UNASSIGNED: The effects of heart failure (HF) on cortical brain structure remain unclear. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the causal effects of heart failure on cortical structures in the brain using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a two-sample MR analysis utilizing genetically-predicted HF trait, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels to examine their effects on the cortical surface area (SA) and thickness (TH) across 34 cortical brain regions. Genome-wide association study summary data were extracted from studies by Rasooly (1,266,315 participants) for HF trait, Schmidt (36,548 participants) for LVEF, the SCALLOP consortium (21,758 participants) for NT-proBNP, and the ENIGMA Consortium (51,665 participants) for cortical SA and TH. A series of MR analyses were employed to exclude heterogeneity and pleiotropy, ensuring the stability of the results. Given the exploratory nature of the study, p-values between 1.22E-04 and 0.05 were considered suggestive of association, and p-values below 1.22E-04 were defined as statistically significant.
UNASSIGNED: In this study, we found no significant association between HF and cortical TH or SA (all p > 1.22E-04). We found that the HF trait and elevated NT-proBNP levels were not associated with cortical SA, but were suggested to decrease cortical TH in the pars orbitalis, lateral orbitofrontal cortex, temporal pole, lingual gyrus, precuneus, and supramarginal gyrus. Reduced LVEF was primarily suggested to decrease cortical SA in the isthmus cingulate gyrus, frontal pole, postcentral gyrus, cuneus, and rostral middle frontal gyrus, as well as TH in the postcentral gyrus. However, it was suggested to causally increase in the SA of the posterior cingulate gyrus and medial orbitofrontal cortex and the TH of the entorhinal cortex and superior temporal gyrus.
UNASSIGNED: We found 15 brain regions potentially affected by HF, which may lead to impairments in cognition, emotion, perception, memory, language, sensory processing, vision, and executive control in HF patients.

UNASSIGNED: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) improved outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and severe secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) compared with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) alone regardless of the severity of baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The study aimed to evaluate the effect of early changes in LVEF after TEER and GDMT alone in patients with HF and severe SMR.
UNASSIGNED: Within the COAPT trial, we evaluated outcomes according to changes in LVEF from baseline to 30 days. The primary outcome was all-cause death or HF hospitalization (HFH) between 30 days and 2 years.
UNASSIGNED: Among 432 patients with paired echocardiographic data, 182 (42.1%) had increased LVEF (LVEF change 6.0% ± 4.9%) and 250 (57.9%) had a decrease or no change in LVEF (LVEF change -6.6% ± 5.6%) from baseline to 30 days. LVEF at 30 days increased more frequently with GDMT alone compared with TEER plus GDMT (51.4% vs 33.0%; P = .0001). Between 30 days and 2 years, there were no significant differences in death or HFH in the increase LVEF and the decrease LVEF groups (58.8% vs 51.4%; multivariable-adjusted HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.87-1.08; P = .59). TEER plus GDMT reduced the 30-day to 2-year rate of death or HFH compared with GDMT alone consistently in patients with increase LVEF and decrease LVEF (Pint = 0.75).
UNASSIGNED: Among patients with HF and severe SMR, early improvements in LVEF were more frequent with GDMT alone compared with TEER plus GDMT but were not associated with subsequent outcomes at 2 years. TEER reduced death or HFH during 2-year follow-up irrespective of early LVEF changes.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Despite many reports of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HRPCI) with hemodynamic support, little is known about whether this approach improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The purpose of the present observational study was to examine, in an ideal patient population with Impella-supported HRPCI, whether there is an impact on left ventricular function at midterm follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: RESTORE EF is a multicenter, retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected observational data set that aimed to assess 90-day LVEF in patients undergoing Impella-supported nonemergent HRPCI (NCT04648306), who survived with no intervening cardiac procedures prior to the primary endpoint follow-up window (90-day LVEF assessment). Secondary endpoints included change in New York Heart Association Functional Classification and Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Grade at the last follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: From August 2019 to May 2021, 406 patients were enrolled at 22 US sites. Age was 70.2 ​​± ​​11.4 ​​years; 26% were female. In paired assessment at 90-day follow-up, baseline LVEF improved from 35 ​​± ​​15% to 45 ​​± ​​14% (N = 251, P < .0001), with significantly greater improvement in patients with residual SYNTAX score I of 0. Percentage classified as New York Heart Association class III/IV decreased from 62% at baseline to 15% at last follow-up (P < .001), and percentage with Canadian Cardiovascular Society grade III/IV symptoms decreased from 72% to 2% (P < .0001).
UNASSIGNED: In an ideal cohort of HRPCI patients, there is a signal that hemodynamically supported HRPCI affords significant improvement in 90-day LVEF, with complete revascularization associated with greater LVEF improvement. These hypothesis-generating findings merit further assessment in large, all-comer studies and randomized trials.

Background: Conduction abnormality post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains clinically significant and usually requires chronic pacing. The effect of right ventricular (RV) pacing post-TAVI on clinical outcomes warrants further studies. Methods: We identified 147 consecutive patients who required chronic RV pacing after a successful TAVI procedure and propensity-matched these patients according to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score to a control group of patients that did not require RV pacing post-TAVI. We evaluated routine echocardiographic measurements and performed offline speckle-tracking strain analysis for the purpose of this study on transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) images performed at 9 to 18 months post-TAVI. Results: The final study population comprised 294 patients (pacing group n = 147 and non-pacing group n = 147), with a mean age of 81 ± 7 years, 59% male; median follow-up was 354 days. There were more baseline conduction abnormalities in the pacing group compared to the non-pacing group (56.5% vs. 41.5%. p = 0.01). Eighty-eight patients (61.6%) in the pacing group required RV pacing due to atrioventricular (AV) conduction block post-TAVI. The mean RV pacing burden was 44% in the pacing group. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was similar at follow-up in the pacing vs. non-pacing groups (57 ± 13.0%, 59 ± 11% p = 0.31); however, LV global longitudinal strain (-12.7 ± 3.5% vs. -18.8 ± 2.7%, p < 0.0001), LV apical strain (-12.9 ± 5.5% vs. 23.2 ± 9.2%, p < 0.0001), and mid-LV strain (-12.7 ± 4.6% vs. -18.7 ± 3.4%, p < 0.0001) were significantly worse in the pacing vs. non-pacing groups. Conclusions: Chronic RV pacing after the TAVI procedure is associated with subclinical LV systolic dysfunction within 1.5 years of follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF) with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF).
RESULTS: We used data from BIOSTAT-CHF including patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% at baseline who had LVEF re-assessed at 9 months. HFimpEF was defined as a LVEF >40% and a LVEF ≥10% increase from baseline at 9 months. We validated findings in the ASIAN-HF registry. The primary outcome was a composite of time to HF rehospitalization or all-cause mortality. In BIOSTAT-CHF, about 20% of patients developed HFimpEF, that was associated with a lower primary event rate of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.97, p = 0.040) and the composite endpoint (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30-0.70, p < 0.001) compared with patients who remained in persistent HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The findings were similar in the ASIAN-HF (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18-0.89, p = 0.024, and HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.17-0.48, p < 0.001). Five independently common predictors for HFimpEF in both BIOSTAT-CHF and ASIAN-HF were female sex, absence of ischaemic heart disease, higher LVEF, smaller left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameter at baseline. A predictive model combining only five predictors (absence of ischaemic heart disease and left bundle branch block, smaller left ventricular end-systolic and left atrial diameter, and higher platelet count) for HFimpEF in the BIOSTAT-CHF achieved an area under the curve of 0.772 and 0.688 in the ASIAN-HF (due to missing left atrial diameter and platelet count).
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 20-30% of patients with HFrEF improved to HFimpEF within 1 year with better clinical outcomes. In addition, the predictive model with clinical predictors could more accurately predict HFimpEF in patients with HFrEF.

BACKGROUND: Significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the heterogeneity of heart failure (HF) phenotypes, particularly among patients with preserved or mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFp/mrEF). Our aim was to identify HF subtypes within the HFp/mrEF population.
METHODS: K-prototypes clustering algorithm was used to identify different HF phenotypes in a cohort of 2 570 patients diagnosed with HFmrEF or HFpEF. This algorithm employs the k-means algorithm for quantitative variables and k-modes for qualitative variables.
RESULTS: We identified three distinct phenotypic clusters: Cluster A (n = 850, 33.1%), characterized by a predominance of women with low comorbidity burden; Cluster B (n = 830, 32.3%), mainly women with diabetes mellitus and high comorbidity; and Cluster C (n = 890, 34.5%), primarily men with a history of active smoking and respiratory comorbidities. Significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics and one-year mortality rates across the clusters: 18% for Cluster A, 33% for Cluster B, and 26.4% for Cluster C (P < 0.001). Cluster B had the shortest median time to death (90 days), followed by Clusters C (99 days) and A (144 days) (P < 0.001). Stratified Cox regression analysis identified age, cancer, respiratory failure, and laboratory parameters as predictors of mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Cluster analysis identified three distinct phenotypes within the HFp/mrEF population, highlighting significant heterogeneity in clinical profiles and prognostic implications. Women were classified into two distinct phenotypes: low-risk women and diabetic women with high mortality rates, while men had a more uniform profile with a higher prevalence of respiratory disease.

UNASSIGNED: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been revealed as a severe illness with a wide-ranging cardiac manifestation and has a worldwide burden on the health-care system.
UNASSIGNED: Our aim in this study is to assess the impact of mild COVID-19 infection on cardiac function in patients without previous structural heart disease.
UNASSIGNED: We evaluated 100 outpatients with a history of mild COVID-19 infection without needing hospitalization within 3 weeks to 3 months after recovery from the acute phase of the illness between August 2020 and July 2021.
UNASSIGNED: The patients were compared with 105 healthy participants without a history of COVID-19 as the control group. All participants underwent comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography.
UNASSIGNED: Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS statistics 23. For all tests, P < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.
UNASSIGNED: COVID-19 patients had higher global longitudinal strain (P = 0.001), systolic pulmonary artery pressure (P = 0.008), RV E\' (P = 0.049), and RV A\' (P = 0.003), while had lower septal tissue velocities (P = 0.01) and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (LVEF) (P = 0.03). Abnormal EF (LVEF <55%) was noted in 19% of the COVID-19 patients and 8.6% of the control group (P = 0.03). Moderate or more diastolic dysfunction was noted in 10 COVID-19 patients but only in one participant in the control group (P = 0.005).
UNASSIGNED: Mild COVID-19 infection can result in cardiac functional and structural changes, even in patients without known previous structural heart disease. Echocardiography can be a useful modality for risk assessment and follow-up in patients with COVID-19.

UNASSIGNED: Patients may experience a decline in cardiac function even after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is apparent that the assessment of left ventricular (LV) function before PCI is often overlooked. The purpose of this review is to explore the significance of LV function assessment before PCI by comparing the differences in short- and long-term PCI outcomes between patients with different LV ejection fraction (LVEF) stratified preoperatively.
UNASSIGNED: PubMed and Scopus were searched to identify potential studies from January 1, 2001 through January 1, 2022.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 969,868 participants in 33 studies at different stratifications of baseline LVEF were included in this review and their PCI outcomes were stratified for analysis. The hazard ratio of all-cause mortality within 30 days, one year and greater than 1 year after PCI between patients with abnormal and normal LVEF were 2.96 [95% CI, 2.2, 3.98], 3.14 [95% CI, 1.64, 6.01] and 3.08 [95% CI, 2.6, 3.64]; moderately impaired LV function versus normal were 2.32 [95% CI, 1.85, 2.91], 2.04 [95% CI, 1.37, 3.03], 1.93 [95% CI, 1.54, 2.44]; poor LV function versus normal were 4.84 [95% CI, 3.83, 6.1], 4.48 [95% CI, 1.37, 14.68], 6.59 [95% CI, 4.23, 10.27].
UNASSIGNED: A moderate or severe reduction in patients\' LVEF may have a serious impact on PCI prognosis. We strongly advocate for adequate assessment of LVEF before PCI as this will assist in choosing the optimal revascularization and postoperative treatment, thereby reducing short- and long-term mortality.

Ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) constitutes a major public health issue, directly involved in the prevalence and incidence of heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Severe impairment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is considered a high-risk marker for SCD, conditioning the criteria that determine an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) placement in primary prevention according to current clinical guidelines. However, its sensitivity and specificity values for the prediction of SCD in ICM may not be highest. Myocardial characterization using cardiac magnetic resonance with late gadolinium enhancement (CMR-LGE) sequences has made it possible to answer clinically relevant questions that are currently not assessable with LVEF alone. There is growing scientific evidence in favor of the relationship between fibrosis evaluated with CMR and the appearance of VA/SCD in patients with ICM. This evidence should make us contemplate a more realistic clinical value of LVEF in our daily clinical decision-making.