UNASSIGNED: Although the restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have long-term benefits, few studies have investigated the acute hemodynamic benefits immediately after SR restoration. Therefore, we investigated whether hemodynamic changes occurred in the first few minutes after cardioversion from AF to SR.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively enrolled 145 patients with AF and divided them into a pre-AF group comprising patients in whom SR was restored by electrical cardioversion during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI; n = 74) and a control group comprising patients who were in SR throughout the procedure (n = 71). The pre-AF group was subdivided into subgroups according to AF classification (paroxysmal AF (PAF), persistent AF (PerAF), and long-standing persistent AF (LSPAF)) and into quartiles based on the AF-heart rate (HR). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and left atrial pressure (LAP) were measured immediately after transseptal puncture (pre-measurement) and before withdrawal from the left atrium after PVI (post-measurement). The changes in MAP and LAP between the pre- and post-measurement (ΔMAP and ΔLAP) were calculated by subtracting the pre-measurements (MAPpre and LAPpre) from the post-measurements (MAPpost and LAPpost).
UNASSIGNED: In the pre-AF group, the time from cardioversion to post-measurement was 19 ± 16 min. When ΔMAP and ΔLAP were compared with the control group, ΔMAP was significantly smaller (4.9 ± 17.8 vs. 11.0 ± 14.2 mm Hg, respectively; P = 0.025), and ΔLAP was not significantly different between the groups. In the subgroup analyses, although ΔLAP was not significantly different among AF types, ΔMAP was significantly increased in the PAF group compared to the PerAF and LSPAF groups (24.0 ± 18.5 vs. 3.1 ± 16.8 and 4.5 ± 18.1 mm Hg, respectively; P = 0.042). The HRpre in the quartiles with the lowest, second, third, and highest AF-HR were approximately 58, 74, 86, and 109 beats per minute (bpm), respectively. The ΔLAP and ΔMAP were not significantly different among the AF-HR quartile groups.
UNASSIGNED: In patients with PAF, atrial contractions may resume quickly, which leads to hemodynamic improvement immediately after SR restoration. As for AF-HR, there was no significant impairment of ventricular diastolic filling at approximately < 109 bpm.

BACKGROUND: Increased left atrial pressure (LAP) contributes to dyspnea and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in baseline LAP and LAP response to rapid pacing between paroxysmal and persistent AF.
RESULTS: This observational study prospectively enrolled 1369 participants who underwent AF catheter ablation, excluding those with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. H2FPEF score was calculated by echocardiography and baseline characteristics. Patients underwent LAP measurements during AF, sinus rhythm, and heart rates of 90, 100, 110, and 120 beats per minute (bpm), induced by right atrial pacing and isoproterenol. The baseline LAP-peak in the persistent AF group consistently exceeded that in the paroxysmal AF (PAF) group across each H2FPEF score subgroup (all P<0.05). LAP-peak increased with pacing (19.5 to 22.5 mm Hg) but decreased with isoproterenol (20.4 to 18.4 mm Hg). Under pacing, patients with PAF exhibited a significantly lower LAP-peak (90 bpm) than those with persistent AF (17.7±8.2 versus 21.1±9.3 mm Hg, P<0.001). However, there was no difference in LAP-peak (120 bpm) between the 2 groups (22.1±8.1 versus 22.9±8.4 mm Hg, P=0.056) because the LAP-peak significantly increased with heart rate in the group with PAF.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PAF exhibited lower baseline LAP with greater increases during rapid pacing compared with individuals with persistent AF, indicating a need to revise the H2FPEF score for distinguishing PAF from persistent AF and emphasizing the importance of rate and rhythm control in PAF for symptom control.
BACKGROUND: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT02138695.

•Single radial artery access for direct transmitral gradient measurement is feasible•A radial TIG coronary catheter can be advanced retrograde into the left atrium•A coronary pressure wire is delivered to the left atrium and left in place•The catheter is subsequently withdrawn into the left ventricle•This permits simultaneous left atrial and left ventricular hemodynamic assessment.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: There are currently no established non-invasive indices of echocardiography for elevated left atrial pressure (LAP) especially in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) is a novel non-invasive electromagnetic energy-based technology that quantifies total lung fluid, enabling the monitoring of volume status in patients with heart failure. The utility of ReDS for estimating LAP in patients with AF remains unknown.
UNASSIGNED: We prospectively investigated patients with AF in whom LAP was directly measured during catheter ablation for AF, and ReDS measurements were conducted the day before ablation. Elevated LAP was defined as LAP ≥ 15 mmHg.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 61 patients were included (median age 66 years, 38 % female). Among them, 26 patients had elevated LAP. There was a positive correlation between ReDS and LAP (r = 0.363, P = 0.004). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the prediction of elevated LAP demonstrated that the best cut-off value of ReDS was 30 %, with a sensitivity of 65 %, specificity of 69 %, and an area under the curve of 0.703 (95 % confidence interval 0.568-0.837). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that ReDS was an independent predictor of elevated LAP, among covariates including left ventricular ejection fraction, the ratio of early transmitral flow velocity to septal mitral annular early diastolic velocity, and left atrial volume index.
UNASSIGNED: Our results suggest ReDS could be a valuable marker of elevated LAP even in patients with AF. Further studies are needed to elucidate the effectiveness of a ReDS-guided decongestive strategy in patients with heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of left atrial (LA) strain parameters to discriminate patients with elevated left atrial pressure (LAP) from patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
RESULTS: A total of 142 patients with non-valvular AF who underwent first catheter ablation (CA) between November 2022 and November 2023 were enrolled in the study. Conventional and speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) were performed in all patients within 24 h before CA, and LAP was invasively measured during the ablation procedure. According to mean LAP, the study population was classified into two groups of normal LAP (LAP < 15 mmHg, n = 101) and elevated LAP (LAP ≥ 15 mmHg, n = 41). Compared with the normal LAP group, elevated LAP group showed significantly reduced LA reservoir strain (LASr) [9.14 (7.97-11.80) vs. 20 (13.59-26.96), p < .001], and increased LA filling index [9.60 (7.15-12.20) vs. 3.72 (2.17-5.82), p < .001], LA stiffness index [1.13 (.82-1.46) vs. .47 (.30-.70), p < .001]. LASr, LA filling index and LA stiffness index were independent predictors of elevated LAP after adjusted by the type of AF, EDT, E/e\', mitral E, and peak acceleration rate of mitral E velocity. The receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis showed LA strain parameters (area under curve [AUC] .794-.819) could provide similar or greater diagnostic accuracy for elevated LAP, as compared to conventional echocardiographic parameters. Furthermore, the novel algorithms built by LASr, LA stiffness index, LA filling index, and left atrial emptying fraction (LAEF), was used to discriminate elevated LAP in AF with good accuracy (AUC .880, accuracy of 81.69%, sensitivity of 80.49%, and specificity of 82.18%), and much better than 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithms in AF.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF, LA strain parameters could be useful to predict elevated LAP and non-inferior to conventional echocardiographic parameters. Besides, the novel algorithm built by LA strain parameters combined with conventional parameters would improve the diagnostic efficiency.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) with MitraClip is a safe and effective alternative to surgical mitral valve repair/replacement in patients with high operative risk. Pleth Variability Index (PVI) is a non-invasive, dynamic index based on analysis of the respiratory variations in the plethysmographic waveform recorded transcutaneously by the pulse oximeter.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate if the hemodynamic effect of improved left-sided output after successful transcatheter mitral valve repair would lead to a significant change in PVI, and if it would correlate with the decrease in left atrial pressure (LAP).
METHODS: Prospective, observational cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03993938).
METHODS: Single academic hospital in Detroit, Michigan (USA), from October 2019 to February 2021.
METHODS: The authors included adult patients with severe mitral regurgitation who underwent successful MitraClip placement.
RESULTS: Of 30 patients, all components of the LAP (a wave, v wave, and mean) decreased significantly after successful MitraClip placement (P < .01). The median (IQR) PVI increased from 21 (11-35) to 23 (13-38) after clip placement; however, this change was not statistically significant (P = .275). No significant correlation between change in PVI and change in LAP was observed (P = .235).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe mitral regurgitation, successful MitraClip resulted in a significant reduction in LAP without a significant change in PVI. A larger sample size may provide more insight on the utility of using PVI as an indicator of LAP change in patients with mitral regurgitation.

Impairment of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function is common amongst those with left heart disease and is associated with significant morbidity. Given that, in simple terms, the ventricle can only eject the volume with which it fills and that approximately one half of hospitalisations for heart failure (HF) are in those with normal/\'preserved\' left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF) (Bianco et al. in JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 13:258-271, 2020. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.12.035), where abnormalities of ventricular filling are the cause of symptoms, it is clear that the assessment of left ventricular diastolic function (LVDF) is crucial for understanding global cardiac function and for identifying the wider effects of disease processes. Invasive methods of measuring LV relaxation and filling pressures are considered the gold-standard for investigating diastolic function. However, the high temporal resolution of trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE) with widely validated and reproducible measures available at the patient\'s bedside and without the need for invasive procedures involving ionising radiation have established echocardiography as the primary imaging modality. The comprehensive assessment of LVDF is therefore a fundamental element of the standard TTE (Robinson et al. in Echo Res Pract7:G59-G93, 2020. 10.1530/ERP-20-0026). However, the echocardiographic assessment of diastolic function is complex. In the broadest and most basic terms, ventricular diastole comprises an early filling phase when blood is drawn, by suction, into the ventricle as it rapidly recoils and lengthens following the preceding systolic contraction and shortening. This is followed in late diastole by distension of the compliant LV when atrial contraction actively contributes to ventricular filling. When LVDF is normal, ventricular filling is achieved at low pressure both at rest and during exertion. However, this basic description merely summarises the complex physiology that enables the diastolic process and defines it according to the mechanical method by which the ventricles fill, overlooking the myocardial function, properties of chamber compliance and pressure differentials that determine the capacity for LV filling. Unlike ventricular systolic function where single parameters are utilised to define myocardial performance (LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS)), the assessment of diastolic function relies on the interpretation of multiple myocardial and blood-flow velocity parameters, along with left atrial (LA) size and function, in order to diagnose the presence and degree of impairment. The echocardiographic assessment of diastolic function is therefore multifaceted and complex, requiring an algorithmic approach that incorporates parameters of myocardial relaxation/recoil, chamber compliance and function under variable loading conditions and the intra-cavity pressures under which these processes occur. This guideline outlines a structured approach to the assessment of diastolic function and includes recommendations for the assessment of LV relaxation and filling pressures. Non-routine echocardiographic measures are described alongside guidance for application in specific circumstances. Provocative methods for revealing increased filling pressure on exertion are described and novel and emerging modalities considered. For rapid access to the core recommendations of the diastolic guideline, a quick-reference guide (additional file 1) accompanies the main guideline document. This describes in very brief detail the diastolic investigation in each patient group and includes all algorithms and core reference tables.

UNASSIGNED: Assessing filling pressure (FP) remains a clinical challenge despite advancements in non-invasive imaging techniques. This study investigates the utility of echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) to left atrial (LA) volume ratio in estimating the resting FP in patients with dyspnoea and preserved ejection fraction (EF).
UNASSIGNED: This study is a prospective, single-centre analysis of 53 consecutive patients with dyspnoea (New York Heart Association grade 2 or 3) and LVEF of ≥50% (mean age 71 ± 10 years) who underwent cardiac catheterisation, including direct measurement of LA pressure at rest using retrograde technique. Echocardiographic data were obtained 1.5 ± 1.0 h after cardiac catheterisation. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 consisted of individuals with elevated FP, indicated by a mean LA pressure or mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure of >12 mmHg, and Group 2 comprised of patients with normal FP. The LV and LA volumes were measured at three specific points: the minimum volume (LVES, LAmin), the volume during diastasis (LVdias, LAdias), and the maximum volume (LVED, LAmax). The corresponding LV/LA volume ratios were analysed: end-systole (LVES/LAmax), diastasis (LVdias/LAdias), and end-diastole (LVED/LAmin).
UNASSIGNED: The patients in Group 1 exhibited lower LV/LA volume ratios compared with those in Group 2 (LVES/LAmax 0.44 ± 0.12 vs. 0.60 ± 0.23, P = 0.0032; LVdias/LAdias 1.13 ± 0.30 vs. 1.56 ± 0.49, P = 0.0007; LVED/LAmin 2.71 ± 1.57 vs. 4.44 ± 1.70, P = 0.0004). The LV/LA volume ratios correlated inversely with an increased FP (LVES/LAmax, r = -0.40, P = 0.0033; LVdias/LAdias, r = -0.45, P = 0.0007; LVED/LAmin, r = -0.55, P < 0.0001). Among all the measurements, the LVdias/LAdias ratio demonstrated the highest discriminatory power to distinguish patients with elevated FP from normal FP, with a cut-off value of ≤1.24 [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.822] for the entire group, encompassing both sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation. For patients in sinus rhythm specifically, the cut-off value was ≤1.28 (AUC = 0.799), with P < 0.0001 for both. The LVdias/LAdias index demonstrated non-inferiority to the E/e\' ratio [ΔAUC = 0.159, confidence interval (CI) = -0.020-0.338; P = 0.0809], while surpassing the indices of LA reservoir function (ΔAUC = 0.249, CI = 0.044-0.454; P = 0.0176), LA reservoir strain (ΔAUC = 0.333, CI = 0.149-0.517; P = 0.0004), and LAmax index (ΔAUC = 0.224, CI = 0.043-0.406; P = 0.0152) in diagnosing patients with elevated FP.
UNASSIGNED: The study presents a straightforward and reproducible method for non-invasive estimation of FP using routine TTE in patients with dyspnoea and preserved EF. The LVdias/LAdias index emerges as a promising indicator for identifying elevated FP, demonstrating comparable or even superior performance to established parameters.