Learning environment

学习环境
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在卫生专业教育中,学习环境的质量会显著影响学生的参与度和职业认同感的形成。尽管全球认识到它的重要性,关于不同健康教育计划中学生对学习环境的看法的研究很少。本研究旨在探讨健康专业学生如何看待自己的学习环境及其对其职业认同发展的影响。
    方法:采用解释性混合方法方法。在定量阶段,DundeeReadyEducationEnvironmentMeasure[Minimum-Maximumpossiblescores=0-200]和MacleodClarkProfessionalIdentityScale[Minimum-Maximumpossiblescores=1-45]wereadminoredtoQatarUniversity-Healthstudents(N=908),最低要求样本量为271名学生。使用SPSS对数据进行分析,包括描述性统计和推理分析。在定性阶段,七个焦点小组(FG)通过微软团队在线进行。FGs以量化结果和Gruppen等人提出的框架开发的主题指南为指导。(AcadMed94:969-74,2019),逐字转录,并使用NVIVO®进行主题分析。
    结果:问卷回复率为57.8%(908份中有525份回复),在排除仅完成人口统计部分的学生后,可用性率为74.3%(525个回复中的390个)。研究表明,对学习环境的“积极多于消极”感知(中位数[IQR]=132[116-174],最低-最高获得分数=43-185),以及对他们的职业身份的“良好”感知(中位数[IQR]=24[22-27],最小-最大获得分数=3-36)。定性数据证实,学习环境支持能力的发展,人际交往能力,和专业身份,尽管关于情感支持充分性的观点参差不齐。理想学习环境的关键属性包括导师计划,奖励制度,以及解决疲劳和无聊的措施。
    结论:QU-Health的学习环境在发展能力和人际交往能力方面是有效的。学生对学习环境的看法与他们的专业认同呈正相关。理想的环境应该包括导师计划,奖励制度,以及解决疲劳和无聊的策略,强调需要持续改进学习环境以提高学生满意度,职业身份发展,和高质量的病人护理。
    BACKGROUND: The quality of the learning environment significantly impacts student engagement and professional identity formation in health professions education. Despite global recognition of its importance, research on student perceptions of learning environments across different health education programs is scarce. This study aimed to explore how health professional students perceive their learning environment and its influence on their professional identity development.
    METHODS: An explanatory mixed-methods approach was employed. In the quantitative phase, the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure [Minimum-Maximum possible scores = 0-200] and Macleod Clark Professional Identity Scale [Minimum-Maximum possible scores = 1-45] were administered to Qatar University-Health students (N = 908), with a minimum required sample size of 271 students. Data were analyzed using SPSS, including descriptive statistics and inferential analysis. In the qualitative phase, seven focus groups (FGs) were conducted online via Microsoft Teams. FGs were guided by a topic guide developed from the quantitative results and the framework proposed by Gruppen et al. (Acad Med 94:969-74, 2019), transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed using NVIVO®.
    RESULTS: The questionnaire response rate was 57.8% (525 responses out of 908), with a usability rate of 74.3% (390 responses out of 525) after excluding students who only completed the demographic section. The study indicated a \"more positive than negative\" perception of the learning environment (Median [IQR] = 132 [116-174], Minimum-Maximum obtained scores = 43-185), and a \"good\" perception of their professional identity (Median [IQR] = 24 [22-27], Minimum-Maximum obtained scores = 3-36). Qualitative data confirmed that the learning environment was supportive in developing competence, interpersonal skills, and professional identity, though opinions on emotional support adequacy were mixed. Key attributes of an ideal learning environment included mentorship programs, a reward system, and measures to address fatigue and boredom.
    CONCLUSIONS: The learning environment at QU-Health was effective in developing competence and interpersonal skills. Students\' perceptions of their learning environment positively correlated with their professional identity. Ideal environments should include mentorship programs, a reward system, and strategies to address fatigue and boredom, emphasizing the need for ongoing improvements in learning environments to enhance student satisfaction, professional identity development, and high-quality patient care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    学习投入被认为对医学生的身心健康很重要。然而,医学院的学习环境与医学生学习投入之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定学习环境对学习投入的积极影响。
    我们从中国12所医科大学收集了10901份有效问卷,和UWES-S用于评估研究参与水平。然后进行皮尔逊卡方检验和韦尔奇的方差分析,以发现研究参与和学习环境之间的关系,亚组分析用于消除混杂因素的可能影响。之后,进行了多变量分析,以证明学习环境是一个独立因素,我们构建了一个列线图作为预测模型。
    采用皮尔逊卡方检验(p<0.001)和韦尔奇方差分析检验(p<0.001),这证明了良好的学习环境有助于获得更高的平均UWES分数。亚组分析也显示出统计学意义(p<0.001)。在多变量分析中,我们可以找到,以“好”为参考,“优秀”(OR=0.329,95CI=0.295-0.366,p<0.001)学习环境有利于学习投入,而“普通”(OR=2.206,95CI=1.989-2.446,p<0.001),“坏”(OR=2.349,95CI=1.597-3.454,p<0.001),和“可怕”(OR=1.696,95CI=1.015-2.834,p=0.044)学习环境只会导致相对较差的学习参与度。根据结果,画了一个列线图,具有预测性辨别和准确性(AUC=0.680)。
    我们得出结论,学校的学习环境是医学生学习投入的独立因素。医学院更高水平的学习环境伴随着更高水平的医学生学习投入。列线图可以作为教育工作者和研究人员的预测参考。
    UNASSIGNED: Study engagement is regarded important to medical students\' physical and mental wellbeing. However, the relationship between learning environment of medical schools and the study engagement of medical students was still unclear. This study was aimed to ascertain the positive effect of learning environment in study engagement.
    UNASSIGNED: We collected 10,901 valid questionnaires from 12 medical universities in China, and UWES-S was utilized to assess the study engagement levels. Then Pearson Chi-Square test and Welch\'s ANOVA test were conducted to find the relationship between study engagement and learning environment, and subgroup analysis was used to eradicate possible influence of confounding factors. After that, a multivariate analysis was performed to prove learning environment was an independent factor, and we constructed a nomogram as a predictive model.
    UNASSIGNED: With Pearson Chi-Square test (p < 0.001) and Welch\'s ANOVA test (p < 0.001), it proved that a good learning environment contributed to a higher mean of UWES scores. Subgroup analysis also showed statistical significance (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, we could find that, taking \"Good\" as reference, \"Excellent\" (OR = 0.329, 95%CI = 0.295-0.366, p < 0.001) learning environment was conducive to one\'s study engagement, while \"Common\" (OR = 2.206, 95%CI = 1.989-2.446, p < 0.001), \"Bad\" (OR = 2.349, 95%CI = 1.597-3.454, p < 0.001), and \"Terrible\" (OR = 1.696, 95%CI = 1.015-2.834, p = 0.044) learning environment only resulted into relatively bad study engagement. Depending on the result, a nomogram was drawn, which had predictive discrimination and accuracy (AUC = 0.680).
    UNASSIGNED: We concluded that learning environment of school was an independent factor of medical student\'s study engagement. A higher level of learning environment of medical school came with a higher level of medical students\' study engagement. The nomogram could serve as a predictive reference for the educators and researchers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大学生工作场所学习是健康科学教育的重要组成部分。教育心理学研究考虑了工作场所自我调节学习的许多不同方面,包括认知,动机,情感,和背景。该领域的多变量纵向和日记研究需要比替代方案更少的项目,甚至每个结构都需要一个项目,并且可以揭示工作场所学习的子过程,并有助于更好地理解学生的学习。短仪器是必要的应用在工作场所设置,尤其是有压力的,减轻调查疲劳。本研究旨在评估测量工作场所学习各个方面的单个项目的心理测量特性。
    方法:从健康科学教育工作场所学习量表中选取的29个单项进行信度分析,信息再现,以及法律网络内的关系。作者还分析了四个通常制定的单一项目与法理学网络中完整的工作场所学习清单量表和外部标准的关系。参与者是奥地利和德国的214名第九或第十学期兽医学学生,他们在2021/2022年冬季学期在不同的工作场所学习。
    结果:在从现有量表中选择的29个单项中,27显示出足够的可靠性,但在有效性方面获得了混合的结果。尽管法律网络中的项目关系与全尺度的相似,大多数项目的信息复制不足。四个一般单一项目显示出可接受的有效性,但是这些措施的可靠性无法评估。
    结论:本文报道了健康科学教育中大学生工作场所学习的单个项目的心理测量特性的发现。这些发现对于决定在未来的研究中是否使用量表和单项测量至关重要。通过应用这些发现,研究人员可以在他们的工作场所学习数据收集更经济,可以包括更多的结构。
    BACKGROUND: Undergraduates\' workplace learning is an important part of health sciences education. Educational psychology research considers many different aspects of self-regulated learning at the workplace, including cognition, motivation, emotions, and context. Multivariate longitudinal and diary studies in this field require fewer items than alternatives or even a single item per construct and can reveal the sub-processes of workplace learning and contribute to a better understanding of students\' learning. Short instruments are necessary for application in workplace settings, especially stressful ones, to mitigate survey fatigue. The present study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of single items measuring various aspects of workplace learning.
    METHODS: Twenty-nine single items selected from the Workplace Learning Inventory in Health Sciences Education were analyzed for reliability, information reproduction, and relationships within the nomological network. The authors additionally analyzed four generally formulated single items\' relationships with the full Workplace Learning Inventory scales and external criteria within the nomological network. Participants were 214 ninth- or tenth-semester veterinary medicine students in Austria and Germany who were learning at varied workplaces during the winter semester of 2021/2022.
    RESULTS: Of the 29 single items selected from existing scales, 27 showed sufficient reliability, but mixed results were obtained regarding validity. Although the items\' relationships within the nomological network were similar to those of the full scales, information reproduction was insufficient for most items. The four general single items showed acceptable validity, but the reliability of these measures of states could not be assessed.
    CONCLUSIONS: This paper reported findings on the psychometric properties of single items for undergraduates\' workplace learning in health science education. The findings are crucial for deciding whether to use scales versus single-item measures in future studies. By applying the findings, researchers can be more economical in their workplace learning data collection and can include more constructs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然学习方法与学生的学习成绩直接相关,学习环境因素可能起到更间接的作用。本研究的目的是(I)评估学习环境因素作为学生平均考试成绩的预测因素,(ii)研究方法是否介导了学习环境因素与考试成绩之间的关联。
    三项年度调查(2017-2019年)来自总共263名挪威职业治疗学生的数据。学习环境因素通过课程体验问卷进行评估,学生的方法和学习技能清单被用来评估学习方法。进行线性回归分析和中介分析。
    较高的“学生自主性”水平与较低的平均成绩直接相关,而较高的“适当工作量”水平与较高的平均成绩相关。“明确的目标”和“适当的工作量”对成绩的总间接影响具有统计学意义;这些影响是通过研究方法变量发生的。然而,所有学习环境变量都显示出一种或多种与学业成绩的关系,这是由学习方法变量介导的。
    学习环境变量似乎与学业成绩复杂相关,直接和间接。
    UNASSIGNED: While study approaches have been directly associated with students\' academic performance, learning environment factors may play a more indirect role. The aim of this study was (i) to assess learning environment factors as predictors of students\' average exam grades, and (ii) whether study approaches mediated associations between learning environment factors and exam grades.
    UNASSIGNED: Three annual surveys (2017-2019) yielded data from a total of 263 Norwegian occupational therapy students. Learning environment factors were assessed with the Course Experience Questionnaire, and the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students were used to assess study approaches. Linear regression analyses and mediation analyses were performed.
    UNASSIGNED: Higher levels of \'student autonomy\' were directly associated with lower averaged grades whereas higher levels of \'appropriate workload\' were associated with higher averaged grades. There were statistically significant total indirect effects of \'clear goals\' and \'appropriate workload\' on grades; these effects occurred through the study approach variables. However, all learning environment variables showed one or more relationships with academic performance that was mediated by study approach variables.
    UNASSIGNED: Learning environment variables appear to be complexly associated with academic performance, both directly and indirectly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    描述研究表明,当教育领导者支持他们的学习者的自主性时,对双方都有积极影响。这在研究生医学教育(GME)中尤为重要,鉴于强调驻地表现,评估,和发展。不幸的是,GME教师经常将自治误解为居民对独立或“自由”的渴望,“事实上,它指的是核心心理需要感到意志和代理人。区别很重要,因为意志不是独立的同义词,提供自由可能与提供真正自治支持的策略背道而驰。这个,反过来,会增加压力,不适应,以及已经在医学中普遍存在的居民倦怠。为了帮助解决这个问题,本文为医学教育工作者区分自主性和独立性提供了一个循证指南,具体的例子,以帮助将理论转化为实践,以更好地支持医学界的福祉。
    Description Research shows that when educational leaders support their learners\' autonomy, it positively impacts both parties. This is particularly important in graduate medical education (GME), given that there is a strong emphasis on resident performance, evaluation, and development. Unfortunately, GME faculty often misunderstand autonomy as the resident\'s desire for independence or \"freedom,\" when in fact it refers to the core psychological need to feel volitional and agentic. The distinction is important because volition is not synonymous with independence, and providing freedom can be at odds with strategies that provide true autonomy support. This, in turn, can contribute to the stress, maladjustment, and resident burnout that are already prevalent in medicine. To help remedy this issue, this paper provides an evidence-based guide for medical educators to distinguish autonomy from independence, with specific examples to help translate theory into practice to better support the well-being of the medical community.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在医学教育中,学习环境(LE)显著影响学生的专业精神和学习成绩。积极的LE看法与更好的学术成果有关。我们的研究,这是在沙特国王大学医学院课程改革15年后进行的,旨在探索学生对LE的看法,并确定需要改进的地方。通过了解他们的经历,我们努力提高LE和促进学术成功。
    方法:这项混合方法研究采用了解释性顺序方法,其中首先使用约翰霍普金斯学习环境量表(JHLES)收集了横截面分析调查阶段,其次是定性焦点小组。使用联合显示将定量和定性方法的结果进行整合。
    结果:共有653名医学生完成了JHLES。总平均分为140分中的81分(16.8分),平均子量表得分在纳入和安全性方面为2.27(0.95),在同龄人群体中为3.37(0.91).定性方法包括归纳分析和演绎分析,确定包含骄傲的总体主题,高期望和竞争,以及对课程的看法。结果的整合强调需要继续努力创建一个支持性和包容性的LE,积极影响学生的经历和学术成功。
    结论:这项研究为寻求提高医学教育质量和支持系统的教育机构提供了有价值的见解。建议包括教师发展,支持性环境的培养,课程修订,改进的导师计划,以及促进包容性和性别平等的举措。未来的研究应该探索纵向和比较研究,创新的混合方法方法,和干预措施,进一步优化医学教育经验。总的来说,这项研究有助于正在进行的医学教育对话,对影响学生感知的复杂因素进行细致入微的理解,并提出可操作的改进策略。
    BACKGROUND: In medical education, the learning environment (LE) significantly impacts students\' professionalism and academic performance. Positive LE perceptions are linked to better academic outcomes. Our study, which was conducted 15 years after curriculum reform at King Saud University\'s College of Medicine, aimed to explore students\' perspectives on their LE and identify areas for improvement. By understanding their experiences, we strive to enhance LE and promote academic success.
    METHODS: This mixed-method study employed an explanatory sequential approach in which a cross-sectional analytical survey phase was collected first using the Johns Hopkins Learning Environment Scale (JHLES), followed by qualitative focus groups. Findings from quantitative and qualitative methods were integrated using joint display.
    RESULTS: A total of 653 medical students completed the JHLES. The total average score was 81 out of 140 (16.8), and the average subscale scores ranged from 2.27 (0.95) for inclusion and safety to 3.37 (0.91) for community of peers. The qualitative approach encompasses both inductive and deductive analyses, identifying overarching themes comprising proudness, high expectations and competition, and views about the curriculum. The integration of results emphasizes the need for continued efforts to create a supportive and inclusive LE that positively influences students\' experiences and academic success.
    CONCLUSIONS: This research offers valuable insights for educational institutions seeking to enhance medical education quality and support systems. Recommendations include faculty development, the cultivation of supportive environments, curriculum revision, improved mentorship programs, and initiatives to promote inclusivity and gender equity. Future research should explore longitudinal and comparative studies, innovative mixed methods approaches, and interventions to further optimize medical education experiences. Overall, this study contributes to the ongoing dialog on medical education, offering a nuanced understanding of the complex factors influencing students\' perceptions and suggesting actionable strategies for improvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是找出体育教师的特殊资格和幼儿园的物理环境在多大程度上影响了学龄前儿童的身体发育。爱沙尼亚各地的44所幼儿园参加了这项研究,其中一半有体育老师(PEt),而其余22所幼儿园由不合格的幼儿园教师(NoPEt)授课。六个Eurofit适应性测试用于评估儿童的身体发育(n=704;6-7岁,平均年龄6.55±0.5岁)。采用方差分析比较两组适应度测试结果的均值。采用线性回归分析,明确个体和环境因素对儿童适应度评分的影响。在建立了PEt位置的幼儿园中,儿童身体素质的结果在统计学上明显更好,更具体地,在握力方面(m=12.0,95%CI=11.8-12.3与m=11.5,95%CI=11.2-11.7)和速度测试(m=23.0,95%CI=22.8-23.2与m=23.6,95%CI=23.3-23.8)。根据老师的采访,这些幼儿园也有更多专门为体育锻炼而创建的房间和区域。研究表明,儿童的身体发育是,当控制其他个人和环境因素时,受体育教师的专业资格(95%CI=0.06-0.56)以及儿童参与体育训练(95%CI=0.29-0.83)的影响。这些发现对于学前机构和市政当局设计促进儿童身体健康的最佳物理环境非常重要。
    The aim of this research is to find out to what extent the special qualifications of physical education teachers and the physical environment of kindergartens influence the physical development of preschoolers. Forty-four kindergartens across Estonia participated in the study, half of which had a physical education teacher (PEt), whereas the remaining 22 kindergartens were taught by non-qualified kindergarten teachers (NoPEt). Six Eurofit fitness tests were used to assess the physical development of children (n = 704; aged 6-7 years old, with an average age of 6.55 ± 0.5 years). An analysis of variance was used to compare the mean values of the fitness test results of the two groups. Linear regression analysis was applied to clarify the influence of individual and environmental factors on children\'s fitness scores. In kindergartens where the position of a PEt had been created, the results of children\'s physical fitness were statistically significantly better, more specifically in handgrip strength (m = 12.0, 95% CI = 11.8-12.3 vs. m = 11.5, 95% CI = 11.2-11.7) and in speed tests (m = 23.0, 95% CI = 22.8-23.2 vs. m = 23.6, 95% CI = 23.3-23.8). According to the teacher interviews, these kindergartens also had more rooms and areas specially created for physical exercises. The study revealed that the physical development of children is, when controlling for other individual and environmental factors, influenced by the professional qualification of the PE teacher (95% CI = 0.06-0.56) as well as children\'s participation in sports training (95% CI = 0.29-0.83). These findings are important for preschool institutions and municipalities in designing the optimal physical environment for facilitating children\'s physical fitness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    学生参与是教育计划质量的关键因素。这是一个复杂的结构,通常以学生行为为重点。然而,更广泛的,更多的组织方法考虑到制度背景,以及如何构建这种组织来鼓励和支持学生的意愿和能力。本文包括使用文献中认可的关键要素的学生参与系统的建议,以及在ASPIRE-to-Excellence学生参与计划中获得认可的医学院的具体示例。ASPIRE参与者的例子表明,某些关键功能的存在创造了学生与其机构之间的互利合作方法。这包括让学生有机会正式参与四个领域,触及学生生活的广度,包括机构治理和政策制定,教育方案的制定和评估,参与学术活动,以及参与当地社区和国际外联活动。根据对三所医学院的信息的深入审查,这些学校最近在学生参与方面获得了ASPIRE-to-Excellence奖,有可能确定某些特定的做法,这些做法单独地和共同地允许一个机构在这个复杂的结构中表现出卓越。作为一个总体概念,很明显,学生在每个领域的参与都受益于以特定形式属性和活动为特征的支持性机构文化。例子包括通过机构政策编纂学生参与治理;最大限度地提高学生之间以及学生与学校管理人员和教职员工之间的沟通途径;并通过任务声明或战略计划形式化参与性环境。对于方案规划,一个有用的概念化是,当一个机构内的所有利益相关者都拥护变革,并且组织支持包括学生作为积极参与者和合作伙伴的协作文化时,就会发生成功的学生参与计划。
    Student engagement is a key contributor to educational programme quality. It is a complex construct often defined with the focus on student behaviors. However, a broader, more organizational approach takes into account the institutional context and how this can be structured to encourage and support students\' willingness and ability to become engaged. This paper includes suggestions for a student engagement system using key elements recognized in the literature and concrete examples from medical schools that achieved recognition in the ASPIRE-to-Excellence student engagement initiative. The examples from the ASPIRE participants demonstrate that the presence of certain key features creates a mutually beneficial collaborative approach between students and their institutions. This includes opportunities for students to formally engage in four domains touching on the breadth of student life, including institutional governance and policy-making, educational programme development and evaluation, participation in activities in the academic community, and participation in local community and international outreach. Based on an in-depth review of the information from three medical schools that recently received an ASPIRE-to-Excellence award in student engagement, it was possible to identify certain specific practices that individually and taken together allow an institution to demonstrate excellence in this complex construct. As an overarching concept, it was clear that student participation in each of these domain areas benefitted from a supportive institutional culture characterized by specific formal attributes and activities. Examples included codifying student involvement in governance through institutional policies; maximizing communication routes among students and between students and school administrators and faculty; and formalizing a participatory environment through missions statements or strategic plans. For programme planning, a helpful conceptualization is that a successful student engagement programme occurs when change is championed by all stakeholders within an institution and the organization supports a collaborative culture that includes students as active participants and partners.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    倦怠是住院医师中越来越普遍的问题。为了解决这个问题,研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)创建了“回到床边”倡议,支持居民驱动的项目,重点是增加与患者的直接互动。2017年,贝勒医学院(BCM)内科住院医师获得了“回到床边”资助,以开发和实施“人文主义调查”,“一项多方面的计划,旨在促进居民与患者之间的个人联系,并促进对患者非临床故事的反思,希望减少倦怠,增加居民的工作意义感。
    在2018年至2020年之间,指导并鼓励内科住院医师参加人文主义调查。该计划包括三个组成部分:“人类历史,“床边查房专注于非临床问题,并与同事分享患者的故事(“庆祝活动”)。使用机构和ACGME关于倦怠的调查对居民进行了调查,在工作中的意义,和临床学习环境。
    三百一十一机构(回应率,74%)和328AGCME(应答率,78%)的调查完成并分析。积极参与人本主义调查的居民报告了工作中更多的意义和成就感(p<0.001)。在本项目期间,居民亚组对学习环境和个人冷漠的评价有所提高。
    从事人文主义研究的贝勒医学院内科住院医师报告说,他们的工作具有更多的意义和成就感。该计划描述了其他专业和机构的低成本模型,以加强人的联系,并在培训期间改善居民的体验。
    在线版本包含补充材料,可在10.1007/s40670-024-02017-9获得。
    UNASSIGNED: Burnout is an increasingly prevalent problem among resident physicians. To address this problem, the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) created the Back to Bedside initiative, supporting resident-driven projects focused on increasing direct interactions with patients. In 2017, Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) Internal Medicine Residency received a Back to Bedside grant to develop and implement \"Humanism Rounds,\" a multifaceted program which sought to promote personal connections between residents and patients and foster reflection about patients\' non-clinical stories, with the hopes of reducing burnout and increasing residents\' sense of meaning at work.
    UNASSIGNED: Between 2018 and 2020, internal medicine residents were instructed on and encouraged to participate in Humanism Rounds. The program included three components: taking a \"human history,\" bedside rounds focused on non-clinical concerns, and sharing patient stories with colleagues (\"celebrations\"). Residents were surveyed using institutional and ACGME surveys regarding burnout, meaning at work, and the clinical learning environment.
    UNASSIGNED: Three hundred eleven institutional (response rate, 74%) and 328 AGCME (response rate, 78%) surveys were completed and analyzed. Residents who actively engaged with Humanism Rounds reported more meaning and fulfillment at work (p < 0.001). During the period of this project, ratings of the learning environment and personal callousness improved among subgroups of residents.
    UNASSIGNED: Baylor College of Medicine Internal Medicine residents who engaged with Humanism Rounds reported more meaning and fulfillment in their work. This program describes a low-cost model for other specialties and institutions to strengthen human connections and improve residents\' experience during training.
    UNASSIGNED: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02017-9.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号