Laryngoscopes

喉镜
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    仍然存在固定气道的困难或失败,并可能导致永久性残疾和死亡。头颈部病变阻塞气道进入的患者一旦失去自主呼吸,就有气道管理失败的风险。清醒灵活范围插管被认为是控制此类患者气道的金标准。在一项涉及25名患有挑战性气道的患者的可行性试验之后,本文介绍了使用灵活的视频鼻喉镜进行清醒鼻气管插管的分步方案,这比传统的插管柔性镜明显短。柔性视频喉镜仅超过插管长度几厘米,允许管子在手术过程中紧跟灵活的范围。一旦范围到达咽部,它可以用一只手很容易地操纵,使操作者能够专注于范围插管组件通过声门的安全推进。根据以往取得的成果和经验,这篇文章强调了该技术的潜在好处:在术前建立最终管理计划的微创“快速查看”的机会,一种更方便,更安全的工具,用于导航扭曲的解剖结构,降低插管撞击和气道损伤的机会,和一个快速和顺利的程序导致提高患者满意度。
    Difficulties or failures in securing the airway still occur and can lead to permanent disabilities and mortality. Patients with head and neck pathologies obstructing airway access are at risk of airway management failure once they lose spontaneous respiration. Awake flexible scope intubation is considered the gold standard for controlling the airway in such patients. Following a feasibility trial involving 25 patients with challenging airways, this article presents a step-by-step protocol for awake nasotracheal intubation using a flexible video rhino-laryngoscope, which is significantly shorter than conventional intubating flexible scopes. The flexible video laryngoscope only exceeds the intubating tube length by a few centimeters, allowing the tube to closely follow the flexible scope during the procedure. Once the scope reaches the pharynx, it can be easily manipulated with one hand, enabling the operator to focus on the safe advancement of the scope-intubating tube assembly through the glottis. Based on previous results and experience gained, this article highlights the potential benefits of the technique: the opportunity for a minimally invasive \"quick look\" preoperatively to establish a final management plan, a more convenient and safer tool for navigating distorted anatomy with a lower chance of intubating tube impingement and airway injury, and a fast and smooth procedure resulting in improved patient satisfaction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: In cervical spine injuries, there is an impairment in positioning of the patient to maintain the airway axis during endotracheal intubation (ETI). Literature shows video laryngoscope (VLS) facilitating the intubation in these patients with cervical immobilization. VL3 VLS (HugeMed Medical Technical Development, Shenzhen, China) is a newer VLS with limited studies. The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of ETI using VL3 VLS with Macintosh and McCoy (MC) blades for simulated difficult airway with rigid cervical collar (RCC). The secondary aim was to compare the oral insertion of laryngoscope and intraoral bleeding.
    METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients were randomly divided into three groups depending on laryngoscope used for ETI. Group M, Group V, and Group MC used Macintosh, VL3, and MC laryngoscopic blades, respectively, for ETI. During ETI, the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS), intubation time (IT), ease of laryngoscope insertion, and any bleeding intraorally were noted. The data collected were further analyzed.
    RESULTS: IDS was statistically significantly least (0.9 ± 1.5) with VL3 VLS compared to direct laryngoscopy with Macintosh and MC blades. There was significantly no difference in IT among the three groups. Insertion of blade of VL3 was significantly more difficult than Macintosh or MC. Intraoral bleeding was present in 8% of patients with VL3.
    CONCLUSIONS: VL3 VLS can be used for ETI during cervical immobilization using RCC. More studies are needed to define its efficacy in different difficult airway situations compared with different VLS.
    Résumé Contexte et objectifs:Dans les lésions de la colonne cervicale, il existe une altération du positionnement du patient pour maintenir l’axe des voies respiratoires pendant l’intubation endotrachéale (ETI). La littérature montre que le vidéolaryngoscope (VLS) facilite l’intubation chez ces patients avec immobilisation cervicale. VL3 VLS (HugeMed Medical Technical development, Shenzen, Chine) est un VLS plus récent avec des études limitées. L’objectif principal de cette étude est de comparer l’efficacité de l’ETI en utilisant le VL3 VLS avec des lames Macintosh et McCoy pour les voies respiratoires difficiles simulées avec collier cervical rigide (RCC). L’objectif secondaire était de comparer l’insertion orale d’un laryngoscope et le saignement intra-oral.Méthodes:150 patients ont été répartis au hasard en trois groupes en fonction du laryngoscope utilisé pour l’ETI. Groupe-M; Group-V et Group-MC utilisaient Macintosh; Lame laryngoscopique VL3 et McCoy respectivement pour ETI. Au cours de l’ETI, l’échelle de difficulté d’intubation (IDS), le temps d’intubation, la facilité d’insertion du laryngoscope et tout saignement intra-oral ont été notés. Les données recueillies ont été analysées plus en détail.Résultats:L’IDS était le plus faible (0,9 ± 1,5) et le taux de réussite de l’ETI (94 %) était statistiquement significativement plus élevé avec le VLS VL3. Il n’y avait aucune différence significative dans la durée d’intubation entre les trois groupes. L’insertion de la lame du VL3 était nettement plus difficile que celle du Macintosh ou du McCoy. Des hémorragies intra-orales étaient présentes chez quelques patients atteints de VL3.Conclusion:VL3 VLS peut être un choix pour l’ETI lors d’une immobilisation cervicale par RCC. D’autres études sont nécessaires pour définir son efficacité dans différentes situations difficiles des voies respiratoires par rapport à différents VLS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的高度传染性,气管插管对医务人员造成感染的高风险。为了减轻这种风险,各种医疗设备,包括视频喉镜,已经发展到辅助插管。这项研究比较了常规喉镜(Macintosh)和一次性视频喉镜(MedcaptainVS-10s和Honestmc喉镜_LA10000)的使用和操作过程。我们设计了一份问卷,以评估操作员对使用设备进行插管的感知,对来自2家医院的50名进行过插管或学习过插管技术的临床工作人员进行了统计分析。主要结果是声门可视化时间,插管时间,插管成功率,操作员和培训模型之间的距离,从声门可视化到管插入的时间。次要结果如下:喉镜整体质量,操作感觉,机动性,易用性,和视频质量。这项研究表明,视频喉镜在质量方面优于传统喉镜,操作感觉,和易用性。当LA10000被雇用时,插管成功率较高,并且由于与训练模型的距离较大,因此操作员感染的风险较低。然而,视频喉镜的使用需要适当的教育和培训设备的使用。这项研究还表明,当参与者在使用视频喉镜之前观看简单的手术视频时,插管时间较短。总的来说,视频喉镜检查可以为临床医务人员在大流行期间提供更安全,更方便的选择。
    Tracheal intubation poses a high risk of infection to medical staff due to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) highly infectious nature. To mitigate this risk, various medical devices, including video laryngoscopy, have been developed to assist intubation. This study compared conventional laryngoscopy (Macintosh) and disposable video laryngoscopes (Medcaptain VS-10s and Honestmc Laryngoscope_LA10000) in terms of their use and operation processes. We designed a questionnaire to assess the operator perception of performing intubation with the devices, and statistical analysis was performed on 50 clinical staff members from 2 hospitals who had performed intubation or had learned intubation techniques. The primary outcomes were time to glottic visualization, intubation time, intubation success rate, distance between the operator and training model, and time from glottic visualization to tube insertion. The secondary outcomes were as follows: overall laryngoscope quality, operative feel, maneuverability, ease of use, and video quality. This study showed that video laryngoscopes were superior to conventional laryngoscopes in terms of quality, operative feel, and ease of use. When LA10000 was employed, the intubation success rate was higher, and the operator risk of infection was lower because of the greater distance from the training model. However, the use of video laryngoscopes requires appropriate education and training use of the devices. This study also demonstrated that when participants viewed a simple operation video prior to using video laryngoscopes, tube insertion time was shorter. Overall, video laryngoscopy can provide a safer and more convenient option for clinical medical personnel during pandemics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尚不确定视频喉镜的刀片几何形状,超角度或Macintosh形状,影响声门视图,患者的成功率和/或气管插管时间预期困难的气道。我们假设,在预期气道困难的患者中,与Macintosh视频喉镜刀片相比,使用超角度视频喉镜刀片会显示出更高的声门开口百分比。
    方法:我们进行了开放标签,病人失明,在计划接受择期耳朵的成年患者中进行的随机对照试验,鼻喉或口腔颌面外科,预计他们的气道会很困难。所有气道操作人员均为顾问麻醉师。患者被随机分配到气管插管与高角度(C-MACD-BLADE™)或Macintosh视频喉镜刀片(C-MAC™)。主要结果是声门开放的百分比。第一次尝试成功被指定为关键的次要结果。
    结果:我们评估了2540名择期接受头颈部手术的成年人的资格,并纳入了182名接受经气管插管的预期困难气道患者。可见声门开口的百分比,表示为中位数(IQR[范围]),89(69-99[0-100])%的视频喉镜刀片和54(9-90[0-100])%的Macintosh视频喉镜刀片(p<0.001)。1例患者的一线高角度视频喉镜检查失败,12例患者的Macintosh视频喉镜检查失败(13%,p=0.002)。首次尝试成功率高角度的视频喉镜刀片为97%,Macintosh视频喉镜刀片为67%(p<0.001)。
    结论:在有经验的麻醉师治疗气道困难的患者中,与Macintosh视频喉镜刀片相比,高角度视频喉镜刀片的声门视图和首次尝试成功率优于Macintosh。
    BACKGROUND: It is not certain whether the blade geometry of videolaryngoscopes, either a hyperangulated or Macintosh shape, affects glottic view, success rate and/or tracheal intubation time in patients with expected difficult airways. We hypothesised that using a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blade would visualise a higher percentage of glottic opening compared with a Macintosh videolaryngoscope blade in patients with expected difficult airways.
    METHODS: We conducted an open-label, patient-blinded, randomised controlled trial in adult patients scheduled to undergo elective ear, nose and throat or oral and maxillofacial surgery, who were anticipated to have a difficult airway. All airway operators were consultant anaesthetists. Patients were allocated randomly to tracheal intubation with either hyperangulated (C-MAC D-BLADE™) or Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades (C-MAC™). The primary outcome was the percentage of glottic opening. First attempt success was designated a key secondary outcome.
    RESULTS: We assessed 2540 adults scheduled for elective head and neck surgery for eligibility and included 182 patients with expected difficult airways undergoing orotracheal intubation. The percentage of glottic opening visualised, expressed as median (IQR [range]), was 89 (69-99 [0-100])% with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blades and 54 (9-90 [0-100])% with Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades (p < 0.001). First-line hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy failed in one patient and Macintosh videolaryngoscopy in 12 patients (13%, p = 0.002). First attempt success rate was 97% with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blades and 67% with Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Glottic view and first attempt success rate were superior with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blades compared with Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades when used by experienced anaesthetists in patients with difficult airways.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    困难的气道管理对临床医生提出了巨大的挑战,特别是如果它是未预料到的。许多指南和各种各样的设备构成了麻醉师管理气道的医疗设备。当单个设备的使用失败时,建议使用组合技术。我们介绍了一名计划进行主动脉瓣置换术的50岁男性患者困难插管的情况。他以前没有困难的气道管理史,术前气道评估未发现异常。体重指数为29kg/m2。在单独使用直接喉镜检查后,视频喉镜和BONFILS插管内窥镜(BIE)失败,我们采用了一种组合技术,结合视频喉镜和BIE。虽然视频喉镜通过大量的分泌物提供了BIE和视觉指导所需的空间,BIE用作气管内导管引导的探针,导致成功的插管。由于该技术需要昂贵的设备,处理它的经验和至少两名操作员,作为救援措施比选择性程序更合适。鉴于插管失败的潜在灾难性后果,掌握先进的气道管理技术仍然至关重要,组合技术就是其中之一。
    Difficult airway management poses a great challenge for clinicians, especially if it is unanticipated. Numerous guidelines and a wide array of devices constitute the anesthesiologist\'s armamentarium for managing the airway. When the use of individual devices fails, the use of combination techniques is advised. We present a case of difficult intubation in a 50-year-old male patient scheduled for aortic valve replacement. He had no prior history of difficult airway management, and no abnormalities were detected on preoperative airway assessment. Body mass index was 29 kg/m2. After the separate use of direct laryngoscopy, videolaryngoscopy and a BONFILS intubation endoscope (BIE) had failed, we resorted to a combination technique, combining videolaryngoscopy and BIE. While the videolaryngoscope provided the space needed for BIE and visual guidance through copious secretions, the BIE served as a stylet for endotracheal tube guidance, leading to successful intubation. Since the technique requires costly equipment, experience in handling it and at least two operators, it is more appropriate as a rescue measure than an elective procedure. Given the potentially disastrous outcomes of failed intubation, mastering advanced airway management techniques remains of vital importance, and the combination technique is one of them.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:喉镜叶片的几何形状决定了作用在咽部结构上的力的相关程度。关于沿叶片的力分布的知识可以预期地允许开发创伤较小的叶片。因此,我们使用C-MACD-BLADE和Macintosh样式的刀片检查了喉镜检查期间沿刀片的力。我们假设,与使用C-MACMacintosh型刀片的视频喉镜检查和使用Macintosh型刀片的直接喉镜检查相比,使用C-MACD-BLADE的视频喉镜检查期间,患者的咽部组织施加较低的峰值力。除此之外,我们假设沿叶片的力分布根据各自叶片的几何形状而不同。方法:经过伦理批准,用D-BLADE或Macintosh刀片进行视频喉镜检查,或使用Macintosh刀片直接喉镜检查(所有KARLSTORZ,Tuttlingen,德国),对164名随机分配的患者进行了研究。在每个叶片的六个位置测量力,并与平均力进行比较。峰值力和空间分布。此外,测量喉镜检查的持续时间.结果:D-BLADE中每个传感器位置的平均力(所有p<0.011)和峰值力(所有p<0.019)最低,而使用Macintosh刀片的视频喉镜和直接喉镜之间没有差异(所有p>0.128)。有了D-BLADE,力最高的是在叶片的尖端。相比之下,力沿着Macintosh叶片更均匀地分布。D-BLADE的视频喉镜检查时间最长(p=0.007)。结论:与Macintosh式刀片相比,使用D-BLADE进行喉镜检查可显著降低作用于咽部和喉组织的力。有趣的是,用麦金塔刀片,我们发现视频喉镜在用力应用方面没有优势.
    Background: The geometry of a laryngoscope\'s blade determines the forces acting on the pharyngeal structures to a relevant degree. Knowledge about the force distribution along the blade may prospectively allow for the development of less traumatic blades. Therefore, we examined the forces along the blades experienced during laryngoscopy with the C-MAC D-BLADE and blades of the Macintosh style. We hypothesised that lower peak forces are applied to the patient\'s pharyngeal tissue during videolaryngoscopy with a C-MAC D-BLADE compared to videolaryngoscopy with a C-MAC Macintosh-style blade and direct laryngoscopy with a Macintosh-style blade. Beyond that, we assumed that the distribution of forces along the blade differs depending on the respective blade\'s geometry. Methods: After ethical approval, videolaryngoscopy with the D-BLADE or the Macintosh blade, or direct laryngoscopy with the Macintosh blade (all KARL STORZ, Tuttlingen, Germany), was performed on 164 randomly assigned patients. Forces were measured at six positions along each blade and compared with regard to mean force, peak force and spatial distribution. Furthermore, the duration of the laryngoscopy was measured. Results: Mean forces (all p < 0.011) and peak forces at each sensor position (all p < 0.019) were the lowest with the D-BLADE, whereas there were no differences between videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy with the Macintosh blades (all p > 0.128). With the D-BLADE, the forces were highest at the blade\'s tip. In contrast, the forces were more evenly distributed along the Macintosh blades. Videolaryngoscopy took the longest with the D-BLADE (p = 0.007). Conclusions: Laryngoscopy with the D-BLADE resulted in significantly lower forces acting on pharyngeal and laryngeal tissue compared to Macintosh-style blades. Interestingly, with the Macintosh blades, we found no advantage for videolaryngoscopy in terms of force application.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号