Periarticular calcification of the knee joint is a rare pathology that may be challenging to diagnose and manage when symptomatic. Here, we describe the first use of fluoroscopic-guided percutaneous needle aspiration and lavage (barbotage) with corticosteroid injection in a case of symptomatic calcification of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL). A 75-year-old female presented with acute lateral knee pain and stiffness, which subsequent radiographic imaging and diagnostic injection confirmed to be attributed to calcification within the LCL. Initial treatment with analgesic medications and a genicular nerve block failed to alleviate symptoms. However, complete resolution of symptoms was achieved following fluoroscopic-guided barbotage and steroid injection. This case underscores the importance of considering LCL calcification in the differential diagnosis of lateral knee pain. This case also illustrates the potential effectiveness of barbotage and adjunctive steroid injection as a minimally invasive treatment option for symptomatic LCL calcification, emphasizing the need for more rigorous studies evaluating treatment strategies for managing periarticular calcifications involving the knee joint.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyse the influence of coronal lower limb alignment on collateral ligament strain.
METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were used. Long-leg standing radiographs were obtained to assess lower limb alignment. Specimens were axially loaded in a custom-made kinematics rig with 200 and 400 N, and dynamic varus/valgus angulation was simulated in 0°, 30°, and 60° of knee flexion. The changes in varus/valgus angulation and strain within different fibre regions of the collateral ligaments were captured using a three-dimensional optical measuring system to examine the axis-dependent strain behaviour of the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) at intervals of 2°.
RESULTS: The LCL and sMCL were exposed to the highest strain values at full extension (p < 0.001). Regardless of flexion angle and extent of axial loading, the ligament strain showed a strong and linear association with varus (all Pearson\'s r ≥ 0.98; p < 0.001) and valgus angulation (all Pearson\'s r ≥ -0.97; p < 0.01). At full extension and 400 N of axial loading, the anterior and posterior LCL fibres exceeded 4% ligament strain at 3.9° and 4.0° of varus, while the sMCL showed corresponding strain values of more than 4% at a valgus angle of 6.8°, 5.4° and 4.9° for its anterior, middle and posterior fibres, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The strain within the native LCL and sMCL was linearly related to coronal lower limb alignment. Strain levels associated with potential ultrastructural damages to the ligaments of more than 4% were observed at 4° of varus and about 5° of valgus malalignment, respectively. When reconstructing the collateral ligaments, an additional realigning osteotomy should be considered in cases of chronic instability with a coronal malalignment exceeding 4°-5° to protect the graft and potentially reduce failures.
METHODS: There is no level of evidence as this study was an experimental laboratory study.

UNASSIGNED: Because of the proximity of several ligaments, aponeuroses, and capsule in the limited area of the elbow joint, the precise anatomy is difficult to understand. In the current narrative review, we focused on two anatomical perspectives: the capsular attachment and structures consisting of ligaments.
UNASSIGNED: Based on the previously performed studies regarding the elbow anatomy, a narrative review was prepared in terms of the capsular attachment and structures consisting of ligaments.
UNASSIGNED: At the tip of the coronoid process, the joint capsule attaches roughly 6 mm distal to its tip with 6-12 mm length. On the lateral epicondyle of the humerus, the capsular attachment at the anterior part of the extensor carpi radialis brevis origin is narrower than the one distal to it. A single interpretation of the lateral collateral ligament is the capsulo-aponeurotic membrane, which is composed of the joint capsule intermingling with the supinator aponeurosis. The anterior bundle of the ulnar collateral ligament could be interpreted as the grossly separated collagenous structure from the tendinous complex, which is composed of the tendinous septum between the flexor digitorum superficialis and pronator teres muscle, the medial part of the brachialis muscle, and deep aponeurosis of the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle.
UNASSIGNED: Based on these perspectives, ligaments could function as a \"static-dynamic\" stabilizer rather than a simple static one.

UNASSIGNED: Current commercial elbow braces have a straight hinge that does not account for the native carrying angle of the elbow. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a custom-designed hinged elbow orthosis (HEO) with variable valgus angulations in stabilizing a lateral collateral ligament (LCL) deficient elbow.
UNASSIGNED: Eight cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in an elbow motion simulator in the abducted varus gravity-loaded position. The specimens were examined before and after simulated LCL injury and then with the addition of the custom-designed HEO with 0°, 10°, and 20° of valgus angulation. Kinematic data were recorded using an electromagnetic tracking system.
UNASSIGNED: The LCL injured state with or without the brace resulted in significant increases in varus angulation of the elbow compared to the intact state in both pronation and supination (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in varus-valgus angulation or ulnohumeral rotation between any of the brace angles and the LCL injured state with the forearm pronated and supinated.
UNASSIGNED: The custom-designed HEO did not provide any additional stability to the LCL injured elbow. The varus arm position should be avoided during the rehabilitation of an LCL injured elbow even when an HEO is used.

UNASSIGNED: A difficult pattern of injuries is Hotchkiss\'s terrible triad, which includes elbow dislocations with fracture of the coronoid and head of radius. It is uncommon to have a concurrent proximal humerus fracture, which makes clinical care even more difficult.
UNASSIGNED: An injured worker, 33 years old, claimed to have fallen from a height and received several injuries when he arrived at our emergency center. On physical examination, the patient showed signs of deformity and had an open injury over his left elbow. The radiographic evaluation showed that the patient had a posterior elbow dislocation along with a fracture of the left coronoid, head of radius, and proximal humerus. Following the reduction in a closed manner, computed tomography of the left elbow was carried out for additional assessment. The patient had both the proximal humerus and elbow fixed, and then the elbow was immobilized for 2 weeks.
UNASSIGNED: Complex musculoskeletal injuries resulting from high-energy trauma require a thorough, multidisciplinary strategy to address since long-term results and any consequences will require ongoing monitoring and rehabilitation.

Background Posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow arises from damage to the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL). While various methods exist for reconstructing or repairing the LUCL\'s attachment to the humerus, the most effective approach remains debatable. This study aims to assess the outcomes of directly repairing the LUCL when the injury occurs at the humeral attachment. Methodology This retrospective study, conducted at the Royal Berkshire Foundation Trust NHS hospital in Reading, UK, assessed outcomes through a review of 15 patients who underwent direct repair of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament between 2017 and 2022, evaluating a range of motion, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and the Nestor grading system. Results This study included nine males and six females, with an average age of 38.8 years. Most LUCL injuries arose from elbow dislocation (46.7%). The average follow-up period for patients was 26 months. At the final assessment, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score reached 99. According to the Nestor grading system, 12 patients achieved excellent results, and three had good outcomes. On average, there was an 11.3° loss of final extension and 5° of final flexion, yet achieving a comparable pronation-supination arch to the contralateral side. Conclusion Direct repair of the LUCL for elbow posterolateral rotary instability yielded excellent outcomes, obviating ligament reconstruction. Recognized as minimally invasive, it accelerates recovery, minimizes trauma, and offers a cost-effective procedure for managing instability.

BACKGROUND: Hyperintensity in the proximal lateral collateral ligament (LCL) is often confusing. This appearance may be alone or accompany other pathologies.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between the signal intensity (SI) change in the proximal LCL and the knee joint pathologies.
METHODS: The knee MRI scans taken between 2020 and 2022 were queried retrospectively. Patients with acute trauma, instability, knee surgery, or high-grade osteoarthritis were excluded. Included patients were divided into two groups as normal SI and increased SI according to proximal LCL. The difference in ligamentous and meniscal pathologies between the two groups was analyzed using a chi-square test. Inter-observer agreement analysis was performed on 50 randomly selected patients.
RESULTS: A total of 351 patients (139 men [39.6%], 212 women [60.4%]; median age = 37 years; interquartile range = 67 years) were included. There were 114 (32.5%) LCLs with normal SI and 237 (67.5%) LCLs with increased SI. Normal SI and increased SI groups had a significant difference in terms of joint side, median age, patellar tendon SI, anterior cruciate ligament SI, and medial collateral ligament SI (P = 0.004, P = 0.004, P = 0.001, P = 0.011, P = 0.004, respectively). A significant difference between the results of two separate LCL examinations in coronal + axial and coronal-only planes (P <0.001). Inter-observer agreement was found to be good to excellent.
CONCLUSIONS: Hyperintensity in the proximal LCL was more common on the right joint side, in older patients, and patients with hyperintensity in the proximal patellar tendon, anterior cruciate ligament, and medial collateral ligament. Evaluating the LCL only in the coronal plane overestimates the hyperintensity.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether elbow instability due to lateral collateral ligament complex injury can be assessed reliably through arthroscopy.
METHODS: Eight fresh human cadaveric elbows were placed in a simulated lateral decubitus position. The radiocapitellar joint (RCJ) gap and ulnohumeral joint (UHJ) gap (mm) were measured with different sizes of probes from the posterolateral viewing portal. The elbow was 90 degrees flexed with neutral forearm rotation for RCJ gap measurement and 30 degrees flexed with full supination for UHJ gap measurement. Sequential testing was performed from Stage 0 to Stage 3 (Stage 0: intact; Stage 1: the release of the anterior 1/3 LCL complex; Stage 2: the release of the anterior two thirds of the LCL complex; and Stage 3: the release of the entire LCL complex) on each specimen. The mean gap of RCJ and lateral UHJ was used for the comparison between stages with the intact elbow.
RESULTS: The mean RCJ gap distance in Stage 2 and Stage 3 was significantly increased compared to that in Stage 0 (Stage 0 vs. Stage 2: P = .008; Stage 0 vs. Stage 3: P = .010). The mean UHJ gap distance of Stage 1, Stage 2, and Stage 3 was significantly increased compared to that in Stage 0 (Stage 0 vs. Stage 1: P = 0.025; Stage 0 vs. Stage 2: P = .010; Stage 0 vs. Stage 3: P = .011). In contrast, the release of the anterior 1/3 of the LCL complex (Stage 1) was not significantly increased compared to the mean joint gap distance of RCJ (P = .157).
CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic measurement of joint gap widening in RCJ and UHJ is a reliable assessment method to detect LCL complex deficiency that involves the anterior two thirds or more.

Repair or reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) using autograft or allograft is a well-accepted treatment of posterolateral rotatory instability. The prevalence and causes for failure of LCL reconstruction are not well documented in the literature. Any approach to the assessment and management of failed LCL reconstruction must begin with understanding the risk factors for failure in the first place. Such understanding would likely make many failures preventable as well. In our experience, there are a number of identifiable preoperative risk factors concerning bony and/or soft tissue constraints for failure of LCL reconstruction. There are also operative factors such as tunnel and graft placement as well as excessive lateral condyle stripping that play a role in risk of failure. This report is an attempt to provide a systematic approach to identifying and managing the preoperative and operative risk factors. Further studies are warranted to determine the indications for, and success rates of surgical intervention in managing these risk factors.

The isolated III grade lateral collateral ligament injuries are rare, and there is limited literature available on their management. We report 3 cases of professional soccer players with isolated distal lateral collateral ligament III grade injury, confirmed by MRI studies. After undergoing MRI examinations, all three players resumed competitive activity without resting and experienced no consequences regarding joint stability. We assessed the significance of the lateral collateral ligament in providing lateral stabilization to the knee joint in professional footballers with clinical tears of the lateral collateral ligament. The other structures of posterolateral area that remain intact contribute to joint stability, and the lateral collateral ligament\'s extra-articular position appears to expedite the ligament\'s healing process. Therefore, we propose a possible conservative treatment approach, mostly for professional athletes and adolescent patients, involving a rehabilitation plan without the need for surgery.