95和79名患者中,达沙替尼,和尼洛替尼,64(45.4%),71(74.7%),和60(75.9%)由于不容忍而停止了相应的TKI;其中,2(3.1%),5(7.0%),0例与博舒替尼交叉不耐受。在TKI耐药和TKI不耐受患者中观察到的反应率,以及博舒替尼和之前的TKIs之间的低交叉不耐受,进一步支持Bosutinib用于费城染色体阳性慢性期CML对之前的TKIs耐药/不耐受的患者.试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02228382。
    The BYOND study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bosutinib 500 mg once daily in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) resistant/intolerant to prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). These post-hoc analyses assessed the efficacy and safety of bosutinib by resistance or intolerance to prior TKIs (imatinib-resistant vs dasatinib/nilotinib-resistant vs TKI-intolerant), and cross-intolerance between bosutinib and prior TKIs (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib), in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic phase CML. Data are reported after ≥3 years\' follow-up. Of 156 patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic phase CML, 53 were imatinib-resistant, 29 dasatinib/nilotinib-resistant, and 74 intolerant to all prior TKIs; cumulative complete cytogenetic response rates at any time were 83.7%, 61.5%, and 86.8%, and cumulative major molecular response rates at any time were 72.9%, 40.7%, and 82.4%, respectively. Of 141, 95, and 79 patients who received prior imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib, 64 (45.4%), 71 (74.7%), and 60 (75.9%) discontinued the respective TKI due to intolerance; of these, 2 (3.1%), 5 (7.0%), and 0 had cross-intolerance with bosutinib. The response rates observed in TKI-resistant and TKI-intolerant patients, and low cross-intolerance between bosutinib and prior TKIs, further support bosutinib use for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic phase CML resistant/intolerant to prior TKIs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02228382.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:全面比较尼洛替尼的治疗反应和结果的数据有限,达沙替尼,氟马替尼和伊马替尼在现实世界中用于新诊断的慢性期慢性粒细胞白血病。
    方法:来自接受第二代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(2G-TKI,尼洛替尼,对来自77个中国中心的达沙替尼或氟马替尼)或伊马替尼治疗进行了回顾性询问。进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析以比较这4种TKI中的治疗反应和结果。
    结果:2,496名接受初始尼洛替尼的患者(n=512),达沙替尼(n=134),本研究对氟马替尼(n=411)或伊马替尼(n=1,439)治疗进行了回顾性调查.PSM分析表明,接受初始尼洛替尼的患者,达沙替尼或氟马替尼治疗具有相当的细胞遗传学和分子反应(p=.28-.91)和生存结局,包括无失败生存(FFS,p=.28-.43),无进展生存期(PFS,p=.19-.93)和总生存期(OS)(p值=.76-.78),但细胞遗传学和分子反应的累积发生率(所有p值<.001)和FFS的概率(p<.001-.01)明显高于接受伊马替尼治疗的患者,尽管PFS(p=.18-.89)和OS(p=.23-.30)相当。
    结论:尼洛替尼,达沙替尼和氟马替尼的疗效相当,新诊断的CML患者的治疗反应和FFS率明显高于伊马替尼。然而,这4种TKIs的PFS和OS无显著差异。这些真实世界的数据可以为常规临床评估提供额外的证据,以确定更合适的治疗方法。
    BACKGROUND: There are limited data comprehensively comparing therapy responses and outcomes among nilotinib, dasatinib, flumatinib and imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia in a real-world setting.
    METHODS: Data from patients with chronic-phase CML receiving initial a second-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (2G-TKI, nilotinib, dasatinib or flumatinib) or imatinib therapy from 77 Chinese centers were retrospectively interrogated. Propensity-score matching (PSM) analyses were performed to to compare therapy responses and outcomes among these 4 TKIs.
    RESULTS: 2,496 patients receiving initial nilotinib (n = 512), dasatinib (n = 134), flumatinib (n = 411) or imatinib (n = 1,439) therapy were retrospectively interrogated in this study. PSM analyses indicated that patients receiving initial nilotinib, dasatinib or flumatinib therapy had comparable cytogenetic and molecular responses (p = .28-.91) and survival outcomes including failure-free survival (FFS, p = .28-.43), progression-free survival (PFS, p = .19-.93) and overall survival (OS) (p values = .76-.78) but had significantly higher cumulative incidences of cytogenetic and molecular responses (all p values < .001) and higher probabilities of FFS (p < .001-.01) than those receiving imatinib therapy, despite comparable PFS (p = .18-.89) and OS (p = .23-.30).
    CONCLUSIONS: Nilotinib, dasatinib and flumatinib had comparable efficacy, and significantly higher therapy responses and higher FFS rates than imatinib in newly diagnosed CML patients. However, there were no significant differences in PFS and OS among these 4 TKIs. These real-world data may provide additional evidence for routine clinical assessments to identify more appropriate therapies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的几年里,研究进展,治疗,和市场动态影响了慢性粒细胞白血病慢性期(CML-CP)的治疗策略。它们包括更广泛的具有成本效益的仿制药伊马替尼,以及其他通用的第二代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)。获得负担得起的仿制药意味着所有CML-CP患者都应该获得安全有效的终身治疗。当总生存期是治疗终点时,伊马替尼提供了良好的治疗价值。当免治疗缓解为目标时,第二代TKIs可能是最佳的前线策略。最近的研究表明,当TKIs以减少的剂量使用时,保持了疗效并降低了毒性。第二代TKIs的减少剂量时间表(毒性较低并诱导更快的深层分子反应)可能使通用第二代TKIs成为更具吸引力的治疗选择。在轻度至中度的情况下调整TKI的剂量,甚至严重但可逆的,不良事件可能比切换到不同的TKI更可取。二线和其他疗法的选择取决于一线治疗观察到的不断发展的模式。剂量调整的ponatinib方案在第二代TKIs耐药患者或T315I突变疾病患者中显示出改善的疗效和安全性。对于阿西替尼,与普纳替尼相比,需要进行更长期的随访,以更好地评估其安全性和有效性.同种异体干细胞移植代表了新一代TKIs的有效替代方案,当TKI的价格>40,000美元/年时,具有更好的治疗价值。
    Over the past several years, advances in research, treatment, and market dynamics have impacted treatment strategies in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). They include the broader availability of cost-effective generic imatinib, and soon other generic second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Access to affordable generics means that all patients with CML-CP should have access to safe and highly effective lifelong therapies. When overall survival is the treatment endpoint, imatinib provides a good treatment value. Second-generation TKIs may be the best frontline strategy when treatment-free remission is the goal. Recent studies have shown maintained efficacy and reduced toxicity when TKIs are used at reduced dosing. Reduced-dose schedules of second-generation TKIs (which are less toxic and induce faster deep molecular responses) may render generic second-generation TKIs a more attractive treatment option. Adjusting the dose of TKI in the presence of mild-to-moderate, or even severe but reversible, adverse events may be preferable to switching to a different TKI. The selection of second-line and beyond therapies depends on the evolving patterns observed with frontline treatment. Dose-adjusted ponatinib schedules have demonstrated improved efficacy and safety in patients resistant to second-generation TKIs or those with T315I-mutated disease. For asciminib, longer-term follow-up is needed to better evaluate its safety and efficacy compared with ponatinib. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation represents a valid alternative to newer-generation TKIs, with a better treatment value when TKIs are priced at >$40,000/year.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号