OBJECTIVE: The accurate measurement of Cobb angles is crucial for the effective clinical management of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The Lenke classification system plays a pivotal role in determining the appropriate fusion levels for treatment planning. However, the presence of interobserver variability and time-intensive procedures presents challenges for clinicians. The purpose of this study is to compare the measurement accuracy of our developed artificial intelligence measurement system for Cobb angles and Lenke classification in AIS patients with manual measurements to validate its feasibility.
METHODS: An artificial intelligence (AI) system measured the Cobb angle of AIS patients using convolutional neural networks, which identified the vertebral boundaries and sequences, recognized the upper and lower end vertebras, and estimated the Cobb angles of the proximal thoracic, main thoracic, and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves sequentially. Accordingly, the Lenke classifications of scoliosis were divided by oscillogram and defined by the AI system. Furthermore, a man-machine comparison (n = 300) was conducted for senior spine surgeons (n = 2), junior spine surgeons (n = 2), and the AI system for the image measurements of proximal thoracic (PT), main thoracic (MT), thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L), thoracic sagittal profile T5-T12, bending views PT, bending views MT, bending views TL/L, the Lenke classification system, the lumbar modifier, and sagittal thoracic alignment.
RESULTS: In the AI system, the calculation time for each patient\'s data was 0.2 s, while the measurement time for each surgeon was 23.6 min. The AI system showed high accuracy in the recognition of the Lenke classification and had high reliability compared to senior doctors (ICC 0.962).
CONCLUSIONS: The AI system has high reliability for the Lenke classification and is a potential auxiliary tool for spinal surgeons.

UNASSIGNED: The Lenke classification system is widely utilized as the preoperative evaluation protocol for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, manual measurement is susceptible to observer-induced variability, which consequently impacts the evaluation of progression. The goal of this investigation was to develop an automated Lenke classification system utilizing innovative deep learning algorithms.
UNASSIGNED: Using the database from the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, the whole spinal x-rays images were retrospectively collected. Specifically, images collection was divided into AIS and control group. The control group consisted of individuals who underwent routine health checks and did not have scoliosis. Afterwards, relative features of all images were annotated. Deep learning was implemented through the utilization of the key-point based detection method to realize the vertebral detection, and Cobb angle measurement and scoliosis classification were performed based on relevant standards. Besides, the segmentation method was employed to achieve the recognition of lumbar vertebral pedicle to determine the type of lumbar spine modifier. Finally, the model performance was further quantitatively analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: In the study, a total of 2082 spinal x-ray images were collected from 407 AIS patients and 227 individuals in the control group. The model for vertebral detection achieved an F1-score of 0.809 for curve type evaluation and an F1-score of 0.901 for thoracic sagittal profile. The intraclass correlation efficient (ICC) of the Cobb angle measurement was 0.925. In the analysis of performance for vertebra pedicle segmentation model, the F1-score of lumbar modification profile was 0.942, the intersection over union (IOU) of the target pixels was 0.827, and the Hausdorff distance (HD) was 6.565 ± 2.583 mm. Specifically, the F1-score for ultimate Lenke type classifier was 0.885.
UNASSIGNED: This study has constructed an automated Lenke classification system by employing the deep learning networks to achieve the recognition pattern and feature extraction. Our models require further validation in additional cases in the future.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to assess the changes in flexibility during night-time bracing in skeletally immature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with curves in the surgical range.
METHODS: We included a consecutive cohort of 89 AIS patients with curves ≥ 45° and an estimated growth potential. All patients were eventually treated with fusion surgery, and all patients had side-bending radiographs prior to both bracing and surgery. Curves were classified as structural or non-structural curves according to Lenke at both timepoints.
RESULTS: The main curve progressed by a mean of 12 ± 10° and the secondary curve by 8 ± 8°. Flexibility of the main curve decreased from 50 ± 19% to 44 ± 19% (p = 0.001) and the underlying curve from 85 ± 21% to 77 ± 22% (p = 0.005). In 69 patients (79%), the Lenke category did not progress during bracing. In 14 patients (15%), the progression in Lenke type occurred in the thoracic region (i.e., Lenke type 1 to type 2), while six patients (7%) progressed in the lumbar region (i.e., type 1 to type 3). In the 69 patients that did not progress, we found that the last touched vertebra moved distally by one or two levels in 26 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe that curve flexibility decreases during bracing in severe AIS. However, this had only a modest impact on the surgical strategy. Bracing as a holding strategy can be applied, but the risk of losing flexibility in the lumbar spine should be outweighed against the risks of premature fusion surgery.

METHODS: Retrospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: To assess if pedicle dysplasia is present in proximal thoracic (PT), both structural and nonstructural, compared to main thoracic (MT) curves; and to assess if it is predictive of radiographic outcomes at minimum 2 years of follow-up.
METHODS: A retrospective review of surgically-treated Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients with Lenke 1-2-3-4 curves was performed. On preoperative CT-scan, at the apical vertebra, pedicle width on the concavity (PWc) and on the convexity (PWv) and Pedicle Dysplasia Index (PDI, defined as PWc/PWv) were measured. Preoperative and last follow-up (at least 2 years) x-rays were reviewed.
RESULTS: 104 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were divided into Structural-PT (S-PT) and Nonstructural-PT (NS-PT) groups based on Lenke criteria. PWc (P < .001). And PDI (P < .001 for S-PT, P = .004 for NS-PT) were significantly smaller in the PT than in MT curves for both groups. PT-PWc significantly correlated with follow-up PT Cobb for both groups (P < .001 and P = .015 respectively). PT-PDI significantly correlated with follow-up PT-Cobb (P < .001), CA (P < .040) and T1 tilt (P < .002), only for NS-PT group. NS-PT patients with PWc PT <1 mm had higher RSHD (P = .021) and T1 tilt (P = .025) at follow-up. NS-PT patients with PDI PT <.3 had higher RSHD (P < .001), CA (P = .002) and T1 tilt (P = .003) at follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: S-PT and NS-PT curves show significant pedicle dysplasia on the concavity. Pedicle dysplasia significantly correlated with shoulder balance at follow-up, for NS-PT patterns. Patients with a PWc <1 mm or PDI <.30 are at particular risk of postoperative shoulder imbalance.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that the point prevalence of back pain ranges from 12 % to 33 % and that the lifetime prevalence of back pain ranges from 28 % to 51 % in adolescents. However, few studies on back pain in patients with Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have been conducted, and these studies had significant limitations, including a lack of comparative controls and detailed information about scoliotic deformity or pain location. This study aimed to determine whether adolescents with AIS experience back pain in specific regions.
METHODS: This retrospective case-control study included 189 female adolescents with AIS who underwent corrective fusion from 2008 to 2020. Questionnaires on back pain and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using the Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument-22 (SRS-22) were conducted preoperatively. The control group included 2909 general female adolescents.
RESULTS: The mean Cobb angles in the main thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves were 51.4 ± 15.3° and 40.4 ± 12.9°. Back pain characteristics included higher point prevalence (25.9 %) and lifetime prevalence (64.6 %) compared to healthy controls. Adolescents with back pain showed lower scores in the pain and mental health domains of the SRS-22. Adolescents with major thoracic AIS showed more back pain in the upper and middle right back compared to adolescents with major thoracolumbar/lumbar AIS.
CONCLUSIONS: The point and lifetime prevalence of back pain were definitely higher in patients with AIS, which affected their HRQOL. There was a relationship between pain around the right scapula and the right major thoracic curve with a rib hump deformity.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of anterior fusion with overcorrection in the instrumented vertebra for Lenke 1 AR type curves has been reported, but how to achieve overcorrection and how overcorrection affects spinal alignment are unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify the factors that cause overcorrection, and to investigate how overcorrection affects postoperative spinal alignment in the surgical treatment of Lenke 1 AR type curves.
METHODS: Patients who had anterior surgery for a Lenke type 1 or 2 and lumbar modifier AR (L4 vertebral tilt to the right) type scoliosis and minimum 2-year follow-up were included. The radiographic data were measured at preoperative, postoperative 1 month, and final follow-up. The UIV-LIV Cobb angle was determined as the Cobb angle between the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV), and a negative number for this angle was considered overcorrection. The screw angle was determined to be the sum of the angle formed by the screw axis and the lower and upper endplates in the LIV and UIV, respectively. The change (Δ) in the parameters from postoperative to final follow-up was calculated. The relationships between the UIV-LIV Cobb angle and other radiographic parameters were evaluated by linear regression analyses.
RESULTS: Fourteen patients met the inclusion criteria. Their median age was 15.5 years, and the median follow-up period was 53.6 months. The median UIV-LIV Cobb angle was -1.4° at postoperative 1 month. The median screw angle was 4.7°, and overcorrection was achieved in 11 (79%) cases at postoperative 1 month. The screw angle (r2 = 0.42, p = 0.012) and Δ FDUV-CSVL (the deviation of the first distal uninstrumented vertebra from the central sacral vertical line, r2 = 0.53, p = 0.003) were significantly correlated with the UIV-LIV Cobb angle.
CONCLUSIONS: Screw placement in the UIV and LIV not parallel to the endplate, but angled, was an effective method to facilitate overcorrection in the instrumented vertebrae. The results of the present study suggest that overcorrection could bring spontaneous improvement of coronal balance below the instrumented segment during the postoperative period.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional growth disorder. Corrective surgical procedures are the recommended treatment option for a thoracic angle exceeding 50° and a lumbar major curve of 40°. Over the past few years, dynamic growth modulation implants have been developed as alternatives to permanent fusion. The ApiFix system was designed as a 2D \"posterior dynamic device\" for curve correction. After implantation in a minimally invasive procedure, it uses polyaxial joints and a self-adjusting rod to preserve the degree of motion and to accommodate the patient\'s growth. It provides an effective method of controlling deformity and fills the gap between the conservative treatment of major curves that are >35° and the fusion procedure. The objective of the two-center cohort study was the analysis of the correction results of patients, who underwent surgical intervention with the ApiFix system. The inclusion criteria were AIS, Lenke type 1 or type 5, a major curve on bending films of ≤30°, and an angle of the major curve of between 35° and 60°. Postoperative radiograph data were obtained longitudinally for up to 24 months of follow-up and compared to preoperative (preop) values. For comparisons of the different time points, non-parametric tests (Wilcoxon) or paired t-tests for normally distributed values were used to analyze repeated measures. Overall, 36 patients (25 female and 11 male) were treated with the ApiFix system from April 2018 to October 2020. Lenke type 1 was identified in 21 (58%) cases and Lenke type 5 was identified in 15 (42%) cases. The average angle of the thoracic major curve for Lenke 1 was 43°. The preoperative lumbar major curve (Lenke 5) was determined to be 43°. Over a follow-up of 24 months, a correction of the major curve to an average of 20° was observed for Lenke 1 and that to an average of 15° was observed for Lenke 5. Lenke type 1 and type 5 showed significant changes in the major curve over the individual test intervals in the paired comparisons compared to the starting angle (Lenke 1: preop-24 months, 0.002; Lenke 5: preop-24 months, 0.043). Overall, 11 events were recorded in the follow-up period, that required revision surgery. We distinguished between repeated interventions required after reaching the maximum distraction length of the implant due to the continued growth of the patient (n = 4) and complications, such as infections or problems associated with the anchorage of the implant (n = 7). The results from the present cohort revealed a statistically significant improvement in the postoperatively measured angles of the major and minor curves in the follow-up after 24 months. Consequently, the results were comparable to those of the already established vertebral body tethering method. Alignment in AIS via dynamic correction systems in combination with a possible growth modulation has been a treatment alternative to surgical fusing procedures for more than a decade. However, the long-term corrective effect has to be validated in further studies.

OBJECTIVE: Bending Asymmetry Index (BAI) has been proposed to characterize the types of scoliotic curve in three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Scolioscan has demonstrated its validity and reliability in scoliosis assessment with manual assessment-based X-ray imaging. The objective of this study is to investigate the ultrasound-derived BAI method to X-ray imaging of scoliosis, with supplementary information provided for the pre-surgery planning.
METHODS: About 30 pre-surgery scoliosis subjects (9 males and 21 females; Cobb: 50.9 ± 19.7°, range 18°-115°) were investigated retrospectively. Each subject underwent three-posture X-ray scanning supine on a plain mattress on the same day. BAI is an indicator to distinguish structural or non-structural curves through the spine flexibility information obtained from lateral bending spinal profiles. BAI was calculated semi-automatically with manual annotation of vertebral centroids and pelvis level inclination adjustment. BAI classification was validated with the scoliotic curve type and traditional Lenke classification using side-bending Cobb angle measurement (S-Cobb).
RESULTS: 82 curves from 30 pre-surgery scoliosis patients were included. The correlation coefficient was R2 = 0.730 (p < 0.05) between BAI and S-Cobb. In terms of scoliotic curve type classification, all curves were correctly classified; out of 30 subjects, 1 case was confirmed as misclassified when applying to Lenke classification earlier, thus has been adjusted.
CONCLUSIONS: BAI method has demonstrated its inter-modality versatility in X-ray imaging application. The curve type classification and the pre-surgery Lenke classification both indicated promising performances upon the exploratory dataset. A fully-automated of BAI measurement is surely an interesting direction to continue our endeavor. Deep learning on the vertebral-level segmentation should be involved in further study.

UNASSIGNED: A retrospective study.
UNASSIGNED: Curve flexibility in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can be evaluated using different techniques. This study aimed to determine whether the combination of side-bending (SB) and traction (TX) radiographs influences preoperative planning for AIS than either radiograph alone.
UNASSIGNED: Thirty-two spine surgeons were asked to review 30 AIS Lenke type 1 cases and select an upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) for the posterior spinal instrumentation of each case. Each rater reviewed the cases 3 times in each round. The raters were provided with the full-length posteroanterior (PA) and lateral standing and SB radiographs for round 1; PA, lateral, and TX radiographs for round 2; and PA, lateral, SB, and TX radiographs for round 3. Intra- and inter-rater reliabilities were evaluated using Kappa statistics.
UNASSIGNED: The intra-rater reliability for UIV and LIV was 0.657 and 0.612 between rounds 1 and 2, 0.634 and 0.692 between rounds 1 and 3, and 0.659 and 0.638 between rounds 2 and 3, respectively, which indicated substantial agreement between rounds. The inter-rater kappa reliabilities for UIV and LIV selection were 0.103 and 0.412 for round 1, 0.121 and 0.380 for round 2, and 0.125 and 0.368 for round 3, indicating slight to moderate agreement between raters.
UNASSIGNED: Whether raters used either SB or TX radiography, or both in addition to PA and lateral standing radiographs, did not influence the decision making for UIV or LIV of AIS Lenke type 1 surgery.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is an abnormal lateral curvature of the spine that arises during the pubescent growth spurt. AIS mainly affects females in the age group of 10 to 16 yr, with a prevalence of about 1% to 3% in the at-risk population.1 Treatment options vary depending on disease presentation and severity. Mild curvature mainly requires periodic observation for disease progression, whereas more moderate curvature can necessitate bracing or corrective surgery.2 Here, we present the use of a temporary rod and neuroimaging for the correction of Lenke type 1 spinal curvature in an AIS patient. An inferior facetectomy is performed, and a Lenke probe is used for entry into the pedicle and vertebral body. The channel is sounded before and after tapping to check for adequate walls prior to insertion of the pedicle screw. The ARTIS pheno is brought into the field, which uses fluoroscopy to create a 3-dimensional (3D) representation of the instrumentation within the spine. A temporary rod is placed in the concavity, and a combination of corrective techniques, including a rod roll, apical translation, and reduction, is performed to bring up the concavity, derotate the spine, and translate the spine. The permanent rod is then placed in the convexity, and compression is performed to bring down the scapular prominence. The temporary rod is then removed, and a final rod is placed to complete the 3D correction. The patient consented to the procedure, and an informed written consent was obtained from the patient to use her photographs and video recordings for publication.